Universal Periodic Review

This UPR tool reflects the global recommendations made to Austria by all countries world-wide during the Universial Priodic Review process (UPR) at the UN Human Rights Council and their current status of implementation. The League coordinates a significant part of Austrian civil society in the UPR process. 

The recommendations can be filtered in the menu below by human rights topics, SDGs, proponent states etc. also a search function is available. 

 

We welcome your comments and suggestions at upr@liga.or.at.


Search category
Filter options
Filter by tag…

Progress: In progress

Secure adequate resources for minority media and improve access to public media

Proponent:

Slovenia


Republic of Slovenia

Slovenia


Republic of Slovenia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

After almost 30 years, an increase in support for ethnic groups was finally implemented in 2021. This increase actually only compensated for the loss caused by inflation. In addition, more than 10% of the funds were earmarked for media in the languages of the various ethnic groups.   A critical aspect that should not be overlooked, however, is the fact that support for ethnic groups in Austria is not automatically adjusted to inflation. In contrast, there is a regulation that ensures that funding for political parties is regularly increased. As a result, the amount available for cultural activities and education shrinks from year to year. The situation becomes even clearer if one consults the official website of the Federal Chancellery, where the promotion of the national minorities in Austria is explained in more detail (see Promotion of the national minorities in Austria on the website of the Federal Chancellery: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/volksgruppen/volksgruppen-foerderung.html).   Beyond the current status, it would be necessary to ensure the financial security of the media in the languages of the national minorities by adjusting the funding by law. This step would not only help to strengthen the cultural diversity and identity of the various ethnic groups, but would also ensure that they are adequately supported. The proportion of content in the language of the ethnic groups in public service broadcasting should also be steadily increased. This would not only promote the diversity of voices in broadcasting, but would also help to preserve and enrich the cultural identity of the different ethnic groups. Overall, the increase in support for ethnic groups is a positive step, but further adjustments and changes are needed to ensure that cultural diversity and identity in Austria are properly recognised and promoted.  

Progress: No progress

Grant asylum seekers effective access to the labour market during their asylum proceedings in order to ensure successful integration

Proponent:

Mozambique


Republic of Mozambique

Mozambique


Republic of Mozambique

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to ensure successful integration, it is of great importance to grant asylum seekers effective access to the labour market during their asylum procedure. This requires adjustments to legislation and administrative procedures. The opportunity to work during the asylum procedure enables asylum seekers to utilise their skills, contribute to society and secure their livelihood. Such access promotes the independence and well-being of those affected. However, there is unequal treatment in terms of access to the labour market, especially in the basic welfare system. While Ukrainians have protection status and access to the labour market from the outset, asylum seekers and displaced persons from Ukraine must obtain an employment permit. This inequality is exacerbated by bureaucratic procedures and an additional income limit, which penalises some groups of people. It is emphasised that the current system of basic services is in urgent need of fundamental reform. All groups, regardless of their status, should have fair access to the labour market in order to promote integration.   A sensible care system should encourage, not hinder, income-earning opportunities through work to enable people to manage without support at an early stage. A fundamental reform of the current system is needed to ensure that no one is permanently denied effective access to the labour market. 

Progress: No progress

Seek to align its legislation and administrative procedures to allow asylum seekers effective access to the labor market during their asylum procedure

Proponent:

Serbia


Republic of Serbia

Serbia


Republic of Serbia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to ensure successful integration, it is of great importance to grant asylum seekers effective access to the labour market during their asylum procedure. This requires adjustments to legislation and administrative procedures. The opportunity to work during the asylum procedure enables asylum seekers to utilise their skills, contribute to society and secure their livelihood. Such access promotes the independence and well-being of those affected. However, there is unequal treatment in terms of access to the labour market, especially in the basic welfare system. While Ukrainians have protection status and access to the labour market from the outset, asylum seekers and displaced persons from Ukraine must obtain an employment permit. This inequality is exacerbated by bureaucratic procedures and an additional income limit, which penalises some groups of people. It is emphasised that the current system of basic services is in urgent need of fundamental reform. All groups, regardless of their status, should have fair access to the labour market in order to promote integration.   A sensible care system should encourage, not hinder, income-earning opportunities through work to enable people to manage without support at an early stage. A fundamental reform of the current system is needed to ensure that no one is permanently denied effective access to the labour market. 

Progress: No progress

Endorse and implement the United Nations Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration

Proponent:

Indonesia


Republic of Indonesia

Indonesia


Republic of Indonesia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In 2018, the Austrian government decided to withdraw from the UN migration pact. The official vote declaration to the United Nations lists a total of 17 reasons for rejecting the agreement. At the same time, the „Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration“ was adopted, an international agreement of the United Nations that aims to improve international cooperation on migration and strengthen the contribution of migrants to sustainable development. Although this pact is not legally binding, it acts as a co-operative guide to better coordinate migration at different levels – local, national, regional and global. The Austrian government could consider rejoining the United Nations Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. This would not only promote international cooperation but also support a collaborative approach to more effective migration policies (see Outcome Document of the Intergovernmental Conference on the Adoption of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration:https://www.un.org/depts/german/migration/A.CONF.231.3.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families

Proponent:

Sri Lanka


Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka


Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. 

Progress: No progress

Ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families

Proponent:

Azerbaijan


Republic of Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan


Republic of Azerbaijan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. 

Progress: No progress

Ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families

Proponent:

Togo


Republic of Togo

Togo


Republic of Togo

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. 

Progress: No progress

Ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families

Proponent:

Rwanda


Republic of Rwanda

Rwanda


Republic of Rwanda

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. 

Progress: No progress

Sign and ratify the International Convention for the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families

Proponent:

Egypt


Arab Republic of Egypt

Egypt


Arab Republic of Egypt

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. 

Progress: No progress

Sign and ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families

Proponent:

Honduras


Republic of Honduras

Honduras


Republic of Honduras

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. 

Progress: No progress

Consider ratifying the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families

Proponent:

Bangladesh


People's Republic of Bangladesh

Bangladesh


People's Republic of Bangladesh

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. 

Progress: No progress

Consider ratifying the International Convention on the Protection of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families

Proponent:

Indonesia


Republic of Indonesia

Indonesia


Republic of Indonesia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. 

Progress: No progress

Consider ratifying the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families

Proponent:

Senegal


Republic of Senegal

Senegal


Republic of Senegal

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. 

Progress: No progress

Consider the ratification of the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families

Proponent:

Philippines


Republic of the Philippines

Philippines


Republic of the Philippines

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. 

Progress: No progress

Ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families and the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

Proponent:

Chile


Republic of Chile

Chile


Republic of Chile

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and enables individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations if their rights have been violated. Austria ratified this protocol in 1978. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and allows individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations when their rights have been violated. Austria, however, ratified this protocol in 1978 (see State Report, Concluding Observations of the Committee on wsk Rights: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:40fa2699-4b9e-450e-a246-fdf4a7dcc164/CESCR_WSK_4_de.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Undertake concrete actions towards the ratification of the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families

Proponent:

El Salvador


Republic of El Salvador

El Salvador


Republic of El Salvador

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. 

Progress: No progress

Strengthen the national legislative framework, in particular by ratifying the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families

Proponent:

Algeria


People's Democratic Republic of Algeria

Algeria


People's Democratic Republic of Algeria

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. 

Progress: No progress

Ratify the International Covenant on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, the Domestic Workers Convention, 2011 (No. 189) of the International Labour Organization, the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and sign the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration

Proponent:

Venezuela


Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

Venezuela


Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and enables individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations if their rights have been violated. Austria ratified this protocol in 1978. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and allows individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations when their rights have been violated. Austria, however, ratified this protocol in 1978 (see State Report, Concluding Observations of the Committee on wsk Rights: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:40fa2699-4b9e-450e-a246-fdf4a7dcc164/CESCR_WSK_4_de.pdf). In June 2011, Austria adopted Convention No. 189 of the International Labour Organization (ILO) regarding domestic workers. This agreement sets out an ambitious level of protection for domestic workers under labour law. However, it has not yet been fully implemented at national level. Domestic workers contribute significantly to the global economy by improving employment opportunities for workers with family responsibilities. They provide care for the elderly, children and people with disabilities and create significant income shifts within and between countries. It is crucial that Austria continues to take measures to strengthen the protection of workers, including the ratification of ILO Convention No. 189 on Domestic Workers (see RIS Convention No.189: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/RegV/REGV_COO_2026_100_2_651606/COO_2026_100_2_653149.html). In 2018, the Austrian government decided to withdraw from the UN migration pact. The official vote declaration to the United Nations lists a total of 17 reasons for rejecting the agreement. At the same time, the „Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration“ was adopted, an international agreement of the United Nations that aims to improve international cooperation on migration and strengthen the contribution of migrants to sustainable development. Although this pact is not legally binding, it acts as a co-operative guide to better coordinate migration at different levels – local, national, regional and global. The Austrian government could consider rejoining the United Nations Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. This would not only promote international cooperation but also support a collaborative approach to more effective migration policies (see Outcome Document of the Intergovernmental Conference on the Adoption of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration:https://www.un.org/depts/german/migration/A.CONF.231.3.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Sign and ratify the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

Proponent:

Honduras


Republic of Honduras

Honduras


Republic of Honduras

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and enables individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations if their rights have been violated. Austria ratified this protocol in 1978. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and allows individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations when their rights have been violated. Austria, however, ratified this protocol in 1978 (see State Report, Concluding Observations of the Committee on wsk Rights: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:40fa2699-4b9e-450e-a246-fdf4a7dcc164/CESCR_WSK_4_de.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Sign and ratify the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

Proponent:

Italy


Italian Republic

Italy


Italian Republic

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and enables individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations if their rights have been violated. Austria ratified this protocol in 1978. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and allows individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations when their rights have been violated. Austria, however, ratified this protocol in 1978 (see State Report, Concluding Observations of the Committee on wsk Rights: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:40fa2699-4b9e-450e-a246-fdf4a7dcc164/CESCR_WSK_4_de.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Ratify the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure

Proponent:

Albania


Republic of Albania

Albania


Republic of Albania

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and enables individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations if their rights have been violated. Austria ratified this protocol in 1978. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and allows individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations when their rights have been violated. Austria, however, ratified this protocol in 1978 (see State Report, Concluding Observations of the Committee on wsk Rights: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:40fa2699-4b9e-450e-a246-fdf4a7dcc164/CESCR_WSK_4_de.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Accept the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure

Proponent:

Finland


Republic of Finland

Finland


Republic of Finland

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and enables individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations if their rights have been violated. Austria ratified this protocol in 1978. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and allows individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations when their rights have been violated. Austria, however, ratified this protocol in 1978 (see State Report, Concluding Observations of the Committee on wsk Rights: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:40fa2699-4b9e-450e-a246-fdf4a7dcc164/CESCR_WSK_4_de.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Ratify the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

Proponent:

France


French Republic

France


French Republic

Gabon


Gabonese Republic

Gabon


Gabonese Republic

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and enables individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations if their rights have been violated. Austria ratified this protocol in 1978. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and allows individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations when their rights have been violated. Austria, however, ratified this protocol in 1978 (see State Report, Concluding Observations of the Committee on wsk Rights: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:40fa2699-4b9e-450e-a246-fdf4a7dcc164/CESCR_WSK_4_de.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Consider ratifying the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

Proponent:

El Salvador


Republic of El Salvador

El Salvador


Republic of El Salvador

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and enables individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations if their rights have been violated. Austria ratified this protocol in 1978. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and allows individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations when their rights have been violated. Austria, however, ratified this protocol in 1978 (see State Report, Concluding Observations of the Committee on wsk Rights: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:40fa2699-4b9e-450e-a246-fdf4a7dcc164/CESCR_WSK_4_de.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention, 2019 (No. 190) of the International Labour Organization

Proponent:

Namibia


Republic of Namibia

Namibia


Republic of Namibia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In 2019, the International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention on the Elimination of Violence and Harassment in the World of Work was adopted at the International Labour Conference (Resolution Austria 2024). This Convention provides a common framework aimed at preventing, eliminating and remedying violence and harassment, including gender-based incidents in the world of work. It marks the first time in international law that the right of all to a world of work free from violence and harassment is explicitly recognised. It not only recognises the right, but also the obligation to respect, promote and realise this right. The Convention also defines the concept of violence and harassment in the world of work at international level. Austria was actively involved in the development of Convention 190, but the country has not yet ratified the convention. Although the Convention has been in place since 2019, the Austrian government, in particular the Family and Women’s Affairs and Labour and Social Affairs ministries, has not yet seen the need for rapid implementation. This is despite the fact that current figures from 2022 show that the global rate of those affected remains high. The women’s rights organisation WIDE and its 21 member organisations are vehemently calling for the ratification of ILO Convention 190 and are campaigning for European countries, including Austria, to take a pioneering role in this process. The convention, which for the first time recognises the right of all people to a working environment free from violence and harassment, has been in force since 25 June 2021.   The Austrian federal government’s responses to corresponding enquiries indicate that there are still concerns and discussions within the EU. An opinion from the Council Legal Service is still pending, and ratification appears to have been delayed due to legal uncertainties and possible effects on other areas (see reply letter from Federal Minister Martin Kocher (Federal Ministry of Labour) and Federal Minister Susanne Raab (Federal Chancellery, Women) on ILO-C190 (2 May 2022)): https://wide-netzwerk.at/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Antwort-BM-Kocher-und-BM-Raab-ILO-190.pdf). WIDE and 21 other member organisations emphasise the urgency of ratifying and implementing Convention 190 in order to effectively combat violence and harassment in the world of work, especially gender-specific assaults. It is pointed out that Austria, despite its active participation in the drafting of the convention, is not yet one of the ratifying states (see statement: https://wide-netzwerk.at/recht-auf-arbeit-frei-von-belaestigung-und-gewalt/). 

Progress: No progress

Accede to the International Convention Against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries

Proponent:

Armenia


Republic of Armenia

Armenia


Republic of Armenia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries is an international agreement that was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 4 December 1989. It entered into force on 20 October 2001. Austria has not ratified the International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries (UN Mercenaries Convention). To date, 37 states have ratified the Convention, but Austria is not among the countries that have ratified or signed it. 

Progress: No progress

Ratify the Protocol 12 to the European Convention on Human Rights, in order to ensure the effective prohibition of discrimination

Proponent:

Spain


Kingdom of Spain

Spain


Kingdom of Spain

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

On 4 November 2000, Protocol No. 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms was adopted and entered into force on 1 April 2005. The Protocol establishes a comprehensive prohibition of discrimination, ensuring that everyone has the right to the full enjoyment of all rights set out in law without discrimination on the basis of sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.   The ratification of Protocol No. 12 by Austria would mean that the country undertakes to enforce and promote the prohibition of discrimination in all areas of public life. Austria would thus take an important step towards strengthening human rights and equal treatment in society (see Protocol No. 12: https://www.menschenrechtskonvention.eu/protokoll-nr-12-emrk-9277/). 

Progress: No progress

Reform its Constitution to incorporate the protection of all human rights, and demonstrate its will to respect them with the approval and application of a national human rights plan

Proponent:

Venezuela


Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

Venezuela


Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Despite the agreement in the last government programme and the sustained demand by opposition parties such as the SPÖ and NEOS, a general National Action Plan for Human Rights for Austria has not yet been finalised or adopted. The details (see: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:7b9e6755-2115-440c-b2ec-cbf64a931aa8/RegProgramm-lang.pdf on page 153) and in the parliamentary initiatives of the SPÖ and NEOS (e.g. SPÖ and NEOS). A general National Action Plan for Human Rights should not be replaced by the results of topic-specific action plans. Rather, it is intended to provide strategic and long-term planning, prioritisation and serve as a central mechanism for coordination and strategic planning to implement the recommendations of the UPR process. In addition to strategic objectives for legislation, a comprehensive national action plan should include the following elements: Network building within the administration and with NGOs, new creation and support of human rights institutions, integration of human rights education in schools and universities, educational programmes for vulnerable groups, public awareness-building, provision of information materials, research and evaluation. As early as 1993, the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna recommended comprehensive National Action Plans for Human Rights. These form the gold standard throughout the EU and are widespread in many countries, as a study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency shows ( Study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency). It is no substitute for a general National Action Plan for Human Rights to await the results of topic-specific National Action Plans. Rather, the purpose of the general National Action Plan is to plan strategically and in the long term and to define priorities. In this way, the National Action Plan for Human Rights can also be the main mechanism for coordination and strategic planning for the implementation of the recommendations of the UPR process.
  In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government aims to revitalise the Human Rights Action Plan and promote its implementation (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).
Civil society organisations are still experiencing difficulties in the area of human rights protection in Austria. Civil society organisations have expressed concerns that discrimination and human rights violations continue against certain groups such as migrants, asylum seekers or LGBTQI+ people. There is a need to protect these vulnerable groups and ensure that their rights are effectively protected. An important note is that despite some progress in the area of human rights enforcement and monitoring, problems still exist. Some non-governmental organisations have pointed out that human rights standards are not fully implemented and that certain mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing human rights need to be further strengthened;

Progress: No progress

Continue its efforts in improving its legal and institutional frameworks for protection against discrimination, and to establish a systematic data collection mechanism to record incidents of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance to ensure that all incidents are investigated, prosecuted and that the perpetrators were punished

Proponent:

Palestine


State of Palestine

Palestine


State of Palestine

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Around 30,000 police officers throughout Austria were prepared for this task by completing e-learning seminars and receiving training as multipliers. The police now work on the basis of a victim-centred approach, actively listening to the victims and investigating consistently to ensure appropriate prosecution. These measures are designed to help tackle bias crime and improve safety for all citizens. With the systematic recording of hate crimes motivated by prejudice and the publication of statistics on hate crimes recorded by the police, a first important step has been taken to make hate crimes visible. It is important to observe the extent to which the views of the police and victim protection organisations or community organisations agree on whether an incident should be classified as a hate crime or not. These observations are an important basis for the reliability of the statistics now collected on hate crimes (Report of the Federal Ministry of the Interior on „Hate Crime“ in Austria 2021: https://www.bmi.gv.at/408/Projekt/files/218_2021_Hate_Crime_Bericht_2021_GESAMT_V20220510_barrierefrei.pdf).
In addition, relevant amendments to criminal legislation have been introduced to improve the handling of hate crimes. The amendments to the Criminal Code (StGB) and the Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO) contain new regulations to combat hate crime more effectively and to strengthen the rights of victims. It is important to regularly review and adapt these legal changes in order to meet current challenges. 
Austria has not yet implemented some of the recommendations of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) from the 2015 report „General Policy Recommendations No. 15 on Combating Hate Speech“. These include, in particular, the pending ratification of the „Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime“ and „Protocol No. 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms“.
ECRI also emphasises that politicians should take a clear stance against racist hate speech and that political parties should introduce codes of conduct that prohibit the use of hate speech. These recommendations have not yet been heeded.  
Austria has still not implemented standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination with large gaps in protection outside the world of work. When it comes to access to goods and services, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief or sexual orientation, and therefore not in the case of multiple discrimination. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education and there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection. There is no explicit legal protection against intersectional discrimination and discrimination based on gender identity, expression or characteristics. The anti-discrimination laws and the respective equality bodies at federal and state level are organised very differently, which makes access to justice more difficult. Those affected by discrimination usually have to take legal action individually. The amounts of damages awarded in practice are low and there is a lack of effective statutory minimum compensation and injunctive relief. A collective action as a collective legal protection instrument only exists in cases of discrimination on the basis of disability.    The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection (see government programme 2025-2029 as a PDF on the website of the Federal Chancellery: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html available).  

Progress: No progress

Strengthen efforts to improve protection against discrimination on all prohibited grounds particularly by harmonizing national legislation

Proponent:

Sudan


Republic of Sudan

Sudan


Republic of Sudan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The 2020 EU Action Plan against Racism calls on the member states to draw up National Action Plans against Racism by the end of 2022. In Austria, the Federal Minister for Women, Family, Integration and Media in the Federal Chancellery is responsible for drawing up the National Action Plan against Racism and Discrimination. This National Action Plan is also anchored in the current government programme (EU Action Plan against Racism 2020: https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/library-document/union-equality-eu-anti-racism-action-plan-2020-2025_en). Austria has also referred to the planned National Action Plan against Racism in various other recommendations regarding the implementation and promotion of measures to combat racism, discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance. This shows its particular importance. Contrary to this assurance and contrary to the agreement in the last government programme, no national action plan to combat racism was adopted and no significant other programmes in the area of anti-racism work were implemented, with the exception of the area of anti-Semitism.   It should be noted that in Austria, both the development and implementation of measures to combat discrimination have been driven forward in close cooperation with various civil society organisations. However, it must be noted that the public discourse often focuses on so-called „immigrant anti-Semitism“ and thus accuses people with migration experience from Turkey and Arabic-speaking countries in particular of anti-Semitism across the board. However, there is a lack of clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-Black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Few concrete measures have been taken so far. There is a lack of targeted awareness-raising measures that address discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities as well as aspects of self-empowerment and human rights. Austria has still not implemented standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination with large gaps in protection outside the world of work. When it comes to access to goods and services, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief or sexual orientation, and therefore not in the case of multiple discrimination. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education and there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection. There is no explicit legal protection against intersectional discrimination and discrimination based on gender identity, expression or characteristics. The anti-discrimination laws and the respective equality bodies at federal and state level are organised very differently, which makes access to justice more difficult. Those affected by discrimination usually have to take legal action individually. The amounts of damages awarded in practice are low and there is a lack of effective statutory minimum compensation and injunctive relief. A collective action as a collective legal protection instrument only exists in cases of discrimination on the basis of disability.    The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection (see government programme 2025-2029 as a PDF on the website of the Federal Chancellery: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html available).  

Progress: No progress

Strengthen efforts to improve protection against discrimination on all prohibited grounds particularly by harmonizing national legislation

Proponent:

Sweden


Kingdom of Sweden

Sweden


Kingdom of Sweden

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has still not implemented standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination with large gaps in protection outside the world of work. When it comes to access to goods and services, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief or sexual orientation, and therefore not in the case of multiple discrimination. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education and there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection. There is no explicit legal protection against intersectional discrimination and discrimination based on gender identity, expression or characteristics. The anti-discrimination laws and the respective equality bodies at federal and state level are organised very differently, which makes access to justice more difficult. Those affected by discrimination usually have to take legal action individually. The amounts of damages awarded in practice are low and there is a lack of effective statutory minimum compensation and injunctive relief. A collective action as a collective legal protection instrument only exists in cases of discrimination on the basis of disability.    The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection (see government programme 2025-2029 as a PDF on the website of the Federal Chancellery: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html available).  

Progress: No progress

Consider amending the Equal Treatment Act and other acts addressing discrimination with a view to ensuring substantive and procedural protection against discrimination with regard to all prohibited grounds of discrimination

Proponent:

Bulgaria


Republic of Bulgaria

Bulgaria


Republic of Bulgaria

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, a number of different laws regulate protection against discrimination at state and federal level. This makes the enforcement of the law complex in some cases, protection is not standardised and – contrary to numerous calls in the UPR process and in numerous other monitoring processes on human rights conventions – there are significant gaps in protection: 1. in terms of access to goods and services in the private sector, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief and sexual orientation. This fact has been criticised for years by numerous civil society organisations and equality actors as a lack of levelling up.
2) Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education.
3. there is also a lack of comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.
In addition, the law contains provisions on the reversal of the burden of proof, which makes it easier for the person affected to prove discrimination, as well as provisions for possible claims for damages and compensation (see Equal Treatment Act, GIBG Federal Law Gazette I No. 66/2004: https://ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20003395&FassungVom=2022-02-10). The Introductory Act to the Administrative Procedure Acts (EGVG) provides a legal basis for dealing with racist refusal of admission in Austria. According to this law, both victims and witnesses of racist discrimination can report such incidents. Police officers are obliged to forward these reports to the competent district administrative authority. The procedure under the EGVG is free of charge for the person making the report. The reporting person or organisation, such as ZARA or the Litigation Association, are not informed of the outcome of the proceedings and have no direct party status. In addition, the EGVG does not provide for compensation for the person discriminated against. Instead, offenders can be fined up to 1,090 euros, an amount that has not been evaluated for years. In the event of repeated violations of the EGVG, the trade authority can theoretically withdraw the trade licence. ZARA supports those affected by discrimination through various measures, including letters of intervention to the establishments concerned, legal advice and referral to other legal bodies such as the Equal Treatment Ombudsman’s Office or the Litigation Association. The aim is to find an out-of-court solution or to take legal action to enforce the rights of victims of discrimination. These legal and supportive measures are crucial to strengthening protection against racial discrimination in Austria and dealing with cases of discrimination appropriately (see Racism Report 2022: https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA-Rassismus_Report_2022.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Take effective legislative and administrative measures to combat discrimination against Muslims, Roma and other minority groups

Proponent:

China


People's Republic of China

China


People's Republic of China

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, a number of different laws regulate protection against discrimination at state and federal level. This makes the enforcement of the law complex in some cases, protection is not standardised and – contrary to numerous calls in the UPR process and in numerous other monitoring processes on human rights conventions – there are significant gaps in protection: 1. in terms of access to goods and services in the private sector, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief and sexual orientation. This fact has been criticised for years by numerous civil society organisations and equality actors as a lack of levelling up.
2) Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education.
3. there is also a lack of comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.
In addition, the law contains provisions on the reversal of the burden of proof, which makes it easier for the person affected to prove discrimination, as well as provisions for possible claims for damages and compensation (see Equal Treatment Act, GIBG Federal Law Gazette I No. 66/2004: https://ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20003395&FassungVom=2022-02-10). The Introductory Act to the Administrative Procedure Acts (EGVG) provides a legal basis for dealing with racist refusal of admission in Austria. According to this law, both victims and witnesses of racist discrimination can report such incidents. Police officers are obliged to forward these reports to the competent district administrative authority. The procedure under the EGVG is free of charge for the person making the report. The reporting person or organisation, such as ZARA or the Litigation Association, are not informed of the outcome of the proceedings and have no direct party status. In addition, the EGVG does not provide for compensation for the person discriminated against. Instead, offenders can be fined up to 1,090 euros, an amount that has not been evaluated for years. In the event of repeated violations of the EGVG, the trade authority can theoretically withdraw the trade licence. ZARA supports those affected by discrimination through various measures, including letters of intervention to the establishments concerned, legal advice and referral to other legal bodies such as the Equal Treatment Ombudsman’s Office or the Litigation Association. The aim is to find an out-of-court solution or to take legal action to enforce the rights of victims of discrimination. These legal and supportive measures are crucial to strengthening protection against racial discrimination in Austria and dealing with cases of discrimination appropriately (see Racism Report 2022: https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA-Rassismus_Report_2022.pdf). 
Anti-Muslim racism is a worrying and growing phenomenon in Austria. According to the Anti-Muslim Racism Report 2023 by the Documentation Centre Austria, a total of 1522 cases were reported, a record high since the beginning of the survey. Two thirds of these incidents took place online, while the rest occurred in the real world, including discrimination in public spaces, such as verbal insults and physical assaults. Women, especially those wearing headscarves, are particularly affected.
In the education sector, incidents such as insulting comments from classmates or threats from school administrators towards praying Muslim pupils have been documented. The spread of hate online is particularly problematic, accounting for almost 90 per cent of reported online incidents. Experts warn that these incidents are deepening social divisions and threatening social cohesion (see documentary Report 2023: https://dokustelle.at/reports/dokustelle-report-2023). In an open letter to the Austrian federal government, civil society calls for the introduction of the criminal offence of „political Islam“ to be dropped. The reason for this is the lack of scientific uniformity in the definition of this term, which could allow it to be used indiscriminately. The concern is that this could lead to generalised suspicions and executive measures against Muslims. The organisation also appeals for protection against discrimination and the preservation of religious freedom by ensuring that state authorities allow all communities to practise their religion freely and equally. It also emphasises that deradicalisation and counter-terrorism strategies must respect the rights of Muslim women to protection from discrimination and freedom of expression. Finally, it calls for religious practices and clothing not to be used as indicators of radicalisation and for surveillance not to be carried out on the basis of membership of Islam or Muslim organisations in order to avoid blanket criminalisation.    In 2023, the Documentation Centre Austria documented a total of 1522 racist attacks against Muslim
and persons perceived as Muslim. This figure is made up of cases that were reported offline and cases that were recorded as part of intensified online monitoring. However, the organisation emphasises that the actual number of attacks is likely to be higher;
In Austria, Roma and Sinti:cze continue to be severely affected by discrimination, particularly in areas such as education, work, health and housing. The national strategy for the inclusion of Roma was updated in 2021, but a study continues to reveal prejudice and structural disadvantages. One problem is „underreporting“, as many of those affected do not report discrimination out of fear or bad experiences. The Ombud for Equal Treatment is trying to combat this by providing legal advice and networking with civil society organisations (see study on the evaluation of the national strategy for the inclusion of Roma in Austria (Sensiro)): https://sensiroprojekt.univie.ac.at/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/SENSIRO_Endbericht.pdf).  

Progress: No progress

Continue to harmonise the national legislation against discrimination in order to ensure protection from all forms of discrimination, including on the basis of age, religion and belief, as well as sexual orientation and gender identity

Proponent:

Croatia


Republic of Croatia

Croatia


Republic of Croatia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

It should be noted that in Austria, both the development and implementation of measures to combat discrimination have been driven forward in close cooperation with various civil society organisations. However, it must be noted that the public discourse often focuses on so-called „immigrant anti-Semitism“ and thus accuses people with migration experience from Turkey and Arabic-speaking countries in particular of anti-Semitism across the board. However, there is a lack of clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-Black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Few concrete measures have been taken so far. There is a lack of targeted awareness-raising measures that address discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities as well as aspects of self-empowerment and human rights. There is still no standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination in Austria. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination. When it comes to access to goods and services, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief or sexual orientation. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education. Similarly, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.    There is no explicit legal protection against intersectional discrimination and discrimination based on gender identity, gender expression or gender characteristics. The anti-discrimination laws and the respective equality bodies at federal and state level are organised very differently, which makes access to justice more difficult.
Those affected by discrimination usually have to take legal action individually. The amounts of damages awarded in practice are low and there is a lack of effective statutory minimum compensation and injunctive relief. A collective action as a collective legal protection instrument only exists in cases of discrimination on the basis of disability.
The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html   As part of the government plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see government plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).
There is still no standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination in Austria. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination.    There have recently been selective amendments to the law against age discrimination, for example in the area of lending. However, there is still no comprehensive ban on discrimination in access to goods and services on the basis of age, religion and belief and sexual orientation (protection exists in federal law, which in the majority of cases only applies on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education. Similarly, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection. The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection (see government programme: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).   In summary, civil society appeals to the federal government to pursue a policy that focuses on the promotion rather than the restriction of fundamental and human rights. The involvement of civil society expertise is considered essential (see Open Letter: https://archiv2022.asyl.at/de/info/news/offenerbriefandiebundesregierung/index.html). While there are political strategies against anti-Semitism, there is no comparable approach to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgements against people perceived as Muslim. The establishment of the Documentation Centre for Political Islam and Operation Luxor reinforce a general suspicion of Muslims and lead to people withdrawing from social discourse, a reduction in diversity of opinion and restrictions on participation. Freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly can be restricted on the basis of membership of a particular group, which has a negative impact on basic democratic principles (Website of the Federal Chancellery – Documentation Centre for Political Islam: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2020/integrationsministerin-raab-dokumentationsstelle-politischer-islam-nimmt-arbeit-auf.html).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).In July 2021, the „anti-terror package“ was passed in Austria, but this raised concerns from civil society organisations and UN experts. In particular, it was feared that the paragraph on „religiously motivated extremist connections“ could stigmatise Muslims (see Terrorism Prevention Act – TeBG (849 d.B.): https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/I/849).   Despite concerns, law enforcement agencies used facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, resulting in potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and effective mechanisms to investigate these practices were lacking (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities entered into force in Austria on 1 July 1998 in order to protect and promote the rights of national minorities. The current report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention emphasises that Austria is continuing its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities. Despite a significant increase in funding for national minorities to almost 8 million euros in 2021 and the adoption of new laws to combat hate speech and violent hate crimes, challenges remain, particularly in minority language education and in the area of mutual respect and intercultural dialogue.   In contrast, there is no clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Little action has been taken, particularly with regard to awareness-raising measures against discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities, as well as promoting self-empowerment and human rights. 

Progress: No progress

Harmonize at all levels anti-discrimination legislation to protect all persons regardless of age, religion or belief, sexual orientation and gender identity

Proponent:

Denmark


Kingdom of Denmark

Denmark


Kingdom of Denmark

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

It should be noted that in Austria, both the development and implementation of measures to combat discrimination have been driven forward in close cooperation with various civil society organisations. However, it must be noted that the public discourse often focuses on so-called „immigrant anti-Semitism“ and thus accuses people with migration experience from Turkey and Arabic-speaking countries in particular of anti-Semitism across the board. However, there is a lack of clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-Black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Few concrete measures have been taken so far. There is a lack of targeted awareness-raising measures that address discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities as well as aspects of self-empowerment and human rights. There is still no standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination in Austria. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination. When it comes to access to goods and services, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief or sexual orientation. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education. Similarly, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.    There is no explicit legal protection against intersectional discrimination and discrimination based on gender identity, gender expression or gender characteristics. The anti-discrimination laws and the respective equality bodies at federal and state level are organised very differently, which makes access to justice more difficult.
Those affected by discrimination usually have to take legal action individually. The amounts of damages awarded in practice are low and there is a lack of effective statutory minimum compensation and injunctive relief. A collective action as a collective legal protection instrument only exists in cases of discrimination on the basis of disability.
The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html   As part of the government plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see government plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).
There is still no standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination in Austria. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination.    There have recently been selective amendments to the law against age discrimination, for example in the area of lending. However, there is still no comprehensive ban on discrimination in access to goods and services on the basis of age, religion and belief and sexual orientation (protection exists in federal law, which in the majority of cases only applies on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education. Similarly, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection. The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection (see government programme: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).   In summary, civil society appeals to the federal government to pursue a policy that focuses on the promotion rather than the restriction of fundamental and human rights. The involvement of civil society expertise is considered essential (see Open Letter: https://archiv2022.asyl.at/de/info/news/offenerbriefandiebundesregierung/index.html). While there are political strategies against anti-Semitism, there is no comparable approach to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgements against people perceived as Muslim. The establishment of the Documentation Centre for Political Islam and Operation Luxor reinforce a general suspicion of Muslims and lead to people withdrawing from social discourse, a reduction in diversity of opinion and restrictions on participation. Freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly can be restricted on the basis of membership of a particular group, which has a negative impact on basic democratic principles (Website of the Federal Chancellery – Documentation Centre for Political Islam: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2020/integrationsministerin-raab-dokumentationsstelle-politischer-islam-nimmt-arbeit-auf.html).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).In July 2021, the „anti-terror package“ was passed in Austria, but this raised concerns from civil society organisations and UN experts. In particular, it was feared that the paragraph on „religiously motivated extremist connections“ could stigmatise Muslims (see Terrorism Prevention Act – TeBG (849 d.B.): https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/I/849).   Despite concerns, law enforcement agencies used facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, resulting in potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and effective mechanisms to investigate these practices were lacking (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities entered into force in Austria on 1 July 1998 in order to protect and promote the rights of national minorities. The current report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention emphasises that Austria is continuing its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities. Despite a significant increase in funding for national minorities to almost 8 million euros in 2021 and the adoption of new laws to combat hate speech and violent hate crimes, challenges remain, particularly in minority language education and in the area of mutual respect and intercultural dialogue.   In contrast, there is no clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Little action has been taken, particularly with regard to awareness-raising measures against discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities, as well as promoting self-empowerment and human rights. 

Progress: No progress

Adopt legislative measures to eradicate all forms of discrimination and to prohibit racial and ethnic profiling by the police

Proponent:

Ecuador


Republic of Ecuador

Ecuador


Republic of Ecuador

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there are reports of racist police checks in which people are discriminated against on the basis of their ethnic origin or skin colour. According to the Amnesty Annual Report 2022, such practices have been documented time and again in police work, which places a particular burden on the communities affected. The Styrian Anti-Discrimination Agency confirms that racial profiling violates the ban on discrimination and must be urgently reformed in order to protect the rights of all citizens (Amnesty International Annual Report: https://www.amnesty.de/informieren/amnesty-report/oesterreich-2022). In Austria, there is still a need to strengthen measures to combat racial discrimination and racial profiling. This requires not only a clear condemnation of such practices, but also the implementation of accountability measures for those who commit, aid and abet or cover up racial discrimination. Promoting transparency, education and training for law enforcement agencies and strengthening the rights of victims are crucial steps to combat racial discrimination and racial profiling. Measures should be taken to hold people who practise racial discrimination and racial profiling accountable (Racism Report 2022 by ZARA- Civil Courage and Anti-Racism Work as PDF: https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA-Rassismus_Report_2022.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Revise and harmonize its anti-discrimination laws and improve its anti-discrimination institutions and their efficiency and approachability to ensure effective protection against all forms of discrimination, including against persons with disabilities and children and young persons in the asylum procedure

Proponent:

Finland


Republic of Finland

Finland


Republic of Finland

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, a number of different laws regulate protection against discrimination at state and federal level. This makes the enforcement of the law complex in some cases, protection is not standardised and – contrary to numerous calls in the UPR process and in numerous other monitoring processes on human rights conventions – there are significant gaps in protection: 1. in terms of access to goods and services in the private sector, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief and sexual orientation. This fact has been criticised for years by numerous civil society organisations and equality actors as a lack of levelling up.
2) Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education.
3. there is also a lack of comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.
In addition, the law contains provisions on the reversal of the burden of proof, which makes it easier for the person affected to prove discrimination, as well as provisions for possible claims for damages and compensation (see Equal Treatment Act, GIBG Federal Law Gazette I No. 66/2004: https://ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20003395&FassungVom=2022-02-10). The Introductory Act to the Administrative Procedure Acts (EGVG) provides a legal basis for dealing with racist refusal of admission in Austria. According to this law, both victims and witnesses of racist discrimination can report such incidents. Police officers are obliged to forward these reports to the competent district administrative authority. The procedure under the EGVG is free of charge for the person making the report. The reporting person or organisation, such as ZARA or the Litigation Association, are not informed of the outcome of the proceedings and have no direct party status. In addition, the EGVG does not provide for compensation for the person discriminated against. Instead, offenders can be fined up to 1,090 euros, an amount that has not been evaluated for years. In the event of repeated violations of the EGVG, the trade authority can theoretically withdraw the trade licence. ZARA supports those affected by discrimination through various measures, including letters of intervention to the establishments concerned, legal advice and referral to other legal bodies such as the Equal Treatment Ombudsman’s Office or the Litigation Association. The aim is to find an out-of-court solution or to take legal action to enforce the rights of victims of discrimination. These legal and supportive measures are crucial to strengthening protection against racial discrimination in Austria and dealing with cases of discrimination appropriately (see Racism Report 2022: https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA-Rassismus_Report_2022.pdf). 
Civil society calls on the German government to pursue a policy that prioritises the promotion of fundamental and human rights instead of restricting them. It emphasises that the expertise of civil society is indispensable for this task. Further information can be found in an open letter to the German government (see Open letter: https://archiv2022.asyl.at/de/info/news/offenerbriefandiebundesregierung/index.html). 

Progress: No progress

Develop transparent nationwide and inclusive anti-discrimination legislations and administrative measures to protect the rights of all communities in Austria including in particular Muslims who are being increasingly discriminated and targeted by Islamophobia

Proponent:

Iran


Islamic Republic of Iran

Iran


Islamic Republic of Iran

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

In Austria, a number of different laws regulate protection against discrimination at state and federal level. This makes the enforcement of the law complex in some cases, protection is not standardised and – contrary to numerous calls in the UPR process and in numerous other monitoring processes on human rights conventions – there are significant gaps in protection: 1. in terms of access to goods and services in the private sector, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief and sexual orientation. This fact has been criticised for years by numerous civil society organisations and equality actors as a lack of levelling up.
2) Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education.
3. there is also a lack of comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.
In addition, the law contains provisions on the reversal of the burden of proof, which makes it easier for the person affected to prove discrimination, as well as provisions for possible claims for damages and compensation (see Equal Treatment Act, GIBG Federal Law Gazette I No. 66/2004: https://ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20003395&FassungVom=2022-02-10). The Introductory Act to the Administrative Procedure Acts (EGVG) provides a legal basis for dealing with racist refusal of admission in Austria. According to this law, both victims and witnesses of racist discrimination can report such incidents. Police officers are obliged to forward these reports to the competent district administrative authority. The procedure under the EGVG is free of charge for the person making the report. The reporting person or organisation, such as ZARA or the Litigation Association, are not informed of the outcome of the proceedings and have no direct party status. In addition, the EGVG does not provide for compensation for the person discriminated against. Instead, offenders can be fined up to 1,090 euros, an amount that has not been evaluated for years. In the event of repeated violations of the EGVG, the trade authority can theoretically withdraw the trade licence. ZARA supports those affected by discrimination through various measures, including letters of intervention to the establishments concerned, legal advice and referral to other legal bodies such as the Equal Treatment Ombudsman’s Office or the Litigation Association. The aim is to find an out-of-court solution or to take legal action to enforce the rights of victims of discrimination. These legal and supportive measures are crucial to strengthening protection against racial discrimination in Austria and dealing with cases of discrimination appropriately (see Racism Report 2022: https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA-Rassismus_Report_2022.pdf). 
Anti-Muslim racism is a worrying and growing phenomenon in Austria. According to the Anti-Muslim Racism Report 2023 by the Documentation Centre Austria, a total of 1522 cases were reported, a record high since the beginning of the survey. Two thirds of these incidents took place online, while the rest occurred in the real world, including discrimination in public spaces, such as verbal insults and physical assaults. Women, especially those wearing headscarves, are particularly affected.
In the education sector, incidents such as insulting comments from classmates or threats from school administrators towards praying Muslim pupils have been documented. The spread of hate online is particularly problematic, accounting for almost 90 per cent of reported online incidents. Experts warn that these incidents are deepening social divisions and threatening social cohesion (see documentary Report 2023: https://dokustelle.at/reports/dokustelle-report-2023). In an open letter to the Austrian federal government, civil society calls for the introduction of the criminal offence of „political Islam“ to be dropped. The reason for this is the lack of scientific uniformity in the definition of this term, which could allow it to be used indiscriminately. The concern is that this could lead to generalised suspicions and executive measures against Muslims. The organisation also appeals for protection against discrimination and the preservation of religious freedom by ensuring that state authorities allow all communities to practise their religion freely and equally. It also emphasises that deradicalisation and counter-terrorism strategies must respect the rights of Muslim women to protection from discrimination and freedom of expression. Finally, it calls for religious practices and clothing not to be used as indicators of radicalisation and for surveillance not to be carried out on the basis of membership of Islam or Muslim organisations in order to avoid blanket criminalisation.    In 2023, the Documentation Centre Austria documented a total of 1522 racist attacks against Muslim
and persons perceived as Muslim. This figure is made up of cases that were reported offline and cases that were recorded as part of intensified online monitoring. However, the organisation emphasises that the actual number of attacks is likely to be higher;
While there are political strategies against anti-Semitism, there is no comparable approach to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgements against people perceived as Muslim. The establishment of the Documentation Centre for Political Islam and Operation Luxor reinforce a general suspicion of Muslims and lead to people withdrawing from social discourse, a reduction in diversity of opinion and restrictions on participation. Freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly can be restricted on the basis of membership of a particular group, which has a negative impact on basic democratic principles (Website of the Federal Chancellery – Documentation Centre for Political Islam: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2020/integrationsministerin-raab-dokumentationsstelle-politischer-islam-nimmt-arbeit-auf.html).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Consolidate and strengthen existing anti-discrimination legislation to provide comprehensive equal protection, particularly in access to goods and services, on all prohibited grounds of discrimination

Proponent:

Ireland


Ireland

Ireland


Ireland

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has still not implemented standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination with large gaps in protection outside the world of work. When it comes to access to goods and services, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief or sexual orientation, and therefore not in the case of multiple discrimination. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education and there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection. There is no explicit legal protection against intersectional discrimination and discrimination based on gender identity, expression or characteristics. The anti-discrimination laws and the respective equality bodies at federal and state level are organised very differently, which makes access to justice more difficult. Those affected by discrimination usually have to take legal action individually. The amounts of damages awarded in practice are low and there is a lack of effective statutory minimum compensation and injunctive relief. A collective action as a collective legal protection instrument only exists in cases of discrimination on the basis of disability.    The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection (see government programme 2025-2029 as a PDF on the website of the Federal Chancellery: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html available).  

Progress: No progress

Continue the ongoing efforts to prevent and fight discrimination on any ground, including by harmonizing and extending the scope of anti-discrimination laws

Proponent:

Italy


Italian Republic

Italy


Italian Republic

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

It should be noted that in Austria, both the development and implementation of measures to combat discrimination have been driven forward in close cooperation with various civil society organisations. However, it must be noted that the public discourse often focuses on so-called „immigrant anti-Semitism“ and thus accuses people with migration experience from Turkey and Arabic-speaking countries in particular of anti-Semitism across the board. However, there is a lack of clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-Black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Few concrete measures have been taken so far. There is a lack of targeted awareness-raising measures that address discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities as well as aspects of self-empowerment and human rights. In Austria, a number of different laws regulate protection against discrimination at state and federal level. This makes the enforcement of the law complex in some cases, protection is not standardised and – contrary to numerous calls in the UPR process and in numerous other monitoring processes on human rights conventions – there are significant gaps in protection: 1. in terms of access to goods and services in the private sector, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief and sexual orientation. This fact has been criticised for years by numerous civil society organisations and equality actors as a lack of levelling up.
2) Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education.
3. there is also a lack of comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.
In addition, the law contains provisions on the reversal of the burden of proof, which makes it easier for the person affected to prove discrimination, as well as provisions for possible claims for damages and compensation (see Equal Treatment Act, GIBG Federal Law Gazette I No. 66/2004: https://ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20003395&FassungVom=2022-02-10). The Introductory Act to the Administrative Procedure Acts (EGVG) provides a legal basis for dealing with racist refusal of admission in Austria. According to this law, both victims and witnesses of racist discrimination can report such incidents. Police officers are obliged to forward these reports to the competent district administrative authority. The procedure under the EGVG is free of charge for the person making the report. The reporting person or organisation, such as ZARA or the Litigation Association, are not informed of the outcome of the proceedings and have no direct party status. In addition, the EGVG does not provide for compensation for the person discriminated against. Instead, offenders can be fined up to 1,090 euros, an amount that has not been evaluated for years. In the event of repeated violations of the EGVG, the trade authority can theoretically withdraw the trade licence. ZARA supports those affected by discrimination through various measures, including letters of intervention to the establishments concerned, legal advice and referral to other legal bodies such as the Equal Treatment Ombudsman’s Office or the Litigation Association. The aim is to find an out-of-court solution or to take legal action to enforce the rights of victims of discrimination. These legal and supportive measures are crucial to strengthening protection against racial discrimination in Austria and dealing with cases of discrimination appropriately (see Racism Report 2022: https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA-Rassismus_Report_2022.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Continue consolidating the normative framework to effectively combat all forms of discrimination

Proponent:

Montenegro


Montenegro

Montenegro


Montenegro

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, a number of different laws regulate protection against discrimination at state and federal level. This makes the enforcement of the law complex in some cases, protection is not standardised and – contrary to numerous calls in the UPR process and in numerous other monitoring processes on human rights conventions – there are significant gaps in protection: 1. in terms of access to goods and services in the private sector, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief and sexual orientation. This fact has been criticised for years by numerous civil society organisations and equality actors as a lack of levelling up.
2) Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education.
3. there is also a lack of comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.
In addition, the law contains provisions on the reversal of the burden of proof, which makes it easier for the person affected to prove discrimination, as well as provisions for possible claims for damages and compensation (see Equal Treatment Act, GIBG Federal Law Gazette I No. 66/2004: https://ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20003395&FassungVom=2022-02-10). The Introductory Act to the Administrative Procedure Acts (EGVG) provides a legal basis for dealing with racist refusal of admission in Austria. According to this law, both victims and witnesses of racist discrimination can report such incidents. Police officers are obliged to forward these reports to the competent district administrative authority. The procedure under the EGVG is free of charge for the person making the report. The reporting person or organisation, such as ZARA or the Litigation Association, are not informed of the outcome of the proceedings and have no direct party status. In addition, the EGVG does not provide for compensation for the person discriminated against. Instead, offenders can be fined up to 1,090 euros, an amount that has not been evaluated for years. In the event of repeated violations of the EGVG, the trade authority can theoretically withdraw the trade licence. ZARA supports those affected by discrimination through various measures, including letters of intervention to the establishments concerned, legal advice and referral to other legal bodies such as the Equal Treatment Ombudsman’s Office or the Litigation Association. The aim is to find an out-of-court solution or to take legal action to enforce the rights of victims of discrimination. These legal and supportive measures are crucial to strengthening protection against racial discrimination in Austria and dealing with cases of discrimination appropriately (see Racism Report 2022: https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA-Rassismus_Report_2022.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Ensure equal protection from all forms of discrimination, including by harmonizing and strengthening the scope of anti-discrimination laws in particular with respect to religion and belief and sexual orientation and gender identity

Proponent:

Netherlands


Kingdom of the Netherlands

Netherlands


Kingdom of the Netherlands

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

In Austria, a number of different laws regulate protection against discrimination at state and federal level. This makes the enforcement of the law complex in some cases, protection is not standardised and – contrary to numerous calls in the UPR process and in numerous other monitoring processes on human rights conventions – there are significant gaps in protection: 1. in terms of access to goods and services in the private sector, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief and sexual orientation. This fact has been criticised for years by numerous civil society organisations and equality actors as a lack of levelling up.
2) Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education.
3. there is also a lack of comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.
In addition, the law contains provisions on the reversal of the burden of proof, which makes it easier for the person affected to prove discrimination, as well as provisions for possible claims for damages and compensation (see Equal Treatment Act, GIBG Federal Law Gazette I No. 66/2004: https://ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20003395&FassungVom=2022-02-10). The Introductory Act to the Administrative Procedure Acts (EGVG) provides a legal basis for dealing with racist refusal of admission in Austria. According to this law, both victims and witnesses of racist discrimination can report such incidents. Police officers are obliged to forward these reports to the competent district administrative authority. The procedure under the EGVG is free of charge for the person making the report. The reporting person or organisation, such as ZARA or the Litigation Association, are not informed of the outcome of the proceedings and have no direct party status. In addition, the EGVG does not provide for compensation for the person discriminated against. Instead, offenders can be fined up to 1,090 euros, an amount that has not been evaluated for years. In the event of repeated violations of the EGVG, the trade authority can theoretically withdraw the trade licence. ZARA supports those affected by discrimination through various measures, including letters of intervention to the establishments concerned, legal advice and referral to other legal bodies such as the Equal Treatment Ombudsman’s Office or the Litigation Association. The aim is to find an out-of-court solution or to take legal action to enforce the rights of victims of discrimination. These legal and supportive measures are crucial to strengthening protection against racial discrimination in Austria and dealing with cases of discrimination appropriately (see Racism Report 2022: https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA-Rassismus_Report_2022.pdf). 
There is still no standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination in Austria. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination. When it comes to access to goods and services, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief or sexual orientation. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education. Similarly, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.    There is no explicit legal protection against intersectional discrimination and discrimination based on gender identity, gender expression or gender characteristics. The anti-discrimination laws and the respective equality bodies at federal and state level are organised very differently, which makes access to justice more difficult.
Those affected by discrimination usually have to take legal action individually. The amounts of damages awarded in practice are low and there is a lack of effective statutory minimum compensation and injunctive relief. A collective action as a collective legal protection instrument only exists in cases of discrimination on the basis of disability.
The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html   As part of the government plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see government plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).
While there are political strategies against anti-Semitism, there is no comparable approach to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgements against people perceived as Muslim. The establishment of the Documentation Centre for Political Islam and Operation Luxor reinforce a general suspicion of Muslims and lead to people withdrawing from social discourse, a reduction in diversity of opinion and restrictions on participation. Freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly can be restricted on the basis of membership of a particular group, which has a negative impact on basic democratic principles (Website of the Federal Chancellery – Documentation Centre for Political Islam: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2020/integrationsministerin-raab-dokumentationsstelle-politischer-islam-nimmt-arbeit-auf.html).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).In July 2021, the „anti-terror package“ was passed in Austria, but this raised concerns from civil society organisations and UN experts. In particular, it was feared that the paragraph on „religiously motivated extremist connections“ could stigmatise Muslims (see Terrorism Prevention Act – TeBG (849 d.B.): https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/I/849).   Despite concerns, law enforcement agencies used facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, resulting in potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and effective mechanisms to investigate these practices were lacking (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities entered into force in Austria on 1 July 1998 in order to protect and promote the rights of national minorities. The current report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention emphasises that Austria is continuing its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities. Despite a significant increase in funding for national minorities to almost 8 million euros in 2021 and the adoption of new laws to combat hate speech and violent hate crimes, challenges remain, particularly in minority language education and in the area of mutual respect and intercultural dialogue.   In contrast, there is no clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Little action has been taken, particularly with regard to awareness-raising measures against discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities, as well as promoting self-empowerment and human rights. 

Progress: No progress

Increase efforts to eradicate Islamophobia and anti-Muslim incidents and introduce a comprehensive data collection system offering a view of cases of such incidents, including hate speech and hate crime

Proponent:

Turkey


Republic of Turkey

Turkey


Republic of Turkey

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet implemented some of the recommendations of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) from the 2015 report „General Policy Recommendations No. 15 on Combating Hate Speech“. These include, in particular, the pending ratification of the „Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime“ and „Protocol No. 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms“.
ECRI also emphasises that politicians should take a clear stance against racist hate speech and that political parties should introduce codes of conduct that prohibit the use of hate speech. These recommendations have not yet been heeded.  
Anti-Muslim racism is a worrying and growing phenomenon in Austria. According to the Anti-Muslim Racism Report 2023 by the Documentation Centre Austria, a total of 1522 cases were reported, a record high since the beginning of the survey. Two thirds of these incidents took place online, while the rest occurred in the real world, including discrimination in public spaces, such as verbal insults and physical assaults. Women, especially those wearing headscarves, are particularly affected.
In the education sector, incidents such as insulting comments from classmates or threats from school administrators towards praying Muslim pupils have been documented. The spread of hate online is particularly problematic, accounting for almost 90 per cent of reported online incidents. Experts warn that these incidents are deepening social divisions and threatening social cohesion (see documentary Report 2023: https://dokustelle.at/reports/dokustelle-report-2023). In an open letter to the Austrian federal government, civil society calls for the introduction of the criminal offence of „political Islam“ to be dropped. The reason for this is the lack of scientific uniformity in the definition of this term, which could allow it to be used indiscriminately. The concern is that this could lead to generalised suspicions and executive measures against Muslims. The organisation also appeals for protection against discrimination and the preservation of religious freedom by ensuring that state authorities allow all communities to practise their religion freely and equally. It also emphasises that deradicalisation and counter-terrorism strategies must respect the rights of Muslim women to protection from discrimination and freedom of expression. Finally, it calls for religious practices and clothing not to be used as indicators of radicalisation and for surveillance not to be carried out on the basis of membership of Islam or Muslim organisations in order to avoid blanket criminalisation.    In 2023, the Documentation Centre Austria documented a total of 1522 racist attacks against Muslim
and persons perceived as Muslim. This figure is made up of cases that were reported offline and cases that were recorded as part of intensified online monitoring. However, the organisation emphasises that the actual number of attacks is likely to be higher;

Progress: No progress

Avoid unequal treatment or discrimination of certain groups on ideological or religious grounds and ensure the constitutionality of laws

Proponent:

Turkey


Republic of Turkey

Turkey


Republic of Turkey

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

A large number of measures have been taken since 2021 to combat all forms of antisemitism. A central coordination centre for the topic of anti-Semitism has been set up at the Federal Chancellery and a national strategy against anti-Semitism has been published (see https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:8bd2975f-0483-4e74-abd9-d66446195d7c/antisemitismusstrategie.pdf). Even though the position has now been downgraded to a department in the Policy Section, it still exists in principle.   Two implementation reports are available (for 2021 and 2022). For the education sector, a strategy paper on the „Prevention of antisemitism through education“ was developed in 2022, which contains recommendations for the implementation of the National Strategy against Antisemitism for the Austrian education administration and teacher training institutions (see: https://oead.at/fileadmin/Dokumente/oead.at/KIM/Downloadcenter/OeAD_E.AT_Strategiepapier_FIN_01.pdf). These recommendations were discussed at the symposium on „Preventing antisemitism through education“ in September 2022. In 2022, the National Forum against Antisemitism was also established to pool knowledge, combat antisemitism and promote Jewish life in Austria. The body is made up of representatives from the federal government, the provinces, municipalities, social partners, academia, religious communities, Jewish museums and civil society. A working group on the documentation of anti-Semitic incidents was also established with the aim of learning from the experiences of other organisations that already document racist, anti-Semitic, etc. incidents. The aim is to learn from the experiences of other organisations already documenting racist, anti-Semitic incidents in order to set up an anti-Semitism documentation centre that meets current requirements.   Parliament also commissioned a study on anti-Semitism in Austria, which was presented in April 2023 (see https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/fachinfos/publikationen/Langbericht-Antisemitismus-2022-Oesterreichweite-Ergebnisse.pdf). While there are political strategies against anti-Semitism, there is no comparable approach to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgements of people perceived as Muslim. The establishment of the Documentation Centre for Political Islam and Operation Luxor reinforce a general suspicion of Muslims and lead to people withdrawing from social discourse, a reduction in diversity of opinion and restrictions on participation. Freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly can be restricted on the basis of membership of a particular group, which has a negative impact on basic democratic principles (website of the Federal Chancellery – Documentation Centre for Political Islam: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2020/integrationsministerin-raab-dokumentationsstelle-politischer-islam-nimmt-arbeit-auf.html). Regarding hate speech on the internet, the Hate on the Net Act was introduced to help victims of online hate, including group-focused misanthropy (HiNBG see: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblAuth/BGBLA_2020_I_148/BGBLA_2020_I_148.html). 

Progress: No progress

Guarantee the recognition, protection and defense of minorities’ rights in the country, as well as adopt legislation against discrimination on the basis of religion, age, disability, sexual orientation and gender identity

Proponent:

Costa Rica


Republic of Costa Rica

Costa Rica


Republic of Costa Rica

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

There is still no standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination in Austria. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination. When it comes to access to goods and services, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief or sexual orientation. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education. Similarly, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.    There is no explicit legal protection against intersectional discrimination and discrimination based on gender identity, gender expression or gender characteristics. The anti-discrimination laws and the respective equality bodies at federal and state level are organised very differently, which makes access to justice more difficult.
Those affected by discrimination usually have to take legal action individually. The amounts of damages awarded in practice are low and there is a lack of effective statutory minimum compensation and injunctive relief. A collective action as a collective legal protection instrument only exists in cases of discrimination on the basis of disability.
The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html   As part of the government plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see government plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).
There is still no standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination in Austria. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination.    There have recently been selective amendments to the law against age discrimination, for example in the area of lending. However, there is still no comprehensive ban on discrimination in access to goods and services on the basis of age, religion and belief and sexual orientation (protection exists in federal law, which in the majority of cases only applies on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education. Similarly, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection. The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection (see government programme: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).   In summary, civil society appeals to the federal government to pursue a policy that focuses on the promotion rather than the restriction of fundamental and human rights. The involvement of civil society expertise is considered essential (see Open Letter: https://archiv2022.asyl.at/de/info/news/offenerbriefandiebundesregierung/index.html). While there are political strategies against anti-Semitism, there is no comparable approach to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgements against people perceived as Muslim. The establishment of the Documentation Centre for Political Islam and Operation Luxor reinforce a general suspicion of Muslims and lead to people withdrawing from social discourse, a reduction in diversity of opinion and restrictions on participation. Freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly can be restricted on the basis of membership of a particular group, which has a negative impact on basic democratic principles (Website of the Federal Chancellery – Documentation Centre for Political Islam: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2020/integrationsministerin-raab-dokumentationsstelle-politischer-islam-nimmt-arbeit-auf.html).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).In July 2021, the „anti-terror package“ was passed in Austria, but this raised concerns from civil society organisations and UN experts. In particular, it was feared that the paragraph on „religiously motivated extremist connections“ could stigmatise Muslims (see Terrorism Prevention Act – TeBG (849 d.B.): https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/I/849).   Despite concerns, law enforcement agencies used facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, resulting in potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and effective mechanisms to investigate these practices were lacking (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities entered into force in Austria on 1 July 1998 in order to protect and promote the rights of national minorities. The current report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention emphasises that Austria is continuing its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities. Despite a significant increase in funding for national minorities to almost 8 million euros in 2021 and the adoption of new laws to combat hate speech and violent hate crimes, challenges remain, particularly in minority language education and in the area of mutual respect and intercultural dialogue.   In contrast, there is no clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Little action has been taken, particularly with regard to awareness-raising measures against discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities, as well as promoting self-empowerment and human rights. {Minderhieten-Diskriminierung}

Progress: No progress

Accept a comprehensive strategy to eliminate all kinds of discrimination on the basis of religion and belief, age, sexual orientation and gender identity

Proponent:

North Korea


Democratic People's Republic of Korea

North Korea


Democratic People's Republic of Korea

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

There is still no standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination in Austria. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination. When it comes to access to goods and services, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief or sexual orientation. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education. Similarly, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.    There is no explicit legal protection against intersectional discrimination and discrimination based on gender identity, gender expression or gender characteristics. The anti-discrimination laws and the respective equality bodies at federal and state level are organised very differently, which makes access to justice more difficult.
Those affected by discrimination usually have to take legal action individually. The amounts of damages awarded in practice are low and there is a lack of effective statutory minimum compensation and injunctive relief. A collective action as a collective legal protection instrument only exists in cases of discrimination on the basis of disability.
The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html   As part of the government plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see government plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).
There is still no standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination in Austria. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination.    There have recently been selective amendments to the law against age discrimination, for example in the area of lending. However, there is still no comprehensive ban on discrimination in access to goods and services on the basis of age, religion and belief and sexual orientation (protection exists in federal law, which in the majority of cases only applies on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education. Similarly, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection. The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection (see government programme: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).   In summary, civil society appeals to the federal government to pursue a policy that focuses on the promotion rather than the restriction of fundamental and human rights. The involvement of civil society expertise is considered essential (see Open Letter: https://archiv2022.asyl.at/de/info/news/offenerbriefandiebundesregierung/index.html). While there are political strategies against anti-Semitism, there is no comparable approach to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgements against people perceived as Muslim. The establishment of the Documentation Centre for Political Islam and Operation Luxor reinforce a general suspicion of Muslims and lead to people withdrawing from social discourse, a reduction in diversity of opinion and restrictions on participation. Freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly can be restricted on the basis of membership of a particular group, which has a negative impact on basic democratic principles (Website of the Federal Chancellery – Documentation Centre for Political Islam: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2020/integrationsministerin-raab-dokumentationsstelle-politischer-islam-nimmt-arbeit-auf.html).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).In July 2021, the „anti-terror package“ was passed in Austria, but this raised concerns from civil society organisations and UN experts. In particular, it was feared that the paragraph on „religiously motivated extremist connections“ could stigmatise Muslims (see Terrorism Prevention Act – TeBG (849 d.B.): https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/I/849).   Despite concerns, law enforcement agencies used facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, resulting in potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and effective mechanisms to investigate these practices were lacking (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities entered into force in Austria on 1 July 1998 in order to protect and promote the rights of national minorities. The current report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention emphasises that Austria is continuing its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities. Despite a significant increase in funding for national minorities to almost 8 million euros in 2021 and the adoption of new laws to combat hate speech and violent hate crimes, challenges remain, particularly in minority language education and in the area of mutual respect and intercultural dialogue.   In contrast, there is no clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Little action has been taken, particularly with regard to awareness-raising measures against discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities, as well as promoting self-empowerment and human rights. 

Progress: No progress

End the exacerbated increase in racism, hate speech, xenophobia, Islamophobia and racial violence against minorities, refugees and migrants

Proponent:

Venezuela


Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

Venezuela


Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

While there are political strategies against anti-Semitism, there is no comparable approach to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgements of people perceived as Muslim. The establishment of the Documentation Centre for Political Islam and Operation Luxor reinforce a general suspicion of Muslims and lead to people withdrawing from social discourse, a reduction in diversity of opinion and restrictions on participation. Freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly can be restricted on the basis of membership of a particular group, which has a negative impact on basic democratic principles (Website of the Federal Chancellery – Documentation Centre for Political Islam: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2020/integrationsministerin-raab-dokumentationsstelle-politischer-islam-nimmt-arbeit-auf.html). Austria should step up its efforts to combat discrimination and hate speech against ethnic minorities, immigrants and refugees. It is crucial to provide additional resources for the prosecution of hate crimes while strengthening prevention. This applies in particular to combating discrimination against Muslims, Roma, people of African descent, refugees and migrants. The promotion of awareness campaigns and cooperation with civil society organisations are important elements in promoting an inclusive and tolerant society.  There is a lack of political strategy, particularly with regard to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgement of people perceived as Muslim. According to a study by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRAU), many migrants reported everyday experiences of discrimination and xenophobia. Data from the organisation ZARA- Zivilcourage und Antirassismus Arbeit documented around 1,300 racist incidents in 2023, which represents a decrease compared to previous years, but still shows a high level (see Zara Racism Report 2023, Data and Analyses, page 10ff: https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA_RassismusReport_2023_DE.pdf).
Particularly alarming was an increase in active case reports of more than 100% compared to 2022, with the months of May, October, November and December standing out in particular. These increases correlated with national and global developments, including political events and media coverage of Muslim communities;
In 2022, 1,080 right-wing extremist offences were registered in Austria, with a significant proportion of these offences motivated by xenophobia. These incidents include both physical violence and damage to property specifically targeting migrants (see statistics on the number of right-wing offences in Austria, 2023: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/881250/umfrage/rechte-straftaten-in-oesterreich-nach-bereichen/). With the systematic recording of hate crimes motivated by prejudice and the publication of statistics on hate crimes recorded by the police, a first important step has been taken to make hate crimes visible. It is important to observe the extent to which the views of the police and victim protection organisations or community organisations agree on whether an incident should be classified as a hate crime or not. These observations are an important basis for the reliability of the statistics on hate crimes that are now being collected. The documentation of anti-Muslim attacks in Austria covers a variety of offences ranging from unequal treatment and insults to physical violence and vandalism. A particular focus was placed on online platforms, where a significant proportion of hate speech against Muslims is recorded, with the dissemination of hate comments accounting for the largest share at 87%. The attacks were documented in various categories of offences, including unequal treatment, insults, spreading hate, physical assaults and vandalism. Particular attention was also paid to online platforms, where the majority of hate speech against Muslims was recorded, with the spread of hate comments accounting for the largest share at 87%.The Documentation Centre Austria worked closely with various organisations, including the Initiative for a Non-Discriminatory Education System (IDB), the association ZARA – Zivilcourage & Anti-Rassismus-Arbeit and the Ombud for Equal Treatment (GAW), to document these cases and support measures against anti-Muslim racism (see Anti-Muslim Racism Report 2023: https://dokustelle.at/fileadmin/Dokuments/Reports/Report_2023/Dokustelle_OEsterreich_Report_2023_-_27.05.2024.pdf).  In 2021, funding for ethnic groups in Austria was significantly increased, with funding now totalling almost 8 million euros. New laws were also adopted to combat hate speech on the internet and violent hate crimes (ACFC/OP/V(2023)002, 5th Review Report of the Advisory Committee for the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe: https://rm.coe.int/5th-op-austria-de-full-version/1680ace87b). Nevertheless, challenges remain, particularly in the area of minority language teaching and with regard to mutual respect and intercultural dialogue in society. In Austria, the Framework Convention is implemented and monitored by a dialogue platform in which government representatives, civil society organisations and experts from science and research work together. This dialogue process is crucial for compliance with the provisions of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (further information on the website of the Federal Chancellery: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/volksgruppen/roma-strategie.html).  On a positive note, the Federal Ministry of the Interior has integrated the systematic recording of prejudice motives in premeditated offences into police work as part of an EU project. For this purpose, the category „Hate crime“ was introduced in the police logging programme (PAD) as a separate „Motive“ tab with the title „Prejudice motives (hate crime) according to victim groups“. The recorded data is transmitted to the justice system via a separate interface: Electronic Legal Transactions (ERV) and subjected to quality assurance by the Federal Ministry of the Interior. Around 30,000 police officers throughout Austria have been prepared for this task by completing e-learning seminars and receiving training as multipliers. The police now work on the basis of a victim-centred approach, actively listening to those affected and investigating consistently to ensure appropriate prosecution. These measures are designed to help tackle bias crime and improve safety for all citizens. The Report of the Federal Ministry of the Interior on Hate Crime in Austria – Annual Report 2021 was published for the first time in 2022. In the period from January to December 2021, 5,464 offences motivated by prejudice were recorded by the police (Report of the Federal Ministry of the Interior on „Hate Crime“ in Austria 2021: https://www.bmi.gv.at/408/Projekt/files/218_2021_Hate_Crime_Bericht_2021_GESAMT_V20220510_barrierefrei.pdf). With the systematic recording of hate crimes motivated by prejudice and the publication of statistics on hate crimes recorded by the police, a first important step has been taken to make hate crimes visible. It is important to observe the extent to which the views of the police and victim protection organisations or community organisations agree on whether an incident should be classified as a hate crime or not. These observations are an important basis for the reliability of the statistics on hate crimes that are now being collected.  Austria has launched programmes and initiatives to promote tolerance and integration. Nevertheless, reports of discrimination and hate speech continue to emerge, suggesting that further action is needed to address these issues. There is a need for continuous monitoring and improvement to ensure that efforts to combat hate speech and discrimination are effective and that the communities affected are sufficiently protected. 

Progress: No progress

Work towards guaranteeing access to legal gender recognition for intersex, transgender and non-binary people to all six current existing options of gender markers, without any barriers, based on self-identification

Proponent:

Malta


Republic of Malta

Malta


Republic of Malta

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In June 2018, the Austrian Constitutional Court ruled in its decision G 77/2018 that intersex people have the right to an appropriate designation in the civil status register (available as a PDF on the website of the Constitutional Court of Austria (VfGH): https://www.vfgh.gv.at/downloads/VfGH_Entscheidung_G_77-2018_unbestimmtes_Geschlecht_anonym.pdf ).  However, the Federal Ministry of the Interior subsequently issued a decree stating that intersex people may only receive one of the specified gender entries (inter, diverse, open, deletion) and only by means of a medical expert opinion (available as a PDF on the website of the Association of Intersex People Austria: https://vimoe.at/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-09-ErlassGeschlechtseintragNeu.pdf ). The Verein Intergeschlechtlicher Menschen Österreich (VIMÖ/OII Austria) demands that inter*, trans* and non-binary people be guaranteed unhindered access to legal recognition of their gender on the basis of self-identification and that gender entries can be chosen in a self-determined manner without pathologising hurdles. This corresponds to the first part of this recommendation;

Progress: No progress

Enact legislations specific to conflict-affected areas and to provide conflict-specific guidance and advice for business enterprises on ensuring respect for human rights to prevent and address the heightened risk of corporate involvement in gross human right violations in conflict affected areas including situations of foreign occupation

Proponent:

Palestine


State of Palestine

Palestine


State of Palestine

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there is currently no specific legislation to guide companies in conflict areas to respect human rights. The focus is on general human rights issues in Austria. According to Amnesty International, there are insufficient measures to systematically prevent human rights violations and there are no specific regulations for companies in conflict zones. So far, efforts have tended to focus on general human rights obligations and domestic human rights issues. 

Progress: No progress

Adopt a national action plan on business and human rights in accordance with the UN Guiding Principles on that issue

Proponent:

Switzerland


Swiss Confederation

Switzerland


Swiss Confederation

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Regrettably, however, there is no National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights in line with the UN Guiding Principles. The implementation of such a plan has so far failed to materialise.   In 2016, the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights published the final Guidelines for National Action Plans, which are the result of an open, global consultation process involving states, businesses, civil society, national human rights institutions and academia. These guidelines build on the Working Group’s 2014 report to the UN General Assembly on National Action Plans (see Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 2014: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blob/266624/b51c16faf1b3424d7efa060e8aaa8130/un-leitprinzipien-de-data.pdf). The Working Group has engaged intensively with governments on this topic, both through a survey in 2014 and through an online consultation on the content elements of a National Action Plan.   The UN Working Group encourages all states to develop, adopt and regularly update a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights. This plan is central to the dissemination and implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The responsibility to introduce such plans lies within the scope of states‘ obligations in relation to the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.   Unfortunately, such initiatives have not yet taken place in Austria and implementation remains outstanding. This raises important questions about the prioritisation and implementation of these fundamental measures aimed at protecting and promoting human rights in the context of business activities;

Progress: No progress

Adopt a national action plan on business and human rights

Proponent:

Luxembourg


Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Luxembourg


Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Regrettably, however, there is no National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights in line with the UN Guiding Principles. The implementation of such a plan has so far failed to materialise.   In 2016, the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights published the final Guidelines for National Action Plans, which are the result of an open, global consultation process involving states, businesses, civil society, national human rights institutions and academia. These guidelines build on the Working Group’s 2014 report to the UN General Assembly on National Action Plans (see Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 2014: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blob/266624/b51c16faf1b3424d7efa060e8aaa8130/un-leitprinzipien-de-data.pdf). The Working Group has engaged intensively with governments on this topic, both through a survey in 2014 and through an online consultation on the content elements of a National Action Plan.   The UN Working Group encourages all states to develop, adopt and regularly update a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights. This plan is central to the dissemination and implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The responsibility to introduce such plans lies within the scope of states‘ obligations in relation to the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.   Unfortunately, such initiatives have not yet taken place in Austria and implementation remains outstanding. This raises important questions about the prioritisation and implementation of these fundamental measures aimed at protecting and promoting human rights in the context of business activities;

Progress: No progress

Develop a national plan on business and human rights, in line with national and international human rights standards in the business sector

Proponent:

Chile


Republic of Chile

Chile


Republic of Chile

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Regrettably, however, there is no National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights in line with the UN Guiding Principles. The implementation of such a plan has so far failed to materialise.   In 2016, the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights published the final Guidelines for National Action Plans, which are the result of an open, global consultation process involving states, businesses, civil society, national human rights institutions and academia. These guidelines build on the Working Group’s 2014 report to the UN General Assembly on National Action Plans (see Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 2014: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blob/266624/b51c16faf1b3424d7efa060e8aaa8130/un-leitprinzipien-de-data.pdf). The Working Group has engaged intensively with governments on this topic, both through a survey in 2014 and through an online consultation on the content elements of a National Action Plan.   The UN Working Group encourages all states to develop, adopt and regularly update a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights. This plan is central to the dissemination and implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The responsibility to introduce such plans lies within the scope of states‘ obligations in relation to the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.   Unfortunately, such initiatives have not yet taken place in Austria and implementation remains outstanding. This raises important questions about the prioritisation and implementation of these fundamental measures aimed at protecting and promoting human rights in the context of business activities;

Progress: No progress

Develop and adopt a National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights

Proponent:

Germany


Federal Republic of Germany

Germany


Federal Republic of Germany

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Regrettably, however, there is no National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights in line with the UN Guiding Principles. The implementation of such a plan has so far failed to materialise.   In 2016, the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights published the final Guidelines for National Action Plans, which are the result of an open, global consultation process involving states, businesses, civil society, national human rights institutions and academia. These guidelines build on the Working Group’s 2014 report to the UN General Assembly on National Action Plans (see Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 2014: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blob/266624/b51c16faf1b3424d7efa060e8aaa8130/un-leitprinzipien-de-data.pdf). The Working Group has engaged intensively with governments on this topic, both through a survey in 2014 and through an online consultation on the content elements of a National Action Plan.   The UN Working Group encourages all states to develop, adopt and regularly update a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights. This plan is central to the dissemination and implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The responsibility to introduce such plans lies within the scope of states‘ obligations in relation to the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.   Unfortunately, such initiatives have not yet taken place in Austria and implementation remains outstanding. This raises important questions about the prioritisation and implementation of these fundamental measures aimed at protecting and promoting human rights in the context of business activities;

Progress: No progress

Strengthen efforts towards respecting human rights in business activities, including the adoption of a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights

Proponent:

Japan


Japan

Japan


Japan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Regrettably, however, there is no National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights in line with the UN Guiding Principles. The implementation of such a plan has so far failed to materialise.   In 2016, the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights published the final Guidelines for National Action Plans, which are the result of an open, global consultation process involving states, businesses, civil society, national human rights institutions and academia. These guidelines build on the Working Group’s 2014 report to the UN General Assembly on National Action Plans (see Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 2014: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blob/266624/b51c16faf1b3424d7efa060e8aaa8130/un-leitprinzipien-de-data.pdf). The Working Group has engaged intensively with governments on this topic, both through a survey in 2014 and through an online consultation on the content elements of a National Action Plan.   The UN Working Group encourages all states to develop, adopt and regularly update a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights. This plan is central to the dissemination and implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The responsibility to introduce such plans lies within the scope of states‘ obligations in relation to the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.   Unfortunately, such initiatives have not yet taken place in Austria and implementation remains outstanding. This raises important questions about the prioritisation and implementation of these fundamental measures aimed at protecting and promoting human rights in the context of business activities;

Progress: No progress

Continue efforts towards the adoption of a national action plan on business and human rights

Proponent:

Mozambique


Republic of Mozambique

Mozambique


Republic of Mozambique

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Regrettably, however, there is no National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights in line with the UN Guiding Principles. The implementation of such a plan has so far failed to materialise.   In 2016, the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights published the final Guidelines for National Action Plans, which are the result of an open, global consultation process involving states, businesses, civil society, national human rights institutions and academia. These guidelines build on the Working Group’s 2014 report to the UN General Assembly on National Action Plans (see Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 2014: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blob/266624/b51c16faf1b3424d7efa060e8aaa8130/un-leitprinzipien-de-data.pdf). The Working Group has engaged intensively with governments on this topic, both through a survey in 2014 and through an online consultation on the content elements of a National Action Plan.   The UN Working Group encourages all states to develop, adopt and regularly update a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights. This plan is central to the dissemination and implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The responsibility to introduce such plans lies within the scope of states‘ obligations in relation to the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.   Unfortunately, such initiatives have not yet taken place in Austria and implementation remains outstanding. This raises important questions about the prioritisation and implementation of these fundamental measures aimed at protecting and promoting human rights in the context of business activities;

Progress: No progress

Take measures to release an Action Plan on business and human rights

Proponent:

Poland


Republic of Poland

Poland


Republic of Poland

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Regrettably, however, there is no National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights in line with the UN Guiding Principles. The implementation of such a plan has so far failed to materialise.   In 2016, the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights published the final Guidelines for National Action Plans, which are the result of an open, global consultation process involving states, businesses, civil society, national human rights institutions and academia. These guidelines build on the Working Group’s 2014 report to the UN General Assembly on National Action Plans (see Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 2014: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blob/266624/b51c16faf1b3424d7efa060e8aaa8130/un-leitprinzipien-de-data.pdf). The Working Group has engaged intensively with governments on this topic, both through a survey in 2014 and through an online consultation on the content elements of a National Action Plan.   The UN Working Group encourages all states to develop, adopt and regularly update a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights. This plan is central to the dissemination and implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The responsibility to introduce such plans lies within the scope of states‘ obligations in relation to the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.   Unfortunately, such initiatives have not yet taken place in Austria and implementation remains outstanding. This raises important questions about the prioritisation and implementation of these fundamental measures aimed at protecting and promoting human rights in the context of business activities;

Progress: No progress

Create an Inter-ministerial Working Group on Men and Boys, to support national gender equality initiatives, with a view to promoting positive masculinity norms and combating violence against men and boys

Proponent:

Haiti


Republic of Haiti

Haiti


Republic of Haiti

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there is currently no inter-ministerial working group specifically dedicated to supporting national gender equality initiatives for men and boys with the stated aim of promoting positive masculinity norms and combating violence against men and boys. This initiative has not yet been adopted by Austria. 

Progress: In progress

Guarantee the freedom of religion or belief for all and ensure the rights of Muslims to practice religion freely including the wearing of veils

Proponent:

Sudan


Republic of Sudan

Sudan


Republic of Sudan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Anti-Muslim racism is a worrying and growing phenomenon in Austria. According to the Anti-Muslim Racism Report 2023 by the Documentation Centre Austria, a total of 1522 cases were reported, a record high since the beginning of the survey. Two thirds of these incidents took place online, while the rest occurred in the real world, including discrimination in public spaces, such as verbal insults and physical assaults. Women, especially those wearing headscarves, are particularly affected.
In the education sector, incidents such as insulting comments from classmates or threats from school administrators towards praying Muslim pupils have been documented. The spread of hate online is particularly problematic, accounting for almost 90 per cent of reported online incidents. Experts warn that these incidents are deepening social divisions and threatening social cohesion (see documentary Report 2023: https://dokustelle.at/reports/dokustelle-report-2023). In an open letter to the Austrian federal government, civil society calls for the introduction of the criminal offence of „political Islam“ to be dropped. The reason for this is the lack of scientific uniformity in the definition of this term, which could allow it to be used indiscriminately. The concern is that this could lead to generalised suspicions and executive measures against Muslims. The organisation also appeals for protection against discrimination and the preservation of religious freedom by ensuring that state authorities allow all communities to practise their religion freely and equally. It also emphasises that deradicalisation and counter-terrorism strategies must respect the rights of Muslim women to protection from discrimination and freedom of expression. Finally, it calls for religious practices and clothing not to be used as indicators of radicalisation and for surveillance not to be carried out on the basis of membership of Islam or Muslim organisations in order to avoid blanket criminalisation.    In 2023, the Documentation Centre Austria documented a total of 1522 racist attacks against Muslim
and persons perceived as Muslim. This figure is made up of cases that were reported offline and cases that were recorded as part of intensified online monitoring. However, the organisation emphasises that the actual number of attacks is likely to be higher;
While there are political strategies against anti-Semitism, there is no comparable approach to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgements against people perceived as Muslim. The establishment of the Documentation Centre for Political Islam and Operation Luxor reinforce a general suspicion of Muslims and lead to people withdrawing from social discourse, a reduction in diversity of opinion and restrictions on participation. Freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly can be restricted on the basis of membership of a particular group, which has a negative impact on basic democratic principles (Website of the Federal Chancellery – Documentation Centre for Political Islam: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2020/integrationsministerin-raab-dokumentationsstelle-politischer-islam-nimmt-arbeit-auf.html).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).In July 2021, the „anti-terror package“ was passed in Austria, but this raised concerns from civil society organisations and UN experts. In particular, it was feared that the paragraph on „religiously motivated extremist connections“ could stigmatise Muslims (see Terrorism Prevention Act – TeBG (849 d.B.): https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/I/849).   Despite concerns, law enforcement agencies used facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, resulting in potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and effective mechanisms to investigate these practices were lacking (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities entered into force in Austria on 1 July 1998 in order to protect and promote the rights of national minorities. The current report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention emphasises that Austria is continuing its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities. Despite a significant increase in funding for national minorities to almost 8 million euros in 2021 and the adoption of new laws to combat hate speech and violent hate crimes, challenges remain, particularly in minority language education and in the area of mutual respect and intercultural dialogue.   In contrast, there is no clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Little action has been taken, particularly with regard to awareness-raising measures against discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities, as well as promoting self-empowerment and human rights. 

Progress: No progress

Take necessary steps to protect freedom of religion or belief in Austria, including reform to ensure more equitable treatment of registered religious groups, and ensuring national security measures consider and minimise the impact on freedom of religion or belief

Proponent:

Australia


Australia

Australia


Australia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

While there are political strategies against anti-Semitism, there is no comparable approach to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgements against people perceived as Muslim. The establishment of the Documentation Centre for Political Islam and Operation Luxor reinforce a general suspicion of Muslims and lead to people withdrawing from social discourse, a reduction in diversity of opinion and restrictions on participation. Freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly can be restricted on the basis of membership of a particular group, which has a negative impact on basic democratic principles (Website of the Federal Chancellery – Documentation Centre for Political Islam: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2020/integrationsministerin-raab-dokumentationsstelle-politischer-islam-nimmt-arbeit-auf.html).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).In July 2021, the „anti-terror package“ was passed in Austria, but this raised concerns from civil society organisations and UN experts. In particular, it was feared that the paragraph on „religiously motivated extremist connections“ could stigmatise Muslims (see Terrorism Prevention Act – TeBG (849 d.B.): https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/I/849).   Despite concerns, law enforcement agencies used facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, resulting in potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and effective mechanisms to investigate these practices were lacking (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities entered into force in Austria on 1 July 1998 in order to protect and promote the rights of national minorities. The current report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention emphasises that Austria is continuing its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities. Despite a significant increase in funding for national minorities to almost 8 million euros in 2021 and the adoption of new laws to combat hate speech and violent hate crimes, challenges remain, particularly in minority language education and in the area of mutual respect and intercultural dialogue.   In contrast, there is no clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Little action has been taken, particularly with regard to awareness-raising measures against discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities, as well as promoting self-empowerment and human rights. 

Progress: No progress

Adopt programmes to increase the participation of ethnic minorities in public and political life

Proponent:

Jordan


Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

Jordan


Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

This recommendation was only taken note of in the 3rd cycle of the UPR. In the eyes of civil society, it would be desirable to adopt such recommendations in the next cycle and to consider implementing them now.   The advisory councils for the national minorities, which are located in the Federal Chancellery, are de lege not a representation of the national minorities, but rather advisory bodies of the Federal Government appointed and nominated by the Federal Chancellor. There are calls for a reform of the appointment procedure, the composition of the advisory councils for the national minorities (consideration of gender equality, presence of young people, etc.) and an expansion of the competences of the advisory councils for the national minorities.  

Progress: No progress

Increase the representation of ethnic minorities in political and public life, including legislative and executive state bodies

Proponent:

Serbia


Republic of Serbia

Serbia


Republic of Serbia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

This recommendation was only taken note of in the 3rd cycle of the UPR. In the eyes of civil society, it would be desirable to adopt such recommendations in the next cycle and to consider implementing them now.   The advisory councils for the national minorities, which are located in the Federal Chancellery, are de lege not a representation of the national minorities, but rather advisory bodies of the Federal Government appointed and nominated by the Federal Chancellor. There are calls for a reform of the appointment procedure, the composition of the advisory councils for the national minorities (consideration of gender equality, presence of young people, etc.) and an expansion of the competences of the advisory councils for the national minorities.  

Progress: No progress

Continue measures to promote gender equality and ensure the representation of ethnic minorities in the political and public life

Proponent:

Nepal


Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal

Nepal


Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

This recommendation was only taken note of in the 3rd cycle of the UPR. In the eyes of civil society, it would be desirable to adopt such recommendations in the next cycle and to consider implementing them now.   The advisory councils for the national minorities, which are located in the Federal Chancellery, are de lege not a representation of the national minorities, but rather advisory bodies of the Federal Government appointed and nominated by the Federal Chancellor. There are calls for a reform of the appointment procedure, the composition of the advisory councils for the national minorities (consideration of gender equality, presence of young people, etc.) and an expansion of the competences of the advisory councils for the national minorities.  A more effective and less paternalistic possibility for the ethnic groups to participate, apart from the general freedom of association, is called for. For example, through a right to sue associations, the establishment of a public-law body, consultation rights, etc. (see legal provision for the ordinance on the advisory councils of the national minorities: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10000614). There is a demand for more effective and less patronising opportunities for the ethnic groups to participate. This could include measures such as the right to collective redress, the establishment of a public law institution or the granting of consultation rights to ensure that communities can play a more meaningful role that goes beyond the general freedom of association and gain more autonomy.  

Progress: No progress

Consider taking measures to promote the participation of women and ethnic minorities in public office and political life

Proponent:

Peru


Republic of Peru

Peru


Republic of Peru

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

A more effective and less paternalistic possibility for the ethnic groups to participate, apart from the general freedom of association, is called for. For example, through a right to sue associations, the establishment of a public-law body, consultation rights, etc. (see legal provision for the ordinance on the advisory councils of the national minorities: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10000614). There is a demand for more effective and less patronising opportunities for the ethnic groups to participate. This could include measures such as the right to collective redress, the establishment of a public law institution or the granting of consultation rights to ensure that communities can play a more meaningful role that goes beyond the general freedom of association and gain more autonomy.  

Progress: No progress

Decriminalize defamation under the Criminal Act in accordance with the international best practice

Proponent:

Sierra Leone


Republic of Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone


Republic of Sierra Leone

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

According to §111 of the Austrian Criminal Code, it is a criminal offence to publicly accuse a person of a contemptible quality or attitude or to accuse them of dishonourable or immoral conduct that is likely to disparage them in public opinion (see §111 StGB, BGBl. No. 60/1974: here). The sanctions for such offences can include a prison sentence of up to six months or a fine of up to 360 daily rates. In line with international standards, Austria should ensure that the Criminal Code is amended accordingly so that defamation is no longer a criminal offence. 

Progress: No progress

Take further steps towards effective access to education and apprenticeship opportunities for asylum seekers, including those who are no longer minors

Proponent:

Philippines


Republic of the Philippines

Philippines


Republic of the Philippines

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to ensure, in line with international best practice, that the Criminal Code does not provide for penalties for defamation, the current section 111 of the Austrian Criminal Code needs to be reviewed. This paragraph makes it a criminal offence to publicly accuse someone of a contemptible quality or attitude in a way that is perceptible to third parties or to accuse someone of dishonourable conduct that is likely to disparage the person concerned in the public opinion. The penalty for such an offence may include a prison sentence of up to six months or a fine of up to 360 daily rates (see: oesterreich.gv.at/.syndication?pageId=f0ee9eb0-2af6-49a6-a86f-2f80eb3d37bc).   To meet international standards, a review and possible amendment of this paragraph may be necessary to ensure that it does not conflict with freedom of expression and adequately protects the rights of citizens. This could include adjusting the definition of defamation and the associated penalties to ensure a balanced and appropriate legal basis;

Progress: No progress

Increase the minimum age for voluntary recruitment to 18 in line with the Committee on the Rights of the Child recommendation

Proponent:

Croatia


Republic of Croatia

Croatia


Republic of Croatia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict was ratified by Austria on 1 February 2002. The main point of the protocol is to raise the minimum age for participation in armed conflict to 18 years (https://www.kinderrechtskonvention.info/kindersoldaten-3205/). Recruitment into the national military starts at 18 years. However, persons at an age of 17 may voluntarily join the armed forces according to sec. 9 para. 2 of the Defense Act and sec. 10 sex. 1 of the Defence Act provides that in general conscription may start at the age of 17.

Progress: No progress

Strengthen the implementation of its programmes for the protection of minorities and undertake necessary legal reforms to address the issue”

Proponent:

Malaysia


Malaysia

Malaysia


Malaysia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities came into force in Austria on 1 July 1998. It aims to protect and promote the rights of national minorities and sets Europe-wide standards in this regard. In the current Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023)14 of the Committee of Ministers of 13 December 2023 (see: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]}), as well as in the Report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe of 16 October 2023 (see: https://rm.coe.int/5th-op-austria-de-full-version/1680ace87b) emphasises that Austria must continue its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities, but must expand them in key areas (see Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023) 14 of the Committee of Ministers of 13 December 2023: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]} ) which provides for immediate measures to protect ethnic groups.  In 2021, funding for ethnic groups in Austria was significantly increased, with funding now totalling almost 8 million euros. New laws were also adopted to combat hate speech on the internet and violent hate crimes (ACFC/OP/V(2023)002, 5th Review Report of the Advisory Committee for the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe: https://rm.coe.int/5th-op-austria-de-full-version/1680ace87b). Nevertheless, challenges remain, particularly in the area of minority language teaching and with regard to mutual respect and intercultural dialogue in society. In Austria, the Framework Convention is implemented and monitored by a dialogue platform in which government representatives, civil society organisations and experts from science and research work together. This dialogue process is crucial for compliance with the provisions of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (further information on the website of the Federal Chancellery: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/volksgruppen/roma-strategie.html). 

Progress: No progress

Continue modernisation of the national minority protection legislative framework in close cooperation with national minorities‘ representatives, including adequate financing

Proponent:

Slovenia


Republic of Slovenia

Slovenia


Republic of Slovenia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities came into force in Austria on 1 July 1998. It aims to protect and promote the rights of national minorities and sets Europe-wide standards in this regard. In the current Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023)14 of the Committee of Ministers of 13 December 2023 (see: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]}), as well as in the Report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe of 16 October 2023 (see: https://rm.coe.int/5th-op-austria-de-full-version/1680ace87b) emphasises that Austria must continue its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities, but must expand them in key areas (see Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023) 14 of the Committee of Ministers of 13 December 2023: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]} ) which provides for immediate measures to protect ethnic groups.  This recommendation was only taken note of in the 3rd cycle of the UPR. In the eyes of civil society, it would be desirable to adopt such recommendations in the next cycle and to consider implementing them now.   The advisory councils for the national minorities, which are located in the Federal Chancellery, are de lege not a representation of the national minorities, but rather advisory bodies of the Federal Government appointed and nominated by the Federal Chancellor. There are calls for a reform of the appointment procedure, the composition of the advisory councils for the national minorities (consideration of gender equality, presence of young people, etc.) and an expansion of the competences of the advisory councils for the national minorities.  

Progress: No progress

Offer migrant groups more institutional opportunities for political participation, involving them in political processes especially in the field of integration

Proponent:

Turkey


Republic of Turkey

Turkey


Republic of Turkey

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

An EU initiative, the Action Plan on Integration and Inclusion 2021-2027, aims to promote the inclusion of all people in society and remove barriers to the participation of people with a migrant background. The plan emphasises the need for both individual efforts and the host community for inclusive integration. Measures include education, labour market integration, access to health services and affordable housing. The EU Commission is seeking partnerships with various stakeholders to ensure the implementation of the action plan and promote the inclusion of migrants (see NAP on Integration and Inclusion 2021-2027: https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files_en?file=2020-11/action_plan_on_integration_and_inclusion_2021-2027.pdf). In Austria, public debates on the integration of migrants are far removed from academic discourse and the real-life experiences of this group. The prevailing opinion assumes a gradual process of adaptation of immigrants to Austrian culture, which, however, often implies unrealistic ideas of unity and homogenisation. Complete integration is seen as a constantly demanded but unattainable goal.   The political commitment of migrants reflects transnational experiences and the framework conditions in the country of immigration. Restrictions in citizenship law mean that many migrants in Vienna are excluded from the active political process. The lack of recognition for transnational experiences and resources as well as the non-immigration orientated political and administrative structures reinforce these challenges. The reaction to this situation has led to the emergence of political entrepreneurs, associations, platforms and media outside the established political structures. These actors deal with issues of migration and integration in Austria and serve as a transnational bridge. Political participation often takes place via associations, which represent an alternative form of inclusion (see project report 2021, Political participation in a transnational context: Turkish and Serbian migrants in Vienna: https://migrant-integration.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-11/stadt-wien-ucc88berarbeitet-projektbericht-8-11-2021.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Review section 35 (2) of the asylum law, granting the right to family reunification without undue restrictions, in particular to unaccompanied minors

Proponent:

Uruguay


Republic of Eastern Uruguay

Uruguay


Republic of Eastern Uruguay

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Section 35 (2) of the Asylum Act regulates family reunification for beneficiaries of subsidiary protection (see Asylum Act 2005, Federal Law Gazette I No. 56/2018 : https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/i/2005/100/P35/NOR40205456). According to a study from December 2016, there are further challenges in the area of family reunification (see the PDF from the European Migration Network on family reunification of third-country nationals in Austria: https://www.emn.at/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Die-Familienzusammenfuehrung-von-Drittstaatsangeh%c3%b6rigen-in-%c3%96sterreich.pdf, page 35 ff). In contrast to persons entitled to asylum, a 3-year waiting period without any flexibility is required for persons entitled to subsidiary protection. This cannot be waived even by a decision of the authorities. In addition, there are the fundamental problems that exist with every family reunification under Austrian law: German language skills must be demonstrated at the time of application. And at least in the context of a prognosis decision, the authorities must be convinced of a secure livelihood and local housing for the family that will join them in the future. This legal situation remains unchanged.  In fact, there has been a larger number of family reunifications in recent years, although the publicly available statistical data does not allow a breakdown into family reunifications of persons entitled to asylum or subsidiary protection. The Red Cross ( https://www.roteskreuz.at/ich-brauche-hilfe/familienzusammenfuehrung) in particular provides support services and counselling for applications for family reunification;

Progress: No progress

Reinstate humanitarian admission programme

Proponent:

Sierra Leone


Republic of Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone


Republic of Sierra Leone

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

From 2013 to 2017, Austria participated in a resettlement programme for Syrian refugees in cooperation with the UNHCR. However, there is currently no such programme. Instead, three „humanitarian admission programmes“ for Syrian refugees were implemented between 2013 and 2017, which enabled the safe and legal entry of 1,900 refugees to Austria. However, there is no permanent resettlement programme and the decision to accept refugees is the responsibility of the Austrian government, which must be taken on a regular basis. No active resettlement programme has been carried out in Austria since the end of 2017.   The term „resettlement“ describes the permanent relocation of particularly vulnerable refugees to third countries with comprehensive refugee protection that are willing to accept them. This decision is taken in situations where a return to the country of origin is not foreseeable and often concerns refugees who have been living in countries of first refuge for many years. Resettlement programmes not only contribute to individual benefits, but also to international responsibility-sharing and to relieving the burden on countries of first refuge. However, the available resettlement places only cover a fraction of the need, which prompts the UNHCR to advocate for their expansion worldwide.   Current challenges such as armed conflicts, natural disasters and global food shortages are exacerbating the humanitarian situation, particularly in regions such as the Middle East, North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, Afghanistan and Yemen. Despite Austria’s historical tradition of taking in and helping people, there is a lack of willingness to take in refugees today. Short-term reception operations in acute crisis situations are organised in cooperation between several countries in order to provide resources for the rescue of people. Austria has not yet participated in such actions (see questions and answers from SOS-Mitmenschen on the humanitarian reception programme in Austria: https://www.sosmitmensch.at/faq-humanitaere-aufnahme&ts=17053094652449). 

Progress: No progress

Reduce legal and administrative barriers to family reunification and effective access to the labor market for the beneficiaries of international protection

Proponent:

Afghanistan


Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

Afghanistan


Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to ensure successful integration, it is of great importance to grant asylum seekers effective access to the labour market during their asylum procedure. This requires adjustments to legislation and administrative procedures. The opportunity to work during the asylum procedure enables asylum seekers to utilise their skills, contribute to society and secure their livelihood. Such access promotes the independence and well-being of those affected. However, there is unequal treatment in terms of access to the labour market, especially in the basic welfare system. While Ukrainians have protection status and access to the labour market from the outset, asylum seekers and displaced persons from Ukraine must obtain an employment permit. This inequality is exacerbated by bureaucratic procedures and an additional income limit, which penalises some groups of people. It is emphasised that the current system of basic services is in urgent need of fundamental reform. All groups, regardless of their status, should have fair access to the labour market in order to promote integration.   A sensible care system should encourage, not hinder, income-earning opportunities through work to enable people to manage without support at an early stage. A fundamental reform of the current system is needed to ensure that no one is permanently denied effective access to the labour market. 

Progress: In progress

Establish an efficient procedure for determining statelessness, and approve residence permits on the basis of statelessness

Proponent:

Mexico


United Mexican States

Mexico


United Mexican States

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The challenges faced by stateless people in Austria extend to various aspects of their everyday lives. The lack of necessary documents leads to considerable restrictions: Working is often prohibited, opening a bank account, travelling or getting married are problematic. Many stateless people therefore live in a legal grey area.   In this context, UNHCR Austria has conducted a comprehensive survey on statelessness in Austria as part of its mandate. The main objective of this survey is to raise awareness of the problem of statelessness and to shed light on the daily challenges faced by stateless people. The results of this assessment serve as a basis for recommendations by the UNHCR to improve the situation of stateless people in Austria and to prevent the emergence of new cases of statelessness (see: https://www.unhcr.org/dach/at/was-wir-tun/staatenlosigkeit/staatenlosigkeit-in-oesterreich). The exact number of stateless people in Austria is difficult to determine, but according to Statistics Austria, around 12,000 people were listed as stateless or with unclear or unknown citizenship in 2016. A key problem that emerges from the study is the lack of a special procedure for determining statelessness in Austria. This means that those affected are often unable to assert basic rights derived from international agreements. As a result, stateless persons remain in a legally insecure situation, without access to work, health insurance or social benefits.   Special attention is also paid to stateless children born in Austria. In order to spare them a fate as stateless persons, the UNHCR recommends legal measures for the automatic acquisition of Austrian citizenship.   In addition, since 8 January 2024, Vienna has been the first Austrian federal state to set up a website to provide information for stateless people at the suggestion of SOS Mitmensch. Since this year, Municipal Department 35 (MA 35) has been providing information about the possibility of simplified naturalisation for stateless persons born in Austria. The aim of this initiative is to inform those affected about the short three-year window of opportunity available to them from the age of majority to obtain Austrian citizenship under simplified conditions. This measure is intended to ensure that affected persons do not miss this opportunity and can effectively exercise their rights. The further development of this initiative remains to be seen (see article: https://www.sosmitmensch.at/wien-startet-informationsoffensive-fuer-staatenlose). 

Progress: No progress

Ratification UN Convention on the Rights of all Migrant Workers and Members of their Families dated 18.12.1990 (ICRMW)

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. 

Progress: No progress

Ratification Additional Protocol to the European Social Charter on Collective Complaints dated 09.11.1995 and the Declaration on Article D of the European Social Charter (revised) dated 03.05.1996 must be accepted in accordance with the procedure laid down in the said Protocol

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet ratified the 1995 Additional Protocol to the European Social Charter on Collective Complaints. This protocol, which has been in force since 1998, allows organisations to submit collective complaints about violations of social rights and was adopted by some European countries in order to promote social justice. Austria has accepted parts of the revised European Social Charter, but without officially recognising the collective complaints procedure. Austria has signed the revised European Social Charter of 1996 and the Additional Protocol on Collective Complaints, but has not yet given its binding consent to the application of the collective complaints procedure. This means that collective complaints by trade unions and other organisations are not admissible before the European Committee of Social Rights. However, Austria is obliged to demonstrate compliance with the Charter through regular reports. Actual accession to the collective complaints procedure and a declaration of acceptance of Article D have not yet taken place. 

Progress: No progress

Ratification Articles 30 and 31 of the European Social Charta

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet ratified Articles 30 and 31 of the revised European Social Charter (ESC). These articles deal with the right to protection against poverty and social exclusion (Article 30) and the right to adequate housing (Article 31). Although Austria has largely implemented the Social Charter and is subject to ongoing reporting obligations to fulfil certain social rights, there are reservations regarding these specific articles, as their implementation is considered complex and potentially costly for the state. Several states, including Germany, have expressed similar reservations about these two articles, as they guarantee comprehensive social rights that would often require extensive legal and financial adjustments (information on the BMAW website on the Council of Europe and ESC: https://www.bmaw.gv.at/Themen/Arbeitsrecht/Internationales-und-Europaeisches-Arbeitsrecht/Europarat-und-Europaeische-Sozialcharta.html). 

Progress: No progress

Ratification 12th additional protocol EMRK dated 04.11.2000

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

On 4 November 2000, Protocol No. 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms was adopted and entered into force on 1 April 2005. The Protocol establishes a comprehensive prohibition of discrimination, ensuring that everyone has the right to the full enjoyment of all rights set out in law without discrimination on the basis of sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.   The ratification of Protocol No. 12 by Austria would mean that the country undertakes to enforce and promote the prohibition of discrimination in all areas of public life. Austria would thus take an important step towards strengthening human rights and equal treatment in society (see Protocol No. 12: https://www.menschenrechtskonvention.eu/protokoll-nr-12-emrk-9277/). 

Progress: No progress

Ratification The Budapest Convention on Cybercrime dated 23.11.2001 and its additional protocol of 23.11.2001

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet ratified the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, which was adopted by the Council of Europe on 23 November 2001. This convention is the first international treaty to set legal standards for combating cybercrime, including measures for criminal prosecution and international cooperation in the case of internet-based offences such as data misuse, cyber fraud and child pornography. It serves many countries as the basis for national laws on cybercrime, but Austria has not yet joined the treaty.  
The Additional Protocol of 2003, which specifically addresses racist and xenophobic offences on the Internet, has also not been ratified by Austria. Although the treaty has been adopted by over 60 countries and is recognised worldwide as a directive, Austria has decided to implement its regulations on cybercrime at a national level without being formally bound by the Budapest Convention;

Progress: No progress

Ratification Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of 10.12.2008

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and enables individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations if their rights have been violated. Austria ratified this protocol in 1978. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and allows individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations when their rights have been violated. Austria, however, ratified this protocol in 1978 (see State Report, Concluding Observations of the Committee on wsk Rights: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:40fa2699-4b9e-450e-a246-fdf4a7dcc164/CESCR_WSK_4_de.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Ratification 3rd Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) of 17.06.2011

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria signed the Third Optional Protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child on 28 February 2012, which allows children an individual complaints procedure for violations of children’s rights, but has not yet ratified it. This lack of ratification means that children in Austria do not have the opportunity to appeal directly to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child if their rights are violated and national legal remedies have been exhausted. Even though Austria was actively involved internationally in the drafting of the protocol, the legal step to fully recognise this important right of appeal has not yet been taken (Netzwerk Kinderrechte Österreich: Umsetzung & Monitoring in Österreich). 

Progress: No progress

Give a mandate to the European Commission to draw up a legally binding international treaty to bind transnational corporations and companies to human rights (Resolution A/HRC/RES/26/9)

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has been involved in the UN negotiations on a binding international treaty to regulate transnational corporations with regard to human rights (Resolution A/HRC/RES/26/9). This treaty has been under discussion within the UN Human Rights Council since 2014, with the EU participating in the negotiations as a single entity. However, the European Commission has not yet received its own negotiating mandate for this process, which makes Europe’s negotiating position complicated in some cases. 

Progress: No progress

Ensure the constructive cooperation by Austria in the relevant Open Ended Inter-Governmental Work Group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has been involved in the UN negotiations on a binding international treaty to regulate transnational corporations with regard to human rights (Resolution A/HRC/RES/26/9). This treaty has been under discussion within the UN Human Rights Council since 2014, with the EU participating in the negotiations as a single entity. However, the European Commission has not yet received its own negotiating mandate for this process, which makes Europe’s negotiating position complicated in some cases. 

Progress: No progress

Implement a comprehensive catalogue of fundamental rights in the constitution

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet enshrined any fundamental social rights such as the right to an adequate standard of living or healthcare in its constitution, which makes it an exception within the EU. While basic human rights and civil liberties are protected in the Austrian constitution, fundamental social rights have so far only applied on the basis of simple laws that can be changed more easily, e.g. in the area of minimum income and healthcare. As a result, social benefits do not have the same constitutional stability as civil liberties.  The Austrian Ombudsman Board and various NGOs are therefore pushing for fundamental social rights to be enshrined in the constitution. A comprehensive catalogue, which was considered in the 2020-2024 government programme, would be necessary, for example, to implement a „Federal Constitutional Law on Social Security“ that protects rights such as healthcare, housing and minimum care. Initiatives such as the Poverty Conference and the Momentum Institute support these demands and emphasise that such rights should also be subject to the control of the Constitutional Court (Ombudsman Board: Volksanwaltschaft drängt auf soziale Grundrechte in der Verfassung, 2022) and a special report by the Ombudsman Board, 2023: https://volksanwaltschaft.gv.at/artikel/Achitz-Sozialhilfe-muss-Existenz-sichern-Soziale-Grundrechte-in-Verfassung-verankern). 

Progress: No progress

Levelling-Up: Comprehensive protection against discrimination in all areas of life

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, a number of different laws regulate protection against discrimination at state and federal level. This makes the enforcement of the law complex in some cases, protection is not standardised and – contrary to numerous calls in the UPR process and in numerous other monitoring processes on human rights conventions – there are significant gaps in protection: 1. in terms of access to goods and services in the private sector, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief and sexual orientation. This fact has been criticised for years by numerous civil society organisations and equality actors as a lack of levelling up.
2) Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education.
3. there is also a lack of comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.
In addition, the law contains provisions on the reversal of the burden of proof, which makes it easier for the person affected to prove discrimination, as well as provisions for possible claims for damages and compensation (see Equal Treatment Act, GIBG Federal Law Gazette I No. 66/2004: https://ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20003395&FassungVom=2022-02-10). The Introductory Act to the Administrative Procedure Acts (EGVG) provides a legal basis for dealing with racist refusal of admission in Austria. According to this law, both victims and witnesses of racist discrimination can report such incidents. Police officers are obliged to forward these reports to the competent district administrative authority. The procedure under the EGVG is free of charge for the person making the report. The reporting person or organisation, such as ZARA or the Litigation Association, are not informed of the outcome of the proceedings and have no direct party status. In addition, the EGVG does not provide for compensation for the person discriminated against. Instead, offenders can be fined up to 1,090 euros, an amount that has not been evaluated for years. In the event of repeated violations of the EGVG, the trade authority can theoretically withdraw the trade licence. ZARA supports those affected by discrimination through various measures, including letters of intervention to the establishments concerned, legal advice and referral to other legal bodies such as the Equal Treatment Ombudsman’s Office or the Litigation Association. The aim is to find an out-of-court solution or to take legal action to enforce the rights of victims of discrimination. These legal and supportive measures are crucial to strengthening protection against racial discrimination in Austria and dealing with cases of discrimination appropriately (see Racism Report 2022: https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA-Rassismus_Report_2022.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Create legal regulations that impose binding and enforceable due diligence obligations to respect human rights and the environment on all Austrian companies and groups of companies domestically and abroad (mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence) and commit to the creation of a general cross-sectoral regulation at EU level

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

In Austria, the introduction of binding due diligence obligations to respect human rights and environmental standards for companies is being actively pursued, particularly in connection with the new EU Supply Chain Directive (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive). This directive obliges large companies in the EU and those with a significant business volume in the EU to identify, minimise or prevent and document negative impacts of their business activities along their entire supply chain. Under the directive, Austria is obliged to transpose the corresponding EU requirements into national law by 26 July 2026. The measures are aimed at companies that have to ensure human rights and environmental standards in their global activities by taking their „activity chain“ into account, and could also indirectly affect smaller companies, for example through contractual requirements from larger trading partners. The directive provides options and forms of support for these companies.
   Austrian companies will be obliged to integrate civil liability issues and compliance requirements into their business strategies and to develop transition plans in line with the climate goals of the Paris Agreement in order to minimise or prevent potential negative impacts of their business activities. In future, an official supervisory authority will also be able to impose sanctions if companies fail to fulfil their due diligence obligations. For the Austrian economy, this represents an adjustment to the now mandatory EU-wide standards. (More information on the EU Supply Chain Act on HRW: https://www.hrw.org/de/news/2024/05/24/neues-eu-lieferkettengesetz-fuer-unternehmen-fragen-und-antworten). 
A § 8 BMG Commission for dialogue processes between the administration and civil society was newly established in the BMK. This commission promotes the exchange between the administration (represented by the) and organised civil society (represented by the managing directors of Ökobüro and Umweltdachverband). However, a climate protection law and other tangible legal progress are still lacking, which is also clearly criticised by civil society (see e.g. on the website of the climate referendum: https://klimavolksbegehren.at/). On 23 February 2022, the European Commission published a draft directive on „Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence“ (CDSDD, see draft on the European Union website: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52022 PC 0071 from=EN). On 1 December 2022, the European Council agreed on its position and on 1 June 2023, the European Parliament will adopt its position, which will be followed by trilogue negotiations between the three institutions (Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the European Council on corporate due diligence in relation to sustainability and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 as PDF: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15024-2022-REV-1/en/pdf). The Federal Ministry of Justice and the Federal Ministry of Labour and Economic Affairs have initiated a good consultation process following the publication of the Commission’s draft directive. The government should again fully involve stakeholders in the future implementation of the directive in Austria.
  It is to be welcomed that the Directive that has been adopted and entered into force includes civil liability and sanctions by public authorities. However, in order for the directive to effectively protect human rights and the environment along global supply chains, access to justice for those affected by rights violations needs to be improved. An important civil society initiative on this topic is „Human rights need laws“ (campaign by the organisation Netzwerk Soziale Verantwortung for a supply chain law in Austria and the EU: https://www.nesove.at/menschenrechte-brauchen-gesetze/).
  On 26 February 2025, the EU Commission presented a package which, according to the Commission, is intended to simplify sustainability rules. Proposed amendments concern the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the EU Taxonomy and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). Although a mere simplification and reduction of redundant and overlapping reporting points was announced, a massive watering down of the CSDDD in important points is now proposed: The erosion of the risk-based approach, as the due diligence obligations would only extend to direct business partners* with a few exceptions; monitoring of due diligence measures would only be carried out every 5 years instead of annually as previously envisaged; deletion of an EU-wide harmonised regulation on civil liability; deletion of the turnover-related minimum maximum penalties for violations; deletion of the obligation to implement climate transition plans, deletion of the possibility of representative actions, etc. (see: here). As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Raise other provisions of the CRC to constitutional status, in particular social rights, the right to an adequate standard of living and the right to health care

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet enshrined any fundamental social rights such as the right to an adequate standard of living or healthcare in its constitution, which makes it an exception within the EU. While basic human rights and civil liberties are protected in the Austrian constitution, fundamental social rights have so far only applied on the basis of simple laws that can be changed more easily, e.g. in the area of minimum income and healthcare. As a result, social benefits do not have the same constitutional stability as civil liberties.  The Austrian Ombudsman Board and various NGOs are therefore pushing for fundamental social rights to be enshrined in the constitution. A comprehensive catalogue, which was considered in the 2020-2024 government programme, would be necessary, for example, to implement a „Federal Constitutional Law on Social Security“ that protects rights such as healthcare, housing and minimum care. Initiatives such as the Poverty Conference and the Momentum Institute support these demands and emphasise that such rights should also be subject to the control of the Constitutional Court (Ombudsman Board: Volksanwaltschaft drängt auf soziale Grundrechte in der Verfassung, 2022) and a special report by the Ombudsman Board, 2023: https://volksanwaltschaft.gv.at/artikel/Achitz-Sozialhilfe-muss-Existenz-sichern-Soziale-Grundrechte-in-Verfassung-verankern). 

Progress: No progress

Consider international human rights instruments effectively when drafting national legislation and develop a best practice in the formulation of draft legislation that gives preference to the formulation of standards that conform to fundamental rights

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

In Austria, the introduction of binding due diligence obligations to respect human rights and environmental standards for companies is being actively pursued, particularly in connection with the new EU Supply Chain Directive (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive). This directive obliges large companies in the EU and those with a significant business volume in the EU to identify, minimise or prevent and document negative impacts of their business activities along their entire supply chain. Under the directive, Austria is obliged to transpose the corresponding EU requirements into national law by 26 July 2026. The measures are aimed at companies that have to ensure human rights and environmental standards in their global activities by taking their „activity chain“ into account, and could also indirectly affect smaller companies, for example through contractual requirements from larger trading partners. The directive provides options and forms of support for these companies.
   Austrian companies will be obliged to integrate civil liability issues and compliance requirements into their business strategies and to develop transition plans in line with the climate goals of the Paris Agreement in order to minimise or prevent potential negative impacts of their business activities. In future, an official supervisory authority will also be able to impose sanctions if companies fail to fulfil their due diligence obligations. For the Austrian economy, this represents an adjustment to the now mandatory EU-wide standards. (More information on the EU Supply Chain Act on HRW: https://www.hrw.org/de/news/2024/05/24/neues-eu-lieferkettengesetz-fuer-unternehmen-fragen-und-antworten). 
A § 8 BMG Commission for dialogue processes between the administration and civil society was newly established in the BMK. This commission promotes the exchange between the administration (represented by the) and organised civil society (represented by the managing directors of Ökobüro and Umweltdachverband). However, a climate protection law and other tangible legal progress are still lacking, which is also clearly criticised by civil society (see e.g. on the website of the climate referendum: https://klimavolksbegehren.at/). On 23 February 2022, the European Commission published a draft directive on „Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence“ (CDSDD, see draft on the European Union website: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52022 PC 0071 from=EN). On 1 December 2022, the European Council agreed on its position and on 1 June 2023, the European Parliament will adopt its position, which will be followed by trilogue negotiations between the three institutions (Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the European Council on corporate due diligence in relation to sustainability and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 as PDF: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15024-2022-REV-1/en/pdf). The Federal Ministry of Justice and the Federal Ministry of Labour and Economic Affairs have initiated a good consultation process following the publication of the Commission’s draft directive. The government should again fully involve stakeholders in the future implementation of the directive in Austria.
  It is to be welcomed that the Directive that has been adopted and entered into force includes civil liability and sanctions by public authorities. However, in order for the directive to effectively protect human rights and the environment along global supply chains, access to justice for those affected by rights violations needs to be improved. An important civil society initiative on this topic is „Human rights need laws“ (campaign by the organisation Netzwerk Soziale Verantwortung for a supply chain law in Austria and the EU: https://www.nesove.at/menschenrechte-brauchen-gesetze/).
  On 26 February 2025, the EU Commission presented a package which, according to the Commission, is intended to simplify sustainability rules. Proposed amendments concern the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the EU Taxonomy and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). Although a mere simplification and reduction of redundant and overlapping reporting points was announced, a massive watering down of the CSDDD in important points is now proposed: The erosion of the risk-based approach, as the due diligence obligations would only extend to direct business partners* with a few exceptions; monitoring of due diligence measures would only be carried out every 5 years instead of annually as previously envisaged; deletion of an EU-wide harmonised regulation on civil liability; deletion of the turnover-related minimum maximum penalties for violations; deletion of the obligation to implement climate transition plans, deletion of the possibility of representative actions, etc. (see: here). As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Increase awareness for the importance of human rights in all regional administrations

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The international activities of the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF) and the organisations charged with this task, erinnern.at and OeAD, all aim to support teachers and learners in the field of human rights education. However, there is no further information on specific projects from Austria. Although the World Programme for Human Rights Education was launched by the United Nations in December 2004, various measures to promote human rights education are being implemented in Austria. Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. 

Progress: No progress

Ensure nationwide uniform legal quality standards in areas relevant to human rights, such as child and youth welfare and youth protection

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, the need to create binding, nationwide quality standards for child and youth welfare, including foster care, is being increasingly emphasised. Although some state-specific regulations and initiatives to ensure quality already exist, there are still differences between the federal states. The creation of harmonised quality standards would ensure that all children and young people placed in foster care or other care facilities receive the same high level of care. In recent years, efforts have been made in Austria to define these standards. The provincial governments are obliged to ensure compliance with the standards in child and youth welfare and to evaluate them regularly. Efforts are also being made to standardise the practice of foster families, which is supported in particular by the exchange of best practice models and the involvement of experts from various organisations. In addition to the introduction of these standards, emphasis is also placed on the regular training and further development of professionals in this area in order to guarantee high-quality care. This includes ensuring that foster families also receive the necessary support and further training to meet the special requirements of foster children. Despite this progress, the implementation of a binding, nationwide regulation remains an ongoing process that requires further political and legislative adjustments. In Austria, efforts are currently being made to ensure the quality of child and youth welfare through legal standards, but implementation remains inconsistent and dependent on the respective federal states. The Child and Youth Welfare Act (KJH-G) requires that the quality of care for children and young people is regularly evaluated by the provincial governments, taking into account professional standards, social developments and scientific findings. Since 2017, quality standards for inpatient child and youth welfare services have been developed in Austria with the aim of standardising them across the provinces. These standards were developed by 19 different organisations, including FICE Austria and SOS Children’s Villages, in order to ensure high-quality care for children and young people. They set out clear requirements for assistance planning, co-operation with parents and the staffing and structural conditions in the facilities. However, there are still differences in the legal regulations for the protection of minors, as this is regulated at state level in Austria. Different federal states have different regulations, which can lead to a certain lack of clarity. Developments in this area show that implementation is an ongoing process that continues to require critical review and adaptation in order to guarantee uniform and high standards. 

Progress: No progress

Prepare and formulate a comprehensive NAP on human rights based on the OHCHR recommendations 2011 and 2015

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Despite the agreement in the last government programme and the sustained demand by opposition parties such as the SPÖ and NEOS, a general National Action Plan for Human Rights for Austria has not yet been finalised or adopted. The details (see: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:7b9e6755-2115-440c-b2ec-cbf64a931aa8/RegProgramm-lang.pdf on page 153) and in the parliamentary initiatives of the SPÖ and NEOS (e.g. SPÖ and NEOS). A general National Action Plan for Human Rights should not be replaced by the results of topic-specific action plans. Rather, it is intended to provide strategic and long-term planning, prioritisation and serve as a central mechanism for coordination and strategic planning to implement the recommendations of the UPR process. In addition to strategic objectives for legislation, a comprehensive national action plan should include the following elements: Network building within the administration and with NGOs, new creation and support of human rights institutions, integration of human rights education in schools and universities, educational programmes for vulnerable groups, public awareness-building, provision of information materials, research and evaluation. As early as 1993, the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna recommended comprehensive National Action Plans for Human Rights. These form the gold standard throughout the EU and are widespread in many countries, as a study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency shows ( Study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency). It is no substitute for a general National Action Plan for Human Rights to await the results of topic-specific National Action Plans. Rather, the purpose of the general National Action Plan is to plan strategically and in the long term and to define priorities. In this way, the National Action Plan for Human Rights can also be the main mechanism for coordination and strategic planning for the implementation of the recommendations of the UPR process.
  In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government aims to revitalise the Human Rights Action Plan and promote its implementation (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Support a status quo collection and formulation of realistic and measurable indicators in the context of the NAP on Human Rights

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Despite the agreement in the last government programme and the sustained demand by opposition parties such as the SPÖ and NEOS, a general National Action Plan for Human Rights for Austria has not yet been finalised or adopted. The details (see: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:7b9e6755-2115-440c-b2ec-cbf64a931aa8/RegProgramm-lang.pdf on page 153) and in the parliamentary initiatives of the SPÖ and NEOS (e.g. SPÖ and NEOS). A general National Action Plan for Human Rights should not be replaced by the results of topic-specific action plans. Rather, it is intended to provide strategic and long-term planning, prioritisation and serve as a central mechanism for coordination and strategic planning to implement the recommendations of the UPR process. In addition to strategic objectives for legislation, a comprehensive national action plan should include the following elements: Network building within the administration and with NGOs, new creation and support of human rights institutions, integration of human rights education in schools and universities, educational programmes for vulnerable groups, public awareness-building, provision of information materials, research and evaluation. As early as 1993, the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna recommended comprehensive National Action Plans for Human Rights. These form the gold standard throughout the EU and are widespread in many countries, as a study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency shows ( Study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency). It is no substitute for a general National Action Plan for Human Rights to await the results of topic-specific National Action Plans. Rather, the purpose of the general National Action Plan is to plan strategically and in the long term and to define priorities. In this way, the National Action Plan for Human Rights can also be the main mechanism for coordination and strategic planning for the implementation of the recommendations of the UPR process.
  In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government aims to revitalise the Human Rights Action Plan and promote its implementation (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Ensure transparent consultation of civil society in the preparation of the NAP on Human Rights

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Despite the agreement in the last government programme and the sustained demand by opposition parties such as the SPÖ and NEOS, a general National Action Plan for Human Rights for Austria has not yet been finalised or adopted. The details (see: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:7b9e6755-2115-440c-b2ec-cbf64a931aa8/RegProgramm-lang.pdf on page 153) and in the parliamentary initiatives of the SPÖ and NEOS (e.g. SPÖ and NEOS). A general National Action Plan for Human Rights should not be replaced by the results of topic-specific action plans. Rather, it is intended to provide strategic and long-term planning, prioritisation and serve as a central mechanism for coordination and strategic planning to implement the recommendations of the UPR process. In addition to strategic objectives for legislation, a comprehensive national action plan should include the following elements: Network building within the administration and with NGOs, new creation and support of human rights institutions, integration of human rights education in schools and universities, educational programmes for vulnerable groups, public awareness-building, provision of information materials, research and evaluation. As early as 1993, the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna recommended comprehensive National Action Plans for Human Rights. These form the gold standard throughout the EU and are widespread in many countries, as a study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency shows ( Study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency). It is no substitute for a general National Action Plan for Human Rights to await the results of topic-specific National Action Plans. Rather, the purpose of the general National Action Plan is to plan strategically and in the long term and to define priorities. In this way, the National Action Plan for Human Rights can also be the main mechanism for coordination and strategic planning for the implementation of the recommendations of the UPR process.
  In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government aims to revitalise the Human Rights Action Plan and promote its implementation (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Develop a specific NAP for the protection of children’s rights based on the recommendations of the UN-CRC

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The development of a specific National Action Plan (NAP) for the protection of children’s rights in Austria based on the recommendations of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child represents an important step towards improving the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child at national level and better protecting children’s rights.
Such an action plan would address the specific recommendations and observations that the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child regularly makes to Austria when reviewing the implementation of children’s rights in the country. These recommendations cover a variety of topics, such as protection from violence, access to education and health services, as well as combating child poverty and discrimination. A specific NAP for the protection of children’s rights would include concrete measures and strategies to put these recommendations into practice and ensure that children’s rights are taken into account in all relevant policy areas. Such a plan would need to include measures to strengthen children’s rights education, to improve the participation of children and young people in decision-making processes and to combat child poverty. In addition, continuous monitoring mechanisms would be required to monitor progress and identify and close any gaps in implementation. In addition, this action plan could also be closely linked to existing initiatives and programmes such as the existing NAP on the Rights of the Child, with an even stronger focus on protecting children’s rights and improving the quality of life of children in all areas of life. This process would also require close cooperation between civil society, child protection organisations and government agencies to ensure that children’s perspectives are taken into account in the planning and decision-making process and that their rights are actively promoted. 

Progress: No progress

Develop a NAP on economy and human rights

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Regrettably, however, there is no National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights in line with the UN Guiding Principles. The implementation of such a plan has so far failed to materialise.   In 2016, the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights published the final Guidelines for National Action Plans, which are the result of an open, global consultation process involving states, businesses, civil society, national human rights institutions and academia. These guidelines build on the Working Group’s 2014 report to the UN General Assembly on National Action Plans (see Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 2014: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blob/266624/b51c16faf1b3424d7efa060e8aaa8130/un-leitprinzipien-de-data.pdf). The Working Group has engaged intensively with governments on this topic, both through a survey in 2014 and through an online consultation on the content elements of a National Action Plan.   The UN Working Group encourages all states to develop, adopt and regularly update a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights. This plan is central to the dissemination and implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The responsibility to introduce such plans lies within the scope of states‘ obligations in relation to the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.   Unfortunately, such initiatives have not yet taken place in Austria and implementation remains outstanding. This raises important questions about the prioritisation and implementation of these fundamental measures aimed at protecting and promoting human rights in the context of business activities;

Progress: No progress

Improve the NAP on disability in consultation with countries, people with disabilities and organisations representing them and take the recommendations of the CRPD Committee into account

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The National Action Plan on Disability 2012-2021 (NAP I) has now expired and has been replaced by the National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II, information on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: here). A comprehensive evaluation of the success of NAP I has been carried out by the Ministry of Social Affairs and is available on their website as a PDF https://www.sozialministerium.at/dam/jcr:edab5ca1-4995-456a-820c-c414da78bc39/Evaluierung202012%E2%80%932020.pdf </a In NAP I, there remains great potential for improvement with regard to the inclusion of people with disabilities and the organisations representing them. The reasons for this are a lack of understanding of what full and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes. In addition, political participation in Austria is highly formalised and has historical roots. This gives well-established and politically networked civil society organisations an advantage. The National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II) was adopted by the Austrian Federal Government on 6 July 2022 and is available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf). The NAP II is also the central national instrument for implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) in Austria. This also aims to ensure the full and effective participation and inclusion of people with disabilities in society.   In the view of civil society, this goal of effective social integration of people with disabilities is not sufficiently realised in NAP II. The NAP II formally exists, but cannot be considered a complete success from this perspective. The National Action Plan on Disability II 2022-2030 (NAP II, available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf) has made some progress compared to the previous National Action Plan on Disability I from 2012-2020 (NAP I). The implementation of NAP II is being monitored by the NAP Monitoring Group. This group consists of representatives from federal ministries, federal states, organisations for people with disabilities and the Monitoring Committee for the Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Its aim is to ensure that the measures in the action plan are implemented. This group also reports verbally on the implementation status of the 375 measures. The extent to which people with disabilities and their organisations are involved in implementation is not always clear and also depends on the respective measures.   During the preparation of the NAP II, the federal ministries and federal states made contributions in 26 expert teams. However, these contributions were only partially drawn up in a participatory process. The Ministry of Social Affairs and a few other federal ministries have set up corresponding processes for the preparation of their contributions. Unfortunately, however, many federal ministries did not respond to this call, which is why contributions on essential topics (e.g. education, children and young people or women) were produced without any real participation by civil society, despite numerous attempts by civil society to make contact. The participatory element was also not consistently ensured in the countries. The contributions made are available on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs, see here). Moreover, the written implementation reports for 2021 and 2022, in which the status of implementation is to be presented in detail and thus made comprehensible, have still not been published. The editorial team, which included representatives of civil society and government monitoring mechanisms, was also unable to compensate for the original lack of participation in the creation of the NAP II, as by the time they were consulted, it was only a matter of combining contributions that had already been approved by the respective political level into an overall work. It was no longer possible for civil society to exert any significant influence on the content.   Reasons for the lack of participation include a lack of understanding of what unrestricted and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes.   In terms of content, there is no coherent strategy for the de-institutionalisation of people with disabilities in the NAP II, although this would be of great importance in order to promote self-determination and inclusion in society and to prevent exploitation, violence and abuse of people with disabilities in institutions;

Progress: No progress

Ensure that the NAP on anti-discrimination covers the fight against all forms of racism (e.g. anti-Muslim racism, anti-Semitism, anti-gypsyism, etc.) and includes realistic and measurable indicators

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The 2020 EU Action Plan against Racism calls on the member states to draw up National Action Plans against Racism by the end of 2022. In Austria, the Federal Minister for Women, Family, Integration and Media in the Federal Chancellery is responsible for drawing up the National Action Plan against Racism and Discrimination. This National Action Plan is also anchored in the current government programme (EU Action Plan against Racism 2020: https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/library-document/union-equality-eu-anti-racism-action-plan-2020-2025_en). Austria has also referred to the planned National Action Plan against Racism in various other recommendations regarding the implementation and promotion of measures to combat racism, discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance. This shows its particular importance. Contrary to this assurance and contrary to the agreement in the last government programme, no national action plan to combat racism was adopted and no significant other programmes in the area of anti-racism work were implemented, with the exception of the area of anti-Semitism.  

Progress: No progress

Secure budgetary resources for the implementation of the NAP on Human Rights and the thematic NAPs

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Despite the agreement in the last government programme and the sustained demand by opposition parties such as the SPÖ and NEOS, a general National Action Plan for Human Rights for Austria has not yet been finalised or adopted. The details (see: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:7b9e6755-2115-440c-b2ec-cbf64a931aa8/RegProgramm-lang.pdf on page 153) and in the parliamentary initiatives of the SPÖ and NEOS (e.g. SPÖ and NEOS). A general National Action Plan for Human Rights should not be replaced by the results of topic-specific action plans. Rather, it is intended to provide strategic and long-term planning, prioritisation and serve as a central mechanism for coordination and strategic planning to implement the recommendations of the UPR process. In addition to strategic objectives for legislation, a comprehensive national action plan should include the following elements: Network building within the administration and with NGOs, new creation and support of human rights institutions, integration of human rights education in schools and universities, educational programmes for vulnerable groups, public awareness-building, provision of information materials, research and evaluation. As early as 1993, the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna recommended comprehensive National Action Plans for Human Rights. These form the gold standard throughout the EU and are widespread in many countries, as a study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency shows ( Study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency). It is no substitute for a general National Action Plan for Human Rights to await the results of topic-specific National Action Plans. Rather, the purpose of the general National Action Plan is to plan strategically and in the long term and to define priorities. In this way, the National Action Plan for Human Rights can also be the main mechanism for coordination and strategic planning for the implementation of the recommendations of the UPR process.
  In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government aims to revitalise the Human Rights Action Plan and promote its implementation (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Strengthen the discourse on international human rights obligations

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The international activities of the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF) and the organisations charged with this task, erinnern.at and OeAD, all aim to support teachers and learners in the field of human rights education. However, there is no further information on specific projects from Austria. Although the World Programme for Human Rights Education was launched by the United Nations in December 2004, various measures to promote human rights education are being implemented in Austria. Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. 

Progress: No progress

Create financial resources for civil society work based on international best practice models

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In 2024, Austria will work on creating long-term financial resources for civil society organisations in order to strengthen their resilience and secure their work beyond short-term project funding. This will be done taking into account international best practice models, which focus primarily on sustainable and stable funding. In Austria, the need for stable basic funding that goes beyond project funding and enables organisations to remain active in the long term is increasingly being recognised. The focus is not only on public funding, but new financing models such as „pay-for-success“ and private investment in the social sector (such as impact investing) are also being given greater consideration. These models enable organisations to increase their social impact and at the same time create a sustainable financial basis. Austria is following successful international examples that show how civil society organisations can become more resilient to crises through strong financial resources. A further aim is to integrate these approaches into the policies and structural support of civil society actors, which could have a long-term positive effect on civil society development in Austria. 

Progress: No progress

Strengthen the regional offices for Equal Treatment and sustainable protection of resources

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In 2024, Austria is calling for the regional offices of the Ombud for Equal Treatment to be strengthened and for resources to be secured in the long term. This is necessary in order to fulfil EU standards, which also include increased prevention work and a more intensive role in data collection and research. The independence of the Ombud for Equal Treatment must be guaranteed. However, there is currently a lack of financial resources and human resources to implement these tasks efficiently (information, 2024: https://www.gleichbehandlungsanwaltschaft.gv.at/unser-angebot/Presse/Pressemeldungen/gleichbehandlungsanwaltschaft-draengt-auf-rasche-umsetzung-der-eu-standards-fuer-gleichbehandlungsstellen-in-oesterreich.html). 

Redaktionelle Verantwortung UPR-Tool:

Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte, upr@liga.or.at

Lizenz CC-BY-SA 

Unterstützung durch:

Forschungskooperation mit der Volksanwaltschaft

Förderung des Zukunftsfonds der Republik Österreich

 

Receive the latest news

Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter