Universal Periodic Review

This UPR tool reflects the global recommendations made to Austria by all countries world-wide during the Universial Priodic Review process (UPR) at the UN Human Rights Council and their current status of implementation. The League coordinates a significant part of Austrian civil society in the UPR process. 

The recommendations can be filtered in the menu below by human rights topics, SDGs, proponent states etc. also a search function is available. 

 

We welcome your comments and suggestions at upr@liga.or.at.


Search category
Filter options
Filter by tag…

Progress: No progress

Conduct awareness-raising campaigns aimed at the media, public officials, as well as the general public, to combat stigmatization and prejudice of which children with disabilities may be victims

Proponent:

Belgium


Kingdom of Belgium

Belgium


Kingdom of Belgium

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Nothing is known about specific awareness-raising campaigns on the rights of children with disabilities, especially those focussing on self-empowerment and human rights. 

Progress: No progress

Present children with disabilities as equal citizens also in the media

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The current approach to promoting the participation of people with disabilities and their representative organisations has significant weaknesses. These weaknesses result from various factors, such as an inadequate understanding of full and effective participation and the insufficient provision of resources for participation processes. In addition, political participation in Austria is highly formalised and has grown historically, which gives advantages to already established and politically networked civil society organisations. However, not enough systematic attention has been paid to carrying out targeted capacity building in accordance with the requirements of the UN CRPD.   It would be desirable if a process similar to the participatory drafting of the 2nd Adult Protection Act had been set up by the Ministry of Justice in 2016 (Justice website: https://www.bmj.gv.at/themen/Zivilrecht/Erwachsenenschutz/Das-neue-Erwachsenenschutzrecht-im-%C3%9Cberblick.html). In fact, from the perspective of civil society, the NAP II cannot yet be considered a sufficient success because it does not sufficiently realise the goal of effective social integration of people with disabilities. 

Progress: No progress

Offer barrier-free websites, subtitling of public and private TV broadcasters, barrier-free access to theatre and film presentations, museums, galleries, etc

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Although Austria 2024 has made progress in the accessibility of services for people with disabilities, many challenges remain. In the area of sign language interpreting services in particular, there is still a significant shortage of trained interpreters. According to the Ministry of Social Affairs, only around 130 sign language interpreters are available for around 10,000 deaf people in Austria, which significantly limits equal participation in social life (update from the Austrian Disability Council, 2024: https://www.behindertenrat.at/2024/09/ausbau-von-gebaerdensprachdolmetsch/). While the new funding guideline from the Ministry of Social Affairs, which aims to increase the number of interpreters, is an important improvement, it is also a reaction to the ongoing bottlenecks and not the result of successful prevention. The expansion of training opportunities for sign language interpreters, both in university and non-university programmes, is urgently needed to meet the demand. Nevertheless, it remains questionable whether these measures will be able to close the existing gaps in the short term. In addition, there is still a need for optimisation in the area of digital accessibility. Although services in plain language, subtitles and sign language interpreters have now been
have now been integrated into audiovisual formats, but the comprehensive implementation is inadequate. Not all public and private institutions offer this accessibility in the same quality and frequency, which continues to make it difficult for people with disabilities to participate BMASGK. So while the efforts are a step in the right direction, the actual implementation and sufficient provision of resources remain an ongoing challenge (offers from the BMASGK: <a href= https://www.sozialministerium.at/Services/Neuigkeiten-und-Termine/gebaerdensprach-dolmetschangebote.html< https://www.sozialministerium.at/Services/Neuigkeiten-und-Termine/gebaerdensprach-dolmetschangebote.html). 

Progress: No progress

Establish the “two-senses principle” in public institutions, transport and communication and information systems

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Although Austria 2024 has made progress in the accessibility of services for people with disabilities, many challenges remain. In the area of sign language interpreting services in particular, there is still a significant shortage of trained interpreters. According to the Ministry of Social Affairs, only around 130 sign language interpreters are available for around 10,000 deaf people in Austria, which significantly limits equal participation in social life (update from the Austrian Disability Council, 2024: https://www.behindertenrat.at/2024/09/ausbau-von-gebaerdensprachdolmetsch/). While the new funding guideline from the Ministry of Social Affairs, which aims to increase the number of interpreters, is an important improvement, it is also a reaction to the ongoing bottlenecks and not the result of successful prevention. The expansion of training opportunities for sign language interpreters, both in university and non-university programmes, is urgently needed to meet the demand. Nevertheless, it remains questionable whether these measures will be able to close the existing gaps in the short term. In addition, there is still a need for optimisation in the area of digital accessibility. Although services in plain language, subtitles and sign language interpreters have now been
have now been integrated into audiovisual formats, but the comprehensive implementation is inadequate. Not all public and private institutions offer this accessibility in the same quality and frequency, which continues to make it difficult for people with disabilities to participate BMASGK. So while the efforts are a step in the right direction, the actual implementation and sufficient provision of resources remain an ongoing challenge (offers from the BMASGK: <a href= https://www.sozialministerium.at/Services/Neuigkeiten-und-Termine/gebaerdensprach-dolmetschangebote.html< https://www.sozialministerium.at/Services/Neuigkeiten-und-Termine/gebaerdensprach-dolmetschangebote.html). 

Redaktionelle Verantwortung UPR-Tool:

Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte, upr@liga.or.at

Lizenz CC-BY-SA 

Unterstützung durch:

Forschungskooperation mit der Volksanwaltschaft

Förderung des Zukunftsfonds der Republik Österreich

 

Receive the latest news

Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter