Universal Periodic Review

This UPR tool reflects the global recommendations made to Austria by all countries world-wide during the Universial Priodic Review process (UPR) at the UN Human Rights Council and their current status of implementation. The League coordinates a significant part of Austrian civil society in the UPR process. 

The recommendations can be filtered in the menu below by human rights topics, SDGs, proponent states etc. also a search function is available. 

 

We welcome your comments and suggestions at upr@liga.or.at.


Search category
Filter options
Filter by tag…

Progress: No progress

Create an Inter-ministerial Working Group on Men and Boys, to support national gender equality initiatives, with a view to promoting positive masculinity norms and combating violence against men and boys

Proponent:

Haiti


Republic of Haiti

Haiti


Republic of Haiti

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there is currently no inter-ministerial working group specifically dedicated to supporting national gender equality initiatives for men and boys with the stated aim of promoting positive masculinity norms and combating violence against men and boys. This initiative has not yet been adopted by Austria. 

Progress: No progress

Guarantee the freedom of religion or belief for all and ensure the rights of Muslims to practice religion freely including the wearing of veils

Proponent:

Sudan


Republic of Sudan

Sudan


Republic of Sudan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Anti-Muslim racism is a worrying and growing phenomenon in Austria. According to the Anti-Muslim Racism Report 2023 by the Documentation Centre Austria, a total of 1522 cases were reported, a record high since the beginning of the survey. Two thirds of these incidents took place online, while the rest occurred in the real world, including discrimination in public spaces, such as verbal insults and physical assaults. Women, especially those wearing headscarves, are particularly affected.
In the education sector, incidents such as insulting comments from classmates or threats from school administrators towards praying Muslim pupils have been documented. The spread of hate online is particularly problematic, accounting for almost 90 per cent of reported online incidents. Experts warn that these incidents are deepening social divisions and threatening social cohesion (see documentary Report 2023: https://dokustelle.at/reports/dokustelle-report-2023). In an open letter to the Austrian federal government, civil society calls for the introduction of the criminal offence of „political Islam“ to be dropped. The reason for this is the lack of scientific uniformity in the definition of this term, which could allow it to be used indiscriminately. The concern is that this could lead to generalised suspicions and executive measures against Muslims. The organisation also appeals for protection against discrimination and the preservation of religious freedom by ensuring that state authorities allow all communities to practise their religion freely and equally. It also emphasises that deradicalisation and counter-terrorism strategies must respect the rights of Muslim women to protection from discrimination and freedom of expression. Finally, it calls for religious practices and clothing not to be used as indicators of radicalisation and for surveillance not to be carried out on the basis of membership of Islam or Muslim organisations in order to avoid blanket criminalisation.    In 2023, the Documentation Centre Austria documented a total of 1522 racist attacks against Muslim
and persons perceived as Muslim. This figure is made up of cases that were reported offline and cases that were recorded as part of intensified online monitoring. However, the organisation emphasises that the actual number of attacks is likely to be higher;
While there are political strategies against anti-Semitism, there is no comparable approach to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgements against people perceived as Muslim. The establishment of the Documentation Centre for Political Islam and Operation Luxor reinforce a general suspicion of Muslims and lead to people withdrawing from social discourse, a reduction in diversity of opinion and restrictions on participation. Freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly can be restricted on the basis of membership of a particular group, which has a negative impact on basic democratic principles (Website of the Federal Chancellery – Documentation Centre for Political Islam: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2020/integrationsministerin-raab-dokumentationsstelle-politischer-islam-nimmt-arbeit-auf.html).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).In July 2021, the „anti-terror package“ was passed in Austria, but this raised concerns from civil society organisations and UN experts. In particular, it was feared that the paragraph on „religiously motivated extremist connections“ could stigmatise Muslims (see Terrorism Prevention Act – TeBG (849 d.B.): https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/I/849).   Despite concerns, law enforcement agencies used facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, resulting in potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and effective mechanisms to investigate these practices were lacking (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities entered into force in Austria on 1 July 1998 in order to protect and promote the rights of national minorities. The current report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention emphasises that Austria is continuing its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities. Despite a significant increase in funding for national minorities to almost 8 million euros in 2021 and the adoption of new laws to combat hate speech and violent hate crimes, challenges remain, particularly in minority language education and in the area of mutual respect and intercultural dialogue.   In contrast, there is no clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Little action has been taken, particularly with regard to awareness-raising measures against discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities, as well as promoting self-empowerment and human rights. 

Progress: No progress

Take necessary steps to protect freedom of religion or belief in Austria, including reform to ensure more equitable treatment of registered religious groups, and ensuring national security measures consider and minimise the impact on freedom of religion or belief

Proponent:

Australia


Australia

Australia


Australia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

While there are political strategies against anti-Semitism, there is no comparable approach to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgements against people perceived as Muslim. The establishment of the Documentation Centre for Political Islam and Operation Luxor reinforce a general suspicion of Muslims and lead to people withdrawing from social discourse, a reduction in diversity of opinion and restrictions on participation. Freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly can be restricted on the basis of membership of a particular group, which has a negative impact on basic democratic principles (Website of the Federal Chancellery – Documentation Centre for Political Islam: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2020/integrationsministerin-raab-dokumentationsstelle-politischer-islam-nimmt-arbeit-auf.html).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).In July 2021, the „anti-terror package“ was passed in Austria, but this raised concerns from civil society organisations and UN experts. In particular, it was feared that the paragraph on „religiously motivated extremist connections“ could stigmatise Muslims (see Terrorism Prevention Act – TeBG (849 d.B.): https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/I/849).   Despite concerns, law enforcement agencies used facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, resulting in potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and effective mechanisms to investigate these practices were lacking (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities entered into force in Austria on 1 July 1998 in order to protect and promote the rights of national minorities. The current report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention emphasises that Austria is continuing its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities. Despite a significant increase in funding for national minorities to almost 8 million euros in 2021 and the adoption of new laws to combat hate speech and violent hate crimes, challenges remain, particularly in minority language education and in the area of mutual respect and intercultural dialogue.   In contrast, there is no clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Little action has been taken, particularly with regard to awareness-raising measures against discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities, as well as promoting self-empowerment and human rights. 

Progress: No progress

Adopt programmes to increase the participation of ethnic minorities in public and political life

Proponent:

Jordan


Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

Jordan


Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

This recommendation was only taken note of in the 3rd cycle of the UPR. In the eyes of civil society, it would be desirable to adopt such recommendations in the next cycle and to consider implementing them now.   The advisory councils for the national minorities, which are located in the Federal Chancellery, are de lege not a representation of the national minorities, but rather advisory bodies of the Federal Government appointed and nominated by the Federal Chancellor. There are calls for a reform of the appointment procedure, the composition of the advisory councils for the national minorities (consideration of gender equality, presence of young people, etc.) and an expansion of the competences of the advisory councils for the national minorities.  

Progress: No progress

Increase the representation of ethnic minorities in political and public life, including legislative and executive state bodies

Proponent:

Serbia


Republic of Serbia

Serbia


Republic of Serbia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

This recommendation was only taken note of in the 3rd cycle of the UPR. In the eyes of civil society, it would be desirable to adopt such recommendations in the next cycle and to consider implementing them now.   The advisory councils for the national minorities, which are located in the Federal Chancellery, are de lege not a representation of the national minorities, but rather advisory bodies of the Federal Government appointed and nominated by the Federal Chancellor. There are calls for a reform of the appointment procedure, the composition of the advisory councils for the national minorities (consideration of gender equality, presence of young people, etc.) and an expansion of the competences of the advisory councils for the national minorities.  

Progress: No progress

Continue measures to promote gender equality and ensure the representation of ethnic minorities in the political and public life

Proponent:

Nepal


Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal

Nepal


Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

This recommendation was only taken note of in the 3rd cycle of the UPR. In the eyes of civil society, it would be desirable to adopt such recommendations in the next cycle and to consider implementing them now.   The advisory councils for the national minorities, which are located in the Federal Chancellery, are de lege not a representation of the national minorities, but rather advisory bodies of the Federal Government appointed and nominated by the Federal Chancellor. There are calls for a reform of the appointment procedure, the composition of the advisory councils for the national minorities (consideration of gender equality, presence of young people, etc.) and an expansion of the competences of the advisory councils for the national minorities.  A more effective and less paternalistic possibility for the ethnic groups to participate, apart from the general freedom of association, is called for. For example, through a right to sue associations, the establishment of a public-law body, consultation rights, etc. (see legal provision for the ordinance on the advisory councils of the national minorities: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10000614). There is a demand for more effective and less patronising opportunities for the ethnic groups to participate. This could include measures such as the right to collective redress, the establishment of a public law institution or the granting of consultation rights to ensure that communities can play a more meaningful role that goes beyond the general freedom of association and gain more autonomy.  

Progress: No progress

Consider taking measures to promote the participation of women and ethnic minorities in public office and political life

Proponent:

Peru


Republic of Peru

Peru


Republic of Peru

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

A more effective and less paternalistic possibility for the ethnic groups to participate, apart from the general freedom of association, is called for. For example, through a right to sue associations, the establishment of a public-law body, consultation rights, etc. (see legal provision for the ordinance on the advisory councils of the national minorities: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10000614). There is a demand for more effective and less patronising opportunities for the ethnic groups to participate. This could include measures such as the right to collective redress, the establishment of a public law institution or the granting of consultation rights to ensure that communities can play a more meaningful role that goes beyond the general freedom of association and gain more autonomy.  

Progress: No progress

Decriminalize defamation under the Criminal Act in accordance with the international best practice

Proponent:

Sierra Leone


Republic of Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone


Republic of Sierra Leone

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

According to §111 of the Austrian Criminal Code, it is a criminal offence to publicly accuse a person of a contemptible quality or attitude or to accuse them of dishonourable or immoral conduct that is likely to disparage them in public opinion (see §111 StGB, BGBl. No. 60/1974: here). The sanctions for such offences can include a prison sentence of up to six months or a fine of up to 360 daily rates. In line with international standards, Austria should ensure that the Criminal Code is amended accordingly so that defamation is no longer a criminal offence. 

Progress: No progress

Take further steps towards effective access to education and apprenticeship opportunities for asylum seekers, including those who are no longer minors

Proponent:

Philippines


Republic of the Philippines

Philippines


Republic of the Philippines

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to ensure, in line with international best practice, that the Criminal Code does not provide for penalties for defamation, the current section 111 of the Austrian Criminal Code needs to be reviewed. This paragraph makes it a criminal offence to publicly accuse someone of a contemptible quality or attitude in a way that is perceptible to third parties or to accuse someone of dishonourable conduct that is likely to disparage the person concerned in the public opinion. The penalty for such an offence may include a prison sentence of up to six months or a fine of up to 360 daily rates (see: oesterreich.gv.at/.syndication?pageId=f0ee9eb0-2af6-49a6-a86f-2f80eb3d37bc).   To meet international standards, a review and possible amendment of this paragraph may be necessary to ensure that it does not conflict with freedom of expression and adequately protects the rights of citizens. This could include adjusting the definition of defamation and the associated penalties to ensure a balanced and appropriate legal basis;

Progress: No progress

Increase the minimum age for voluntary recruitment to 18 in line with the Committee on the Rights of the Child recommendation

Proponent:

Croatia


Republic of Croatia

Croatia


Republic of Croatia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict was ratified by Austria on 1 February 2002. The main point of the protocol is to raise the minimum age for participation in armed conflict to 18 years. In Austria, it is generally possible to complete the Voluntary Social Year from the age of 17. However, if particularly suitable, participation at a younger age is also possible under certain circumstances (see further information on the website of the Children’s Convention: https://www.kinderrechtskonvention.info/kindersoldaten-3205/). 

Progress: No progress

Strengthen the implementation of its programmes for the protection of minorities and undertake necessary legal reforms to address the issue”

Proponent:

Malaysia


Malaysia

Malaysia


Malaysia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities came into force in Austria on 1 July 1998. It aims to protect and promote the rights of national minorities and sets Europe-wide standards in this regard. In the current Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023)14 of the Committee of Ministers of 13 December 2023 (see: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]}), as well as in the Report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe of 16 October 2023 (see: https://rm.coe.int/5th-op-austria-de-full-version/1680ace87b) emphasises that Austria must continue its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities, but must expand them in key areas (see Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023) 14 of the Committee of Ministers of 13 December 2023: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]} ) which provides for immediate measures to protect ethnic groups.  In 2021, funding for ethnic groups in Austria was significantly increased, with funding now totalling almost 8 million euros. New laws were also adopted to combat hate speech on the internet and violent hate crimes (ACFC/OP/V(2023)002, 5th Review Report of the Advisory Committee for the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe: https://rm.coe.int/5th-op-austria-de-full-version/1680ace87b). Nevertheless, challenges remain, particularly in the area of minority language teaching and with regard to mutual respect and intercultural dialogue in society. In Austria, the Framework Convention is implemented and monitored by a dialogue platform in which government representatives, civil society organisations and experts from science and research work together. This dialogue process is crucial for compliance with the provisions of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (further information on the website of the Federal Chancellery: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/volksgruppen/roma-strategie.html). 

Progress: No progress

Continue modernisation of the national minority protection legislative framework in close cooperation with national minorities‘ representatives, including adequate financing

Proponent:

Slovenia


Republic of Slovenia

Slovenia


Republic of Slovenia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities came into force in Austria on 1 July 1998. It aims to protect and promote the rights of national minorities and sets Europe-wide standards in this regard. In the current Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023)14 of the Committee of Ministers of 13 December 2023 (see: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]}), as well as in the Report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe of 16 October 2023 (see: https://rm.coe.int/5th-op-austria-de-full-version/1680ace87b) emphasises that Austria must continue its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities, but must expand them in key areas (see Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023) 14 of the Committee of Ministers of 13 December 2023: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]} ) which provides for immediate measures to protect ethnic groups.  This recommendation was only taken note of in the 3rd cycle of the UPR. In the eyes of civil society, it would be desirable to adopt such recommendations in the next cycle and to consider implementing them now.   The advisory councils for the national minorities, which are located in the Federal Chancellery, are de lege not a representation of the national minorities, but rather advisory bodies of the Federal Government appointed and nominated by the Federal Chancellor. There are calls for a reform of the appointment procedure, the composition of the advisory councils for the national minorities (consideration of gender equality, presence of young people, etc.) and an expansion of the competences of the advisory councils for the national minorities.  

Progress: No progress

Offer migrant groups more institutional opportunities for political participation, involving them in political processes especially in the field of integration

Proponent:

Turkey


Republic of Turkey

Turkey


Republic of Turkey

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

An EU initiative, the Action Plan on Integration and Inclusion 2021-2027, aims to promote the inclusion of all people in society and remove barriers to the participation of people with a migrant background. The plan emphasises the need for both individual efforts and the host community for inclusive integration. Measures include education, labour market integration, access to health services and affordable housing. The EU Commission is seeking partnerships with various stakeholders to ensure the implementation of the action plan and promote the inclusion of migrants (see NAP on Integration and Inclusion 2021-2027: https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files_en?file=2020-11/action_plan_on_integration_and_inclusion_2021-2027.pdf). In Austria, public debates on the integration of migrants are far removed from academic discourse and the real-life experiences of this group. The prevailing opinion assumes a gradual process of adaptation of immigrants to Austrian culture, which, however, often implies unrealistic ideas of unity and homogenisation. Complete integration is seen as a constantly demanded but unattainable goal.   The political commitment of migrants reflects transnational experiences and the framework conditions in the country of immigration. Restrictions in citizenship law mean that many migrants in Vienna are excluded from the active political process. The lack of recognition for transnational experiences and resources as well as the non-immigration orientated political and administrative structures reinforce these challenges. The reaction to this situation has led to the emergence of political entrepreneurs, associations, platforms and media outside the established political structures. These actors deal with issues of migration and integration in Austria and serve as a transnational bridge. Political participation often takes place via associations, which represent an alternative form of inclusion (see project report 2021, Political participation in a transnational context: Turkish and Serbian migrants in Vienna: https://migrant-integration.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-11/stadt-wien-ucc88berarbeitet-projektbericht-8-11-2021.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Review section 35 (2) of the asylum law, granting the right to family reunification without undue restrictions, in particular to unaccompanied minors

Proponent:

Uruguay


Republic of Eastern Uruguay

Uruguay


Republic of Eastern Uruguay

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Section 35 (2) of the Asylum Act regulates family reunification for beneficiaries of subsidiary protection (see Asylum Act 2005, Federal Law Gazette I No. 56/2018 : https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/i/2005/100/P35/NOR40205456). According to a study from December 2016, there are further challenges in the area of family reunification (see the PDF from the European Migration Network on family reunification of third-country nationals in Austria: https://www.emn.at/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Die-Familienzusammenfuehrung-von-Drittstaatsangeh%c3%b6rigen-in-%c3%96sterreich.pdf, page 35 ff). In contrast to persons entitled to asylum, a 3-year waiting period without any flexibility is required for persons entitled to subsidiary protection. This cannot be waived even by a decision of the authorities. In addition, there are the fundamental problems that exist with every family reunification under Austrian law: German language skills must be demonstrated at the time of application. And at least in the context of a prognosis decision, the authorities must be convinced of a secure livelihood and local housing for the family that will join them in the future. This legal situation remains unchanged.  In fact, there has been a larger number of family reunifications in recent years, although the publicly available statistical data does not allow a breakdown into family reunifications of persons entitled to asylum or subsidiary protection. The Red Cross ( https://www.roteskreuz.at/ich-brauche-hilfe/familienzusammenfuehrung) in particular provides support services and counselling for applications for family reunification;

Progress: No progress

Reinstate humanitarian admission programme

Proponent:

Sierra Leone


Republic of Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone


Republic of Sierra Leone

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

From 2013 to 2017, Austria participated in a resettlement programme for Syrian refugees in cooperation with the UNHCR. However, there is currently no such programme. Instead, three „humanitarian admission programmes“ for Syrian refugees were implemented between 2013 and 2017, which enabled the safe and legal entry of 1,900 refugees to Austria. However, there is no permanent resettlement programme and the decision to accept refugees is the responsibility of the Austrian government, which must be taken on a regular basis. No active resettlement programme has been carried out in Austria since the end of 2017.   The term „resettlement“ describes the permanent relocation of particularly vulnerable refugees to third countries with comprehensive refugee protection that are willing to accept them. This decision is taken in situations where a return to the country of origin is not foreseeable and often concerns refugees who have been living in countries of first refuge for many years. Resettlement programmes not only contribute to individual benefits, but also to international responsibility-sharing and to relieving the burden on countries of first refuge. However, the available resettlement places only cover a fraction of the need, which prompts the UNHCR to advocate for their expansion worldwide.   Current challenges such as armed conflicts, natural disasters and global food shortages are exacerbating the humanitarian situation, particularly in regions such as the Middle East, North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, Afghanistan and Yemen. Despite Austria’s historical tradition of taking in and helping people, there is a lack of willingness to take in refugees today. Short-term reception operations in acute crisis situations are organised in cooperation between several countries in order to provide resources for the rescue of people. Austria has not yet participated in such actions (see questions and answers from SOS-Mitmenschen on the humanitarian reception programme in Austria: https://www.sosmitmensch.at/faq-humanitaere-aufnahme&ts=17053094652449). 

Progress: No progress

Reduce legal and administrative barriers to family reunification and effective access to the labor market for the beneficiaries of international protection

Proponent:

Afghanistan


Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

Afghanistan


Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to ensure successful integration, it is of great importance to grant asylum seekers effective access to the labour market during their asylum procedure. This requires adjustments to legislation and administrative procedures. The opportunity to work during the asylum procedure enables asylum seekers to utilise their skills, contribute to society and secure their livelihood. Such access promotes the independence and well-being of those affected. However, there is unequal treatment in terms of access to the labour market, especially in the basic welfare system. While Ukrainians have protection status and access to the labour market from the outset, asylum seekers and displaced persons from Ukraine must obtain an employment permit. This inequality is exacerbated by bureaucratic procedures and an additional income limit, which penalises some groups of people. It is emphasised that the current system of basic services is in urgent need of fundamental reform. All groups, regardless of their status, should have fair access to the labour market in order to promote integration.   A sensible care system should encourage, not hinder, income-earning opportunities through work to enable people to manage without support at an early stage. A fundamental reform of the current system is needed to ensure that no one is permanently denied effective access to the labour market. 

Progress: No progress

Establish an efficient procedure for determining statelessness, and approve residence permits on the basis of statelessness

Proponent:

Mexico


United Mexican States

Mexico


United Mexican States

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The challenges faced by stateless people in Austria extend to various aspects of their everyday lives. The lack of necessary documents leads to considerable restrictions: Working is often prohibited, opening a bank account, travelling or getting married are problematic. Many stateless people therefore live in a legal grey area.   In this context, UNHCR Austria has conducted a comprehensive survey on statelessness in Austria as part of its mandate. The main objective of this survey is to raise awareness of the problem of statelessness and to shed light on the daily challenges faced by stateless people. The results of this assessment serve as a basis for recommendations by the UNHCR to improve the situation of stateless people in Austria and to prevent the emergence of new cases of statelessness (see: https://www.unhcr.org/dach/at/was-wir-tun/staatenlosigkeit/staatenlosigkeit-in-oesterreich). The exact number of stateless people in Austria is difficult to determine, but according to Statistics Austria, around 12,000 people were listed as stateless or with unclear or unknown citizenship in 2016. A key problem that emerges from the study is the lack of a special procedure for determining statelessness in Austria. This means that those affected are often unable to assert basic rights derived from international agreements. As a result, stateless persons remain in a legally insecure situation, without access to work, health insurance or social benefits.   Special attention is also paid to stateless children born in Austria. In order to spare them a fate as stateless persons, the UNHCR recommends legal measures for the automatic acquisition of Austrian citizenship.   In addition, since 8 January 2024, Vienna has been the first Austrian federal state to set up a website to provide information for stateless people at the suggestion of SOS Mitmensch. Since this year, Municipal Department 35 (MA 35) has been providing information about the possibility of simplified naturalisation for stateless persons born in Austria. The aim of this initiative is to inform those affected about the short three-year window of opportunity available to them from the age of majority to obtain Austrian citizenship under simplified conditions. This measure is intended to ensure that affected persons do not miss this opportunity and can effectively exercise their rights. The further development of this initiative remains to be seen (see article: https://www.sosmitmensch.at/wien-startet-informationsoffensive-fuer-staatenlose). 

Redaktionelle Verantwortung UPR-Tool:

Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte, upr@liga.or.at

Lizenz CC-BY-SA 

Unterstützung durch:

Forschungskooperation mit der Volksanwaltschaft

Förderung des Zukunftsfonds der Republik Österreich

 

Receive the latest news

Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter