Universal Periodic Review

This UPR tool reflects the global recommendations made to Austria by all countries world-wide during the Universial Priodic Review process (UPR) at the UN Human Rights Council and their current status of implementation. The League coordinates a significant part of Austrian civil society in the UPR process. 

The recommendations can be filtered in the menu below by human rights topics, SDGs, proponent states etc. also a search function is available. 

 

We welcome your comments and suggestions at upr@liga.or.at.


Search category
Filter options
Filter by tag…

Progress: No progress

Create an Inter-ministerial Working Group on Men and Boys, to support national gender equality initiatives, with a view to promoting positive masculinity norms and combating violence against men and boys

Proponent:

Haiti


Republic of Haiti

Haiti


Republic of Haiti

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there is currently no inter-ministerial working group specifically dedicated to supporting national gender equality initiatives for men and boys with the stated aim of promoting positive masculinity norms and combating violence against men and boys. This initiative has not yet been adopted by Austria. 

Progress: No progress

Guarantee the freedom of religion or belief for all and ensure the rights of Muslims to practice religion freely including the wearing of veils

Proponent:

Sudan


Republic of Sudan

Sudan


Republic of Sudan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Anti-Muslim racism is a worrying and growing phenomenon in Austria. According to the Anti-Muslim Racism Report 2023 by the Documentation Centre Austria, a total of 1522 cases were reported, a record high since the beginning of the survey. Two thirds of these incidents took place online, while the rest occurred in the real world, including discrimination in public spaces, such as verbal insults and physical assaults. Women, especially those wearing headscarves, are particularly affected.
In the education sector, incidents such as insulting comments from classmates or threats from school administrators towards praying Muslim pupils have been documented. The spread of hate online is particularly problematic, accounting for almost 90 per cent of reported online incidents. Experts warn that these incidents are deepening social divisions and threatening social cohesion (see documentary Report 2023: https://dokustelle.at/reports/dokustelle-report-2023). In an open letter to the Austrian federal government, civil society calls for the introduction of the criminal offence of „political Islam“ to be dropped. The reason for this is the lack of scientific uniformity in the definition of this term, which could allow it to be used indiscriminately. The concern is that this could lead to generalised suspicions and executive measures against Muslims. The organisation also appeals for protection against discrimination and the preservation of religious freedom by ensuring that state authorities allow all communities to practise their religion freely and equally. It also emphasises that deradicalisation and counter-terrorism strategies must respect the rights of Muslim women to protection from discrimination and freedom of expression. Finally, it calls for religious practices and clothing not to be used as indicators of radicalisation and for surveillance not to be carried out on the basis of membership of Islam or Muslim organisations in order to avoid blanket criminalisation.    In 2023, the Documentation Centre Austria documented a total of 1522 racist attacks against Muslim
and persons perceived as Muslim. This figure is made up of cases that were reported offline and cases that were recorded as part of intensified online monitoring. However, the organisation emphasises that the actual number of attacks is likely to be higher;
While there are political strategies against anti-Semitism, there is no comparable approach to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgements against people perceived as Muslim. The establishment of the Documentation Centre for Political Islam and Operation Luxor reinforce a general suspicion of Muslims and lead to people withdrawing from social discourse, a reduction in diversity of opinion and restrictions on participation. Freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly can be restricted on the basis of membership of a particular group, which has a negative impact on basic democratic principles (Website of the Federal Chancellery – Documentation Centre for Political Islam: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2020/integrationsministerin-raab-dokumentationsstelle-politischer-islam-nimmt-arbeit-auf.html).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).In July 2021, the „anti-terror package“ was passed in Austria, but this raised concerns from civil society organisations and UN experts. In particular, it was feared that the paragraph on „religiously motivated extremist connections“ could stigmatise Muslims (see Terrorism Prevention Act – TeBG (849 d.B.): https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/I/849).   Despite concerns, law enforcement agencies used facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, resulting in potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and effective mechanisms to investigate these practices were lacking (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities entered into force in Austria on 1 July 1998 in order to protect and promote the rights of national minorities. The current report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention emphasises that Austria is continuing its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities. Despite a significant increase in funding for national minorities to almost 8 million euros in 2021 and the adoption of new laws to combat hate speech and violent hate crimes, challenges remain, particularly in minority language education and in the area of mutual respect and intercultural dialogue.   In contrast, there is no clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Little action has been taken, particularly with regard to awareness-raising measures against discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities, as well as promoting self-empowerment and human rights. 

Progress: No progress

Take necessary steps to protect freedom of religion or belief in Austria, including reform to ensure more equitable treatment of registered religious groups, and ensuring national security measures consider and minimise the impact on freedom of religion or belief

Proponent:

Australia


Australia

Australia


Australia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

While there are political strategies against anti-Semitism, there is no comparable approach to anti-Muslim racism. Instead, measures are taken that lead to prejudgements against people perceived as Muslim. The establishment of the Documentation Centre for Political Islam and Operation Luxor reinforce a general suspicion of Muslims and lead to people withdrawing from social discourse, a reduction in diversity of opinion and restrictions on participation. Freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly can be restricted on the basis of membership of a particular group, which has a negative impact on basic democratic principles (Website of the Federal Chancellery – Documentation Centre for Political Islam: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/nachrichten-der-bundesregierung/2020/integrationsministerin-raab-dokumentationsstelle-politischer-islam-nimmt-arbeit-auf.html).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).In July 2021, the „anti-terror package“ was passed in Austria, but this raised concerns from civil society organisations and UN experts. In particular, it was feared that the paragraph on „religiously motivated extremist connections“ could stigmatise Muslims (see Terrorism Prevention Act – TeBG (849 d.B.): https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/I/849).   Despite concerns, law enforcement agencies used facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, resulting in potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and effective mechanisms to investigate these practices were lacking (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities entered into force in Austria on 1 July 1998 in order to protect and promote the rights of national minorities. The current report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention emphasises that Austria is continuing its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities. Despite a significant increase in funding for national minorities to almost 8 million euros in 2021 and the adoption of new laws to combat hate speech and violent hate crimes, challenges remain, particularly in minority language education and in the area of mutual respect and intercultural dialogue.   In contrast, there is no clear responsibility at federal level to combat anti-black racism, anti-Muslim racism and racism in general. Little action has been taken, particularly with regard to awareness-raising measures against discrimination against people with disabilities and limited abilities, as well as promoting self-empowerment and human rights. 

Progress: No progress

Adopt programmes to increase the participation of ethnic minorities in public and political life

Proponent:

Jordan


Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

Jordan


Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

This recommendation was only taken note of in the 3rd cycle of the UPR. In the eyes of civil society, it would be desirable to adopt such recommendations in the next cycle and to consider implementing them now.   The advisory councils for the national minorities, which are located in the Federal Chancellery, are de lege not a representation of the national minorities, but rather advisory bodies of the Federal Government appointed and nominated by the Federal Chancellor. There are calls for a reform of the appointment procedure, the composition of the advisory councils for the national minorities (consideration of gender equality, presence of young people, etc.) and an expansion of the competences of the advisory councils for the national minorities.  

Progress: No progress

Increase the representation of ethnic minorities in political and public life, including legislative and executive state bodies

Proponent:

Serbia


Republic of Serbia

Serbia


Republic of Serbia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

This recommendation was only taken note of in the 3rd cycle of the UPR. In the eyes of civil society, it would be desirable to adopt such recommendations in the next cycle and to consider implementing them now.   The advisory councils for the national minorities, which are located in the Federal Chancellery, are de lege not a representation of the national minorities, but rather advisory bodies of the Federal Government appointed and nominated by the Federal Chancellor. There are calls for a reform of the appointment procedure, the composition of the advisory councils for the national minorities (consideration of gender equality, presence of young people, etc.) and an expansion of the competences of the advisory councils for the national minorities.  

Progress: No progress

Continue measures to promote gender equality and ensure the representation of ethnic minorities in the political and public life

Proponent:

Nepal


Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal

Nepal


Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

This recommendation was only taken note of in the 3rd cycle of the UPR. In the eyes of civil society, it would be desirable to adopt such recommendations in the next cycle and to consider implementing them now.   The advisory councils for the national minorities, which are located in the Federal Chancellery, are de lege not a representation of the national minorities, but rather advisory bodies of the Federal Government appointed and nominated by the Federal Chancellor. There are calls for a reform of the appointment procedure, the composition of the advisory councils for the national minorities (consideration of gender equality, presence of young people, etc.) and an expansion of the competences of the advisory councils for the national minorities.  A more effective and less paternalistic possibility for the ethnic groups to participate, apart from the general freedom of association, is called for. For example, through a right to sue associations, the establishment of a public-law body, consultation rights, etc. (see legal provision for the ordinance on the advisory councils of the national minorities: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10000614). There is a demand for more effective and less patronising opportunities for the ethnic groups to participate. This could include measures such as the right to collective redress, the establishment of a public law institution or the granting of consultation rights to ensure that communities can play a more meaningful role that goes beyond the general freedom of association and gain more autonomy.  

Progress: No progress

Consider taking measures to promote the participation of women and ethnic minorities in public office and political life

Proponent:

Peru


Republic of Peru

Peru


Republic of Peru

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

A more effective and less paternalistic possibility for the ethnic groups to participate, apart from the general freedom of association, is called for. For example, through a right to sue associations, the establishment of a public-law body, consultation rights, etc. (see legal provision for the ordinance on the advisory councils of the national minorities: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10000614). There is a demand for more effective and less patronising opportunities for the ethnic groups to participate. This could include measures such as the right to collective redress, the establishment of a public law institution or the granting of consultation rights to ensure that communities can play a more meaningful role that goes beyond the general freedom of association and gain more autonomy.  

Progress: No progress

Decriminalize defamation under the Criminal Act in accordance with the international best practice

Proponent:

Sierra Leone


Republic of Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone


Republic of Sierra Leone

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

According to §111 of the Austrian Criminal Code, it is a criminal offence to publicly accuse a person of a contemptible quality or attitude or to accuse them of dishonourable or immoral conduct that is likely to disparage them in public opinion (see §111 StGB, BGBl. No. 60/1974: here). The sanctions for such offences can include a prison sentence of up to six months or a fine of up to 360 daily rates. In line with international standards, Austria should ensure that the Criminal Code is amended accordingly so that defamation is no longer a criminal offence. 

Progress: No progress

Take further steps towards effective access to education and apprenticeship opportunities for asylum seekers, including those who are no longer minors

Proponent:

Philippines


Republic of the Philippines

Philippines


Republic of the Philippines

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to ensure, in line with international best practice, that the Criminal Code does not provide for penalties for defamation, the current section 111 of the Austrian Criminal Code needs to be reviewed. This paragraph makes it a criminal offence to publicly accuse someone of a contemptible quality or attitude in a way that is perceptible to third parties or to accuse someone of dishonourable conduct that is likely to disparage the person concerned in the public opinion. The penalty for such an offence may include a prison sentence of up to six months or a fine of up to 360 daily rates (see: oesterreich.gv.at/.syndication?pageId=f0ee9eb0-2af6-49a6-a86f-2f80eb3d37bc).   To meet international standards, a review and possible amendment of this paragraph may be necessary to ensure that it does not conflict with freedom of expression and adequately protects the rights of citizens. This could include adjusting the definition of defamation and the associated penalties to ensure a balanced and appropriate legal basis;

Progress: No progress

Increase the minimum age for voluntary recruitment to 18 in line with the Committee on the Rights of the Child recommendation

Proponent:

Croatia


Republic of Croatia

Croatia


Republic of Croatia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict was ratified by Austria on 1 February 2002. The main point of the protocol is to raise the minimum age for participation in armed conflict to 18 years. In Austria, it is generally possible to complete the Voluntary Social Year from the age of 17. However, if particularly suitable, participation at a younger age is also possible under certain circumstances (see further information on the website of the Children’s Convention: https://www.kinderrechtskonvention.info/kindersoldaten-3205/). 

Progress: No progress

Strengthen the implementation of its programmes for the protection of minorities and undertake necessary legal reforms to address the issue”

Proponent:

Malaysia


Malaysia

Malaysia


Malaysia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities came into force in Austria on 1 July 1998. It aims to protect and promote the rights of national minorities and sets Europe-wide standards in this regard. In the current Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023)14 of the Committee of Ministers of 13 December 2023 (see: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]}), as well as in the Report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe of 16 October 2023 (see: https://rm.coe.int/5th-op-austria-de-full-version/1680ace87b) emphasises that Austria must continue its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities, but must expand them in key areas (see Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023) 14 of the Committee of Ministers of 13 December 2023: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]} ) which provides for immediate measures to protect ethnic groups.  In 2021, funding for ethnic groups in Austria was significantly increased, with funding now totalling almost 8 million euros. New laws were also adopted to combat hate speech on the internet and violent hate crimes (ACFC/OP/V(2023)002, 5th Review Report of the Advisory Committee for the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe: https://rm.coe.int/5th-op-austria-de-full-version/1680ace87b). Nevertheless, challenges remain, particularly in the area of minority language teaching and with regard to mutual respect and intercultural dialogue in society. In Austria, the Framework Convention is implemented and monitored by a dialogue platform in which government representatives, civil society organisations and experts from science and research work together. This dialogue process is crucial for compliance with the provisions of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (further information on the website of the Federal Chancellery: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/volksgruppen/roma-strategie.html). 

Progress: No progress

Continue modernisation of the national minority protection legislative framework in close cooperation with national minorities‘ representatives, including adequate financing

Proponent:

Slovenia


Republic of Slovenia

Slovenia


Republic of Slovenia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities came into force in Austria on 1 July 1998. It aims to protect and promote the rights of national minorities and sets Europe-wide standards in this regard. In the current Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023)14 of the Committee of Ministers of 13 December 2023 (see: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]}), as well as in the Report of the Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe of 16 October 2023 (see: https://rm.coe.int/5th-op-austria-de-full-version/1680ace87b) emphasises that Austria must continue its efforts to safeguard the rights of national minorities, but must expand them in key areas (see Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023) 14 of the Committee of Ministers of 13 December 2023: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]} ) which provides for immediate measures to protect ethnic groups.  This recommendation was only taken note of in the 3rd cycle of the UPR. In the eyes of civil society, it would be desirable to adopt such recommendations in the next cycle and to consider implementing them now.   The advisory councils for the national minorities, which are located in the Federal Chancellery, are de lege not a representation of the national minorities, but rather advisory bodies of the Federal Government appointed and nominated by the Federal Chancellor. There are calls for a reform of the appointment procedure, the composition of the advisory councils for the national minorities (consideration of gender equality, presence of young people, etc.) and an expansion of the competences of the advisory councils for the national minorities.  

Progress: No progress

Offer migrant groups more institutional opportunities for political participation, involving them in political processes especially in the field of integration

Proponent:

Turkey


Republic of Turkey

Turkey


Republic of Turkey

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

An EU initiative, the Action Plan on Integration and Inclusion 2021-2027, aims to promote the inclusion of all people in society and remove barriers to the participation of people with a migrant background. The plan emphasises the need for both individual efforts and the host community for inclusive integration. Measures include education, labour market integration, access to health services and affordable housing. The EU Commission is seeking partnerships with various stakeholders to ensure the implementation of the action plan and promote the inclusion of migrants (see NAP on Integration and Inclusion 2021-2027: https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files_en?file=2020-11/action_plan_on_integration_and_inclusion_2021-2027.pdf). In Austria, public debates on the integration of migrants are far removed from academic discourse and the real-life experiences of this group. The prevailing opinion assumes a gradual process of adaptation of immigrants to Austrian culture, which, however, often implies unrealistic ideas of unity and homogenisation. Complete integration is seen as a constantly demanded but unattainable goal.   The political commitment of migrants reflects transnational experiences and the framework conditions in the country of immigration. Restrictions in citizenship law mean that many migrants in Vienna are excluded from the active political process. The lack of recognition for transnational experiences and resources as well as the non-immigration orientated political and administrative structures reinforce these challenges. The reaction to this situation has led to the emergence of political entrepreneurs, associations, platforms and media outside the established political structures. These actors deal with issues of migration and integration in Austria and serve as a transnational bridge. Political participation often takes place via associations, which represent an alternative form of inclusion (see project report 2021, Political participation in a transnational context: Turkish and Serbian migrants in Vienna: https://migrant-integration.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-11/stadt-wien-ucc88berarbeitet-projektbericht-8-11-2021.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Review section 35 (2) of the asylum law, granting the right to family reunification without undue restrictions, in particular to unaccompanied minors

Proponent:

Uruguay


Republic of Eastern Uruguay

Uruguay


Republic of Eastern Uruguay

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Section 35 (2) of the Asylum Act regulates family reunification for beneficiaries of subsidiary protection (see Asylum Act 2005, Federal Law Gazette I No. 56/2018 : https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/i/2005/100/P35/NOR40205456). According to a study from December 2016, there are further challenges in the area of family reunification (see the PDF from the European Migration Network on family reunification of third-country nationals in Austria: https://www.emn.at/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Die-Familienzusammenfuehrung-von-Drittstaatsangeh%c3%b6rigen-in-%c3%96sterreich.pdf, page 35 ff). In contrast to persons entitled to asylum, a 3-year waiting period without any flexibility is required for persons entitled to subsidiary protection. This cannot be waived even by a decision of the authorities. In addition, there are the fundamental problems that exist with every family reunification under Austrian law: German language skills must be demonstrated at the time of application. And at least in the context of a prognosis decision, the authorities must be convinced of a secure livelihood and local housing for the family that will join them in the future. This legal situation remains unchanged.  In fact, there has been a larger number of family reunifications in recent years, although the publicly available statistical data does not allow a breakdown into family reunifications of persons entitled to asylum or subsidiary protection. The Red Cross ( https://www.roteskreuz.at/ich-brauche-hilfe/familienzusammenfuehrung) in particular provides support services and counselling for applications for family reunification;

Progress: No progress

Reinstate humanitarian admission programme

Proponent:

Sierra Leone


Republic of Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone


Republic of Sierra Leone

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

From 2013 to 2017, Austria participated in a resettlement programme for Syrian refugees in cooperation with the UNHCR. However, there is currently no such programme. Instead, three „humanitarian admission programmes“ for Syrian refugees were implemented between 2013 and 2017, which enabled the safe and legal entry of 1,900 refugees to Austria. However, there is no permanent resettlement programme and the decision to accept refugees is the responsibility of the Austrian government, which must be taken on a regular basis. No active resettlement programme has been carried out in Austria since the end of 2017.   The term „resettlement“ describes the permanent relocation of particularly vulnerable refugees to third countries with comprehensive refugee protection that are willing to accept them. This decision is taken in situations where a return to the country of origin is not foreseeable and often concerns refugees who have been living in countries of first refuge for many years. Resettlement programmes not only contribute to individual benefits, but also to international responsibility-sharing and to relieving the burden on countries of first refuge. However, the available resettlement places only cover a fraction of the need, which prompts the UNHCR to advocate for their expansion worldwide.   Current challenges such as armed conflicts, natural disasters and global food shortages are exacerbating the humanitarian situation, particularly in regions such as the Middle East, North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, Afghanistan and Yemen. Despite Austria’s historical tradition of taking in and helping people, there is a lack of willingness to take in refugees today. Short-term reception operations in acute crisis situations are organised in cooperation between several countries in order to provide resources for the rescue of people. Austria has not yet participated in such actions (see questions and answers from SOS-Mitmenschen on the humanitarian reception programme in Austria: https://www.sosmitmensch.at/faq-humanitaere-aufnahme&ts=17053094652449). 

Progress: No progress

Reduce legal and administrative barriers to family reunification and effective access to the labor market for the beneficiaries of international protection

Proponent:

Afghanistan


Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

Afghanistan


Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to ensure successful integration, it is of great importance to grant asylum seekers effective access to the labour market during their asylum procedure. This requires adjustments to legislation and administrative procedures. The opportunity to work during the asylum procedure enables asylum seekers to utilise their skills, contribute to society and secure their livelihood. Such access promotes the independence and well-being of those affected. However, there is unequal treatment in terms of access to the labour market, especially in the basic welfare system. While Ukrainians have protection status and access to the labour market from the outset, asylum seekers and displaced persons from Ukraine must obtain an employment permit. This inequality is exacerbated by bureaucratic procedures and an additional income limit, which penalises some groups of people. It is emphasised that the current system of basic services is in urgent need of fundamental reform. All groups, regardless of their status, should have fair access to the labour market in order to promote integration.   A sensible care system should encourage, not hinder, income-earning opportunities through work to enable people to manage without support at an early stage. A fundamental reform of the current system is needed to ensure that no one is permanently denied effective access to the labour market. 

Progress: No progress

Establish an efficient procedure for determining statelessness, and approve residence permits on the basis of statelessness

Proponent:

Mexico


United Mexican States

Mexico


United Mexican States

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The challenges faced by stateless people in Austria extend to various aspects of their everyday lives. The lack of necessary documents leads to considerable restrictions: Working is often prohibited, opening a bank account, travelling or getting married are problematic. Many stateless people therefore live in a legal grey area.   In this context, UNHCR Austria has conducted a comprehensive survey on statelessness in Austria as part of its mandate. The main objective of this survey is to raise awareness of the problem of statelessness and to shed light on the daily challenges faced by stateless people. The results of this assessment serve as a basis for recommendations by the UNHCR to improve the situation of stateless people in Austria and to prevent the emergence of new cases of statelessness (see: https://www.unhcr.org/dach/at/was-wir-tun/staatenlosigkeit/staatenlosigkeit-in-oesterreich). The exact number of stateless people in Austria is difficult to determine, but according to Statistics Austria, around 12,000 people were listed as stateless or with unclear or unknown citizenship in 2016. A key problem that emerges from the study is the lack of a special procedure for determining statelessness in Austria. This means that those affected are often unable to assert basic rights derived from international agreements. As a result, stateless persons remain in a legally insecure situation, without access to work, health insurance or social benefits.   Special attention is also paid to stateless children born in Austria. In order to spare them a fate as stateless persons, the UNHCR recommends legal measures for the automatic acquisition of Austrian citizenship.   In addition, since 8 January 2024, Vienna has been the first Austrian federal state to set up a website to provide information for stateless people at the suggestion of SOS Mitmensch. Since this year, Municipal Department 35 (MA 35) has been providing information about the possibility of simplified naturalisation for stateless persons born in Austria. The aim of this initiative is to inform those affected about the short three-year window of opportunity available to them from the age of majority to obtain Austrian citizenship under simplified conditions. This measure is intended to ensure that affected persons do not miss this opportunity and can effectively exercise their rights. The further development of this initiative remains to be seen (see article: https://www.sosmitmensch.at/wien-startet-informationsoffensive-fuer-staatenlose). 

Progress: No progress

Ratification UN Convention on the Rights of all Migrant Workers and Members of their Families dated 18.12.1990 (ICRMW)

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families is an agreement supported by the United Nations that aims to improve the legal status of migrants with worker status, seasonal and casual workers and their family members. Despite its international commitment, Austria has not yet ratified this convention (see resolution on ratification ICMW: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXII/A/763). The discrepancy between the signing of international agreements and their actual implementation in national law raises questions and could give rise to a review and possible reassessment of these decisions. This could be an opportunity for Austria to strengthen its commitment to the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers and their family members. 

Progress: No progress

Ratification Additional Protocol to the European Social Charter on Collective Complaints dated 09.11.1995 and the Declaration on Article D of the European Social Charter (revised) dated 03.05.1996 must be accepted in accordance with the procedure laid down in the said Protocol

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet ratified the 1995 Additional Protocol to the European Social Charter on Collective Complaints. This protocol, which has been in force since 1998, allows organisations to submit collective complaints about violations of social rights and was adopted by some European countries in order to promote social justice. Austria has accepted parts of the revised European Social Charter, but without officially recognising the collective complaints procedure. Austria has signed the revised European Social Charter of 1996 and the Additional Protocol on Collective Complaints, but has not yet given its binding consent to the application of the collective complaints procedure. This means that collective complaints by trade unions and other organisations are not admissible before the European Committee of Social Rights. However, Austria is obliged to demonstrate compliance with the Charter through regular reports. Actual accession to the collective complaints procedure and a declaration of acceptance of Article D have not yet taken place. 

Progress: No progress

Ratification Articles 30 and 31 of the European Social Charta

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet ratified Articles 30 and 31 of the revised European Social Charter (ESC). These articles deal with the right to protection against poverty and social exclusion (Article 30) and the right to adequate housing (Article 31). Although Austria has largely implemented the Social Charter and is subject to ongoing reporting obligations to fulfil certain social rights, there are reservations regarding these specific articles, as their implementation is considered complex and potentially costly for the state. Several states, including Germany, have expressed similar reservations about these two articles, as they guarantee comprehensive social rights that would often require extensive legal and financial adjustments (information on the BMAW website on the Council of Europe and ESC: https://www.bmaw.gv.at/Themen/Arbeitsrecht/Internationales-und-Europaeisches-Arbeitsrecht/Europarat-und-Europaeische-Sozialcharta.html). 

Progress: No progress

Ratification 12th additional protocol EMRK dated 04.11.2000

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

On 4 November 2000, Protocol No. 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms was adopted and entered into force on 1 April 2005. The Protocol establishes a comprehensive prohibition of discrimination, ensuring that everyone has the right to the full enjoyment of all rights set out in law without discrimination on the basis of sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.   The ratification of Protocol No. 12 by Austria would mean that the country undertakes to enforce and promote the prohibition of discrimination in all areas of public life. Austria would thus take an important step towards strengthening human rights and equal treatment in society (see Protocol No. 12: https://www.menschenrechtskonvention.eu/protokoll-nr-12-emrk-9277/). 

Progress: No progress

Ratification The Budapest Convention on Cybercrime dated 23.11.2001 and its additional protocol of 23.11.2001

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet ratified the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, which was adopted by the Council of Europe on 23 November 2001. This convention is the first international treaty to set legal standards for combating cybercrime, including measures for criminal prosecution and international cooperation in the case of internet-based offences such as data misuse, cyber fraud and child pornography. It serves many countries as the basis for national laws on cybercrime, but Austria has not yet joined the treaty.  
The Additional Protocol of 2003, which specifically addresses racist and xenophobic offences on the Internet, has also not been ratified by Austria. Although the treaty has been adopted by over 60 countries and is recognised worldwide as a directive, Austria has decided to implement its regulations on cybercrime at a national level without being formally bound by the Budapest Convention;

Progress: No progress

Ratification Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of 10.12.2008

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and enables individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations if their rights have been violated. Austria ratified this protocol in 1978. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is an additional protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and allows individuals and groups to submit complaints to the United Nations when their rights have been violated. Austria, however, ratified this protocol in 1978 (see State Report, Concluding Observations of the Committee on wsk Rights: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:40fa2699-4b9e-450e-a246-fdf4a7dcc164/CESCR_WSK_4_de.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Ratification 3rd Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) of 17.06.2011

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria signed the Third Optional Protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child on 28 February 2012, which allows children an individual complaints procedure for violations of children’s rights, but has not yet ratified it. This lack of ratification means that children in Austria do not have the opportunity to appeal directly to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child if their rights are violated and national legal remedies have been exhausted. Even though Austria was actively involved internationally in the drafting of the protocol, the legal step to fully recognise this important right of appeal has not yet been taken (Netzwerk Kinderrechte Österreich: Umsetzung & Monitoring in Österreich). 

Progress: No progress

Give a mandate to the European Commission to draw up a legally binding international treaty to bind transnational corporations and companies to human rights (Resolution A/HRC/RES/26/9)

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has been involved in the UN negotiations on a binding international treaty to regulate transnational corporations with regard to human rights (Resolution A/HRC/RES/26/9). This treaty has been under discussion within the UN Human Rights Council since 2014, with the EU participating in the negotiations as a single entity. However, the European Commission has not yet received its own negotiating mandate for this process, which makes Europe’s negotiating position complicated in some cases. 

Progress: No progress

Ensure the constructive cooperation by Austria in the relevant Open Ended Inter-Governmental Work Group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has been involved in the UN negotiations on a binding international treaty to regulate transnational corporations with regard to human rights (Resolution A/HRC/RES/26/9). This treaty has been under discussion within the UN Human Rights Council since 2014, with the EU participating in the negotiations as a single entity. However, the European Commission has not yet received its own negotiating mandate for this process, which makes Europe’s negotiating position complicated in some cases. 

Progress: No progress

Implement a comprehensive catalogue of fundamental rights in the constitution

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet enshrined any fundamental social rights such as the right to an adequate standard of living or healthcare in its constitution, which makes it an exception within the EU. While basic human rights and civil liberties are protected in the Austrian constitution, fundamental social rights have so far only applied on the basis of simple laws that can be changed more easily, e.g. in the area of minimum income and healthcare. As a result, social benefits do not have the same constitutional stability as civil liberties.  The Austrian Ombudsman Board and various NGOs are therefore pushing for fundamental social rights to be enshrined in the constitution. A comprehensive catalogue, which was considered in the 2020-2024 government programme, would be necessary, for example, to implement a „Federal Constitutional Law on Social Security“ that protects rights such as healthcare, housing and minimum care. Initiatives such as the Poverty Conference and the Momentum Institute support these demands and emphasise that such rights should also be subject to the control of the Constitutional Court (Ombudsman Board: Volksanwaltschaft drängt auf soziale Grundrechte in der Verfassung, 2022) and a special report by the Ombudsman Board, 2023: https://volksanwaltschaft.gv.at/artikel/Achitz-Sozialhilfe-muss-Existenz-sichern-Soziale-Grundrechte-in-Verfassung-verankern). 

Progress: No progress

Levelling-Up: Comprehensive protection against discrimination in all areas of life

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, a number of different laws regulate protection against discrimination at state and federal level. This makes the enforcement of the law complex in some cases, protection is not standardised and – contrary to numerous calls in the UPR process and in numerous other monitoring processes on human rights conventions – there are significant gaps in protection: 1. in terms of access to goods and services in the private sector, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief and sexual orientation. This fact has been criticised for years by numerous civil society organisations and equality actors as a lack of levelling up.
2) Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education.
3. there is also a lack of comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.
In addition, the law contains provisions on the reversal of the burden of proof, which makes it easier for the person affected to prove discrimination, as well as provisions for possible claims for damages and compensation (see Equal Treatment Act, GIBG Federal Law Gazette I No. 66/2004: https://ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20003395&FassungVom=2022-02-10). The Introductory Act to the Administrative Procedure Acts (EGVG) provides a legal basis for dealing with racist refusal of admission in Austria. According to this law, both victims and witnesses of racist discrimination can report such incidents. Police officers are obliged to forward these reports to the competent district administrative authority. The procedure under the EGVG is free of charge for the person making the report. The reporting person or organisation, such as ZARA or the Litigation Association, are not informed of the outcome of the proceedings and have no direct party status. In addition, the EGVG does not provide for compensation for the person discriminated against. Instead, offenders can be fined up to 1,090 euros, an amount that has not been evaluated for years. In the event of repeated violations of the EGVG, the trade authority can theoretically withdraw the trade licence. ZARA supports those affected by discrimination through various measures, including letters of intervention to the establishments concerned, legal advice and referral to other legal bodies such as the Equal Treatment Ombudsman’s Office or the Litigation Association. The aim is to find an out-of-court solution or to take legal action to enforce the rights of victims of discrimination. These legal and supportive measures are crucial to strengthening protection against racial discrimination in Austria and dealing with cases of discrimination appropriately (see Racism Report 2022: https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA-Rassismus_Report_2022.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Create legal regulations that impose binding and enforceable due diligence obligations to respect human rights and the environment on all Austrian companies and groups of companies domestically and abroad (mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence) and commit to the creation of a general cross-sectoral regulation at EU level

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

In Austria, the introduction of binding due diligence obligations to respect human rights and environmental standards for companies is being actively pursued, particularly in connection with the new EU Supply Chain Directive (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive). This directive obliges large companies in the EU and those with a significant business volume in the EU to identify, minimise or prevent and document negative impacts of their business activities along their entire supply chain. Under the directive, Austria is obliged to transpose the corresponding EU requirements into national law by 26 July 2026. The measures are aimed at companies that have to ensure human rights and environmental standards in their global activities by taking their „activity chain“ into account, and could also indirectly affect smaller companies, for example through contractual requirements from larger trading partners. The directive provides options and forms of support for these companies.
   Austrian companies will be obliged to integrate civil liability issues and compliance requirements into their business strategies and to develop transition plans in line with the climate goals of the Paris Agreement in order to minimise or prevent potential negative impacts of their business activities. In future, an official supervisory authority will also be able to impose sanctions if companies fail to fulfil their due diligence obligations. For the Austrian economy, this represents an adjustment to the now mandatory EU-wide standards. (More information on the EU Supply Chain Act on HRW: https://www.hrw.org/de/news/2024/05/24/neues-eu-lieferkettengesetz-fuer-unternehmen-fragen-und-antworten). 
A § 8 BMG Commission for dialogue processes between the administration and civil society was newly established in the BMK. This commission promotes the exchange between the administration (represented by the) and organised civil society (represented by the managing directors of Ökobüro and Umweltdachverband). However, a climate protection law and other tangible legal progress are still lacking, which is also clearly criticised by civil society (see e.g. on the website of the climate referendum: https://klimavolksbegehren.at/). On 23 February 2022, the European Commission published a draft directive on „Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence“ (CDSDD, see draft on the European Union website: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52022 PC 0071 from=EN). On 1 December 2022, the European Council agreed on its position and on 1 June 2023, the European Parliament will adopt its position, which will be followed by trilogue negotiations between the three institutions (Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the European Council on corporate due diligence in relation to sustainability and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 as PDF: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15024-2022-REV-1/en/pdf). The Federal Ministry of Justice and the Federal Ministry of Labour and Economic Affairs have initiated a good consultation process following the publication of the Commission’s draft directive. The government should again fully involve stakeholders in the future implementation of the directive in Austria.
  It is to be welcomed that the Directive that has been adopted and entered into force includes civil liability and sanctions by public authorities. However, in order for the directive to effectively protect human rights and the environment along global supply chains, access to justice for those affected by rights violations needs to be improved. An important civil society initiative on this topic is „Human rights need laws“ (campaign by the organisation Netzwerk Soziale Verantwortung for a supply chain law in Austria and the EU: https://www.nesove.at/menschenrechte-brauchen-gesetze/).
  On 26 February 2025, the EU Commission presented a package which, according to the Commission, is intended to simplify sustainability rules. Proposed amendments concern the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the EU Taxonomy and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). Although a mere simplification and reduction of redundant and overlapping reporting points was announced, a massive watering down of the CSDDD in important points is now proposed: The erosion of the risk-based approach, as the due diligence obligations would only extend to direct business partners* with a few exceptions; monitoring of due diligence measures would only be carried out every 5 years instead of annually as previously envisaged; deletion of an EU-wide harmonised regulation on civil liability; deletion of the turnover-related minimum maximum penalties for violations; deletion of the obligation to implement climate transition plans, deletion of the possibility of representative actions, etc. (see: here). As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Raise other provisions of the CRC to constitutional status, in particular social rights, the right to an adequate standard of living and the right to health care

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet enshrined any fundamental social rights such as the right to an adequate standard of living or healthcare in its constitution, which makes it an exception within the EU. While basic human rights and civil liberties are protected in the Austrian constitution, fundamental social rights have so far only applied on the basis of simple laws that can be changed more easily, e.g. in the area of minimum income and healthcare. As a result, social benefits do not have the same constitutional stability as civil liberties.  The Austrian Ombudsman Board and various NGOs are therefore pushing for fundamental social rights to be enshrined in the constitution. A comprehensive catalogue, which was considered in the 2020-2024 government programme, would be necessary, for example, to implement a „Federal Constitutional Law on Social Security“ that protects rights such as healthcare, housing and minimum care. Initiatives such as the Poverty Conference and the Momentum Institute support these demands and emphasise that such rights should also be subject to the control of the Constitutional Court (Ombudsman Board: Volksanwaltschaft drängt auf soziale Grundrechte in der Verfassung, 2022) and a special report by the Ombudsman Board, 2023: https://volksanwaltschaft.gv.at/artikel/Achitz-Sozialhilfe-muss-Existenz-sichern-Soziale-Grundrechte-in-Verfassung-verankern). 

Progress: No progress

Consider international human rights instruments effectively when drafting national legislation and develop a best practice in the formulation of draft legislation that gives preference to the formulation of standards that conform to fundamental rights

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

In Austria, the introduction of binding due diligence obligations to respect human rights and environmental standards for companies is being actively pursued, particularly in connection with the new EU Supply Chain Directive (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive). This directive obliges large companies in the EU and those with a significant business volume in the EU to identify, minimise or prevent and document negative impacts of their business activities along their entire supply chain. Under the directive, Austria is obliged to transpose the corresponding EU requirements into national law by 26 July 2026. The measures are aimed at companies that have to ensure human rights and environmental standards in their global activities by taking their „activity chain“ into account, and could also indirectly affect smaller companies, for example through contractual requirements from larger trading partners. The directive provides options and forms of support for these companies.
   Austrian companies will be obliged to integrate civil liability issues and compliance requirements into their business strategies and to develop transition plans in line with the climate goals of the Paris Agreement in order to minimise or prevent potential negative impacts of their business activities. In future, an official supervisory authority will also be able to impose sanctions if companies fail to fulfil their due diligence obligations. For the Austrian economy, this represents an adjustment to the now mandatory EU-wide standards. (More information on the EU Supply Chain Act on HRW: https://www.hrw.org/de/news/2024/05/24/neues-eu-lieferkettengesetz-fuer-unternehmen-fragen-und-antworten). 
A § 8 BMG Commission for dialogue processes between the administration and civil society was newly established in the BMK. This commission promotes the exchange between the administration (represented by the) and organised civil society (represented by the managing directors of Ökobüro and Umweltdachverband). However, a climate protection law and other tangible legal progress are still lacking, which is also clearly criticised by civil society (see e.g. on the website of the climate referendum: https://klimavolksbegehren.at/). On 23 February 2022, the European Commission published a draft directive on „Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence“ (CDSDD, see draft on the European Union website: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52022 PC 0071 from=EN). On 1 December 2022, the European Council agreed on its position and on 1 June 2023, the European Parliament will adopt its position, which will be followed by trilogue negotiations between the three institutions (Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the European Council on corporate due diligence in relation to sustainability and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 as PDF: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15024-2022-REV-1/en/pdf). The Federal Ministry of Justice and the Federal Ministry of Labour and Economic Affairs have initiated a good consultation process following the publication of the Commission’s draft directive. The government should again fully involve stakeholders in the future implementation of the directive in Austria.
  It is to be welcomed that the Directive that has been adopted and entered into force includes civil liability and sanctions by public authorities. However, in order for the directive to effectively protect human rights and the environment along global supply chains, access to justice for those affected by rights violations needs to be improved. An important civil society initiative on this topic is „Human rights need laws“ (campaign by the organisation Netzwerk Soziale Verantwortung for a supply chain law in Austria and the EU: https://www.nesove.at/menschenrechte-brauchen-gesetze/).
  On 26 February 2025, the EU Commission presented a package which, according to the Commission, is intended to simplify sustainability rules. Proposed amendments concern the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the EU Taxonomy and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). Although a mere simplification and reduction of redundant and overlapping reporting points was announced, a massive watering down of the CSDDD in important points is now proposed: The erosion of the risk-based approach, as the due diligence obligations would only extend to direct business partners* with a few exceptions; monitoring of due diligence measures would only be carried out every 5 years instead of annually as previously envisaged; deletion of an EU-wide harmonised regulation on civil liability; deletion of the turnover-related minimum maximum penalties for violations; deletion of the obligation to implement climate transition plans, deletion of the possibility of representative actions, etc. (see: here). As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Increase awareness for the importance of human rights in all regional administrations

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The international activities of the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF) and the organisations charged with this task, erinnern.at and OeAD, all aim to support teachers and learners in the field of human rights education. However, there is no further information on specific projects from Austria. Although the World Programme for Human Rights Education was launched by the United Nations in December 2004, various measures to promote human rights education are being implemented in Austria. Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. 

Progress: No progress

Ensure nationwide uniform legal quality standards in areas relevant to human rights, such as child and youth welfare and youth protection

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, the need to create binding, nationwide quality standards for child and youth welfare, including foster care, is being increasingly emphasised. Although some state-specific regulations and initiatives to ensure quality already exist, there are still differences between the federal states. The creation of harmonised quality standards would ensure that all children and young people placed in foster care or other care facilities receive the same high level of care. In recent years, efforts have been made in Austria to define these standards. The provincial governments are obliged to ensure compliance with the standards in child and youth welfare and to evaluate them regularly. Efforts are also being made to standardise the practice of foster families, which is supported in particular by the exchange of best practice models and the involvement of experts from various organisations. In addition to the introduction of these standards, emphasis is also placed on the regular training and further development of professionals in this area in order to guarantee high-quality care. This includes ensuring that foster families also receive the necessary support and further training to meet the special requirements of foster children. Despite this progress, the implementation of a binding, nationwide regulation remains an ongoing process that requires further political and legislative adjustments. In Austria, efforts are currently being made to ensure the quality of child and youth welfare through legal standards, but implementation remains inconsistent and dependent on the respective federal states. The Child and Youth Welfare Act (KJH-G) requires that the quality of care for children and young people is regularly evaluated by the provincial governments, taking into account professional standards, social developments and scientific findings. Since 2017, quality standards for inpatient child and youth welfare services have been developed in Austria with the aim of standardising them across the provinces. These standards were developed by 19 different organisations, including FICE Austria and SOS Children’s Villages, in order to ensure high-quality care for children and young people. They set out clear requirements for assistance planning, co-operation with parents and the staffing and structural conditions in the facilities. However, there are still differences in the legal regulations for the protection of minors, as this is regulated at state level in Austria. Different federal states have different regulations, which can lead to a certain lack of clarity. Developments in this area show that implementation is an ongoing process that continues to require critical review and adaptation in order to guarantee uniform and high standards. 

Progress: No progress

Prepare and formulate a comprehensive NAP on human rights based on the OHCHR recommendations 2011 and 2015

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Despite the agreement in the last government programme and the sustained demand by opposition parties such as the SPÖ and NEOS, a general National Action Plan for Human Rights for Austria has not yet been finalised or adopted. The details (see: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:7b9e6755-2115-440c-b2ec-cbf64a931aa8/RegProgramm-lang.pdf on page 153) and in the parliamentary initiatives of the SPÖ and NEOS (e.g. SPÖ and NEOS). A general National Action Plan for Human Rights should not be replaced by the results of topic-specific action plans. Rather, it is intended to provide strategic and long-term planning, prioritisation and serve as a central mechanism for coordination and strategic planning to implement the recommendations of the UPR process. In addition to strategic objectives for legislation, a comprehensive national action plan should include the following elements: Network building within the administration and with NGOs, new creation and support of human rights institutions, integration of human rights education in schools and universities, educational programmes for vulnerable groups, public awareness-building, provision of information materials, research and evaluation. As early as 1993, the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna recommended comprehensive National Action Plans for Human Rights. These form the gold standard throughout the EU and are widespread in many countries, as a study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency shows ( Study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency). It is no substitute for a general National Action Plan for Human Rights to await the results of topic-specific National Action Plans. Rather, the purpose of the general National Action Plan is to plan strategically and in the long term and to define priorities. In this way, the National Action Plan for Human Rights can also be the main mechanism for coordination and strategic planning for the implementation of the recommendations of the UPR process.
  In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government aims to revitalise the Human Rights Action Plan and promote its implementation (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Support a status quo collection and formulation of realistic and measurable indicators in the context of the NAP on Human Rights

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Despite the agreement in the last government programme and the sustained demand by opposition parties such as the SPÖ and NEOS, a general National Action Plan for Human Rights for Austria has not yet been finalised or adopted. The details (see: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:7b9e6755-2115-440c-b2ec-cbf64a931aa8/RegProgramm-lang.pdf on page 153) and in the parliamentary initiatives of the SPÖ and NEOS (e.g. SPÖ and NEOS). A general National Action Plan for Human Rights should not be replaced by the results of topic-specific action plans. Rather, it is intended to provide strategic and long-term planning, prioritisation and serve as a central mechanism for coordination and strategic planning to implement the recommendations of the UPR process. In addition to strategic objectives for legislation, a comprehensive national action plan should include the following elements: Network building within the administration and with NGOs, new creation and support of human rights institutions, integration of human rights education in schools and universities, educational programmes for vulnerable groups, public awareness-building, provision of information materials, research and evaluation. As early as 1993, the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna recommended comprehensive National Action Plans for Human Rights. These form the gold standard throughout the EU and are widespread in many countries, as a study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency shows ( Study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency). It is no substitute for a general National Action Plan for Human Rights to await the results of topic-specific National Action Plans. Rather, the purpose of the general National Action Plan is to plan strategically and in the long term and to define priorities. In this way, the National Action Plan for Human Rights can also be the main mechanism for coordination and strategic planning for the implementation of the recommendations of the UPR process.
  In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government aims to revitalise the Human Rights Action Plan and promote its implementation (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Ensure transparent consultation of civil society in the preparation of the NAP on Human Rights

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Despite the agreement in the last government programme and the sustained demand by opposition parties such as the SPÖ and NEOS, a general National Action Plan for Human Rights for Austria has not yet been finalised or adopted. The details (see: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:7b9e6755-2115-440c-b2ec-cbf64a931aa8/RegProgramm-lang.pdf on page 153) and in the parliamentary initiatives of the SPÖ and NEOS (e.g. SPÖ and NEOS). A general National Action Plan for Human Rights should not be replaced by the results of topic-specific action plans. Rather, it is intended to provide strategic and long-term planning, prioritisation and serve as a central mechanism for coordination and strategic planning to implement the recommendations of the UPR process. In addition to strategic objectives for legislation, a comprehensive national action plan should include the following elements: Network building within the administration and with NGOs, new creation and support of human rights institutions, integration of human rights education in schools and universities, educational programmes for vulnerable groups, public awareness-building, provision of information materials, research and evaluation. As early as 1993, the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna recommended comprehensive National Action Plans for Human Rights. These form the gold standard throughout the EU and are widespread in many countries, as a study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency shows ( Study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency). It is no substitute for a general National Action Plan for Human Rights to await the results of topic-specific National Action Plans. Rather, the purpose of the general National Action Plan is to plan strategically and in the long term and to define priorities. In this way, the National Action Plan for Human Rights can also be the main mechanism for coordination and strategic planning for the implementation of the recommendations of the UPR process.
  In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government aims to revitalise the Human Rights Action Plan and promote its implementation (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Develop a specific NAP for the protection of children’s rights based on the recommendations of the UN-CRC

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The development of a specific National Action Plan (NAP) for the protection of children’s rights in Austria based on the recommendations of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child represents an important step towards improving the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child at national level and better protecting children’s rights.
Such an action plan would address the specific recommendations and observations that the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child regularly makes to Austria when reviewing the implementation of children’s rights in the country. These recommendations cover a variety of topics, such as protection from violence, access to education and health services, as well as combating child poverty and discrimination. A specific NAP for the protection of children’s rights would include concrete measures and strategies to put these recommendations into practice and ensure that children’s rights are taken into account in all relevant policy areas. Such a plan would need to include measures to strengthen children’s rights education, to improve the participation of children and young people in decision-making processes and to combat child poverty. In addition, continuous monitoring mechanisms would be required to monitor progress and identify and close any gaps in implementation. In addition, this action plan could also be closely linked to existing initiatives and programmes such as the existing NAP on the Rights of the Child, with an even stronger focus on protecting children’s rights and improving the quality of life of children in all areas of life. This process would also require close cooperation between civil society, child protection organisations and government agencies to ensure that children’s perspectives are taken into account in the planning and decision-making process and that their rights are actively promoted. 

Progress: No progress

Develop a NAP on economy and human rights

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Regrettably, however, there is no National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights in line with the UN Guiding Principles. The implementation of such a plan has so far failed to materialise.   In 2016, the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights published the final Guidelines for National Action Plans, which are the result of an open, global consultation process involving states, businesses, civil society, national human rights institutions and academia. These guidelines build on the Working Group’s 2014 report to the UN General Assembly on National Action Plans (see Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 2014: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blob/266624/b51c16faf1b3424d7efa060e8aaa8130/un-leitprinzipien-de-data.pdf). The Working Group has engaged intensively with governments on this topic, both through a survey in 2014 and through an online consultation on the content elements of a National Action Plan.   The UN Working Group encourages all states to develop, adopt and regularly update a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights. This plan is central to the dissemination and implementation of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The responsibility to introduce such plans lies within the scope of states‘ obligations in relation to the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.   Unfortunately, such initiatives have not yet taken place in Austria and implementation remains outstanding. This raises important questions about the prioritisation and implementation of these fundamental measures aimed at protecting and promoting human rights in the context of business activities;

Progress: No progress

Improve the NAP on disability in consultation with countries, people with disabilities and organisations representing them and take the recommendations of the CRPD Committee into account

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The National Action Plan on Disability 2012-2021 (NAP I) has now expired and has been replaced by the National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II, information on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: here). A comprehensive evaluation of the success of NAP I has been carried out by the Ministry of Social Affairs and is available on their website as a PDF https://www.sozialministerium.at/dam/jcr:edab5ca1-4995-456a-820c-c414da78bc39/Evaluierung202012%E2%80%932020.pdf </a In NAP I, there remains great potential for improvement with regard to the inclusion of people with disabilities and the organisations representing them. The reasons for this are a lack of understanding of what full and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes. In addition, political participation in Austria is highly formalised and has historical roots. This gives well-established and politically networked civil society organisations an advantage. The National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II) was adopted by the Austrian Federal Government on 6 July 2022 and is available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf). The NAP II is also the central national instrument for implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) in Austria. This also aims to ensure the full and effective participation and inclusion of people with disabilities in society.   In the view of civil society, this goal of effective social integration of people with disabilities is not sufficiently realised in NAP II. The NAP II formally exists, but cannot be considered a complete success from this perspective. The National Action Plan on Disability II 2022-2030 (NAP II, available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf) has made some progress compared to the previous National Action Plan on Disability I from 2012-2020 (NAP I). The implementation of NAP II is being monitored by the NAP Monitoring Group. This group consists of representatives from federal ministries, federal states, organisations for people with disabilities and the Monitoring Committee for the Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Its aim is to ensure that the measures in the action plan are implemented. This group also reports verbally on the implementation status of the 375 measures. The extent to which people with disabilities and their organisations are involved in implementation is not always clear and also depends on the respective measures.   During the preparation of the NAP II, the federal ministries and federal states made contributions in 26 expert teams. However, these contributions were only partially drawn up in a participatory process. The Ministry of Social Affairs and a few other federal ministries have set up corresponding processes for the preparation of their contributions. Unfortunately, however, many federal ministries did not respond to this call, which is why contributions on essential topics (e.g. education, children and young people or women) were produced without any real participation by civil society, despite numerous attempts by civil society to make contact. The participatory element was also not consistently ensured in the countries. The contributions made are available on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs, see here). Moreover, the written implementation reports for 2021 and 2022, in which the status of implementation is to be presented in detail and thus made comprehensible, have still not been published. The editorial team, which included representatives of civil society and government monitoring mechanisms, was also unable to compensate for the original lack of participation in the creation of the NAP II, as by the time they were consulted, it was only a matter of combining contributions that had already been approved by the respective political level into an overall work. It was no longer possible for civil society to exert any significant influence on the content.   Reasons for the lack of participation include a lack of understanding of what unrestricted and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes.   In terms of content, there is no coherent strategy for the de-institutionalisation of people with disabilities in the NAP II, although this would be of great importance in order to promote self-determination and inclusion in society and to prevent exploitation, violence and abuse of people with disabilities in institutions;

Progress: No progress

Ensure that the NAP on anti-discrimination covers the fight against all forms of racism (e.g. anti-Muslim racism, anti-Semitism, anti-gypsyism, etc.) and includes realistic and measurable indicators

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The 2020 EU Action Plan against Racism calls on the member states to draw up National Action Plans against Racism by the end of 2022. In Austria, the Federal Minister for Women, Family, Integration and Media in the Federal Chancellery is responsible for drawing up the National Action Plan against Racism and Discrimination. This National Action Plan is also anchored in the current government programme (EU Action Plan against Racism 2020: https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/library-document/union-equality-eu-anti-racism-action-plan-2020-2025_en). Austria has also referred to the planned National Action Plan against Racism in various other recommendations regarding the implementation and promotion of measures to combat racism, discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance. This shows its particular importance. Contrary to this assurance and contrary to the agreement in the last government programme, no national action plan to combat racism was adopted and no significant other programmes in the area of anti-racism work were implemented, with the exception of the area of anti-Semitism.  

Progress: No progress

Secure budgetary resources for the implementation of the NAP on Human Rights and the thematic NAPs

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Despite the agreement in the last government programme and the sustained demand by opposition parties such as the SPÖ and NEOS, a general National Action Plan for Human Rights for Austria has not yet been finalised or adopted. The details (see: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:7b9e6755-2115-440c-b2ec-cbf64a931aa8/RegProgramm-lang.pdf on page 153) and in the parliamentary initiatives of the SPÖ and NEOS (e.g. SPÖ and NEOS). A general National Action Plan for Human Rights should not be replaced by the results of topic-specific action plans. Rather, it is intended to provide strategic and long-term planning, prioritisation and serve as a central mechanism for coordination and strategic planning to implement the recommendations of the UPR process. In addition to strategic objectives for legislation, a comprehensive national action plan should include the following elements: Network building within the administration and with NGOs, new creation and support of human rights institutions, integration of human rights education in schools and universities, educational programmes for vulnerable groups, public awareness-building, provision of information materials, research and evaluation. As early as 1993, the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna recommended comprehensive National Action Plans for Human Rights. These form the gold standard throughout the EU and are widespread in many countries, as a study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency shows ( Study by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency). It is no substitute for a general National Action Plan for Human Rights to await the results of topic-specific National Action Plans. Rather, the purpose of the general National Action Plan is to plan strategically and in the long term and to define priorities. In this way, the National Action Plan for Human Rights can also be the main mechanism for coordination and strategic planning for the implementation of the recommendations of the UPR process.
  In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government aims to revitalise the Human Rights Action Plan and promote its implementation (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Strengthen the discourse on international human rights obligations

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The international activities of the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF) and the organisations charged with this task, erinnern.at and OeAD, all aim to support teachers and learners in the field of human rights education. However, there is no further information on specific projects from Austria. Although the World Programme for Human Rights Education was launched by the United Nations in December 2004, various measures to promote human rights education are being implemented in Austria. Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. 

Progress: No progress

Create financial resources for civil society work based on international best practice models

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In 2024, Austria will work on creating long-term financial resources for civil society organisations in order to strengthen their resilience and secure their work beyond short-term project funding. This will be done taking into account international best practice models, which focus primarily on sustainable and stable funding. In Austria, the need for stable basic funding that goes beyond project funding and enables organisations to remain active in the long term is increasingly being recognised. The focus is not only on public funding, but new financing models such as „pay-for-success“ and private investment in the social sector (such as impact investing) are also being given greater consideration. These models enable organisations to increase their social impact and at the same time create a sustainable financial basis. Austria is following successful international examples that show how civil society organisations can become more resilient to crises through strong financial resources. A further aim is to integrate these approaches into the policies and structural support of civil society actors, which could have a long-term positive effect on civil society development in Austria. 

Progress: No progress

Strengthen the regional offices for Equal Treatment and sustainable protection of resources

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In 2024, Austria is calling for the regional offices of the Ombud for Equal Treatment to be strengthened and for resources to be secured in the long term. This is necessary in order to fulfil EU standards, which also include increased prevention work and a more intensive role in data collection and research. The independence of the Ombud for Equal Treatment must be guaranteed. However, there is currently a lack of financial resources and human resources to implement these tasks efficiently (information, 2024: https://www.gleichbehandlungsanwaltschaft.gv.at/unser-angebot/Presse/Pressemeldungen/gleichbehandlungsanwaltschaft-draengt-auf-rasche-umsetzung-der-eu-standards-fuer-gleichbehandlungsstellen-in-oesterreich.html). 

Progress: No progress

Ensure legal protection of the child and youth advocates of the federal states, with a uniform mandate

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

In Austria, there are nine independent Ombuds Offices for Children and Young People (KIJAs), one in each federal state, which offer children and young people legal assistance and support. These advocacy centres are not bound by instructions and work independently to protect the rights of young people. In addition to providing counselling, they are also active in advocacy and public relations work to promote the implementation of children’s rights and document violations of children’s rights.
However, the legal protection of these institutions, including the anchoring of their independence, has been a controversial issue in the past. A relevant amendment to the law, which was passed in 2018, means that federal competence in the area of child and youth welfare will be transferred to the federal states from 2020, which could also have an impact on the legal position of the KIJAs. Critics fear that this change could weaken the Ombuds Offices for Children and Youths, particularly in their function as monitoring institutions in line with international recommendations.
The Ombuds Offices for Children and Youths in Austria are part of larger networks, such as the Standing Conference of Ombudspersons for Children and Youths (Stänko), and also participate internationally in the promotion of children’s rights. The creation of a standardised legal framework and greater financial and staffing security for the KIJAs is still considered important in order to secure their work in the long term and effectively represent the rights of children and young people.
  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Introduce uniform protection against discrimination throughout Austria: Amend the Equal Treatment Act15 and other anti-discrimination laws to ensure material and procedural protection against discrimination on all prohibited grounds

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The problems in the school environment were particularly emphasised, where preventative work against racism is urgently needed. Several measures are proposed to prevent discrimination in Austria, based on the current findings of the ZARA Racism Report 2023. These include educational initiatives to promote awareness and sensitivity to discrimination, as well as the strengthening and consistent implementation of anti-discrimination laws. Public campaigns should support tolerance and diversity, while counselling centres and support services help those affected. These approaches aim to create a more inclusive and non-discriminatory society. Further details can be found in the full report (see Zara Report 2023: https://assets.zara.or.at/media/rassismusreport/ZARA_RassismusReport_2023_DE.pdf ). The ZARA Racism Report 2023 emphasises the need for strict measures to prevent discrimination in Austria. This includes the consistent application and enforcement of anti-discrimination laws to ensure that offences are effectively punished. In addition, specialised counselling centres and support services should be easily accessible for those affected. Law enforcement agencies must be sensitised and trained to recognise and combat discrimination in order to ensure an appropriate response to racist incidents. These measures help to promote a discrimination-free society. Organisations such as SOS Mitmensch and the Ombud for Equal Treatment are also calling for improved legislation and stronger prosecution to prevent discrimination. They emphasise the importance of monitoring and reporting in order to measure progress and identify gaps. 

Progress: No progress

Introduce quota regulations in politics, business and on management levels to increase the proportion of women

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). Gender stereotypes and role expectations contribute to inequality, make it difficult for women to advance in their careers and reduce their opportunities. To tackle the gender pay gap in the EU, the Council of the European Union adopted new rules on 24 April 2023 to combat pay discrimination and reduce the gender pay gap. According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have until June 2026 to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees. The exact implementation of the directive is not yet known (further information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). Since the non-partisan expert government of 2019 with Austria’s first female Federal Chancellor, a largely balanced gender ratio of federal ministers and state secretaries has been established, although in recent years this has gradually tilted back towards a male majority. The proportion of women in parliament has also risen steadily in recent decades, most recently reaching around 40%. As there are no legal requirements for the creation of electoral lists or the allocation of mandates in this respect, there is a significant difference between the political parties. Gender parity of 50% is only reached or exceeded in the Green, Neos and SPÖ parties. The ÖVP and FPÖ are below parity, with the latter party only achieving a female quota of 17%. At provincial level, the gender ratio in both governments and provincial parliaments lags behind the federal level. There is an extreme imbalance at municipal level, where there are only around 10% female mayors. This ratio is roughly the same across all parties.   Measures taken by the federal government in 2022 include the establishment of an „Austrian Fund for the Empowerment and Advancement of Women and Girls“, which operates the „LEA – Let’s Empower Austria“ project (website https://letsempoweraustria.at/), as well as the „Girls in Politics“ project, which enables girls and young women to accompany mayors at work in individual municipalities (information on the BKA website: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/agenda/frauen-und-gleichstellung/gleichstellung-am-arbeitsmarkt/girls-in-politics.html. An evaluation of the projects is still pending. A report by the Women’s Section of the Federal Chancellery from 2022 provides a statistical basis for taking stock of the participation of women in political decision-making positions (as a PDF Further information is available at the following link: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:c1f8eb6d-b56e-480a-9463-38273dc136d6/frauen_in_polit_entscheidungspositionen_2022.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Implement further measures to reduce the gender pay gap

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). 

Progress: No progress

Implement campaigns and measures for equal distribution of unpaid reproductive work between men and women (domestic work, childcare and care of the elderly)

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). With this in mind, in August 2023 the ACA also published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which highlights the potential for effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf). An important civil society initiative in this area is the Neighbourhoods Without Partner Violence Initiative („StoP Partner Violence“) with the participation of the umbrella organisation Autonomous Austrian Women’s Shelters (for the initiative, see https://stop-partnergewalt.at/). The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond current measures are needed to effectively combat violence against women. According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have until June 2026 to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees. The exact implementation of the directive is not yet known (further information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). 

Progress: No progress

Include women with disabilities in all political programmes for women

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Since the non-partisan expert government of 2019 with Austria’s first female Federal Chancellor, a largely balanced gender ratio of federal ministers and state secretaries has been established, although in recent years this has gradually tilted back towards a male majority. The proportion of women in parliament has also risen steadily in recent decades, most recently reaching around 40%. As there are no legal requirements for the creation of electoral lists or the allocation of mandates in this respect, there is a significant difference between the political parties. Gender parity of 50% is only reached or exceeded in the Green, Neos and SPÖ parties. The ÖVP and FPÖ are below parity, with the latter party only achieving a female quota of 17%. At provincial level, the gender ratio in both governments and provincial parliaments lags behind the federal level. There is an extreme imbalance at municipal level, where there are only around 10% female mayors. This ratio is roughly the same across all parties.   Measures taken by the federal government in 2022 include the establishment of an „Austrian Fund for the Empowerment and Advancement of Women and Girls“, which operates the „LEA – Let’s Empower Austria“ project (website https://letsempoweraustria.at/), as well as the „Girls in Politics“ project, which enables girls and young women to accompany mayors at work in individual municipalities (information on the BKA website: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/agenda/frauen-und-gleichstellung/gleichstellung-am-arbeitsmarkt/girls-in-politics.html. An evaluation of the projects is still pending. A report by the Women’s Section of the Federal Chancellery from 2022 provides a statistical basis for taking stock of the participation of women in political decision-making positions (as a PDF Further information is available at the following link: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:c1f8eb6d-b56e-480a-9463-38273dc136d6/frauen_in_polit_entscheidungspositionen_2022.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Promote gender-sensitive language

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there have been ongoing efforts to promote gender-inclusive language and the provision of interpreting services for a number of years. The use of gender-equitable language is supported at various levels, both in the administration and in the public sector. One key initiative is the Linguistic Equality Programme, which is enshrined in the legislative guidelines. The aim is to prevent discrimination on the basis of gender and to make all genders linguistically visible. In the area of interpreting services, active attention is paid to ensuring that these are also available for people with special needs, such as sign language. There are legal requirements that sign language interpreting services must be guaranteed in many areas of public life, for example in court proceedings or in administration. In addition, the provision of information in plain language is also supported in order to enable people with learning difficulties or other barriers to access important information. Overall, Austria has taken concrete steps to promote both gender-inclusive language and barrier-free communication in society. 

Progress: No progress

Support nationwide ban against sexist and discriminatory advertising

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there is as yet no nationwide legal regulation against sexist and discriminatory advertising, although the issue keeps cropping up in political and social debate. There are currently various initiatives to take action against sexist advertising, but they either rely on the advertising industry’s self-regulatory mechanism or concern individual federal states. The Austrian Equal Treatment Act and the Press Council’s Code of Honour prohibit discrimination, but these regulations are often ineffective against sexist advertising in public spaces. A prominent example of such an initiative is the Women’s People’s Petition, which calls for a general ban on sexist advertising content in order to protect the mental health and well-being of the population. In some cities, such as Berlin or London, there are already specific regulations that restrict such advertising, which is being discussed as a model for Austria (Anti-Discrimination Agency STMK, federal law banning sexist advertising: https://www.antidiskriminierungsstelle.steiermark.at/cms/beitrag/11865759/99340954). There is currently no binding nationwide legal regulation in sight, even though there are repeated demands and concepts that provide for stronger legal control;

Progress: No progress

Strengthen participation opportunities for children and young people at a local level

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Reviewing and improving the participation of children in educational, care and vocational training institutions is a central concern of the promotion of children’s rights and participation in Austria. Various measures are taken to ensure the integration and co-determination of children in all relevant areas of life. In the education sector in particular, efforts are being made to expand the opportunities for children and young people to participate in decisions that affect them. This ranges from co-determination in schools to their influence on decisions in care facilities or labour and vocational training systems. In this context, quality standards for the participation of children and young people have been developed in Austria, as in other European countries. One example of this is the „National Action Plan for Children and Youth Participation“, which aims to strengthen participation in various areas of life. The inclusion of children in decision-making processes is seen as an integral part of everyday life, from schools to social institutions, and is intended to ensure that their rights and interests are heard. It is increasingly recognised that children and young people should not only have a say in political matters, but also in everyday areas in order to actively shape their living conditions. In this context, it is important that participation is understood not only as formal participation, but also as a dynamic process that helps children to develop their participation skills and actively exercise them. As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Review existing forms of participation of children in all educational, care and work/training institutions

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Reviewing and improving the participation of children in educational, care and vocational training institutions is a central concern of the promotion of children’s rights and participation in Austria. Various measures are taken to ensure the integration and co-determination of children in all relevant areas of life. In the education sector in particular, efforts are being made to expand the opportunities for children and young people to participate in decisions that affect them. This ranges from co-determination in schools to their influence on decisions in care facilities or labour and vocational training systems. In this context, quality standards for the participation of children and young people have been developed in Austria, as in other European countries. One example of this is the „National Action Plan for Children and Youth Participation“, which aims to strengthen participation in various areas of life. The inclusion of children in decision-making processes is seen as an integral part of everyday life, from schools to social institutions, and is intended to ensure that their rights and interests are heard. It is increasingly recognised that children and young people should not only have a say in political matters, but also in everyday areas in order to actively shape their living conditions. In this context, it is important that participation is understood not only as formal participation, but also as a dynamic process that helps children to develop their participation skills and actively exercise them. As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Strongly focus on political education to strengthen the Federal Youth Representation

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Reviewing and improving the participation of children in educational, care and vocational training institutions is a central concern of the promotion of children’s rights and participation in Austria. Various measures are taken to ensure the integration and co-determination of children in all relevant areas of life. In the education sector in particular, efforts are being made to expand the opportunities for children and young people to participate in decisions that affect them. This ranges from co-determination in schools to their influence on decisions in care facilities or labour and vocational training systems. In this context, quality standards for the participation of children and young people have been developed in Austria, as in other European countries. One example of this is the „National Action Plan for Children and Youth Participation“, which aims to strengthen participation in various areas of life. The inclusion of children in decision-making processes is seen as an integral part of everyday life, from schools to social institutions, and is intended to ensure that their rights and interests are heard. It is increasingly recognised that children and young people should not only have a say in political matters, but also in everyday areas in order to actively shape their living conditions. In this context, it is important that participation is understood not only as formal participation, but also as a dynamic process that helps children to develop their participation skills and actively exercise them. As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Present children with disabilities as equal citizens also in the media

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The current approach to promoting the participation of people with disabilities and their representative organisations has significant weaknesses. These weaknesses result from various factors, such as an inadequate understanding of full and effective participation and the insufficient provision of resources for participation processes. In addition, political participation in Austria is highly formalised and has grown historically, which gives advantages to already established and politically networked civil society organisations. However, not enough systematic attention has been paid to carrying out targeted capacity building in accordance with the requirements of the UN CRPD.   It would be desirable if a process similar to the participatory drafting of the 2nd Adult Protection Act had been set up by the Ministry of Justice in 2016 (Justice website: https://www.bmj.gv.at/themen/Zivilrecht/Erwachsenenschutz/Das-neue-Erwachsenenschutzrecht-im-%C3%9Cberblick.html). In fact, from the perspective of civil society, the NAP II cannot yet be considered a sufficient success because it does not sufficiently realise the goal of effective social integration of people with disabilities. 

Progress: No progress

Create a new National Action Plan „Protection against Violence for Women“ which also considers women with disabilities, precarious residence permits, asylum seekers and women with mental illness

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

With the National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016, measures were taken throughout Austria to implement the requirements of the Istanbul Convention against Violence against Women (see National Action Plan 2014-2016 as PDF: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:1f95e551-0e17-4d67-8090-b7bced3f4947/nap.pdf). However, the National Action Plan has now expired without replacement. Despite the fact that Austria has ratified the Convention, there is a lack of implementation and improvement of further measures, including due diligence in victim protection and, in particular, improved cooperation with civil society.   In August 2023, the ACA published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which identifies potential for the effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA also highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf). A National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016 with 60 measures has been drawn up, but no further action plan is planned (National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016 on the website of the National Coordination Centre for the Protection of Women against Violence: https://www.coordination-vaw.gv.at/koordinierung/nap.html).  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Ensure unlimited contractual coverage of existing women’s shelters and women’s and girls‘ counselling centres in all federal states and provide for the necessary resources for new barrier-free, women-specific care and counselling facilities

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Austria therefore lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are required to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).There are numerous counselling services for women affected by violence in Austria. These include special counselling centres, hotlines and shelters that offer round-the-clock support. Many of these services offer comprehensive counselling on legal, psychological and social issues. Nevertheless, it is important that these services are further expanded and publicised to ensure that all women affected receive the support they need. The central facilities include the women’s helpline, the Austria-wide violence protection centres and the Autonomous Austrian Women’s Shelters (AÖF). The network of these facilities ensures that women in need have access to help around the clock. In addition, specific services are provided for special target groups, such as migrant women, female refugees and asylum seekers. These services are designed to overcome cultural and language barriers and offer customised support to the women concerned.  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Improve data collection on gender-based violence and femicide

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Austria therefore lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are required to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Develop a strategy and implementation plan for the protection and prevention of violence against children

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

On 31 January 2023, the National Council decided to develop a package of measures for child protection. The plan is to develop initiatives to promote the protection of children and young people by implementing concepts and training for professionals, strengthening sexual offences and creating prevention exceptions for perpetrators (National Council meeting on child protection – 195th session of the National Council on 31 January 2023 (195/NRSITZ): https://www.parlament.gv.at/aktuelles/pk/jahr_2023/pk0084#XXVII_NRSITZ_00195). The child protection organisations, such as the Austrian Ombuds Offices for Children and Youths, Austrian Child Protection Centres, NC Kinderrechte, ECPAT Austria and Netzwerk Kinderrechte, believe that the package of measures for child protection is progress in the right direction. However, it requires further steps, especially implementation, in order to see a real change in the protection of children and young people (position paper of the Children’s Rights Network: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/positionspapier-kinderschutzpaket-fuer-den-ausserfamiliaeren-kinderschutz/<).
  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029:
https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

No shared custody of the parents in case of violence

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, a guideline for dealing with violence in custody and contact proceedings was introduced in 2024, which clearly rejects joint custody in cases of domestic violence. The guidelines, which were developed by Justice Minister Alma Zadić and experts from the fields of child and women’s protection, emphasise that joint custody is not in the best interests of the child in such cases. It is particularly problematic that mothers who are victims of domestic violence are often forced to continue sharing custody despite the danger posed by their partner. This regulation should be further specified in future in the reform of child custody law, so that joint custody should no longer take place in cases of violence.
This guideline is currently not binding, but a reform of child custody law that makes these principles more binding is being considered. 

Progress: No progress

Finance nationwide campaigns on violence against women and children and raise awareness of support facilities

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The international activities of the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF) and the organisations charged with this task, erinnern.at and OeAD, all aim to support teachers and learners in the field of human rights education. However, there is no further information on specific projects from Austria. Although the World Programme for Human Rights Education was launched by the United Nations in December 2004, various measures to promote human rights education are being implemented in Austria. Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. 

Progress: No progress

Create binding nationwide quality standards for child and youth welfare services, including care by foster families

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, efforts are currently being made to ensure the quality of child and youth welfare through legal standards, but implementation remains inconsistent and dependent on the respective federal states. The Child and Youth Welfare Act (KJH-G) requires that the quality of care for children and young people is regularly evaluated by the provincial governments, taking into account professional standards, social developments and scientific findings. Since 2017, quality standards for inpatient child and youth welfare services have been developed in Austria with the aim of standardising them across the provinces. These standards were developed by 19 different organisations, including FICE Austria and SOS Children’s Villages, in order to ensure high-quality care for children and young people. They set out clear requirements for assistance planning, co-operation with parents and the staffing and structural conditions in the facilities. However, there are still differences in the legal regulations for the protection of minors, as this is regulated at state level in Austria. Different federal states have different regulations, which can lead to a certain lack of clarity. Developments in this area show that implementation is an ongoing process that continues to require critical review and adaptation in order to guarantee uniform and high standards. 

Progress: No progress

Create a legal obligation for all institutions (private, church and public) that care for children and young people to implement child protection guidelines and safeguarding concepts

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

On 31 January 2023, the National Council decided to develop a package of measures for child protection. The plan is to develop initiatives to promote the protection of children and young people by implementing concepts and training for professionals, strengthening sexual offences and creating prevention exceptions for perpetrators (National Council meeting on child protection – 195th session of the National Council on 31 January 2023 (195/NRSITZ): https://www.parlament.gv.at/aktuelles/pk/jahr_2023/pk0084#XXVII_NRSITZ_00195). The child protection organisations, such as the Austrian Ombuds Offices for Children and Youths, Austrian Child Protection Centres, NC Kinderrechte, ECPAT Austria and Netzwerk Kinderrechte, believe that the package of measures for child protection is progress in the right direction. However, it requires further steps, especially implementation, in order to see a real change in the protection of children and young people (position paper of the Children’s Rights Network: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/positionspapier-kinderschutzpaket-fuer-den-ausserfamiliaeren-kinderschutz/<).
  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029:
https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Create a nationwide protection concept and specialised care facilities with appropriate safety standards (protective housing) for minors affected by human trafficking

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

A working group on child trafficking coordinated by the Federal Criminal Police Office (Family) as part of the interministerial task force against human trafficking presented a concept for an Austria-wide protection centre for trafficked children in 2021, which has not yet been implemented. However, a revision of „guidelines for action“ for those involved in identifying and protecting victims of child trafficking, which is planned by the Child Trafficking Working Group in 2023, depends on this and should enable a more harmonised approach across the country. There are also deficits in the area of legal protection for children, including access to compensation. 

Progress: No progress

Ensure an independent investigative body for cases of police abuse and adequate treatment of cases of abuse

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

{unabhängige Mechanismen-Allgemein}

Progress: No progress

Offer effective protection against secondary victimisation in the complaints procedure and balance the structural power advantage of the police over complainants

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

{unabhängige Mechanismen-Allgemein}

Progress: No progress

Set up efforts to make ethnic profiling transparent and develop countermeasures

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there are reports of racist police checks in which people are discriminated against on the basis of their ethnic origin or skin colour. According to the Amnesty Annual Report 2022, such practices have been documented time and again in police work, which places a particular burden on the communities affected. The Styrian Anti-Discrimination Agency confirms that racial profiling violates the ban on discrimination and must be urgently reformed in order to protect the rights of all citizens (Amnesty International Annual Report: https://www.amnesty.de/informieren/amnesty-report/oesterreich-2022). 

Progress: No progress

Take measures to strengthen the independence of the judiciary

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to fulfil this recommendation, Austria should take concrete steps to ensure that those who practice racial discrimination and racial profiling are held accountable. This is an important step towards a fairer and more inclusive society (see Racism Report 2022 by ZARA- Zivilcourage und Antirassismusarbeit as PDF: here). This includes training for prospective judges and police officers as well as the integration of human rights education into the curricula of Austrian schools. The training of prison guards, including topics such as human rights and anti-discrimination, is carried out in consultation with the staff representatives (see Federal Law Gazette II No. 129/2011, Overall legal regulation for basic training for employees in pay group v1 in the prison service: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20007252).   Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. Positive approaches such as training for prospective judges and police officers and the integration of human rights education into curricula should be further strengthened. The mention of the training of judicial guards is commendable, but additional efforts are needed to achieve comprehensive social sensitisation. 

Progress: No progress

Ensure financial resources for the judiciary at all levels

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to fulfil this recommendation, Austria should take concrete steps to ensure that those who practice racial discrimination and racial profiling are held accountable. This is an important step towards a fairer and more inclusive society (see Racism Report 2022 by ZARA- Zivilcourage und Antirassismusarbeit as PDF: here). This includes training for prospective judges and police officers as well as the integration of human rights education into the curricula of Austrian schools. The training of prison guards, including topics such as human rights and anti-discrimination, is carried out in consultation with the staff representatives (see Federal Law Gazette II No. 129/2011, Overall legal regulation for basic training for employees in pay group v1 in the prison service: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20007252).   Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. Positive approaches such as training for prospective judges and police officers and the integration of human rights education into curricula should be further strengthened. The mention of the training of judicial guards is commendable, but additional efforts are needed to achieve comprehensive social sensitisation. 

Progress: No progress

Create a politically independent top management of the public prosecutor’s offices and full transparency in instructions

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there have been discussions for years about setting up an independent mechanism to investigate abuse and excessive use of force by law enforcement officers. Human rights organisations such as Amnesty International and the UN Committee against Torture criticise the fact that Austria does not have a truly independent mechanism for investigating police violence. So far, allegations have mostly been investigated internally or by the public prosecutor’s office, which is often considered insufficiently independent. In 2023, the Austrian government took steps to address this problem. Legislative initiatives have been discussed that provide for the establishment of an independent investigative body. These initiatives aim to increase independence and transparency in the investigation of allegations against law enforcement officials. The Austrian Minister of Justice and the Ministry of the Interior have agreed as part of the government’s work to present a draft for the establishment of such a mechanism. It is expected that this mechanism will be institutionally and operationally independent of the law enforcement authorities and the Ministry of the Interior.   Despite this progress, there are still concerns about the actual independence and effectiveness of the proposed mechanism. Critics argue that without sufficient powers and resources, the new mechanism will not be much more effective than the existing structures. It remains to be seen what the final legislative proposal will look like and whether it will be approved by parliament. Human rights groups and civil society organisations continue to push for swift and substantial reforms.  

Progress: No progress

Provide mandatory training for judges and prosecutors on human rights and children’s rights

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

{Menschenrechtsbildung-Justiz}

Progress: No progress

Adapt the appointment procedures of the presidents of the administrative courts

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to fulfil this recommendation, Austria should take concrete steps to ensure that those who practice racial discrimination and racial profiling are held accountable. This is an important step towards a fairer and more inclusive society (see Racism Report 2022 by ZARA- Zivilcourage und Antirassismusarbeit as PDF: here). This includes training for prospective judges and police officers as well as the integration of human rights education into the curricula of Austrian schools. The training of prison guards, including topics such as human rights and anti-discrimination, is carried out in consultation with the staff representatives (see Federal Law Gazette II No. 129/2011, Overall legal regulation for basic training for employees in pay group v1 in the prison service: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20007252).   Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. Positive approaches such as training for prospective judges and police officers and the integration of human rights education into curricula should be further strengthened. The mention of the training of judicial guards is commendable, but additional efforts are needed to achieve comprehensive social sensitisation. 

Progress: No progress

Reduce court fees

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to fulfil this recommendation, Austria should take concrete steps to ensure that those who practice racial discrimination and racial profiling are held accountable. This is an important step towards a fairer and more inclusive society (see Racism Report 2022 by ZARA- Zivilcourage und Antirassismusarbeit as PDF: here). This includes training for prospective judges and police officers as well as the integration of human rights education into the curricula of Austrian schools. The training of prison guards, including topics such as human rights and anti-discrimination, is carried out in consultation with the staff representatives (see Federal Law Gazette II No. 129/2011, Overall legal regulation for basic training for employees in pay group v1 in the prison service: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20007252).   Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. Positive approaches such as training for prospective judges and police officers and the integration of human rights education into curricula should be further strengthened. The mention of the training of judicial guards is commendable, but additional efforts are needed to achieve comprehensive social sensitisation. 

Progress: No progress

Earmark court fees and fines for judicial improvements

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to fulfil this recommendation, Austria should take concrete steps to ensure that those who practice racial discrimination and racial profiling are held accountable. This is an important step towards a fairer and more inclusive society (see Racism Report 2022 by ZARA- Zivilcourage und Antirassismusarbeit as PDF: here). This includes training for prospective judges and police officers as well as the integration of human rights education into the curricula of Austrian schools. The training of prison guards, including topics such as human rights and anti-discrimination, is carried out in consultation with the staff representatives (see Federal Law Gazette II No. 129/2011, Overall legal regulation for basic training for employees in pay group v1 in the prison service: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20007252).   Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. Positive approaches such as training for prospective judges and police officers and the integration of human rights education into curricula should be further strengthened. The mention of the training of judicial guards is commendable, but additional efforts are needed to achieve comprehensive social sensitisation. 

Progress: No progress

Implement measures to ensure sufficient qualified interpretation services (including sign language and support in simple language)

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there have been ongoing efforts to promote gender-inclusive language and the provision of interpreting services for a number of years. The use of gender-equitable language is supported at various levels, both in the administration and in the public sector. One key initiative is the Linguistic Equality Programme, which is enshrined in the legislative guidelines. The aim is to prevent discrimination on the basis of gender and to make all genders linguistically visible. In the area of interpreting services, active attention is paid to ensuring that these are also available for people with special needs, such as sign language. There are legal requirements that sign language interpreting services must be guaranteed in many areas of public life, for example in court proceedings or in administration. In addition, the provision of information in plain language is also supported in order to enable people with learning difficulties or other barriers to access important information. Overall, Austria has taken concrete steps to promote both gender-inclusive language and barrier-free communication in society. 

Progress: No progress

Increase the flat-rate contribution to the costs of the defence in the event of an acquittal in criminal proceedings

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet implemented some of the recommendations of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) from its report „General Policy Recommendations No. 15 on Combating Hate Speech (2015)“ (see: ECRI General Policy Recommendations No.15 on Combating Hate Speech,2015: https://rm.coe.int/ecri-general-policy-recommendation-no-15-on-combating-hate-speech/16808b5b01). This includes the pending ratification of the „Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime“ and the „Protocol No. 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.“  

Progress: No progress

Improve the comprehensibility of legal instructions, especially for defendants in criminal proceedings

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet implemented some of the recommendations of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) from its report „General Policy Recommendations No. 15 on Combating Hate Speech (2015)“ (see: ECRI General Policy Recommendations No.15 on Combating Hate Speech,2015: https://rm.coe.int/ecri-general-policy-recommendation-no-15-on-combating-hate-speech/16808b5b01). This includes the pending ratification of the „Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime“ and the „Protocol No. 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.“  

Progress: No progress

Ensure procedural assistance if necessary also at first instance before the administrative authorities

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet implemented some of the recommendations of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) from its report „General Policy Recommendations No. 15 on Combating Hate Speech (2015)“ (see: ECRI General Policy Recommendations No.15 on Combating Hate Speech,2015: https://rm.coe.int/ecri-general-policy-recommendation-no-15-on-combating-hate-speech/16808b5b01). This includes the pending ratification of the „Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime“ and the „Protocol No. 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.“  

Progress: No progress

Implement a consistent application of the „special reasons for aggravation“ according to § 33 StGB (Austrian Criminal Code) in proceedings concerning crimes with discriminatory or racist motives

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, the Criminal Code (§ 33 StGB) provides for a number of „special aggravating circumstances“ that increase the penalty for certain offences. A central point concerns the offender’s motive. In particular, racist or xenophobic motives are categorised as particularly reprehensible and are considered an aggravating factor in sentencing. This provision aims to punish offences based on discrimination, hatred or intolerance more severely. Specifically, this means that if someone commits an offence for racist, xenophobic or similar extreme motives, this must lead to a more severe sentence. § Section 33 StGB explicitly mentions this as one of the aggravating circumstances. In addition, other factors such as cruelty, malice or taking advantage of a victim’s defencelessness are also recognised as aggravating circumstances (StGB §33: StGB §33). This provision ensures that offences motivated by discriminatory ideologies are given special consideration and sentenced in order to demonstrate a clear stance against racist and extremist acts and to counteract such acts;

Progress: No progress

Ensure traceable documentation and recording of the development crimes with discriminatory or racist motives

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet implemented some of the recommendations of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) from the 2015 report „General Policy Recommendations No. 15 on Combating Hate Speech“. These include, in particular, the pending ratification of the „Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime“ and „Protocol No. 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms“.
ECRI also emphasises that politicians should take a clear stance against racist hate speech and that political parties should introduce codes of conduct that prohibit the use of hate speech. These recommendations have not yet been heeded.  

Progress: No progress

Use the planned legal instruments appropriately (custody, requirements for antiviolence training, extension of investigation procedures), especially in cases of sexual and domestic violence

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Austria lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Court of Audit highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf). It appears that the financial resources remain insufficient.  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Offer compulsory further training for judges and public prosecutors in the field of gender and domestic violence

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In order to fulfil this recommendation, Austria should take concrete steps to ensure that those who practice racial discrimination and racial profiling are held accountable. This is an important step towards a fairer and more inclusive society (see Racism Report 2022 by ZARA- Zivilcourage und Antirassismusarbeit as PDF: here). This includes training for prospective judges and police officers as well as the integration of human rights education into the curricula of Austrian schools. The training of prison guards, including topics such as human rights and anti-discrimination, is carried out in consultation with the staff representatives (see Federal Law Gazette II No. 129/2011, Overall legal regulation for basic training for employees in pay group v1 in the prison service: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20007252).   Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. Positive approaches such as training for prospective judges and police officers and the integration of human rights education into curricula should be further strengthened. The mention of the training of judicial guards is commendable, but additional efforts are needed to achieve comprehensive social sensitisation. 

Progress: No progress

Create organisationally separate juvenile courts and detention facilities

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

A reform was implemented in the area of juvenile criminal justice. This includes the creation of organisationally separate juvenile courts and penal institutions. The aim of this measure is to take better account of the specific needs of juvenile offenders and to ensure individualised, rehabilitative treatment. Previously, juveniles were still often placed in general prisons, which led to a lack of age-appropriate care.
The reform now ensures that separate courts and detention centres are created for juveniles, which are geared towards the special legal and social needs of this age group. This is intended to provide better support for both the prevention of reoffending and reintegration into society after a prison sentence.
This development is taking place against the backdrop of international standards in juvenile criminal law, which call for adults and juveniles to be treated separately, particularly with regard to education and resocialisation. 

Progress: No progress

Evaluate the achievement of the objective of preventing juveniles and young adults who have committed crimes for the first time from pursuing a criminal career

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

A reform was implemented in the area of juvenile criminal justice. This includes the creation of organisationally separate juvenile courts and penal institutions. The aim of this measure is to take better account of the specific needs of juvenile offenders and to ensure individualised, rehabilitative treatment. Previously, juveniles were still often placed in general prisons, which led to a lack of age-appropriate care.
The reform now ensures that separate courts and detention centres are created for juveniles, which are geared towards the special legal and social needs of this age group. This is intended to provide better support for both the prevention of reoffending and reintegration into society after a prison sentence.
This development is taking place against the backdrop of international standards in juvenile criminal law, which call for adults and juveniles to be treated separately, particularly with regard to education and resocialisation. 

Progress: No progress

Implement measures to reduce the number of detainees

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

There are currently 191 unfilled posts in Austrian prisons, including 111 in the executive service and 80 in administration. This leads to a considerable workload for the existing staff, who have to compensate for both staff shortages and absences due to illness. The answers to two parliamentary questions make it clear that the staff shortage has existed for years and that the situation remains tense (see two questions: https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/AB/17366/imfname_1624738.pdf and https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/AB/17457/imfname_1625033.pdf). In the last three years, the number of staff has not been increased, although the number of inmates has risen. The government’s current practice is criticised as a lack of administration. Posts are not increased with the argument that they cannot be filled anyway, and there are no measures to make the professions in the prisons more attractive. There is a particular lack of specialised staff such as social workers and psychologists. A more attractive job profile with fair pay is considered essential to remedy the situation. Despite measures such as the increase in basic salaries and a new recruiting and image campaign, filling vacancies remains challenging. Further measures, such as the heavy labour regulation for all justice guard employees, are considered necessary (see also statistics on the Ministry of Justice website on the distribution of inmate numbers: https://www.justiz.gv.at/strafvollzug/statistik/verteilung-des-insassinnen-bzw-insassenstandes.2c94848542ec49810144457e2e6f3de9.de.html). Legislatively, there are no recognisable changes that will lead to a reduction in the number of people in prison.  In a study published in March 2023 by the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Fundamental and Human Rights (LBI-GMR), other problem areas were also pointed out as alternatives to the deprivation of liberty of children (e.g. complete removal of juveniles from detention centres, capacities of juvenile psychiatry).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Extend work and employment opportunities for detainees

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there are ongoing efforts to expand work and employment opportunities for prisoners, which is seen as a central component of their resocialisation. It is increasingly recognised that meaningful work during imprisonment not only structures everyday life, but also helps prisoners to develop skills that are necessary for later reintegration into the labour market. This includes not only traditional work activities, but also educational and vocational training programmes.  However, there are still challenges in the Austrian prison system, particularly with regard to the staffing situation and limited resources in the prisons. In 2022, prisoners worked an average of only 3.16 hours per day, which is far below the target values for productive and rehabilitative work. Furthermore, employment rates vary greatly between prisons, indicating an uneven distribution of work opportunities. There are also endeavours to further improve the existing system. The Court of Audit criticises a lack of holistic concepts for the operational structure in prisons and calls for greater use and expansion of workplaces. There are also concrete proposals for improvement with regard to the training and further education of prisoners, for example through the increased integration of vocational training measures and practical workplaces in the prisons. These developments are part of the ongoing reforms aimed at increasing prisoners‘ chances of successful resocialisation and a stable re-entry into society (see press release on the reports „Management and coordination of the penitentiary system; follow-up review“).
measures; follow-up review“ and „Resocialisation measures of the justice system“
of 15 March 2024: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home_1/fragen-medien/Presseinformation_Justizanstalten_15032024_bf.pdf).  

Progress: No progress

Increase medical and psychosocial staff, but also of the judicial guard

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Prisons in Austria have been operating at full capacity for years and are overcrowded, while at the same time there is a significant shortage of staff. This was noted by the Austrian Court of Audit in its latest reports, which has a negative impact on resocialisation efforts. Despite some reforms and measures, many recommendations to improve the situation, such as investment in staff development and improved operational structures, remain incompletely implemented. For example, of 15 recommendations reviewed, only five were fully implemented. In 2023, 96 per cent of posts were filled, but there was still a shortfall of over 130 full-time employees. The employment rate of prisoners varies greatly, for example in 2023 it was 69 per cent in Vienna-Simmering Prison and 94 per cent in Gerasdorf. In 2022, the average duration of employment per prisoner was 3.16 hours per working day. The ACA emphasises the need to increase employment opportunities for prisoners and adapt the training on offer in order to increase the chances of successful reintegration into society (see ACA report, Management and coordination of the prison system; follow-up review, 2024,: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/home_7/2024_9_Straf_Massnahmenvollzug_FuP.pdf).  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Create free legal advice facilities for prison inmates

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Individual legal protection in prisons is primarily regulated by the Prison Act. Legal protection in the event of restrictions of liberty outside of prisons is guaranteed in particular by the Accommodation Act and the Residential Homes Act. There are no plans to further strengthen individual legal protection. There is no sufficiently prepared data on the practical exercise of legal protection. 

Progress: No progress

Ensure confidential patient interviews without the presence of the judicial guard

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Individual legal protection in prisons is primarily regulated by the Prison Act. Legal protection in the event of restrictions of liberty outside of prisons is guaranteed in particular by the Accommodation Act and the Residential Homes Act. There are no plans to further strengthen individual legal protection. There is no sufficiently prepared data on the practical exercise of legal protection. 

Progress: No progress

Improve visiting and contact opportunities for children of detained parents

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

A reform was implemented in the area of juvenile criminal justice. This includes the creation of organisationally separate juvenile courts and penal institutions. The aim of this measure is to take better account of the specific needs of juvenile offenders and to ensure individualised, rehabilitative treatment. Previously, juveniles were still often placed in general prisons, which led to a lack of age-appropriate care.
The reform now ensures that separate courts and detention centres are created for juveniles, which are geared towards the special legal and social needs of this age group. This is intended to provide better support for both the prevention of reoffending and reintegration into society after a prison sentence.
This development is taking place against the backdrop of international standards in juvenile criminal law, which call for adults and juveniles to be treated separately, particularly with regard to education and resocialisation. 

Progress: No progress

Fully implement the recommendations of the UN study on child detention

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, the implementation of the recommendations of the UN study on the deprivation of liberty of children has been further analysed and examined in recent years. The study, which was published in 2019, looked at global standards and practices in dealing with the deprivation of liberty of children and adolescents and focussed on alternative measures to detention. These recommendations aim to consider deprivation of liberty as the last step and to ensure that less restrictive measures that can avoid or minimise the loss of liberty are always considered first.  In Austria, the way in which these recommendations are already being implemented and where there is a need for action was examined, particularly in the area of juvenile criminal justice and the care of refugee children and children with disabilities. A key issue was the availability of alternative measures to deprivation of liberty and the participation of children and young people in the relevant decision-making processes. It was noted that there are still structural and organisational challenges in some areas, particularly with regard to the practice of placement and dealing with children’s psychological and developmental needs. There are also efforts to focus more on children’s rights and to create better monitoring of the circumstances in which children are deprived of their liberty. Further adjustments to the UN recommendations should help to improve the conditions for young people placed in institutions and to develop alternatives that enable less stressful and traumatising treatment. The full implementation of these recommendations is an ongoing process that also involves close cooperation with relevant stakeholders such as the Ombudsman for Children and Youths and the Ombudsman Board (information on the KJ Wien website: https://kija-wien.at/freiheitsentzug-was-er-ist-und-was-er-aus-kinderrechtlicher-perspektive-bedeutet/).  

Progress: No progress

Adapt the maximum stopping days in house arrest (114 StVG) to international recommendations

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The adjustment of the maximum detention days in house arrest and the associated conditions is regulated in Austria in the Prison Act (StVG) and the Probationary Services Act (BewHG). A relevant change was made as part of the 2019 amendment to the StVG, which, among other things, expanded the options for electronically monitored house arrest. This reform introduced several important elements:
1. extension of the detention period in house arrest: the duration of electronically monitored house arrest was extended to up to 24 months, with the exception of offences such as serious violence or sexual offences. This change is in line with international recommendations to improve prison conditions, particularly with regard to less restrictive forms of detention for minor offences.
2. outdoor exercise: In electronically monitored house arrest, the possibility of allowing prisoners limited outdoor exercise has also been introduced. This is in line with the recommendations of international human rights organisations, which advocate humane treatment and rehabilitation of offenders.
3. further adjustments to the prison system: Further adjustments concern the conditions of house arrest, for example with regard to insurance cover and the conditions for authorising house arrest as a form of detention for certain offences. The aim of these changes is to make the system more flexible and fairer and to promote resocialisation. 
In summary, these changes are aligned with international standards for the penal system, which support the transition from a purely punitive approach to a more rehabilitative one. They are part of a more comprehensive reform of the penal system in Austria, which aims to achieve a more differentiated treatment of offenders and better integration into society after imprisonment (see StVG-Novelle-2019: https://www.bmj.gv.at/ministerium/gesetzesentwuerfe/entw%C3%BCrfe-2019/bundesgesetz-mit-dem-das-strafvollzugsgesetz-und-das-bewaehrungshilfegesetz-geaendert-werden-stvg-novelle-2019–ministerialentwurf.html).  

Progress: No progress

Promote the reform of preventive custody on the basis of Article 14 of the CRPD

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

On 15 December 2022, the „Measures Enforcement Adjustment Act“ was passed by the National Council (on the parliament’s website: Maßnahmenvollzugsanpassungsgesetz, 2022). However, this law only deals with the first part of a planned two-part reform project. In particular, the requirements for admission to and release from the penitentiary system were changed with the aim of reducing the total number of offenders. These first reform steps resulted in changes to the Criminal Code (StGB), the Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO) and the Juvenile Courts Act (JGG). Only the second part of the planned reform project is intended to improve the care provided in detention centres and the therapies etc. on offer. However, no progress is currently being made on the second part of the reform. Civil society fears that the steps taken so far will bring too little practical change, as important issues such as the provision and funding of care and support before, during and after placement as well as an offer of adequate medical care remain unconsidered and offenders with mental illnesses still do not have sufficient access to medical treatment.   A study published by the LBI-GMR in March 2023 on alternatives to the deprivation of liberty of children pointed out further problem areas (e.g. complete removal of juveniles from detention centres, capacities of juvenile psychiatry). Another ongoing project is dedicated to the necessary strengthening of procedural rights of persons with psychosocial impairments in detention centres (see LBI-GMR study: https://gmr.lbg.ac.at/forschung/menschenwuerde-und-oeffentliche-sicherheit/). 

Progress: No progress

Continue to implement recommendations of the 2015 Reform Report for preventive custody

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

On 15 December 2022, the „Measures Enforcement Adjustment Act“ was passed by the National Council (on the parliament’s website: Maßnahmenvollzugsanpassungsgesetz, 2022). However, this law only deals with the first part of a planned two-part reform project. In particular, the requirements for admission to and release from the penitentiary system were changed with the aim of reducing the total number of offenders. These first reform steps resulted in changes to the Criminal Code (StGB), the Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO) and the Juvenile Courts Act (JGG). Only the second part of the planned reform project is intended to improve the care provided in detention centres and the therapies etc. on offer. However, no progress is currently being made on the second part of the reform. Civil society fears that the steps taken so far will bring too little practical change, as important issues such as the provision and funding of care and support before, during and after placement as well as an offer of adequate medical care remain unconsidered and offenders with mental illnesses still do not have sufficient access to medical treatment.   A study published by the LBI-GMR in March 2023 on alternatives to the deprivation of liberty of children pointed out further problem areas (e.g. complete removal of juveniles from detention centres, capacities of juvenile psychiatry). Another ongoing project is dedicated to the necessary strengthening of procedural rights of persons with psychosocial impairments in detention centres (see LBI-GMR study: https://gmr.lbg.ac.at/forschung/menschenwuerde-und-oeffentliche-sicherheit/). 

Progress: No progress

Nationwide uniform, legally binding standards, which are regularly monitored on an evidence-based basis with the participation of technical experts and guarantee improvement of standards

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet implemented some of the recommendations of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) from its report „General Policy Recommendations No. 15 on Combating Hate Speech (2015)“ (see: ECRI General Policy Recommendations No.15 on Combating Hate Speech,2015: https://rm.coe.int/ecri-general-policy-recommendation-no-15-on-combating-hate-speech/16808b5b01). This includes the pending ratification of the „Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime“ and the „Protocol No. 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.“  

Progress: No progress

Expand federal child and youth welfare statistics, including analysis and planning instruments

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

On 31 January 2023, the National Council decided to develop a package of measures for child protection. The plan is to develop initiatives to promote the protection of children and young people by implementing concepts and training for professionals, strengthening sexual offences and creating prevention exceptions for perpetrators (National Council meeting on child protection – 195th session of the National Council on 31 January 2023 (195/NRSITZ): https://www.parlament.gv.at/aktuelles/pk/jahr_2023/pk0084#XXVII_NRSITZ_00195). The child protection organisations, such as the Austrian Ombuds Offices for Children and Youths, Austrian Child Protection Centres, NC Kinderrechte, ECPAT Austria and Netzwerk Kinderrechte, believe that the package of measures for child protection is progress in the right direction. However, it requires further steps, especially implementation, in order to see a real change in the protection of children and young people (position paper of the Children’s Rights Network: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/positionspapier-kinderschutzpaket-fuer-den-ausserfamiliaeren-kinderschutz/<).
  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029:
https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Implement the concepts on Assisted Parenthood for parents with disabilities

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The current approach to promoting the participation of people with disabilities and their representative organisations has significant weaknesses. These weaknesses result from various factors, such as an inadequate understanding of full and effective participation and the insufficient provision of resources for participation processes. In addition, political participation in Austria is highly formalised and has grown historically, which gives advantages to already established and politically networked civil society organisations. However, not enough systematic attention has been paid to carrying out targeted capacity building in accordance with the requirements of the UN CRPD.   It would be desirable if a process similar to the participatory drafting of the 2nd Adult Protection Act had been set up by the Ministry of Justice in 2016 (Justice website: https://www.bmj.gv.at/themen/Zivilrecht/Erwachsenenschutz/Das-neue-Erwachsenenschutzrecht-im-%C3%9Cberblick.html). In fact, from the perspective of civil society, the NAP II cannot yet be considered a sufficient success because it does not sufficiently realise the goal of effective social integration of people with disabilities. 

Progress: No progress

Amend the incitement provisions of § 283 StGB to include the victim group on the basis of gender identity

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

There is still no standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination in Austria. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination. When it comes to access to goods and services, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief or sexual orientation. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education. Similarly, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection.    There is no explicit legal protection against intersectional discrimination and discrimination based on gender identity, gender expression or gender characteristics. The anti-discrimination laws and the respective equality bodies at federal and state level are organised very differently, which makes access to justice more difficult.
Those affected by discrimination usually have to take legal action individually. The amounts of damages awarded in practice are low and there is a lack of effective statutory minimum compensation and injunctive relief. A collective action as a collective legal protection instrument only exists in cases of discrimination on the basis of disability.
The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html   As part of the government plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see government plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Protect human dignity as a central legal good, also in cases of hatred on the internet

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Regarding hate speech on the internet, the Hate on the Net Act was introduced to help victims of online hate, including group-focused misanthropy (HiNBG see: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblAuth/BGBLA_2020_I_148/BGBLA_2020_I_148.html). Another positive development is that the Federal Ministry of the Interior has integrated the systematic recording of prejudicial motives in intentional criminal offences into police work as part of an EU project. For this purpose, the category „Hate crime“ was introduced in the police logging programme (PAD) as a separate „Motive“ tab with the title „Prejudice motives (hate crime) according to victim groups“. The recorded data is transmitted to the justice system via a separate interface: Electronic Legal Transactions (ERV) and subjected to quality assurance by the Federal Ministry of the Interior. Around 30,000 police officers throughout Austria have been prepared for this task by completing e-learning seminars and receiving training as multipliers. The police now work on the basis of a victim-centred approach, actively listening to those affected and investigating consistently to ensure appropriate prosecution. These measures are designed to help tackle bias crimes and improve safety for all citizens.  

Redaktionelle Verantwortung UPR-Tool:

Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte, upr@liga.or.at

Lizenz CC-BY-SA 

Unterstützung durch:

Forschungskooperation mit der Volksanwaltschaft

Förderung des Zukunftsfonds der Republik Österreich

 

Receive the latest news

Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter