Universal Periodic Review

This UPR tool reflects the global recommendations made to Austria by all countries world-wide during the Universial Priodic Review process (UPR) at the UN Human Rights Council and their current status of implementation. The League coordinates a significant part of Austrian civil society in the UPR process. See this LINK for an overview about this process.

The recommendations can be filtered in the menu below by human rights topics, SDGs, proponent states etc. And also a search function is available.

We welcome your comments and suggestions at upr@liga.or.at.


Search category
Filter options
Filter by tag…

Progress: No progress

Create a politically independent top management of the public prosecutor’s offices and full transparency in instructions

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there have been discussions for years about setting up an independent mechanism to investigate abuse and excessive use of force by law enforcement officers. Human rights organisations such as Amnesty International and the UN Committee against Torture criticise the fact that Austria does not have a truly independent mechanism for investigating police violence. So far, allegations have mostly been investigated internally or by the public prosecutor’s office, which is often considered insufficiently independent. In 2023, the Austrian government took steps to address this problem. Legislative initiatives have been discussed that provide for the establishment of an independent investigative body. These initiatives aim to increase independence and transparency in the investigation of allegations against law enforcement officials. The Austrian Minister of Justice and the Ministry of the Interior have agreed as part of the government’s work to present a draft for the establishment of such a mechanism. It is expected that this mechanism will be institutionally and operationally independent of the law enforcement authorities and the Ministry of the Interior.   Despite this progress, there are still concerns about the actual independence and effectiveness of the proposed mechanism. Critics argue that without sufficient powers and resources, the new mechanism will not be much more effective than the existing structures. It remains to be seen what the final legislative proposal will look like and whether it will be approved by parliament. Human rights groups and civil society organisations continue to push for swift and substantial reforms.  

Redaktionelle Verantwortung UPR-Tool:

Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte, upr@liga.or.at

Lizenz CC-BY-SA 

Unterstützung durch:

Forschungskooperation mit der Volksanwaltschaft

Förderung des Zukunftsfonds der Republik Österreich

 

Receive the latest news

Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter