Universal Periodic Review

This UPR tool reflects the global recommendations made to Austria by all countries world-wide during the Universial Priodic Review process (UPR) at the UN Human Rights Council and their current status of implementation. The League coordinates a significant part of Austrian civil society in the UPR process. 

The recommendations can be filtered in the menu below by human rights topics, SDGs, proponent states etc. also a search function is available. 

 

We welcome your comments and suggestions at upr@liga.or.at.


Search category
Filter options
Filter by tag…

Progress: No progress

Continue strengthening successful policy to increase access to education, health and integration into the labour market for women with disabilities, ethnic minority groups, migrants, refugees and Asylum seekers

Proponent:

Somalia


Federal Republic of Somalia

Somalia


Federal Republic of Somalia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Gender stereotypes and role expectations contribute to inequality, make it difficult for women to advance in their careers and reduce their opportunities. To tackle the gender pay gap in the EU, the Council of the European Union adopted new rules on 24 April 2023 to combat pay discrimination and reduce the gender pay gap. According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: here). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The employment rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale).  With regard to women with disabilities, it should be noted that they are not a specific target group of the Austrian labour market service. The status of ministerial work is still the 2017 inclusion package (see information on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Menschen-mit-Behinderungen/Berufliche-Teilhabe-von-Menschen-mit-Behinderungen.html). Civil society considers this to be insufficient. No measures have been taken to prevent multiple and/or intersectional discrimination against women and girls with disabilities. There is still a lack of adequate consideration of the gender perspective in disability legislation, the disability perspective in women’s legislation and the related enforcement of laws. The Ombud for Equal Treatment (website:https://www.gleichbehandlungsanwaltschaft.gv.at), a state institution at the Federal Chancellery (BKA), is responsible for all grounds of discrimination except disability. However, women with disabilities must contact the Social Ministry Service (website: https://www.gleichbehandlungsanwaltschaft.gv.at) in the event of multiple discrimination and apply for conciliation. This conciliation procedure is mandatory and must be carried out before a lawsuit is filed with the civil court. The problem is that the Social Ministry Service has no specific expertise in dealing with women with disabilities and is not trained in a gender-equitable approach.  With regard to people of foreign origin, the employment rate is lower than for people born in Austria. Women from certain countries of origin are particularly affected (e.g. Turkey with a female employment rate of only 44%) and foreign origin is still a frequent reason for discrimination in the workplace (see Statistics Austria, „Labour market situation of migrants in Austria 2022“: https://www.statistik.at/fileadmin/publications/Arbeitsmarktsituation-Migrant-innen-2021.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Take further steps towards effective access to education and apprenticeship opportunities for asylum seekers, including those who are no longer minors

Proponent:

Philippines


Republic of the Philippines

Philippines


Republic of the Philippines

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to ensure, in line with international best practice, that the Criminal Code does not provide for penalties for defamation, the current section 111 of the Austrian Criminal Code needs to be reviewed. This paragraph makes it a criminal offence to publicly accuse someone of a contemptible quality or attitude in a way that is perceptible to third parties or to accuse someone of dishonourable conduct that is likely to disparage the person concerned in the public opinion. The penalty for such an offence may include a prison sentence of up to six months or a fine of up to 360 daily rates (see: oesterreich.gv.at/.syndication?pageId=f0ee9eb0-2af6-49a6-a86f-2f80eb3d37bc).   To meet international standards, a review and possible amendment of this paragraph may be necessary to ensure that it does not conflict with freedom of expression and adequately protects the rights of citizens. This could include adjusting the definition of defamation and the associated penalties to ensure a balanced and appropriate legal basis;

Progress: No progress

Give effective access to education and teaching for asylum seekers, including those who are no longer minors

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to ensure, in line with international best practice, that the Criminal Code does not provide for penalties for defamation, the current section 111 of the Austrian Criminal Code needs to be reviewed. This paragraph makes it a criminal offence to publicly accuse someone of a contemptible quality or attitude in a way that is perceptible to third parties or to accuse someone of dishonourable conduct that is likely to disparage the person concerned in the public opinion. The penalty for such an offence may include a prison sentence of up to six months or a fine of up to 360 daily rates (see: oesterreich.gv.at/.syndication?pageId=f0ee9eb0-2af6-49a6-a86f-2f80eb3d37bc).   To meet international standards, a review and possible amendment of this paragraph may be necessary to ensure that it does not conflict with freedom of expression and adequately protects the rights of citizens. This could include adjusting the definition of defamation and the associated penalties to ensure a balanced and appropriate legal basis;

Redaktionelle Verantwortung UPR-Tool:

Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte, upr@liga.or.at

Lizenz CC-BY-SA 

Unterstützung durch:

Forschungskooperation mit der Volksanwaltschaft

Förderung des Zukunftsfonds der Republik Österreich

 

Receive the latest news

Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter