Universal Periodic Review

This UPR tool reflects the global recommendations made to Austria by all countries world-wide during the Universial Priodic Review process (UPR) at the UN Human Rights Council and their current status of implementation. The League coordinates a significant part of Austrian civil society in the UPR process. 

The recommendations can be filtered in the menu below by human rights topics, SDGs, proponent states etc. also a search function is available. 

 

We welcome your comments and suggestions at upr@liga.or.at.


Search category
Filter options
Filter by tag…

Progress: No progress

Continue to respect economic, social and cultural rights including social protection without discrimination

Proponent:

Slovakia


Slovak Republic

Slovakia


Slovak Republic

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The status of economic, social and cultural human rights remains precarious. Fundamental social rights in particular are not enshrined in the constitution. The lack of implementation in this area was also criticised by the Austrian League of Human Rights in the Human Rights Report 2022. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (BGBl. No. 590/1978) is also not enshrined in constitutional law. It is subject to fulfilment within the meaning of Article 50 para. 2 of the Federal Constitution, meaning that a supreme court review of relevant laws and measures on the basis of this instrument is not possible. Austria has also not ratified the Optional Protocol on the individual complaints procedure.   The implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child through the Federal Constitutional Act on the Rights of Children (BGBl. I No. 4/2011) also largely omitted the economic, social and cultural rights of children. On the contrary, many welfare state regulations, including access to affordable social housing, have been tightened for migrants and refugees in recent years. Social protection and social participation are thus being withheld from immigrants in a discriminatory manner. This matter is partly a matter for the federal states, meaning that there are major differences across Austria.   There is a lack of harmonisation in line with human rights. The Basic Social Assistance Act (Federal Law Gazette I 2019/41) was also repealed by the Constitutional Court in March 2023 in key points (including qualified knowledge of German as a prerequisite for receiving social assistance) due to a violation of the provisions of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) (see the Constitutional Court’s website: https://www.vfgh.gv.at/medien/Sozialhilfe.php).  However, numerous other regulations at federal and provincial level contain explicit disadvantages for asylum seekers and persons entitled to asylum, persons entitled to subsidiary protection, as well as non-EU citizens (third-country nationals), some of whom have been living legally in Austria for a long time. This also applies, for example, to the Upper Austrian Housing Subsidies Act, which contains special obstacles to accessing housing subsidies for third-country nationals and refugees who are long-term residents, or the Federal Housing Non-Profit Act, according to which subsidised housing may only be allocated to foreign citizens after 5 years of residence and a successful integration test (Upper Austrian Housing Subsidies Act: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=LROO&Gesetzesnummer=10000366). 

Progress: No progress

Consolidate and strengthen existing anti-discrimination legislation to provide comprehensive equal protection, particularly in access to goods and services, on all prohibited grounds of discrimination

Proponent:

Ireland


Ireland

Ireland


Ireland

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has still not implemented standardised and comprehensive legal protection against discrimination. Austrian equality law is still characterised by a discriminatory hierarchy of grounds for discrimination with large gaps in protection outside the world of work. When it comes to access to goods and services, federal law (which is applicable in the majority of all cases) only provides protection against discrimination on the basis of disability, ethnicity and gender – but not on the basis of age, religion and belief or sexual orientation, and therefore not in the case of multiple discrimination. Furthermore, there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination based on all grounds of discrimination in the area of education and there is no comprehensive protection against discrimination in a number of areas of social protection. There is no explicit legal protection against intersectional discrimination and discrimination based on gender identity, expression or characteristics. The anti-discrimination laws and the respective equality bodies at federal and state level are organised very differently, which makes access to justice more difficult. Those affected by discrimination usually have to take legal action individually. The amounts of damages awarded in practice are low and there is a lack of effective statutory minimum compensation and injunctive relief. A collective action as a collective legal protection instrument only exists in cases of discrimination on the basis of disability.    The current government programme 2025-2029 does not provide for the elimination of these inequalities in discrimination protection (see government programme 2025-2029 as a PDF on the website of the Federal Chancellery: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html available).  

Redaktionelle Verantwortung UPR-Tool:

Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte, upr@liga.or.at

Lizenz CC-BY-SA 

Unterstützung durch:

Forschungskooperation mit der Volksanwaltschaft

Förderung des Zukunftsfonds der Republik Österreich

 

Receive the latest news

Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter