This UPR tool reflects the global recommendations made to Austria by all countries world-wide during the Universial Priodic Review process (UPR) at the UN Human Rights Council and their current status of implementation. The League coordinates a significant part of Austrian civil society in the UPR process. See this LINK for an overview about this process.
The recommendations can be filtered in the menu below by human rights topics, SDGs, proponent states etc. And also a search function is available.
We welcome your comments and suggestions at upr@liga.or.at.
Progress: Currently no comment
Increase funding for shelters and support services and improve access to sexual and reproductive health services in rural areas to reduce gender-based violence
Proponent:
Australia
Progress: Currently no comment
Adopt a uniform legal definition of domestic violence in line with the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence
Proponent:
Kingdom of Belgium
Progress: Currently no comment
Improve data collection on gender-based violence and femicide
Proponent:
Kingdom of the Netherlands
Progress: Currently no comment
Ensure full implementation of the National Action Plan 2025–2029 to combat violence against women and girls and adopt additional measures to improve gender equality in employment
Proponent:
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Progress: Currently no comment
Continue efforts to implement policies and measures to prevent and combat violence against women, including through the effective implementation of relevant national strategies
Proponent:
Lebanese Republic
Progress: Currently no comment
Strengthen the protection of children and young people from violence through evidence-based prevention policies, increased awareness-raising, enhanced prosecution, and improved legal frameworks, social services, and health services
Proponent:
Sultanate of Oman
Progress: Currently no comment
Continue to promote actions to protect children and young people from violence, including through the adoption of measures in educational institutions
Proponent:
Republic of El Salvador
Progress: Currently no comment
Adopt further measures to prevent violence against children and youth, including by strengthening the legal framework, implementing nationwide awareness-raising campaigns, and providing psychological care and support to those affected
Proponent:
State of Qatar
Progress: Currently no comment
Ensuring the rights of the children to enjoy his or her own culture and preserve his or her own identity, including to live with their biological families and in an appropriate socio-cultural milieu in order to ensure all round development of the child
Proponent:
Republic of India
Progress: Currently no comment
Strengthen legal and procedural safeguards to protect the rights of children, in line with the best interests of the child
Proponent:
Republic of Kazakhstan
Progress: Currently no comment
Consider adopting legislation that guarantees a legal guardianship system for unaccompanied minors immediately upon arrival in the country, in order to ensure their protection, well-being, and the exercise of their human rights, in accordance with the rights of the child and the best interests of the child
Proponent:
Republic of Eastern Uruguay
Progress: Currently no comment
Grant access to nationality to all children born in the country, regardless of their parents‘ status
Proponent:
Republic of Eastern Uruguay
Progress: Currently no comment
Continue applying concrete measures in safeguarding the rights of older persons
Proponent:
Republic of Cyprus
Progress: Currently no comment
Maintain its efforts to promote the rights and inclusion of persons with disabilities, including through the implementation of the National Action Plan on Disabilit
Proponent:
Georgia
Progress: Currently no comment
Continue efforts to implement the 2022–2030 National Action Plan on Disability
Proponent:
Lebanese Republic
Progress: Currently no comment
Take concrete steps to advance equal rights for people with disabilities, by moving towards an inclusive education, discontinuing the use of seclusion and restrictions
Proponent:
Kingdom of Lesotho
Progress: Currently no comment
Advance inclusive access for persons with disabilities through strengthened independent living and accessibility policies
Proponent:
Malaysia
Progress: Currently no comment
Ensure that persons with disabilities can promptly access the social services they need without undue bureaucratic hindrances
Proponent:
Republic of Malta
Progress: Currently no comment
Take measures to promote the rights of persons with disabilities, including establishing a comprehensive deinstitutionalization strategy
Proponent:
Japan
Progress: Currently no comment
Bolster efforts in protecting persons with disabilities, by ensuring equal access to inclusive education, employment, healthcare, public services and intensify measures towards deinstitutionalization
Proponent:
Romania
Progress: Currently no comment
Continue efforts to ensure the transition to inclusive education for children with disabilities
Proponent:
Republic of Bulgaria
Progress: Currently no comment
Ensure inclusive and nondiscriminatory access to education, health care and social protection for vulnerable groups including children with disabilities
Proponent:
Republic of Serbia
Progress: Currently no comment
Step up its efforts to implement inclusive policies for persons with disabilities and combat stigmatization and stereotyping
Proponent:
Hellenic Republic
Progress: Currently no comment
Advance the design of the deinstitutionalization process for persons with disabilities, and the promotion and coordination of its implementation strategy at the national level
Proponent:
Republic of Colombia
Progress: Currently no comment
Continue policies, plans, and measures aimed at protecting persons with disabilities and integrating them into social and professional life, and support civil society organizations working in this field
Proponent:
Republic of Sudan
Progress: Currently no comment
Strengthen protection and inclusion of persons with disabilities by improving accessibility, community-based services and safeguards against abuse, in line with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)
Proponent:
Republic of The Gambia
Progress: Currently no comment
Guarantee the effective participation of people with disabilities and their representative organizations in decision-making processes that affect them
Proponent:
Kingdom of Spain
Progress: Currently no comment
Promote employment and equal pay for equal work for people with disabilities
Proponent:
People's Republic of China
Progress: Currently no comment
Intensify efforts to promote the employment of persons with disabilities, including by simplifying subsidy application procedures and introducing financial and non-financial incentives
Proponent:
Kingdom of Thailand
Progress: Currently no comment
Further strengthen measures to address disparities in the level of employment and wages for persons with disabilities
Proponent:
Republic Trinidad and Tobago
Progress: Currently no comment
Take all necessary measures to guarantee the rights of persons with disabilities with regard to pay, particularly for those employed through supported employment programmes
Proponent:
French Republic
Progress: Currently no comment
Confirm the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities, particularly children, by removing legal, administrative, and bureaucratic barriers to access social assistance benefits, school system and labour market, and by addressing stigma and discriminatory practices
Proponent:
Italian Republic
Progress: Currently no comment
Implement a ban on the use of contraceptive measures on persons with disabilities without their informed consent
Proponent:
Republic of Iceland
Progress: Currently no comment
Prevent and investigate cases of forced sterilization of women and girls with disabilities, ensuring effective protection of their rights
Proponent:
Republic of Chile
Progress: Currently no comment
Consider, in accordance with the recommendation of the Committee against Torture, reviewing any legislation that allows for the deprivation of a person’s liberty on the grounds of incapacity and the forcible subjection to medical interventions of persons with disabilities, in particular persons with intellectual or psychosocial disabilities
Proponent:
Swiss Confederation
Progress: Currently no comment
Take further steps to strengthen the implementation of the “Roma Empowerment for the Labour Market 2022–2030” directive, with the objective of reducing unemployment and improving living conditions among the Roma community
Proponent:
Republic of North Macedonia –
Progress: Currently no comment
Take concrete steps to prevent racial profiling and discrimination against People of African Descent by strengthening policy measures and enforcement of legal protections, collecting relevant disaggregated data and ensuring their equal access to housing, employment and education
Proponent:
Commonwealth of the Bahamas
Progress: Currently no comment
Take further steps to create a unified structured policy within the entire Austrian territory for protecting and promoting all indigenous minority languages, including support for bilingual education through stable state funding for bilingual schools
Proponent:
Czech Republic
Progress: Currently no comment
Take additional measures to eradicate racist and xenophobic speech targeting migrants, Muslims, people of African descent, and members of other national and religious groups
Proponent:
Republic of Belarus
Progress: Currently no comment
Prosecute all forms of discrimination and violence on the basis of race and religion and provide effective remedies to the victims
Proponent:
Republic of Indonesia
Progress: Currently no comment
Enhance efforts towards a comprehensive reform of the Austrian Minority Act of 1976
Proponent:
Republic of Slovenia
Progress: Currently no comment
Redouble efforts to strengthen and promote the cultural identity and diversity of national minorities
Proponent:
Tunisian Republic
Progress: Currently no comment
Ensure financial and other resources for bilingual education of national minorities, in the capital and in the relevant regions
Proponent:
Republic of Croatia
Progress: Currently no comment
Continue to take measures to improve the situation of national minorities, including their access to education
Proponent:
Republic of Cuba
Progress: Currently no comment
Swift conclusion of bilingual judiciary reform in Carinthia, thus expanding access to justice in minority language for the Slovenian national minority in Carinthia
Proponent:
Republic of Slovenia
Progress: Currently no comment
Adopt overdue measures in the field of bilingual education in Carinthia, including integrating pre-school education into the bilingual education system
Proponent:
Republic of Slovenia
Progress: Currently no comment
Extend the scope of anti-discrimination legislation to ensure protection for persons of diverse SOGIESC
Proponent:
Republic of Iceland
Progress: Currently no comment
Adopt legal provisions that explicitly prohibit non-urgent and non-essential medical or surgical treatment on intersex children before they are of sufficient age or maturity to make their own decisions
Proponent:
Republic of Malta
Progress: Currently no comment
Respect intersex children’s right to self-determination and ban medically unnecessary surgeries
Proponent:
Republic of Iceland
Progress: Currently no comment
Ensure that Protection against discrimination in healthcare based on gender expression or sex characteristics is implemented consistently at the Federal, Länder and local levels
Proponent:
Republic of Malta
Progress: Currently no comment
Adopt legislation banning the practice of “conversion therapy” related to sexual orientation and gender identity
Proponent:
Kingdom of Norway
Progress: Currently no comment
Further advance inclusive education, without discrimination, for women and girls with migration backgrounds, at all levels of education
Proponent:
Romania
Progress: Currently no comment
Enhance legislative protections for migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers by ensuring equitable asylum processes, preventing refoulement, improving reception standards, and expeditiously appointing guardians for unaccompanied minors
Proponent:
Kingdom of Lesotho
Progress: Currently no comment
Further promote anti-discrimination measures and the inclusion of migrants, including by reducing administrative barriers to equal economic participation and expanding the integration service for skilled migrant workers including in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) and healthcare
Proponent:
Kingdom of Thailand
Progress: Currently no comment
End discriminatory migration and policing practices, and prohibit ethnic profiling
Proponent:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Progress: Currently no comment
Strengthen the protection of unaccompanied foreign migrant minors, expand family reunification mechanisms, and ensure full respect for the principle of non-refoulement, especially in cases of extreme vulnerability
Proponent:
Kingdom of Spain
Progress: Currently no comment
End mandatory immigration detention and apply strict time limits, safeguards, and independent oversight when detention is used
Proponent:
Republic of Colombia
Progress: Currently no comment
Further strengthen the integration of migrants by expanding language and vocational training programmes, improving access to the labour market, and supporting initiatives that empower migrant women and girls
Proponent:
Eritrea
Progress: Currently no comment
Offer migrant groups more institutional opportunities for political participation and ensure tolerance in education system, including the teaching of mother tongue for migrant communities
Proponent:
Republic of Turkey
Progress: Currently no comment
Enhance policies for the social and economic integration of migrants and minorities, with a view to promoting social cohesion
Proponent:
Republic of Mozambique
Progress: Currently no comment
Continue to promote the social and economic integration of migrants, in particular through inclusive policies facilitating access to essential basic services
Proponent:
Republic of Cameroon
Progress: Currently no comment
Continue strengthening social protection systems to ensure that vulnerable populations, including migrants and other vulnerable communities, receive adequate support and are fully included in social and economic programmes
Proponent:
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia
Progress: Currently no comment
Pay particular attention to its human rights obligations in the context of the significant influx of migrants from the Middle East and North Africa
Proponent:
Russian Federation
Progress: Currently no comment
Take decisive measures to eliminate illiteracy among the children of refugees and migrants
Proponent:
Republic of Belarus
Progress: Currently no comment
Continue to enhance measures and mechanisms for the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers, asylum-seekers, and refugees, including by fully enforcing the Act Against Online Hate Speech and other relevant legislations in line with international obligations
Proponent:
Republic of the Philippines
Progress: Currently no comment
Ensure that unaccompanied and accompanied refugee minors have equal access to services, including psychosocial care, on the same basis as Austrian and European youth
Proponent:
Republic of Niger
Progress: Currently no comment
Continue enhancing protection for asylum seekers and refugees, including unaccompanied minors, by ensuring access to education, age-appropriate accommodations, legal assistance, and psychosocial support, in accordance with the best interests of the child
Proponent:
Eritrea
Progress: Currently no comment
Strengthen efforts to ensure that all asylum-seekers and other persons in need of international protection have access to fair and effective refugee status determination procedures, and that the principle of non-refoulement is respected
Proponent:
Republic of Ecuador
Progress: Currently no comment
Strengthen the protection of asylum seekers, particularly unaccompanied children, and expedite procedures without discrimination, taking into account reunification
Proponent:
Arab Republic of Egypt
Progress: Currently no comment
Strengthen safeguards in the asylum system, including timely vulnerability assessments, adequate reception and, where applicable, detention conditions, and full compliance of external refugee arrangements with international human rights and refugee law
Proponent:
Federal Republic of Brazil
Progress: Currently no comment
Strengthen the national refugee protection system, with special attention to legal guardianship for unaccompanied minors and to timely and non-discriminatory access to essential services
Proponent:
Republic of El Salvador
Progress: Currently no comment
Strengthen the legislative framework for the protection of the rights of refugees and asylum seekers, and ensure refugees’ access to basic services and legal assistance
Proponent:
Republic of Kazakhstan
Progress: Currently no comment
Further strengthen measures to protect and promote the human rights of migrants and refugees, including by facilitating family reunification
Proponent:
Republic of Korea
Progress: Currently no comment
Continue efforts to ensure the right to inclusive education for refugees and persons with disabilities
Proponent:
Republic of Ghana
Progress: No progress
Take effective measures to increase its official development assistance to achieve the internationally agreed target of 0.7% of its GDP, in order to realize economic, social and cultural rights
Proponent:
People's Republic of Bangladesh
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):
Although there has been selective progress in humanitarian aid and direct project aid, a substantial increase in the Austrian Office Development Assistance ODA ratio is not recognisable. The temporary increase to 0.39% in 2022 due to additional funds for Ukraine is considered a one-off effect (Austrian Development Agency website: ADA: Official Development Assistance: https://www.entwicklung.at/ada/oeffentliche-entwicklungshilfeleistungen). A binding step-by-step plan is required to achieve the target of 0.7% (see OECD website: preliminary figures from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development- OECD: https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-standards/official-development-assistance.htm ). However, civil society is expressing concerns about implementation. Although a gradual increase in development aid funding was agreed in the government programme, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has not yet taken sufficient steps to pursue the goal.
; In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is focussing on joint improvements with all stakeholders on this point (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).
Progress: No progress
Consider taking additional steps to increase its ODA contribution to reach 0.7% of GNI
Proponent:
Kingdom of Cambodia
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):
Although there has been selective progress in humanitarian aid and direct project aid, a substantial increase in the Austrian Office Development Assistance ODA ratio is not recognisable. The temporary increase to 0.39% in 2022 due to additional funds for Ukraine is considered a one-off effect (Austrian Development Agency website: ADA: Official Development Assistance: https://www.entwicklung.at/ada/oeffentliche-entwicklungshilfeleistungen). A binding step-by-step plan is required to achieve the target of 0.7% (see OECD website: preliminary figures from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development- OECD: https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-standards/official-development-assistance.htm ). However, civil society is expressing concerns about implementation. Although a gradual increase in development aid funding was agreed in the government programme, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has not yet taken sufficient steps to pursue the goal.
; In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is focussing on joint improvements with all stakeholders on this point (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).
Progress: No progress
Respect the commitment to devote 0.7% of gross national income to official development assistance
Proponent:
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):
Although there has been selective progress in humanitarian aid and direct project aid, a substantial increase in the Austrian Office Development Assistance ODA ratio is not recognisable. The temporary increase to 0.39% in 2022 due to additional funds for Ukraine is considered a one-off effect (Austrian Development Agency website: ADA: Official Development Assistance: https://www.entwicklung.at/ada/oeffentliche-entwicklungshilfeleistungen). A binding step-by-step plan is required to achieve the target of 0.7% (see OECD website: preliminary figures from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development- OECD: https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-standards/official-development-assistance.htm ). However, civil society is expressing concerns about implementation. Although a gradual increase in development aid funding was agreed in the government programme, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has not yet taken sufficient steps to pursue the goal.
; In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is focussing on joint improvements with all stakeholders on this point (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).
Progress: Partial success
Include in its ODA emergency aid packages specifically targeted to address the social and economic impacts of Covid-19
Proponent:
Kingdom of Bhutan
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
In terms of public development cooperation, the Austrian government has taken steps to mitigate the impact of the pandemic by providing financial support and initiating aid projects at home and abroad. Nevertheless, long-term strategies are needed to ensure sustainable recovery and to be prepared for future challenges.
Progress: In progress
Continue efforts to substantially increase the ODA funding for gender equality programmes
Proponent:
Republic of Malta
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
In 2019, the proportion of projects (co-)financed by the Austrian Development Agency with public development funds for the specific promotion of gender equality as defined by the OECD Development Assistance Committee rose to one third (33%) for the first time. In 2020 and 2021, however, this share fell again to around 14% without any additional budget being made available. The overall share of Austrian Development Agency project funding that contributes to gender equality in general (sometimes less specifically) fell from 81% in 2019 to 74% in 2021 (see Austrian Development Agency website: https://www.entwicklung.at/mediathek/publikationen/berichte). Compared to the total bilateral development aid of all public actors, the proportion of funds that contribute to gender equality is significantly lower. At 32% (with only 5% specifically dedicated to gender equality), Austria is well below the OECD Development Assistance Committee member state average of 44% (2020/2021), and there is a need to increase this proportion (OECD Development Assistance Committee: https://web-archive.oecd.org/temp/2024-03-07/73550-development-finance-for-gender-equality-and-women-s-empowerment.htm). Civil society emphasises the importance of cooperation with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and recommends discussing the requirements and feasibility with NGOs more intensively in future in order to improve the quality of gender mainstreaming;
Progress: Success
Ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
Proponent:
French Republic
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
Austria ratified the relevant protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child in 2002:
BGBl III Nr 92/2002 or Ratification list of the UN.
Progress: In progress
Continue to improve human rights protection and work closely with its partners
Proponent:
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
Civil society organisations are still experiencing difficulties in the area of human rights protection in Austria. Civil society organisations have expressed concerns that discrimination and human rights violations continue against certain groups such as migrants, asylum seekers or LGBTQI+ people. There is a need to protect these vulnerable groups and ensure that their rights are effectively protected. An important note is that despite some progress in the area of human rights enforcement and monitoring, problems still exist. Some non-governmental organisations have pointed out that human rights standards are not fully implemented and that certain mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing human rights need to be further strengthened;An important note is that despite some progress in the area of human rights enforcement and monitoring, problems still exist. Some non-governmental organisations have pointed out that human rights standards are not fully implemented and that certain mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing human rights need to be further strengthened.
Progress: Partial success
Reform the Austrian Ombudsman to meet the Paris Principles relating to the Status of National Human Rights Institutions
Proponent:
Canada
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
In April 2022, the Austrian Ombudsman Board received full A status from the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions GANHRI in recognition of the improvements to the constitutional framework. A status requires full compliance with the United Nations Paris Principles. The United Nations defined the international standard for the role and functioning of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in 1993. The NHRI principles contain provisions on the mandate and mode of operation. The core elements are independence, a mandate encompassing all human rights, a legal mandate
mandate, a legal basis to ensure political legitimacy and independence as well as an infrastructure and funding that enable effective work. The relevant accreditation report published in March 2022 links the A status achieved with the obligation to make further improvements to the organisation’s effectiveness and independence in the areas of appointment procedures, inter-institutional diversity and cooperation with civil society (see accreditation report: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/SCA-Report-March-2022_E.pdf). The introduction of a permanent informal sounding board with the participation of civil society organisations has led to significant improvements, particularly in the area of cooperation. In the context of the new appointment, civil society organisations are calling for a rapid adjustment of the appointment procedure in accordance with the Paris Principles. In this regard, the recommendations of the GANHRI of March 2022 are supported, which include a broad public call for tenders, the consideration of a diverse selection of candidates, the involvement of civil society organisations and transparent selection criteria. We call for the procedure to be reviewed and reformed in close consultation with civil society.
Progress: Partial success
Bring the National Human Rights Institution into compliance with the Paris Principles and maintain its complete independence
Proponent:
Arab Republic of Egypt
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
In April 2022, the Austrian Ombudsman Board received full A status from the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions GANHRI in recognition of the improvements to the constitutional framework. A status requires full compliance with the United Nations Paris Principles. The United Nations defined the international standard for the role and functioning of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in 1993. The NHRI principles contain provisions on the mandate and mode of operation. The core elements are independence, a mandate encompassing all human rights, a legal mandate
mandate, a legal basis to ensure political legitimacy and independence as well as an infrastructure and funding that enable effective work. The relevant accreditation report published in March 2022 links the A status achieved with the obligation to make further improvements to the organisation’s effectiveness and independence in the areas of appointment procedures, inter-institutional diversity and cooperation with civil society (see accreditation report: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/SCA-Report-March-2022_E.pdf). The introduction of a permanent informal sounding board with the participation of civil society organisations has led to significant improvements, particularly in the area of cooperation. In the context of the new appointment, civil society organisations are calling for a rapid adjustment of the appointment procedure in accordance with the Paris Principles. In this regard, the recommendations of the GANHRI of March 2022 are supported, which include a broad public call for tenders, the consideration of a diverse selection of candidates, the involvement of civil society organisations and transparent selection criteria. We call for the procedure to be reviewed and reformed in close consultation with civil society. An open letter from 25 civil society organisations dated 18 July 2022 addresses the need for a transparent and participatory selection and appointment process for national human rights institutions (NHRIs). It emphasises that such a process must be anchored in relevant laws, regulations or binding administrative guidelines to ensure independence and public trust in NHRIs. The organisations warn of the negative impact on civil society trust if the independence of NHRI members could be influenced by political connections, even if this is only a perceived threat (see Amnesty International Open Letter, 18.07.2022: https://cdn.amnesty.at/media/9979/offener-brief-volksanwaltschaft-18-07-22.pdf). As part of a review of the Austrian Ombudsman Board with regard to the agreement with international standards (so-called „Paris Principles“) in March 2022, GANHRI criticised in particular the appointment procedure, which does not do justice to the principle of independence. GANHRI considers the procedure currently enshrined in the Federal Constitution Act to be inadequate, comprehensive and transparent, as it does not provide for a public tender or opportunities for civil society to participate. Some NHRIs have their own budget, which enables them to act more independently, while budgetary sovereignty can be problematic in other cases. The political appointment of some members is sometimes a challenge, as clear quality criteria are not always guaranteed. Nevertheless, political or administrative experience among ombudsmen and ombudswomen can offer advantages and contribute to the effectiveness of their work;
Progress: Partial success
Ensure that the Austrian Ombudsman Board fully complies with the Paris Principles
Proponent:
Republic of Albania
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
In April 2022, the Austrian Ombudsman Board received full A status from the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions GANHRI in recognition of the improvements to the constitutional framework. A status requires full compliance with the United Nations Paris Principles. The United Nations defined the international standard for the role and functioning of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in 1993. The NHRI principles contain provisions on the mandate and mode of operation. The core elements are independence, a mandate encompassing all human rights, a legal mandate
mandate, a legal basis to ensure political legitimacy and independence as well as an infrastructure and funding that enable effective work. The relevant accreditation report published in March 2022 links the A status achieved with the obligation to make further improvements to the organisation’s effectiveness and independence in the areas of appointment procedures, inter-institutional diversity and cooperation with civil society (see accreditation report: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/SCA-Report-March-2022_E.pdf). The introduction of a permanent informal sounding board with the participation of civil society organisations has led to significant improvements, particularly in the area of cooperation. In the context of the new appointment, civil society organisations are calling for a rapid adjustment of the appointment procedure in accordance with the Paris Principles. In this regard, the recommendations of the GANHRI of March 2022 are supported, which include a broad public call for tenders, the consideration of a diverse selection of candidates, the involvement of civil society organisations and transparent selection criteria. We call for the procedure to be reviewed and reformed in close consultation with civil society.
Progress: Partial success
Continue steps leading to the full compliance of the Austrian Ombudsman Board with the Paris Principles
Proponent:
Georgia
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
In April 2022, the Austrian Ombudsman Board received full A status from the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions GANHRI in recognition of the improvements to the constitutional framework. A status requires full compliance with the United Nations Paris Principles. The United Nations defined the international standard for the role and functioning of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in 1993. The NHRI principles contain provisions on the mandate and mode of operation. The core elements are independence, a mandate encompassing all human rights, a legal mandate
mandate, a legal basis to ensure political legitimacy and independence as well as an infrastructure and funding that enable effective work. The relevant accreditation report published in March 2022 links the A status achieved with the obligation to make further improvements to the organisation’s effectiveness and independence in the areas of appointment procedures, inter-institutional diversity and cooperation with civil society (see accreditation report: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/SCA-Report-March-2022_E.pdf). The introduction of a permanent informal sounding board with the participation of civil society organisations has led to significant improvements, particularly in the area of cooperation. In the context of the new appointment, civil society organisations are calling for a rapid adjustment of the appointment procedure in accordance with the Paris Principles. In this regard, the recommendations of the GANHRI of March 2022 are supported, which include a broad public call for tenders, the consideration of a diverse selection of candidates, the involvement of civil society organisations and transparent selection criteria. We call for the procedure to be reviewed and reformed in close consultation with civil society.
Progress: Partial success
Ensure that the Austrian Ombudsman Board is independent and in full accordance with the Paris principles on national human rights institutions
Proponent:
Republic of India
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
In April 2022, the Austrian Ombudsman Board received full A status from the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions GANHRI in recognition of the improvements to the constitutional framework. A status requires full compliance with the United Nations Paris Principles. The United Nations defined the international standard for the role and functioning of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in 1993. The NHRI principles contain provisions on the mandate and mode of operation. The core elements are independence, a mandate encompassing all human rights, a legal mandate
mandate, a legal basis to ensure political legitimacy and independence as well as an infrastructure and funding that enable effective work. The relevant accreditation report published in March 2022 links the A status achieved with the obligation to make further improvements to the organisation’s effectiveness and independence in the areas of appointment procedures, inter-institutional diversity and cooperation with civil society (see accreditation report: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/SCA-Report-March-2022_E.pdf). The introduction of a permanent informal sounding board with the participation of civil society organisations has led to significant improvements, particularly in the area of cooperation. In the context of the new appointment, civil society organisations are calling for a rapid adjustment of the appointment procedure in accordance with the Paris Principles. In this regard, the recommendations of the GANHRI of March 2022 are supported, which include a broad public call for tenders, the consideration of a diverse selection of candidates, the involvement of civil society organisations and transparent selection criteria. We call for the procedure to be reviewed and reformed in close consultation with civil society. An open letter from 25 civil society organisations dated 18 July 2022 addresses the need for a transparent and participatory selection and appointment process for national human rights institutions (NHRIs). It emphasises that such a process must be anchored in relevant laws, regulations or binding administrative guidelines to ensure independence and public trust in NHRIs. The organisations warn of the negative impact on civil society trust if the independence of NHRI members could be influenced by political connections, even if this is only a perceived threat (see Amnesty International Open Letter, 18.07.2022: https://cdn.amnesty.at/media/9979/offener-brief-volksanwaltschaft-18-07-22.pdf). As part of a review of the Austrian Ombudsman Board with regard to the agreement with international standards (so-called „Paris Principles“) in March 2022, GANHRI criticised in particular the appointment procedure, which does not do justice to the principle of independence. GANHRI considers the procedure currently enshrined in the Federal Constitution Act to be inadequate, comprehensive and transparent, as it does not provide for a public tender or opportunities for civil society to participate. Some NHRIs have their own budget, which enables them to act more independently, while budgetary sovereignty can be problematic in other cases. The political appointment of some members is sometimes a challenge, as clear quality criteria are not always guaranteed. Nevertheless, political or administrative experience among ombudsmen and ombudswomen can offer advantages and contribute to the effectiveness of their work;
Progress: Partial success
Improve the functioning of the Austrian Ombudsman with a view to ensuring its independence and compliance with the Paris Principles
Proponent:
People's Democratic Republic of Algeria
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
In April 2022, the Austrian Ombudsman Board received full A status from the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions GANHRI in recognition of the improvements to the constitutional framework. A status requires full compliance with the United Nations Paris Principles. The United Nations defined the international standard for the role and functioning of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in 1993. The NHRI principles contain provisions on the mandate and mode of operation. The core elements are independence, a mandate encompassing all human rights, a legal mandate
mandate, a legal basis to ensure political legitimacy and independence as well as an infrastructure and funding that enable effective work. The relevant accreditation report published in March 2022 links the A status achieved with the obligation to make further improvements to the organisation’s effectiveness and independence in the areas of appointment procedures, inter-institutional diversity and cooperation with civil society (see accreditation report: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/SCA-Report-March-2022_E.pdf). The introduction of a permanent informal sounding board with the participation of civil society organisations has led to significant improvements, particularly in the area of cooperation. In the context of the new appointment, civil society organisations are calling for a rapid adjustment of the appointment procedure in accordance with the Paris Principles. In this regard, the recommendations of the GANHRI of March 2022 are supported, which include a broad public call for tenders, the consideration of a diverse selection of candidates, the involvement of civil society organisations and transparent selection criteria. We call for the procedure to be reviewed and reformed in close consultation with civil society. An open letter from 25 civil society organisations dated 18 July 2022 addresses the need for a transparent and participatory selection and appointment process for national human rights institutions (NHRIs). It emphasises that such a process must be anchored in relevant laws, regulations or binding administrative guidelines to ensure independence and public trust in NHRIs. The organisations warn of the negative impact on civil society trust if the independence of NHRI members could be influenced by political connections, even if this is only a perceived threat (see Amnesty International Open Letter, 18.07.2022: https://cdn.amnesty.at/media/9979/offener-brief-volksanwaltschaft-18-07-22.pdf). As part of a review of the Austrian Ombudsman Board with regard to the agreement with international standards (so-called „Paris Principles“) in March 2022, GANHRI criticised in particular the appointment procedure, which does not do justice to the principle of independence. GANHRI considers the procedure currently enshrined in the Federal Constitution Act to be inadequate, comprehensive and transparent, as it does not provide for a public tender or opportunities for civil society to participate. Some NHRIs have their own budget, which enables them to act more independently, while budgetary sovereignty can be problematic in other cases. The political appointment of some members is sometimes a challenge, as clear quality criteria are not always guaranteed. Nevertheless, political or administrative experience among ombudsmen and ombudswomen can offer advantages and contribute to the effectiveness of their work;
Progress: In progress
Ensuring the appointment process of the members of the Austrian Ombudsman Board is in a full accordance with Paris Principles
Proponent:
Republic of Iraq
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
In April 2022, the Austrian Ombudsman Board received full A status from the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions GANHRI in recognition of the improvements to the constitutional framework. A status requires full compliance with the United Nations Paris Principles. The United Nations defined the international standard for the role and functioning of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in 1993. The NHRI principles contain provisions on the mandate and mode of operation. The core elements are independence, a mandate encompassing all human rights, a legal mandate
mandate, a legal basis to ensure political legitimacy and independence as well as an infrastructure and funding that enable effective work. The relevant accreditation report published in March 2022 links the A status achieved with the obligation to make further improvements to the organisation’s effectiveness and independence in the areas of appointment procedures, inter-institutional diversity and cooperation with civil society (see accreditation report: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/SCA-Report-March-2022_E.pdf). The introduction of a permanent informal sounding board with the participation of civil society organisations has led to significant improvements, particularly in the area of cooperation. In the context of the new appointment, civil society organisations are calling for a rapid adjustment of the appointment procedure in accordance with the Paris Principles. In this regard, the recommendations of the GANHRI of March 2022 are supported, which include a broad public call for tenders, the consideration of a diverse selection of candidates, the involvement of civil society organisations and transparent selection criteria. We call for the procedure to be reviewed and reformed in close consultation with civil society.
Progress: Partial success
Ensure that the Austrian Ombudsman Board fully complies with the Paris Principles and has sufficient human and financial resources to perform its role independently
Proponent:
Republic of Kazakhstan
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
In April 2022, the Austrian Ombudsman Board received full A status from the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions GANHRI in recognition of the improvements to the constitutional framework. A status requires full compliance with the United Nations Paris Principles. The United Nations defined the international standard for the role and functioning of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in 1993. The NHRI principles contain provisions on the mandate and mode of operation. The core elements are independence, a mandate encompassing all human rights, a legal mandate
mandate, a legal basis to ensure political legitimacy and independence as well as an infrastructure and funding that enable effective work. The relevant accreditation report published in March 2022 links the A status achieved with the obligation to make further improvements to the organisation’s effectiveness and independence in the areas of appointment procedures, inter-institutional diversity and cooperation with civil society (see accreditation report: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/SCA-Report-March-2022_E.pdf). The introduction of a permanent informal sounding board with the participation of civil society organisations has led to significant improvements, particularly in the area of cooperation. In the context of the new appointment, civil society organisations are calling for a rapid adjustment of the appointment procedure in accordance with the Paris Principles. In this regard, the recommendations of the GANHRI of March 2022 are supported, which include a broad public call for tenders, the consideration of a diverse selection of candidates, the involvement of civil society organisations and transparent selection criteria. We call for the procedure to be reviewed and reformed in close consultation with civil society. The report of the Austrian Ombudsman Board (1 January to 31 December 2023; III-1135 d.B.) see report : https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/I/2578/fname_1632810.pdf, published on 4 June 2024, emphasises that the Austrian Ombudsman Board is facing major challenges. The increasing number of complaints requires an increase in human and financial resources. The report emphasises the need for structural adjustments in order to ensure the efficiency and quality of the Ombudsman Board’s work in the long term.
Progress: Partial success
Take necessary steps to ensure full compliance of the Austrian Ombudsman Board with the Paris Principles, including reforming the process of appointing members to ensure selection is merit based
Proponent:
Australia
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
An open letter from 25 civil society organisations dated 18 July 2022 addresses the need for a transparent and participatory selection and appointment process for national human rights institutions (NHRIs). It emphasises that such a process must be anchored in relevant laws, regulations or binding administrative guidelines to ensure independence and public trust in NHRIs. The organisations warn of the negative impact on civil society trust if the independence of NHRI members could be influenced by political connections, even if this is only a perceived threat (see Amnesty International Open Letter, 18.07.2022: https://cdn.amnesty.at/media/9979/offener-brief-volksanwaltschaft-18-07-22.pdf). As part of a review of the Austrian Ombudsman Board with regard to the agreement with international standards (so-called „Paris Principles“) in March 2022, GANHRI criticised in particular the appointment procedure, which does not do justice to the principle of independence. GANHRI considers the procedure currently enshrined in the Federal Constitution Act to be inadequate, comprehensive and transparent, as it does not provide for a public tender or opportunities for civil society to participate. Some NHRIs have their own budget, which enables them to act more independently, while budgetary sovereignty can be problematic in other cases. The political appointment of some members is sometimes a challenge, as clear quality criteria are not always guaranteed. Nevertheless, political or administrative experience among ombudsmen and ombudswomen can offer advantages and contribute to the effectiveness of their work;
Progress: Partial success
Establish a national human rights institution in conformity with the Paris Principles
Proponent:
Republic of Senegal
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
In April 2022, the Austrian Ombudsman Board received full A status from the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions GANHRI in recognition of the improvements to the constitutional framework. A status requires full compliance with the United Nations Paris Principles. The United Nations defined the international standard for the role and functioning of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in 1993. The NHRI principles contain provisions on the mandate and mode of operation. The core elements are independence, a mandate encompassing all human rights, a legal mandate
mandate, a legal basis to ensure political legitimacy and independence as well as an infrastructure and funding that enable effective work. The relevant accreditation report published in March 2022 links the A status achieved with the obligation to make further improvements to the organisation’s effectiveness and independence in the areas of appointment procedures, inter-institutional diversity and cooperation with civil society (see accreditation report: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/SCA-Report-March-2022_E.pdf). The introduction of a permanent informal sounding board with the participation of civil society organisations has led to significant improvements, particularly in the area of cooperation. In the context of the new appointment, civil society organisations are calling for a rapid adjustment of the appointment procedure in accordance with the Paris Principles. In this regard, the recommendations of the GANHRI of March 2022 are supported, which include a broad public call for tenders, the consideration of a diverse selection of candidates, the involvement of civil society organisations and transparent selection criteria. We call for the procedure to be reviewed and reformed in close consultation with civil society.
Progress: Partial success
Continue measures to strengthen the national human rights institutions
Proponent:
Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
Various measures have been taken to strengthen the Austrian Ombudsman Board. In April 2022, the Austrian Ombudsman Board received full A status from the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) for improvements to its constitutional framework. This status requires full compliance with the United Nations Paris Principles, which define international standards for the independence, mandate and functioning of national human rights institutions. The improvements include a transparent appointment procedure, stronger cooperation with civil society and a comprehensive legal anchoring of the Ombudsman’s tasks. In April 2022, the Austrian Ombudsman Board received full A status from the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions GANHRI in recognition of the improvements to the constitutional framework. A status requires full compliance with the United Nations Paris Principles. The United Nations defined the international standard for the role and functioning of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in 1993. The NHRI principles contain provisions on the mandate and mode of operation. The core elements are independence, a mandate encompassing all human rights, a legal mandate
mandate, a legal basis to ensure political legitimacy and independence as well as an infrastructure and funding that enable effective work. The relevant accreditation report published in March 2022 links the A status achieved with the obligation to make further improvements to the organisation’s effectiveness and independence in the areas of appointment procedures, inter-institutional diversity and cooperation with civil society (see accreditation report: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/SCA-Report-March-2022_E.pdf). The introduction of a permanent informal sounding board with the participation of civil society organisations has led to significant improvements, particularly in the area of cooperation. In the context of the new appointment, civil society organisations are calling for a rapid adjustment of the appointment procedure in accordance with the Paris Principles. In this regard, the recommendations of the GANHRI of March 2022 are supported, which include a broad public call for tenders, the consideration of a diverse selection of candidates, the involvement of civil society organisations and transparent selection criteria. We call for the procedure to be reviewed and reformed in close consultation with civil society. An open letter from 25 civil society organisations dated 18 July 2022 addresses the need for a transparent and participatory selection and appointment process for national human rights institutions (NHRIs). It emphasises that such a process must be anchored in relevant laws, regulations or binding administrative guidelines to ensure independence and public trust in NHRIs. The organisations warn of the negative impact on civil society trust if the independence of NHRI members could be influenced by political connections, even if this is only a perceived threat (see Amnesty International Open Letter, 18.07.2022: https://cdn.amnesty.at/media/9979/offener-brief-volksanwaltschaft-18-07-22.pdf). As part of a review of the Austrian Ombudsman Board with regard to the agreement with international standards (so-called „Paris Principles“) in March 2022, GANHRI criticised in particular the appointment procedure, which does not do justice to the principle of independence. GANHRI considers the procedure currently enshrined in the Federal Constitution Act to be inadequate, comprehensive and transparent, as it does not provide for a public tender or opportunities for civil society to participate. Some NHRIs have their own budget, which enables them to act more independently, while budgetary sovereignty can be problematic in other cases. The political appointment of some members is sometimes a challenge, as clear quality criteria are not always guaranteed. Nevertheless, political or administrative experience among ombudsmen and ombudswomen can offer advantages and contribute to the effectiveness of their work;The mandate of the Austrian Ombudsman Board is comprehensively enshrined in constitutional and ordinary law and, in addition to the activities of an ombudsman’s office to monitor the state administration and the function of the National Human Rights Institution, also includes its position as a national preventive mechanism under the OPCAT (The Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment) via the relevant commissions and the Human Rights Advisory Council (Ombudsman’s Office preventive human rights monitoring). From a children’s rights perspective, complementary measures should be examined, such as strengthening and harmonising the mandate of the Ombudspersons for Children and Youths in the federal states as well as more extensive structures focused on the implementation of children’s rights in Austria, similar to the monitoring structures under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The report of the Austrian Ombudsman Board (1 January to 31 December 2023; III-1135 d.B.) see report : https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/I/2578/fname_1632810.pdf, published on 4 June 2024, emphasises that the Austrian Ombudsman Board is facing major challenges. The increasing number of complaints requires an increase in human and financial resources. The report emphasises the need for structural adjustments in order to ensure the efficiency and quality of the Ombudsman Board’s work in the long term.
Progress: In progress
Ensure a comprehensive mandate of the Austrian Ombudsman Board, particularly with regard to children’s rights
Proponent:
Republic of Moldova
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
The mandate of the Austrian Ombudsman Board is comprehensively enshrined in constitutional and ordinary law and, in addition to the activities of an ombudsman’s office to monitor the state administration and the function of the National Human Rights Institution, also includes its position as a national preventive mechanism under the OPCAT (The Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment) via the relevant commissions and the Human Rights Advisory Council (Ombudsman’s Office preventive human rights monitoring). From a children’s rights perspective, complementary measures should be examined, such as strengthening and harmonising the mandate of the Ombudspersons for Children and Youths in the federal states as well as more extensive structures focused on the implementation of children’s rights in Austria, similar to the monitoring structures under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
Progress: Partial success
Establish an independent national human rights institution
Proponent:
Federal Republic of Somalia
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
An open letter from 25 civil society organisations dated 18 July 2022 addresses the need for a transparent and participatory selection and appointment process for national human rights institutions (NHRIs). It emphasises that such a process must be anchored in relevant laws, regulations or binding administrative guidelines to ensure independence and public trust in NHRIs. The organisations warn of the negative impact on civil society trust if the independence of NHRI members could be influenced by political connections, even if this is only a perceived threat (see Amnesty International Open Letter, 18.07.2022: https://cdn.amnesty.at/media/9979/offener-brief-volksanwaltschaft-18-07-22.pdf). As part of a review of the Austrian Ombudsman Board with regard to the agreement with international standards (so-called „Paris Principles“) in March 2022, GANHRI criticised in particular the appointment procedure, which does not do justice to the principle of independence. GANHRI considers the procedure currently enshrined in the Federal Constitution Act to be inadequate, comprehensive and transparent, as it does not provide for a public tender or opportunities for civil society to participate. Some NHRIs have their own budget, which enables them to act more independently, while budgetary sovereignty can be problematic in other cases. The political appointment of some members is sometimes a challenge, as clear quality criteria are not always guaranteed. Nevertheless, political or administrative experience among ombudsmen and ombudswomen can offer advantages and contribute to the effectiveness of their work;
Progress: No progress
Take all appropriate measures to promote tolerance, intercultural dialogue and respect for diversity in the society
Proponent:
Republic of Turkmenistan
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
An open letter from Asylum Coordination Austria calls on the federal government to expand the range of services in the areas of youth and social work as well as political education and participation. Barrier-free and equal opportunities should be created, especially for people affected by racism, in order to involve them more strongly in democratic processes. This is particularly important for young people. (see: https://archiv2022.asyl.at/de/info/news/offenerbriefandiebundesregierung/index.html). The letter emphasises the need to promote cultural integration through such measures in order to improve participation and coexistence in society. Despite the introduction of the World Programme for Human Rights Education by the United Nations in December 2004, human rights education measures are being implemented in Austria, but there is still a need for increased commitment in this area in order to promote social cohesion and counteract discrimination.
Progress: In progress
Strengthen efforts to combat anti-Semitism and promote religious tolerance by continuing its work in education and policing
Proponent:
United States of America
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):
A large number of measures have been taken since 2021 to combat all forms of antisemitism. A central coordination centre for the topic of anti-Semitism has been established at the Federal Chancellery and a national strategy against anti-Semitism has been published (National Strategy of the Republic of Austria to Prevent and
Combating all forms of antisemitism, 2021: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:8bd2975f-0483-4e74-abd9-d66446195d7c/antisemitismusstrategie.pdf ). Even though the position has now been downgraded to a department in the Policy Section, it still exists in principle. Two implementation reports are available (for 2021 and 2022). For the education sector, a strategy paper on the „Prevention of antisemitism through education“ was drawn up in 2022, which contains recommendations for the implementation of the National Strategy against Antisemitism for the Austrian education administration and teacher training institutions (Strategy paper, 2022: https://www.erinnern.at/themen/artikel/massnahmenpaket-praevention-von-antisemitismus-durch-bildung). These recommendations were discussed in September 2022 at the symposium on „Preventing antisemitism through education“. A working group was established to document antisemitic incidents with the aim of learning from the experiences of other organisations that already document racist, antisemitic, etc. incidents. The aim is to learn from the experiences of other organisations that already document racist, anti-Semitic, etc. incidents in order to set up an anti-Semitism documentation centre that meets current requirements. Parliament also commissioned a study on anti-Semitism in Austria, which was presented in April 2023 (Study, 2023: https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/fachinfos/publikationen/Langbericht-Antisemitismus-2022-Oesterreichweite-Ergebnisse.pdf ). A large number of measures have been taken since 2021 to combat all forms of antisemitism. A central coordination centre for the topic of anti-Semitism has been set up at the Federal Chancellery and a national strategy against anti-Semitism has been published (see https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:8bd2975f-0483-4e74-abd9-d66446195d7c/antisemitismusstrategie.pdf). Even though the position has now been downgraded to a department in the Policy Section, it still exists in principle. There are two implementation reports (for 2021 and 2022). For the education sector, a strategy paper on the „Prevention of antisemitism through education“ was developed in 2022, which contains recommendations for the implementation of the National Strategy against Antisemitism for the Austrian education administration and teacher training institutions (see: https://oead.at/fileadmin/Dokumente/oead.at/KIM/Downloadcenter/OeAD_E.AT_Strategiepapier_FIN_01.pdf). These recommendations were discussed at the symposium on „Preventing antisemitism through education“ in September 2022. In 2022, the National Forum against Antisemitism was also established to pool knowledge, combat antisemitism and promote Jewish life in Austria. The body is made up of representatives from the federal government, the provinces, municipalities, social partners, academia, religious communities, Jewish museums and civil society. A working group on the documentation of anti-Semitic incidents has been established with the aim of learning from the experiences of other organisations that already document racist, anti-Semitic, etc. incidents. The aim is to learn from the experiences of other organisations already documenting racist, anti-Semitic, etc. incidents in order to set up an anti-Semitism documentation centre that meets current requirements. Parliament also commissioned a study on anti-Semitism in Austria, which was presented in April 2023 (see https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/fachinfos/publikationen/Langbericht-Antisemitismus-2022-Oesterreichweite-Ergebnisse.pdf). As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).There are currently no specific programmes or legal regulations in Austria that focus exclusively on the topic of religious tolerance. However, this does not mean that religious tolerance is not important in society. In general, it is strengthened by various general anti-discrimination measures and the promotion of diversity and inclusion.
Progress: No progress
Take further measures to promote tolerance and respect for cultural diversity in order to eradicate existing prejudices and stereotypes against migrants and foreigners
Proponent:
Kingdom of Bahrain
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
An open letter to the federal government from Asylkoordination Österreich calls for the expansion of youth and social work programmes as well as political education and participation. Affected people in Austria, especially young people, should be given equal and barrier-free participation in democratic processes in order to support them, especially in times of racism (see: https://archiv2022.asyl.at/de/info/news/offenerbriefandiebundesregierung/index.html). Although the World Programme for Human Rights Education was launched by the United Nations in December 2004, various measures to promote human rights education are being implemented in Austria. These include training courses for prospective judges and policewomen as well as the integration of human rights education into the curricula of Austrian schools. The training of prison guards, including topics such as human rights and anti-discrimination, is carried out in consultation with the staff representatives (see Federal Law Gazette II No. 129/2011, Overall legal regulation for basic training for employees in pay group v1 in the prison service: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20007252). Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. The positive approaches such as training for prospective judges and police officers and the integration of human rights education into curricula should be further strengthened. The mention of the training of judicial guards is commendable, but additional efforts are needed to achieve comprehensive social sensitisation. The Federal Government is called upon to take the demands formulated in the open letter seriously and to take effective measures. It is to be hoped that increased efforts will be made to create a fair and inclusive society in Austria that guarantees the equal participation of all those affected in democratic processes.
Progress: In progress
Continue to promote measures in combating racism, discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance
Proponent:
Barbados
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):
Racism remains a serious social problem in Austria. The latest report by SOS Mitmensch and other studies show that racist discrimination and hate crimes are on the rise. Anti-Muslim racism in particular has increased in recent years, partly fuelled by political rhetoric and campaigns targeting Muslim communities. Anti-Muslim hate crimes are common and are often supported by certain political groups. In 2023, the Documentation Centre on Islamophobia and Anti-Muslim Racism recorded a total of 1522 racist attacks against Muslims and people perceived to be Muslim. Compared to the previous year, 263 more cases were reported to us offline, which represents an increase of over 100 per cent of active case reports. The report shows a striking increase in case reports from the education sector. See report: here).
Austria has various laws in place to combat racism, including the Prohibition Act and the Equal Treatment Act. However, these legal frameworks are not always applied consistently, leading to calls for stronger policy measures and more rigorous enforcement of existing laws. Education and awareness-raising measures are also crucial to raise awareness of racial discrimination in the population and bring about long-term change (see SOS-Mitmensch report: https://www.sosmitmensch.at/site/momagazin/alleausgaben/7/article/395.html&ts=1720702499859).
ZARA’s report for the year 2023 provides a comprehensive overview of the extent and various forms of racism in Austria. A total of 1302 reports were documented and processed, almost 60% of which concerned online racism. This underlines the importance of digital platforms as a place for racist incidents, which can often be documented and reported using simple screenshots. The public sphere and the goods/services sector were particularly affected, with 58.2% and 15.9% of reports respectively. State authorities and institutions were involved in 11% of cases, while racist incidents in the police were only formally complained about in 4 out of 58 cases. In most of the other cases, those affected sought support from ZARA through counselling sessions and legal advice. A significant number (almost 78%) of reports came from witnesses, while 22% were submitted by those directly affected. The report also criticises the lack of implementation of a National Action Plan against Racism in Austria, although the need for structural change and combating institutional racism is obvious. There are still challenges in dealing with racism in Austria and the need for social support and structural changes to effectively address these issues (see Racism Report 2023, March 2024 edition: https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA_RassismusReport_2023_DE.pdf). As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).It should be noted that in Austria, both the development and implementation of measures to combat discrimination have been driven forward in close cooperation with various civil society organisations. However, it must be noted that the public discourse often focuses on so-called „immigrant anti-Semitism“ and thus accuses people with migration experience from Turkey and Arabic-speaking countries in particular of anti-Semitism across the board. However, there is a lack of clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-Black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Few concrete measures have been taken so far. There is a lack of targeted awareness-raising measures that address discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities as well as aspects of self-empowerment and human rights. In 2023, the Ombud for Equal Treatment reported an increase in discrimination complaints, which indicates a greater sensitisation of the population. A recent update on xenophobia in Austria shows that the issue remains highly relevant to society. New studies and surveys confirm that xenophobia remains a significant issue, although exact figures and trends may vary depending on the source and methodology. One of the more recent studies, conducted by institutions such as the University of Vienna or SORA (Institute for Social Research and Empirical Methods), shows that a significant proportion of the Austrian population remains sceptical about immigration and foreigners. These attitudes manifest themselves in the rejection of cultural diversity, different religious practices and the perception of economic effects on jobs and social security. In addition to traditional forms of xenophobia as measured in the past, new forms of xenophobia often manifest themselves in the form of online hate speech and on social media. These platforms can act as a catalyst for negative attitudes and actions towards foreigners. Political debates and events, both within Austria and internationally, often influence public perceptions and attitudes towards migrants and foreigners. For example, immigration policy issues and security concerns related to refugee flows have continued to fuel debate and possibly changes in attitudes in recent years. Overall, xenophobia in Austria remains a complex and highly debated issue that continues to shape political, social and cultural dynamics and poses challenges for integration and social coexistence.
Progress: In progress
Take urgent and long-term measures to prevent the resurgence of far-right-wing and other groups inspired by extremist national socialist ideologies and neo-Nazism
Proponent:
Republic of Belarus
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):
On 1 February 2022, Section 4(3a)(2) of the Ordinance of the Federal Minister of Justice of 16 June 1986 on the Implementation of the Public Prosecutor’s Office Act (DV-StAG) was amended in order to enshrine in law the establishment of special competences for terrorist criminal cases in public prosecutor’s offices with more than ten systematised posts (see DV-StAG: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/1986/338/A1P4/NOR40241334). At the same time, Section 32 (5) of the Court Organisation Act (GOG) created the legal obligation to also introduce special jurisdiction for criminal terrorism cases at the regional courts. With the entry into force of the Counter-Terrorism Act (TeBG, Federal Law Gazette I No. 159/2021) on 1 September 2021 and 1 January 2022, additional measures were taken to combat terrorism (see: TeBG, Federal Law Gazette I No. 159/2021: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblAuth/BGBLA_2021_I_159/BGBLA_2021_I_159.html). The law contains comprehensive provisions that enable the authorities to take more effective action against terrorist and anti-state offences, genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. The Criminal Records Act also introduced a separate labelling of such crimes (see MVAG, BGBI. I No. 223/2022: https://ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblAuth/BGBLA_2022_I_223/BGBLA_2022_I_223.). The Coordination Unit for the Prevention of Extremism and Deradicalisation in Prisons aims to gain information and insights through closer cooperation with prisons, courts, public prosecutors‘ offices and authorities. It deals with risk assessments, the monitoring of external contacts, the definition of training and further education programmes, the implementation of inter-agency case discussions and the monitoring of measures and structures in the prison system. The target group is offenders convicted under the Prohibition Act or for terrorist offences or international crimes, as well as inmates suspected of radicalisation (see BMJ website: https://www.bmj.gv.at/themen/Strafvollzug/Koordinationsstelle-Extremismuspr%C3%A4vention-und-Deradikalisierung-(KED).html). A national action plan to combat right-wing extremism and prevent extremism and radicalisation may be planned, but has not been implemented. In 2018, an „Austrian Strategy for the Prevention of Extremism and Deradicalisation“ was adopted, which has led to changes in parts (see PDF: https://www.dsn.gv.at/501/files/Praevention/767_Strategie_Extremismuspraevention_und_Deradikalisierung_publikation_210x297mm_DE_WEB_20190115.pdf). In general, it should be noted that comprehensive measures have been taken in this area. However, there is concern that the strong emphasis on combating extremism in security policy practice does not jeopardise other fundamental rights and freedoms. It should be noted that in recent years, the responsible members of government have repeatedly gone to great lengths to advertise specific large-scale actions against extremism (e.g. the media-famous Aktion Luxor), while in many of these cases the measures and investigations actually carried out did not stand up to subsequent judicial review for the most part.
As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government has set itself the goal of countering extremism with targeted measures and strengthening social resilience (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).The website of the Directorate of State Security and Intelligence (DSN) presents current developments and measures in the area of „Preventing extremism and deradicalisation in Austria“ (see website: here). The focus is on the implementation of the „Austrian Action Plan for the Prevention of Extremism and Deradicalisation“, which was published in July 2023 (see NAP: https://www.dsn.gv.at/216/files/BNED_NAP_Deutsch_web_bf_20240527.pdf). The DSN emphasises the importance of coordinated cooperation between state authorities, educational institutions and civil society organisations in order to effectively counter extremist tendencies.
An important aspect of current efforts is to raise awareness among the population and provide preventative educational programmes. The DSN also provides various resources and information to better educate professionals and the general public about the risks and signs of extremism. The aim is to increase security in Austria and counter extremist influences through early intervention and targeted deradicalisation programmes;
There are currently clear challenges in the prevention of extremism in Austria. The Extremism Advice Centre points out existing gaps, particularly in the accessibility and availability of prevention services for young people. There is a lack of sufficiently specialised contact points and long-term projects that address the diverse needs of different target groups. In addition, the „RE:WORK – Preventing extremism in schools“ project was launched to provide schools with more support in their prevention work. The project aims to train teachers and pupils in dealing with extremist tendencies and provide them with tools for effective prevention.
As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government has set itself the goal of countering extremism with targeted measures and strengthening social resilience (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html). One of the current priorities in the fight against terrorism in Austria is the need for basic research. In November 2021, Interior Minister Karl Nehammer emphasised the importance of a deep understanding of radicalisation processes and the ideological motives behind terrorism for the development of effective prevention strategies. The research should help to improve targeted measures to prevent terrorist attacks and combat extremist networks.
In addition, the 5th Prevention Summit on Extremism and Terrorism was held in March 2024. The summit serves as a platform for the exchange of best practices and the development of new concepts for preventing extremism and terrorism.
Overall, these developments show that a comprehensive understanding and continuous exchange are essential elements for optimising security strategies in Austria and taking effective action against terrorism and extremism.
As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government has set itself the goal of countering extremism with targeted measures and strengthening social resilience (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).In April 2021, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution reported an increasing threat from right-wing extremism in Austria. The 2021 constitutional protection report emphasises that right-wing extremist groups and individuals are increasingly spreading violent and extremist ideologies, particularly through their presence on the internet. These actors often use conspiracy theories and pseudo-scientific arguments to spread their messages (see the 2021 Report on the Protection of the Constitution, page 20ff: https://www.dsn.gv.at/501/files/VSB/VSB_2021_bf_012023.pdf). In addition, a parliamentary question was submitted in June 2021, which emphasised the need to combat right-wing extremism in Austria more effectively. The answers to this enquiry made it clear that, in addition to monitoring and criminal prosecution, preventative measures are also essential. These include increased education and awareness-raising initiatives as well as closer cooperation between security authorities and civil society organisations in order to curb the spread of right-wing extremist ideologies at an early stage and reduce their influence on society (see Action Plan against Right-Wing Extremism 2021: <a href=https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/A/1656< https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/A/1656).
As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government has set itself the goal of countering extremism with targeted measures and strengthening social resilience (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).The problems in the school environment were particularly emphasised, where preventative work against racism is urgently needed. Several measures are proposed to prevent discrimination in Austria, based on the current findings of the ZARA Racism Report 2023. These include educational initiatives to promote awareness and sensitivity to discrimination, as well as the strengthening and consistent implementation of anti-discrimination laws. Public campaigns should support tolerance and diversity, while counselling centres and support services help those affected. These approaches aim to create a more inclusive and non-discriminatory society. Further details can be found in the full report (see Zara Report 2023: https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA_RassismusReport_2023_DE.pdf ). The ZARA Racism Report 2023 emphasises the need for strict measures to prevent discrimination in Austria. This includes the consistent application and enforcement of anti-discrimination laws to ensure that offences are effectively punished. In addition, specialised counselling centres and support services should be easily accessible for those affected. Law enforcement agencies must be sensitised and trained to recognise and combat discrimination in order to ensure an appropriate response to racist incidents. These measures help to promote a discrimination-free society. Organisations such as SOS Mitmensch and the Ombud for Equal Treatment are also calling for improved legislation and stronger prosecution to prevent discrimination. They emphasise the importance of monitoring and reporting in order to measure progress and identify gaps.
Progress: In progress
Combat all forms of discrimination and protect minorities
Proponent:
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):
The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities came into force in Austria on 1 July 1998. It aims to protect and promote the rights of national minorities and sets Europe-wide standards in this regard. In the current Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023)14 of the Committee of Ministers of 13 December 2023 (see: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]}), as well as in the Report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe of 16 October 2023 (see: https://rm.coe.int/5th-op-austria-de-full-version/1680ace87b) emphasises that Austria must continue its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities, but must expand them in key areas (see Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023) 14 of the Committee of Ministers of 13 December 2023: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]} ) which provides for immediate measures to protect ethnic groups.
Redaktionelle Verantwortung UPR-Tool:
Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte, upr@liga.or.at
Lizenz CC-BY-SA
Unterstützung durch:
Forschungskooperation mit der Volksanwaltschaft
Förderung des Zukunftsfonds der Republik Österreich
