Universal Periodic Review

This UPR tool reflects the global recommendations made to Austria by all countries world-wide during the Universial Priodic Review process (UPR) at the UN Human Rights Council and their current status of implementation. The League coordinates a significant part of Austrian civil society in the UPR process. 

The recommendations can be filtered in the menu below by human rights topics, SDGs, proponent states etc. also a search function is available. 

 

We welcome your comments and suggestions at upr@liga.or.at.


Search category
Filter options
Filter by tag…

Progress: In progress

Continue efforts to strengthen legislative measures to combat human trafficking and to reinforcing monitoring mechanisms in this field

Proponent:

Tunisia


Tunisian Republic

Tunisia


Tunisian Republic

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

With regard to measures to combat human trafficking, including child trafficking, the Federal Government has set extensive goals in the areas of prevention, victim protection, prosecution and monitoring in its National Action Plan 2021-2023. However, challenges remain, for example, in the identification of trafficked persons in the area of labour exploitation, in the security of residence for trafficked persons and in measures against child trafficking. In 2011, the EU adopted Directive 2011/36/EU on combating trafficking in human beings, which has already been implemented by Austria. In addition, the EU is pursuing its own strategy to combat human trafficking for the period 2021-2025 (see Strategy 2021-2025: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_1663). A task force of the Austrian federal government has been coordinating and strengthening measures to combat human trafficking since 2004. The task force is made up of federal ministries, federal states, social partners and NGOs. It develops and supports national action plans against human trafficking. This year, the current „National Action Plan against Human Trafficking (NAP) 2024-2027“ was published. In a recently published working paper, the effects of the federal system in Austria on the safety of persons in prostitution were also analysed. Every three years, the task force submits reports on the implementation of the action plans to the federal government and parliament. In addition, annual reports on the implementation of the NAP are prepared. If necessary, individual points are analysed in greater depth to ensure a better overview. This process is coordinated by the Federal Foreign Office (NAP Trafficking in Human Beings 2024-2027: https://www.bmeia.gv.at/fileadmin/user_upload/Zentrale/Aussenpolitik/Menschenrechte/NAP_2024.pdf). 

Progress: In progress

Take further measures to harmonize protection standards for victims of child trafficking throughout its territory, and refine its data collection to cover all forms of trafficking and sexual exploitation of children

Proponent:

Sri Lanka


Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka


Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

A working group on child trafficking coordinated by the Federal Criminal Police Office (Family) as part of the interministerial task force against human trafficking presented a concept for an Austria-wide protection centre for trafficked children in 2021, which has not yet been implemented. However, a revision of „guidelines for action“ for those involved in identifying and protecting victims of child trafficking, which is planned by the Child Trafficking Working Group in 2023, depends on this and should enable a more harmonised approach across the country. There are also deficits in the area of legal protection for children, including access to compensation. A key challenge remains the identification of trafficked persons in the area of labour exploitation, the guarantee of residence security for these persons and the implementation of measures against child trafficking and sexual exploitation. In addition, the collection of relevant data in these areas poses a further difficulty. Every year on the European Day against Trafficking in Human Beings, the Austrian Task Force against Trafficking in Human Beings/MFAO, in partnership with Liechtenstein, organises a conference on current implementation challenges (further information can be found on the website of the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs: https://www.bmeia.gv.at/themen/menschenrechte/kampf-gegen-den-menschenhandel/ available). 

Progress: No progress

Redouble its efforts to facilitate access of persons with disabilities to the labour market by ensuring effective implementation of the Employment of People with Disabilities Act

Proponent:

Thailand


Kingdom of Thailand

Thailand


Kingdom of Thailand

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there is a distinction between people who are fit for work and those who are not. The ability or inability to work is determined exclusively on the basis of medical criteria, often directly after school. The federal states are responsible for people who are not fit for work, while the federal government is responsible for people who are fit for work. Hardly any measures have been taken with regard to the group of people who are unable to work. These people continue to work in day labour and employment structures, but do not receive a wage and have no independent social insurance (with the exception of accident insurance). This leads to increased poverty in old age and there is no data on the transition to the regular labour market. There are no nationwide uniform measures to make this possible and the planned measures in the National Action Plan 2022-2030 have not yet been implemented (see National Action Plan on Disability available on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Menschen-mit-Behinderungen/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-Behinderung.html). Support services for people who are able to work are largely linked to a certain degree of disability (GdB), which means that people who do not have a degree of disability (GdB) determined by the state are excluded from corresponding support measures. The measures offered by the Public Employment Service (AMS) are not fully accessible to people with disabilities. As a result, unemployed people with disabilities are less likely to take part in AMS training programmes than unemployed people without disabilities.    There are only a few measures to combat gender-specific employment imbalances and wage gaps, apart from higher wage cost support for women with disabilities as part of the „Inclusion Support Plus“ programme (Inklusionsförderung/InklusionsförderungPlus: https://www.wko.at/service/arbeitsrecht-sozialrecht/inklusionsfoerderung-inklusionsfoerderungplus.html). There are no specific labour market policy measures for women with disabilities (wage subsidies: Website of the Social Ministry Service: https://www.sozialministeriumservice.at/Finanzielles/Foerderungen/Lohnfoerderungen/Lohnfoerderungen.de.html). Austria has currently implemented various measures to promote the employment of people with disabilities, including the Disability Employment Act (BEinstG). The law stipulates that employers with a certain number of employees are obliged to hire a minimum number of people with disabilities or otherwise pay a compensatory tax. Although progress has been made, there are still challenges. The actual employment rate of people with disabilities remains below the legally required level and many companies prefer to pay the compensatory tax. There is still a need to improve the enforcement of the law, create more incentives for companies and expand the accessibility infrastructure. 

Progress: No progress

Provide appropriate job opportunities for persons with disabilities

Proponent:

Iran


Islamic Republic of Iran

Iran


Islamic Republic of Iran

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there is a distinction between people who are fit for work and those who are not. The ability or inability to work is determined exclusively on the basis of medical criteria, often directly after school. The federal states are responsible for people who are not fit for work, while the federal government is responsible for people who are fit for work. Hardly any measures have been taken with regard to the group of people who are unable to work. These people continue to work in day labour and employment structures, but do not receive a wage and have no independent social insurance (with the exception of accident insurance). This leads to increased poverty in old age and there is no data on the transition to the regular labour market. There are no nationwide uniform measures to make this possible and the planned measures in the National Action Plan 2022-2030 have not yet been implemented (see National Action Plan on Disability available on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Menschen-mit-Behinderungen/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-Behinderung.html). Support services for people who are able to work are largely linked to a certain degree of disability (GdB), which means that people who do not have a degree of disability (GdB) determined by the state are excluded from corresponding support measures. The measures offered by the Public Employment Service (AMS) are not fully accessible to people with disabilities. As a result, unemployed people with disabilities are less likely to take part in AMS training programmes than unemployed people without disabilities.    There are only a few measures to combat gender-specific employment imbalances and wage gaps, apart from higher wage cost support for women with disabilities as part of the „Inclusion Support Plus“ programme (Inklusionsförderung/InklusionsförderungPlus: https://www.wko.at/service/arbeitsrecht-sozialrecht/inklusionsfoerderung-inklusionsfoerderungplus.html). There are no specific labour market policy measures for women with disabilities (wage subsidies: Website of the Social Ministry Service: https://www.sozialministeriumservice.at/Finanzielles/Foerderungen/Lohnfoerderungen/Lohnfoerderungen.de.html). 

Progress: No progress

Strengthen measures to increase job opportunities for women in full-time employment sectors

Proponent:

Myanmar


Republic of the Union of Myanmar

Myanmar


Republic of the Union of Myanmar

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

No corresponding legislation has yet been passed in Austria. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2023 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). Another factor is the fact that women often work in occupations that are traditionally seen as „women’s jobs“ and are lower paid. To improve the compatibility of work and family life, the Austrian Trade Union Federation (ÖGB) advocates, among other things, a legal entitlement to free childcare from the first birthday, the introduction of the ÖGB-AK family working time model, the nationwide expansion of care and support services, such as mobile services, day care centres, inpatient services and alternative care options, inpatient services and alternative care models, the reduction of normal working hours in accordance with the Working Hours Act as well as a reduction in the maximum permitted daily, weekly and annual working hours, better recognition of child-raising periods and increased qualification programmes for women (see further information on the website of the Austrian Trade Union Federation: https://www.oegb.at/themen/gleichstellung/geschlechtergerechtigkeit/finanzielle-unabhaengigkeit-von-frauen–barrieren-und-loesungen). Concrete measures by the federal government are still pending.  

Progress: No progress

Better enforce human rights compliance by private economic actors with a view to reducing the gender pay gap and diversifying career options for all

Proponent:

Vietnam


Socialist Republic of Vietnam

Vietnam


Socialist Republic of Vietnam

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). 

Progress: No progress

Take appropriate measures to eliminate discrimination of women in the labour market and reduce the gender pay gap

Proponent:

Uganda


Republic of Uganda

Uganda


Republic of Uganda

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). Gender stereotypes and role expectations contribute to inequality, make it difficult for women to advance in their careers and reduce their opportunities. To tackle the gender pay gap in the EU, the Council of the European Union adopted new rules on 24 April 2023 to combat pay discrimination and reduce the gender pay gap. 

Progress: No progress

Implement campaigns and measures to reduce the pay gap between men and women

Proponent:

Belgium


Kingdom of Belgium

Belgium


Kingdom of Belgium

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). 

Progress: No progress

Further promote measures that ensure the economic and social empowerment of women, mainly through reducing gender pay gap

Proponent:

Ethiopia


Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia

Ethiopia


Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have until June 2026 to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees. The exact implementation of the directive is not yet known (further information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). 

Progress: No progress

Further strengthen measures to promote equality between women and men, in particular regarding equal pay and the participation of women on the boards and in the chief executive offices of companies

Proponent:

France


French Republic

France


French Republic

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). Women continue to be underrepresented not only in companies, but also in political decision-making positions at state and municipal level. Despite some progress, there are still considerable problems with regard to the pay gap and the number of women in decision-making positions. The pay gap between women and men remains high. Women are underrepresented not only in companies, but also in political decision-making positions at provincial and municipal level. According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have until June 2026 to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees. The exact implementation of the directive is not yet known (further information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). 

Progress: No progress

Further pursue its efforts to narrow the gender pay gap and to ensure equal opportunities for women on the labour market

Proponent:

Greece


Hellenic Republic

Greece


Hellenic Republic

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). Gender stereotypes and role expectations contribute to inequality, make it difficult for women to advance in their careers and reduce their opportunities. To tackle the gender pay gap in the EU, the Council of the European Union adopted new rules on 24 April 2023 to combat pay discrimination and reduce the gender pay gap. 

Progress: No progress

Reducing the wages gap between women and men in work

Proponent:

Iraq


Republic of Iraq

Iraq


Republic of Iraq

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). 

Progress: No progress

Implement concrete measures to reduce the gender pay gap

Proponent:

Lithuania


Republic of Lithuania

Lithuania


Republic of Lithuania

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). 

Progress: No progress

Promote the principle of equal pay for work of equal value and minimize the gender pay gap

Proponent:

Maldives


Republic of Maldives

Maldives


Republic of Maldives

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). 

Progress: No progress

Redouble efforts in addressing the gender pay gap

Proponent:

Mozambique


Republic of Mozambique

Mozambique


Republic of Mozambique

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). 

Progress: No progress

Continue efforts to narrow down and eventually eliminate gender pay gap for equal work with men

Proponent:

Myanmar


Republic of the Union of Myanmar

Myanmar


Republic of the Union of Myanmar

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). 

Progress: No progress

Enhance efforts to reduce the high wage gap by enforcing the principle of gender equality

Proponent:

Slovenia


Republic of Slovenia

Slovenia


Republic of Slovenia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). 

Progress: No progress

Eliminate gender pay gap

Proponent:

Somalia


Federal Republic of Somalia

Somalia


Federal Republic of Somalia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). 

Progress: No progress

Continue efforts to implement the national development programme to combat poverty, preserve peace and protect the environment

Proponent:

Libya


State of Libya

Libya


State of Libya

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

{Armut-Allgemein}A § 8 BMG Commission for dialogue processes between the administration and civil society was newly established in the BMK. This commission promotes the exchange between the administration (represented by the) and organised civil society (represented by the managing directors of Ökobüro and Umweltdachverband). However, a climate protection law and other tangible legal progress are still lacking, which is also clearly criticised by civil society (see e.g. on the website of the climate referendum: https://klimavolksbegehren.at/). On 23 February 2022, the European Commission published a draft directive on „Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence“ (CDSDD, see draft on the European Union website: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52022 PC 0071 from=EN). On 1 December 2022, the European Council agreed on its position and on 1 June 2023, the European Parliament will adopt its position, which will be followed by trilogue negotiations between the three institutions (Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the European Council on corporate due diligence in relation to sustainability and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 as PDF: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15024-2022-REV-1/en/pdf). The Federal Ministry of Justice and the Federal Ministry of Labour and Economic Affairs have initiated a good consultation process following the publication of the Commission’s draft directive. The government should again fully involve stakeholders in the future implementation of the directive in Austria.
  It is to be welcomed that the Directive that has been adopted and entered into force includes civil liability and sanctions by public authorities. However, in order for the directive to effectively protect human rights and the environment along global supply chains, access to justice for those affected by rights violations needs to be improved. An important civil society initiative on this topic is „Human rights need laws“ (campaign by the organisation Netzwerk Soziale Verantwortung for a supply chain law in Austria and the EU: https://www.nesove.at/menschenrechte-brauchen-gesetze/).
  On 26 February 2025, the EU Commission presented a package which, according to the Commission, is intended to simplify sustainability rules. Proposed amendments concern the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the EU Taxonomy and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). Although a mere simplification and reduction of redundant and overlapping reporting points was announced, a massive watering down of the CSDDD in important points is now proposed: The erosion of the risk-based approach, as the due diligence obligations would only extend to direct business partners* with a few exceptions; monitoring of due diligence measures would only be carried out every 5 years instead of annually as previously envisaged; deletion of an EU-wide harmonised regulation on civil liability; deletion of the turnover-related minimum maximum penalties for violations; deletion of the obligation to implement climate transition plans, deletion of the possibility of representative actions, etc. (see: here). As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Make progress towards an economic and social recovery with a human rights approach to face the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, taking into account the special needs of vulnerable groups of society

Proponent:

Chile


Republic of Chile

Chile


Republic of Chile

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The COVID-19 pandemic has also led to far-reaching restrictions on fundamental human and children’s rights in Austria (personal freedom, freedom of movement, education, health, etc.). However, there has been no review of the experiences to date; the federal government announced an analysis process led by the Academy of Sciences in May 2023; however, the involvement of civil society in the process remains unclear. In March 2023, the Austrian Children’s Rights Network, with the support of the Ministry of Social Affairs, published a „Corona Special Report“, which takes a detailed look at the many detrimental consequences of the fight against the pandemic for children (in the areas of civil liberties, information and participation, education, teaching, leisure, mental health, poverty, protection against violence and child rights monitoring) („Children’s Rights and Corona“ special report: here).   The LBI-GMR is running two projects in 2023 on crisis management and children’s rights, including a series of workshops with children and young people on their insights from the pandemic (available on the website: https://gmr.lbg.ac.at/forschung/menschenwuerde-und-oeffentliche-sicherheit/).   There has been an increase in domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the current state of affairs shows that Austria’s measures and resources to combat domestic violence are inadequate. The rising number of cases of domestic violence during the pandemic has been repeatedly addressed by non-governmental organisations. Other effects of the COVID-19 pandemic include an increased suicide rate, including among young people, and a greater need for psychosocial support. The federal government is currently not systematically analysing and investigating the causes. It would be desirable to advance research here, not only to counter the specific effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, but also to be able to design measures in a more human rights-compliant manner in a comparable crisis in the future;

Progress: No progress

Implement a national strategy for the prevention and reduction of poverty, which gives priority to the most vulnerable sectors and incorporates the response to the socio-economic impact of COVID-19 in the short, medium and long term

Proponent:

Cuba


Republic of Cuba

Cuba


Republic of Cuba

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The picture of poverty in Austria is varied: 2.3% of the population are currently directly affected by poverty, while 17.3% are considered to be at risk of poverty or marginalisation. However, these estimates do not take into account recent developments such as high inflation and the rising cost of living in 2022/2023, which could place additional burdens on low-income households.   The concept of poverty reduction in Austria and globally is based not only on financial indicators, but also on a comprehensive approach that includes education, health and living standards. Goal 1 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals calls for the sustainable eradication of poverty in all its forms, which means that in addition to securing a living income, the focus is also on improving equal opportunities and participation. For Austria, this specifically means ensuring access to basic services such as healthcare and education in addition to material support. Overcoming the current economic challenges therefore requires both short-term measures and long-term strategies in order to reduce social exclusion and sustainably improve the quality of life for all population groups. Children, elderly women, single parents, the long-term unemployed and people without citizenship are particularly at risk. People with chronic illnesses also face considerable challenges, and high housing costs are pushing many people to the brink.   More than a fifth of all people at risk of poverty and marginalisation are children (22%, or 353,000 children aged 0-17). More than half of children living in single-parent households are at risk of poverty or exclusion (52%), and 30% of families with at least three children are affected. Among pension recipients, women living alone in particular are affected by poverty at an above-average rate of 28% (see Current poverty figures in Austria: https://www.armutskonferenz.at/armut-in-oesterreich/aktuelle-armuts-und-verteilungszahlen.html). Civil society, including the Poverty Conference, urgently appeals to the need for the following measures to advance the fight against poverty: There is a need for a minimum income that is actually sufficient to lead a decent life; a quality, well-developed social infrastructure that is accessible to all is crucial to improve the quality of life of those affected; a new and innovative labour market and working time policy is needed to create long-term solutions to the problem of poverty; and more and comprehensive political participation opportunities must be created for people affected by poverty and social exclusion. This is crucial if their interests and needs are to be adequately taken into account. These measures are the first and decisive steps in the fight against poverty and social exclusion in Austria (see FAQ on the Poverty Conference website: https://www.armutskonferenz.at/armut-in-oesterreich/faqs-zum-thema-armut.html). The COVID-19 pandemic has also led to far-reaching restrictions on fundamental human and children’s rights in Austria (personal freedom, freedom of movement, education, health, etc.). However, there has been no review of the experiences to date; the federal government announced an analysis process led by the Academy of Sciences in May 2023; however, the involvement of civil society in the process remains unclear. In March 2023, the Austrian Children’s Rights Network, with the support of the Ministry of Social Affairs, published a „Corona Special Report“, which takes a detailed look at the many detrimental consequences of the fight against the pandemic for children (in the areas of civil liberties, information and participation, education, teaching, leisure, mental health, poverty, protection against violence and child rights monitoring) („Children’s Rights and Corona“ special report: here).   The LBI-GMR is running two projects in 2023 on crisis management and children’s rights, including a series of workshops with children and young people on their insights from the pandemic (available on the website: https://gmr.lbg.ac.at/forschung/menschenwuerde-und-oeffentliche-sicherheit/).   There has been an increase in domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the current state of affairs shows that Austria’s measures and resources to combat domestic violence are inadequate. The rising number of cases of domestic violence during the pandemic has been repeatedly addressed by non-governmental organisations. Other effects of the COVID-19 pandemic include an increased suicide rate, including among young people, and a greater need for psychosocial support. The federal government is currently not systematically analysing and investigating the causes. It would be desirable to advance research here, not only to counter the specific effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, but also to be able to design measures in a more human rights-compliant manner in a comparable crisis in the future;

Progress: No progress

Examine the Covid-19-related long-term consequences for the state of human rights protection in Austria with a special focus on the situation of women and children affected by domestic violence

Proponent:

Germany


Federal Republic of Germany

Germany


Federal Republic of Germany

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The COVID-19 pandemic has also led to far-reaching restrictions on fundamental human and children’s rights in Austria (personal freedom, freedom of movement, education, health, etc.). However, there has been no review of the experiences to date; the federal government announced an analysis process led by the Academy of Sciences in May 2023; however, the involvement of civil society in the process remains unclear. In March 2023, the Austrian Children’s Rights Network, with the support of the Ministry of Social Affairs, published a „Corona Special Report“, which takes a detailed look at the many detrimental consequences of the fight against the pandemic for children (in the areas of civil liberties, information and participation, education, teaching, leisure, mental health, poverty, protection against violence and child rights monitoring) („Children’s Rights and Corona“ special report: here).   The LBI-GMR is running two projects in 2023 on crisis management and children’s rights, including a series of workshops with children and young people on their insights from the pandemic (available on the website: https://gmr.lbg.ac.at/forschung/menschenwuerde-und-oeffentliche-sicherheit/).   There has been an increase in domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the current state of affairs shows that Austria’s measures and resources to combat domestic violence are inadequate. The rising number of cases of domestic violence during the pandemic has been repeatedly addressed by non-governmental organisations. Other effects of the COVID-19 pandemic include an increased suicide rate, including among young people, and a greater need for psychosocial support. The federal government is currently not systematically analysing and investigating the causes. It would be desirable to advance research here, not only to counter the specific effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, but also to be able to design measures in a more human rights-compliant manner in a comparable crisis in the future;

Progress: No progress

Take further measures to reduce poverty among older persons, particularly older women and older migrants

Proponent:

Malaysia


Malaysia

Malaysia


Malaysia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

The situation of poverty in old age in Austria remains critical, especially for older women. Around 14% of people over the age of 65 are at risk of poverty or marginalisation, which affects around 212,000 people. Women are more affected: 16% of older women are considered to be at risk of poverty, compared to around 10% of men. This is often due to lower pensions resulting from part-time work, childcare periods and caring responsibilities, which are predominantly taken on by women. As Diakonie reports, financial constraints exacerbate social and health problems in old age. Many of those affected struggle with loneliness and have difficulties accessing care services. Diakonie and Volkshilfe are therefore calling for better recognition of childcare and care periods as well as an increase in the minimum income to enable older people to live a dignified life.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Continue to increase the availability and accessibility of child and adolescent mental health service and programme

Proponent:

Timor-Leste


Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste

Timor-Leste


Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

The free psychosocial care programme for children, adolescents and young adults „Gesund aus der Krise“ has entered a second phase following requests from several organisations. The aim of „Gesund aus der Krise“ is to offer low-threshold psychosocial care throughout Austria without long waiting times. However, authorisation is usually only granted for 10 to 15 hours of treatment, whereas the majority of cases would require more time. It would be necessary to make the programme open-ended and provide additional funding. More free, low-threshold therapy programmes are generally necessary.   In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is focussing on joint improvements with all stakeholders on this point (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Continue to increase the availability and accessibility of child and adolescent mental health services and programs

Proponent:

Portugal


Portuguese Republic

Portugal


Portuguese Republic

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

The free psychosocial care programme for children, adolescents and young adults „Gesund aus der Krise“ has entered a second phase following requests from several organisations. The aim of „Gesund aus der Krise“ is to offer low-threshold psychosocial care throughout Austria without long waiting times. However, authorisation is usually only granted for 10 to 15 hours of treatment, whereas the majority of cases would require more time. It would be necessary to make the programme open-ended and provide additional funding. More free, low-threshold therapy programmes are generally necessary.   In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is focussing on joint improvements with all stakeholders on this point (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Guarantee access to sexual and reproductive rights and particularly to abortion (France)

Proponent:

France


French Republic

France


French Republic

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The current situation regarding sexual and reproductive rights in Austria is a problem. Although the right to abortion is formally recognised, there are still numerous hurdles and restrictions that make access to this basic medical procedure difficult. Various non-governmental organisations such as the Austrian Society for Family Planning (ÖGF) and the Women’s Health Centre (FGZ) have repeatedly pointed out that there are restrictions on access to abortion in some parts of Austria and that there is a lack of information and counselling services.   Austrian law allows abortions to be carried out without penalty within the first three months of pregnancy, which is known as the „deadline solution“. Under certain circumstances, abortion is also possible after this period has expired. Nevertheless, restrictive laws and social stigmatisation make it difficult for women to have a safe and legal abortion.   The current situation highlights the need for a comprehensive revision of legislation and additional measures to educate and sensitise the public. § Section 6 (3) of the Hospitals and Health Resorts Act stipulates that hospitals may not have any provisions in their regulations that prohibit the performance of an abortion without punishment or co-operation in this. In addition, the public healthcare system bears the costs of an abortion if it is necessary for medical reasons (Federal Law Gazette I No. 13/2019, Section 6 (3) of the Hospitals and Health Resorts Act: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/1957/1/P6/NOR40211921?ResultFunctionToken==100&Suchworte=anstaltsordnung). One goal of the Women’s Health Action Plan 2020 is to promote reproductive health, and measure 27, which is included in the plan, aims to support women in their self-determined sexuality, for example by providing low-threshold access to contraceptives, and to guarantee the possibility of abortion in all federal states (Action Plan Women’s Health as PDF: https://www.sozialministerium.at/dam/jcr:b185f2aa-a1a5-4893-a940-e034d76710c3/Aktionsplan_Frauengesundheit_01_2020.pdf). Progress is still to be evaluated.  A current problem is that many women have to travel long distances to receive adequate care, as there is an uneven distribution of abortion facilities in different regions. In addition, women’s autonomy and freedom of choice are impaired by legal requirements such as the reflection period and the obligation to undergo counselling. In recent years, individual federal states have seen regression rather than progress in access to abortion. 

Progress: In progress

Strengthen measures to address obesity in children and to promote a healthy lifestyle, as recommended by the Committee on the Rights of the Child

Proponent:

Sri Lanka


Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka


Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The range and effectiveness of the measures are to be increased, with the aim of improving availability and reducing waiting times in order to enable faster help for those affected. Studies show that mental stress in children and adolescents has increased significantly in recent years, particularly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This is often linked to obesity.  

Progress: No progress

Strengthen the legislative framework to expressly prohibit any practice that modifies a person’s sexual characteristics without well-founded medical reasons or without the full consent of that person

Proponent:

Uruguay


Republic of Eastern Uruguay

Uruguay


Republic of Eastern Uruguay

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The European Commission’s LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020-2025 calls for an end to this „genital mutilation of intersex people (see: here). International organisations, including the UN, the European Parliament and the European Commission, also support the end of these practices. Other European countries such as Malta, Greece and Germany have already passed corresponding laws. 

Progress: In progress

Ensure free and timely access to appropriate health-care for all, including LGBTI+ persons, children and adolescents where the young person has sufficient maturity to provide informed consent

Proponent:

Iceland


Republic of Iceland

Iceland


Republic of Iceland

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In the „Concluding Observations“ on the situation of children’s rights in Austria, published in March 2020, the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child called for a ban on the performance of medically unnecessary treatments or surgical interventions on children with variations in gender development (intersex children).   These measures should only be carried out if they are safe and can be postponed until the children concerned are able to give their consent on the basis of an informed decision (see paragraph 27, lit a). However, there is no concrete information on the exact steps to implement these recommendations (see Convention on the Rights of the Child as PDF: here). On 10 May 2024, the UN Committee against Torture (CAT) published new recommendations to Austria concerning the protection of intersex people (see CAT recommendations to Austria 2024: https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/SessionDetails1.aspx?SessionID=2749&Lang=en). In points 42 and 43 of its „Concluding Observations“, the committee expressed the desire for legal regulation to prohibit non-medically necessary interventions on intersex children. Furthermore, the committee recommended that people who have undergone such treatments should be adequately compensated and that counselling and support structures should be set up. These recommendations build on those made by the CAT in 2015, in which Austria was already called upon to ensure the protection of intersex people from harmful interventions. Despite this call, Austria has not yet implemented any corresponding measures, which is why it now seems important to reiterate the recommendations.   VIMÖ has submitted an alternative report to the UN Committee in which the procedures practised in Austria are scientifically documented. The report shows that there are more than 1,000 hospital discharges of children and adolescents with variations in sex characteristics every year. Many of these discharges are associated with operations that can be categorised as intersex genital mutilation (IGM) (see alternative VIMÖ report: https://vimoe.at/2024/04/25/oesterreich-vom-un-ausschuss-gegen-folter-cat-geprueft-veroeffentlichung-unseres-ngo-berichts-und-bedeutende-antwort-oesterreichs/). During the hearing on 17 April 2024, Austria admitted that such operations continue to be carried out. Reference was also made to existing legal regulations intended to protect minors from such interventions;The European Commission’s LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020-2025 calls for an end to this „genital mutilation of intersex people (see: here). International organisations, including the UN, the European Parliament and the European Commission, also support the end of these practices. Other European countries such as Malta, Greece and Germany have already passed corresponding laws. 

Progress: No progress

End harmful practices, including forced and coercive medical interventions, to ensure the bodily integrity of children with intersex variations

Proponent:

Iceland


Republic of Iceland

Iceland


Republic of Iceland

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In June 2021, the Austrian National Council unanimously passed resolution 1594/A(E) on the „Protection of intersex children and adolescents from medically unnecessary treatments of their sex characteristics“ (see parliament’s website: here). The Federal Ministry of Justice (BMJ) then set up a working group – with the involvement of civil society, psychotherapists and doctors – to draw up a draft law. The working group completed its work in November 2021.  A corresponding draft has been pending since then. Back in 2020, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child called on Austria to protect intersex children from non-necessary and non-consensual medical interventions. The Committee described this practice as „harmful and referred to the UN Convention against Torture“. Austria was already reprimanded by the UN Committee against Torture in 2015 for such treatments (reprimands to Austria in the VIMÖ/PIÖ position paper: https://vimoe.at/2020/02/25/februar-2020-un-kinderrechtsausschuss-ruegt-oesterreich-fuer-nicht-notwendige-behandlungen-an-inter-kindern/).   The European Commission’s LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020-2025 also calls for an end to this „genital mutilation of intersex people (see: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/lesbian-gay-bi-trans-and-intersex-equality/lgbtiq-equality-strategy-2020-2025_e). International organisations, including the UN, the European Parliament and the European Commission, also support the end of these practices. Other European countries such as Malta, Greece and Germany have already passed corresponding laws. Self-advocacy organisations such as the Verein Intergeschlechtlicher Menschen Österreich (VIMÖ/OII Austria) are calling for a law to protect intersex children and young people or children and young people with variations in gender characteristics (VIMÖ website: https://www.ots.at/presseaussendung/OTS_20230411_OTS0032/vimoe-zu-lgbtiq-intergroup-im-parlament-intergeschlechtliche-kinder-muessen-geschuetzt-werden-verbot-seit-zwei-jahren-ausstaendig). On 10 May 2020, the UN Committee against Torture (CAT) issued new recommendations to Austria on the protection of intersex people. In points 42 and 43 of its „Concluding Observations“, the Committee is in favour of a legal regulation that prohibits medically unnecessary interventions on children. It also recommends compensating people who have undergone such interventions and setting up counselling and support structures. These recommendations build on those of the 2015 CAT, in which Austria was also called upon to ensure the protection of intersex people from harmful interventions. To date, Austria has not implemented these recommendations. 

Progress: No progress

Prohibit any practice that modifies a person’s sex characteristics without irrefutable medical reasons and the full and informed consent of the person affected

Proponent:

Malta


Republic of Malta

Malta


Republic of Malta

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The European Commission’s LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020-2025 calls for an end to this „genital mutilation of intersex people (see: here). International organisations, including the UN, the European Parliament and the European Commission, also support the end of these practices. Other European countries such as Malta, Greece and Germany have already passed corresponding laws. 

Progress: No progress

Ensure that the human rights of intersex persons are respected, by developing a medical care protocol ensuring their participation in decision-making on medical interventions that affect them

Proponent:

Argentina


Argentine Republic

Argentina


Argentine Republic

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The European Commission’s LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020-2025 calls for an end to this „genital mutilation of intersex people (see: here). International organisations, including the UN, the European Parliament and the European Commission, also support the end of these practices. Other European countries such as Malta, Greece and Germany have already passed corresponding laws. 

Progress: No progress

Strengthen access for all children to free, equitable and quality primary and secondary education, regardless of their socioeconomic status

Proponent:

Sri Lanka


Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka


Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

In implementation of the EU Child Guarantee, the Children’s Opportunities programme was initiated in Austria to ensure basic services for children, particularly those in disadvantaged circumstances (early childhood education, health, combating child poverty); however, the necessary action plan, which has been due from the federal government for well over a year, has not yet been presented (see website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: <a
href=https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Soziale-Themen/Europäische-Garantie-für-Kinder.html)>https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Soziale-Themen/Europäische-Garantie-für-Kinder.html). In addition, the Integration Department at the Federal Chancellery supports low-threshold language support courses and learning support for children and young people of school age in order to improve their German skills and educational opportunities. In the years 2021 to 2023, around 7 million euros were made available for these purposes, with projects such as the Caritas learning cafés throughout Austria and the „HIPPY projects“ in various federal states being funded. In addition, the Ombuds Office for Children and Youths offers an education ombudsman service for kindergartens and schools, which provides support for various school-related problems such as derogatory behaviour, discrimination, violence, bullying, unfair grades and the involvement of pupils in decision-making processes and acute crisis situations in kindergartens and schools. We would also like to draw attention to current statements written by members of the Children’s Rights Network. These relate to various developments, including refugee and asylum coordination, the inclusion of children with disabilities in collaboration with the Austrian Disability Council and protection against violence in collaboration with the Association of Child Protection Centres and „Die Möwe.“ In addition, the Children’s Rights Network submitted a supplementary report to the 5th and 6th Report of the Republic of Austria to the United Nations in accordance with Article 44 (1b) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.   The following demands are presented in this report on behalf of the Children’s Rights Network: The introduction of compulsory kindergarten years, an expansion of educational opportunities for children under the age of three, targeted support for children with special needs, including affordable language support, the transfer of elementary education to federal competence and improved training for educators and a comprehensive integration of children’s and human rights into early childhood education and appropriate further training for educators (see report: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Bericht_DT.pdf).
  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Strengthen efforts to access quality education for all children, regardless of their socio-economic status

Proponent:

Maldives


Republic of Maldives

Maldives


Republic of Maldives

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

In implementation of the EU Child Guarantee, the Children’s Opportunities programme was initiated in Austria to ensure basic services for children, particularly those in disadvantaged circumstances (early childhood education, health, combating child poverty); however, the necessary action plan, which has been due from the federal government for well over a year, has not yet been presented (see website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: <a
href=https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Soziale-Themen/Europäische-Garantie-für-Kinder.html)>https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Soziale-Themen/Europäische-Garantie-für-Kinder.html). In addition, the Integration Department at the Federal Chancellery supports low-threshold language support courses and learning support for children and young people of school age in order to improve their German skills and educational opportunities. In the years 2021 to 2023, around 7 million euros were made available for these purposes, with projects such as the Caritas learning cafés throughout Austria and the „HIPPY projects“ in various federal states being funded. In addition, the Ombuds Office for Children and Youths offers an education ombudsman service for kindergartens and schools, which provides support for various school-related problems such as derogatory behaviour, discrimination, violence, bullying, unfair grades and the involvement of pupils in decision-making processes and acute crisis situations in kindergartens and schools. We would also like to draw attention to current statements written by members of the Children’s Rights Network. These relate to various developments, including refugee and asylum coordination, the inclusion of children with disabilities in collaboration with the Austrian Disability Council and protection against violence in collaboration with the Association of Child Protection Centres and „Die Möwe.“ In addition, the Children’s Rights Network submitted a supplementary report to the 5th and 6th Report of the Republic of Austria to the United Nations in accordance with Article 44 (1b) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.   The following demands are presented in this report on behalf of the Children’s Rights Network: The introduction of compulsory kindergarten years, an expansion of educational opportunities for children under the age of three, targeted support for children with special needs, including affordable language support, the transfer of elementary education to federal competence and improved training for educators and a comprehensive integration of children’s and human rights into early childhood education and appropriate further training for educators (see report: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Bericht_DT.pdf).
  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Increase awareness of cultural diversity, non-discrimination and tolerance in education system

Proponent:

Turkey


Republic of Turkey

Turkey


Republic of Turkey

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In its Concluding Observations on Austria in March 2020, the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child made more than 60 recommendations to improve the situation of children’s rights, including protection against violence, education, non-discrimination, health and inclusion. The federal government does not have a structured implementation programme (e.g. strategy, action plan) for this; an exchange with relevant stakeholders only takes place within the framework of the Children’s Rights Board set up in the Federal Chancellery/Family, albeit with non-binding results. In implementation of the EU Child Guarantee, the Child Opportunities Programme was initiated in Austria to ensure basic services for children, particularly those in disadvantaged circumstances (early childhood education, health, combating child poverty); however, the necessary action plan, which has been due from the federal government for well over a year, has not yet been presented (see website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: <a
href=https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Soziale-Themen/Europäische-Garantie-für-Kinder.html>https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Soziale-Themen/Europäische-Garantie-für-Kinder.html).
In addition, the Integration Department at the Federal Chancellery supports low-threshold language courses and learning support for children and young people of school age in order to improve their German skills and educational opportunities. In the years 2021 to 2023, around 7 million euros were made available for these purposes, with projects such as the Caritas learning cafés throughout Austria and the „HIPPY projects“ in various federal states being funded.   The Ombuds Office for Children and Youths offers an education ombudsman service for kindergartens and schools, which provides support for various school-related problems such as derogatory behaviour, discrimination, violence, bullying, unfair grades and the involvement of pupils in decision-making processes and acute crisis situations in kindergartens and schools.   We would also like to draw attention to current statements written by members of the Children’s Rights Network. These relate to various developments, including refugee and asylum coordination, the inclusion of children with disabilities in collaboration with the Austrian Disability Council and protection against violence in collaboration with the Association of Child Protection Centres and „Die Möwe.“ In addition, the Children’s Rights Network submitted a supplementary report to the 5th and 6th Report of the Republic of Austria to the United Nations in accordance with Article 44 (1b) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.   The following demands are presented in this report on behalf of the Children’s Rights Network: The introduction of compulsory kindergarten years, an expansion of educational opportunities for children under the age of three, targeted support for children with special needs, including affordable language support, the transfer of elementary education to federal competence and improved training for educators and a comprehensive integration of children’s and human rights into early childhood education and appropriate further training for educators (Supplementary Report to the 5th and 6th Report of the Republic of Austria to the United Nations pursuant to Article 44(1)(b) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Bericht_DT.pdf).“ 

Progress: No progress

Intensify efforts to promote equal opportunities in access to education for Roma children at all levels

Proponent:

Ghana


Republic of Ghana

Ghana


Republic of Ghana

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In 2021, the Austrian „Strategy for the Continuation of the Inclusion of Roma in Austria“ was updated (see report „Strategy for the Continuation of the Inclusion of Roma in Austria“ published by the Federal Chancellery 2021: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:b556a06c-cd86-4b3d-a492-815c8a1bfb84/Strategie%20Roma%20Inklusion.pdf). Although the strategy for the inclusion of Roma in Austria aims to combat antiziganism (marginalisation and hostility towards Sinti and Roma), it does not contain any specific information on financial support for measures to combat hostility towards Roma and Sin:tizze. 

Progress: No progress

Continue efforts to promote equal access to education for children from ethnic minorities, such as the Roma

Proponent:

Peru


Republic of Peru

Peru


Republic of Peru

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In 2021, the Austrian „Strategy for the Continuation of the Inclusion of Roma in Austria“ was updated (see report „Strategy for the Continuation of the Inclusion of Roma in Austria“ published by the Federal Chancellery 2021: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:b556a06c-cd86-4b3d-a492-815c8a1bfb84/Strategie%20Roma%20Inklusion.pdf). Although the strategy for the inclusion of Roma in Austria aims to combat antiziganism (marginalisation and hostility towards Sinti and Roma), it does not contain any specific information on financial support for measures to combat hostility towards Roma and Sin:tizze. 

Progress: No progress

Provide equal opportunities and access to education for Roma minorities at all levels

Proponent:

Iran


Islamic Republic of Iran

Iran


Islamic Republic of Iran

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In 2021, the Austrian „Strategy for the Continuation of the Inclusion of Roma in Austria“ was updated (see report „Strategy for the Continuation of the Inclusion of Roma in Austria“ published by the Federal Chancellery 2021: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:b556a06c-cd86-4b3d-a492-815c8a1bfb84/Strategie%20Roma%20Inklusion.pdf). Although the strategy for the inclusion of Roma in Austria aims to combat antiziganism (marginalisation and hostility towards Sinti and Roma), it does not contain any specific information on financial support for measures to combat hostility towards Roma and Sin:tizze. 

Progress: No progress

Strengthen access for all children, including the Roma children, to equitable, quality and free primary and secondary education

Proponent:

Senegal


Republic of Senegal

Senegal


Republic of Senegal

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

A well-functioning school system in the mother tongue forms the fundamental basis for the existence and further development of ethnic groups. The language of an ethnic group is a central component of its cultural identity, the preservation and appreciation of which the Austrian state has guaranteed in accordance with the Federal Constitution. The federal government and the legislator have a responsibility to ensure that ethnic groups have non-discriminatory access to educational opportunities in their own language.   To date, bilingual education has only been regulated by law in some federal states. However, there are no clear guidelines for important areas of education such as early childhood education, kindergarten care and after-school programmes. In secondary education, the use of the languages of the national minorities is often lost, as there is a lack of appropriate and high-quality bilingual education programmes in many places.    Outside the scope of the minority school laws – especially in Styria and Vienna – the national minority groups are completely excluded from bilingual education in the public school system (website of the Federal Chancellery: here). This recommendation was only noted in the 3rd cycle of the UPR. In the eyes of civil society, it would be desirable to adopt such recommendations in the next cycle and to consider implementing them now.    There is an urgent need to provide financial and other resources. This should ensure that members of ethnic groups not covered by minority school laws have unrestricted access to fair and appropriate bilingual education  This was also called for as an immediate measure by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe in its Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023)14 of 13 December 2023 on the implementation by Austria of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (see: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]}).  In 2021, the Austrian „Strategy for the Continuation of the Inclusion of Roma in Austria“ was updated (see report „Strategy for the Continuation of the Inclusion of Roma in Austria“ published by the Federal Chancellery 2021: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:b556a06c-cd86-4b3d-a492-815c8a1bfb84/Strategie%20Roma%20Inklusion.pdf). Although the strategy for the inclusion of Roma in Austria aims to combat antiziganism (marginalisation and hostility towards Sinti and Roma), it does not contain any specific information on financial support for measures to combat hostility towards Roma and Sin:tizze. 

Progress: No progress

Ensure equal opportunities in the area of education and leisure activities for children and youth, including of non-Austrian background, as well as ensure full implementation of the Constitution provision on indigenous minorities, including through systemic support of bilingual schools

Proponent:

Czech Republic


Czech Republic

Czech Republic


Czech Republic

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

In implementation of the EU Child Guarantee, the Children’s Opportunities programme was initiated in Austria to ensure basic services for children, particularly those in disadvantaged circumstances (early childhood education, health, combating child poverty); however, the necessary action plan, which has been due from the federal government for well over a year, has not yet been presented (see website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: <a
href=https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Soziale-Themen/Europäische-Garantie-für-Kinder.html)>https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Soziale-Themen/Europäische-Garantie-für-Kinder.html). In addition, the Integration Department at the Federal Chancellery supports low-threshold language support courses and learning support for children and young people of school age in order to improve their German skills and educational opportunities. In the years 2021 to 2023, around 7 million euros were made available for these purposes, with projects such as the Caritas learning cafés throughout Austria and the „HIPPY projects“ in various federal states being funded. In addition, the Ombuds Office for Children and Youths offers an education ombudsman service for kindergartens and schools, which provides support for various school-related problems such as derogatory behaviour, discrimination, violence, bullying, unfair grades and the involvement of pupils in decision-making processes and acute crisis situations in kindergartens and schools. We would also like to draw attention to current statements written by members of the Children’s Rights Network. These relate to various developments, including refugee and asylum coordination, the inclusion of children with disabilities in collaboration with the Austrian Disability Council and protection against violence in collaboration with the Association of Child Protection Centres and „Die Möwe.“ In addition, the Children’s Rights Network submitted a supplementary report to the 5th and 6th Report of the Republic of Austria to the United Nations in accordance with Article 44 (1b) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.   The following demands are presented in this report on behalf of the Children’s Rights Network: The introduction of compulsory kindergarten years, an expansion of educational opportunities for children under the age of three, targeted support for children with special needs, including affordable language support, the transfer of elementary education to federal competence and improved training for educators and a comprehensive integration of children’s and human rights into early childhood education and appropriate further training for educators (see report: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Bericht_DT.pdf).
  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).
Although progress has been made, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child criticises the lack of implementation of a structured programme to improve children’s rights in Austria. There is a lack of concrete and comprehensive action plans, such as the long-requested action plan within the framework of the EU Child Guarantee (see Network Children’s Rights Austria, Implementation and Monitoring in Austria: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/umsetzung-und-monitoring-in-oesterreich/). The Federal Youth Council (BJV) and other organisations are working hard to improve the situation. The BJV has proclaimed 2024 as the „Year of Children’s Rights“ to draw more attention to children’s rights and is calling for more investment in mental health services and a national action plan to combat child poverty, among other things (see Federal Youth Representation, more information on the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: https://bjv.at/kinder-jugend/kinderrechte/).
  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth services, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Ensure that children with migration or minority background have unhindered and equal access to education

Proponent:

Bangladesh


People's Republic of Bangladesh

Bangladesh


People's Republic of Bangladesh

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In implementation of the EU Child Guarantee, the Child Opportunities programme was initiated in Austria to ensure basic services for children, particularly those in disadvantaged circumstances (early childhood education, health, combating child poverty); however, the necessary action plan, which has been due from the federal government for well over a year, has not yet been presented (see website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: <a
href=https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Soziale-Themen/Europäische-Garantie-für-Kinder.html>https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Soziale-Themen/Europäische-Garantie-für-Kinder.html).
In addition, the Integration Department at the Federal Chancellery supports low-threshold language courses and learning support for children and young people of school age in order to improve their German skills and educational opportunities. In the years 2021 to 2023, around 7 million euros were made available for these purposes, with projects such as the Caritas learning cafés throughout Austria and the „HIPPY projects“ in various federal states being funded.   In addition, the Ombuds Office for Children and Youths offers an education ombudsman’s office for kindergartens and schools, which provides support for various school problems such as derogatory behaviour, discrimination, violence, bullying, unfair grades and the involvement of pupils in decision-making processes and acute crisis situations in kindergartens and schools;
A well-functioning school system in the mother tongue forms the fundamental basis for the existence and further development of ethnic groups. The language of an ethnic group is a central component of its cultural identity, the preservation and appreciation of which the Austrian state has guaranteed in accordance with the Federal Constitution. The federal government and the legislator have a responsibility to ensure that ethnic groups have non-discriminatory access to educational opportunities in their own language.   To date, bilingual education has only been regulated by law in some federal states. However, there are no clear guidelines for important areas of education such as early childhood education, kindergarten care and after-school programmes. In secondary education, the use of the languages of the national minorities is often lost, as there is a lack of appropriate and high-quality bilingual education programmes in many places.    Outside the scope of the minority school laws – especially in Styria and Vienna – the national minority groups are completely excluded from bilingual education in the public school system (website of the Federal Chancellery: here). This recommendation was only noted in the 3rd cycle of the UPR. In the eyes of civil society, it would be desirable to adopt such recommendations in the next cycle and to consider implementing them now.    There is an urgent need to provide financial and other resources. This should ensure that members of ethnic groups not covered by minority school laws have unrestricted access to fair and appropriate bilingual education  This was also called for as an immediate measure by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe in its Resolution CM/ResCMN (2023)14 of 13 December 2023 on the implementation by Austria of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (see: https://search.coe.int/cm#{%22CoEIdentifier%22:[%220900001680adcf6e%22],%22sort%22:[%22CoEValidationDate%20Descending%22]}).  

Progress: No progress

Take all necessary measures to ensure that children of immigrant origin have unrestricted and equal access to education

Proponent:

Nicaragua


Republic of Nicaragua

Nicaragua


Republic of Nicaragua

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In implementation of the EU Child Guarantee, the Child Opportunities programme was initiated in Austria to ensure basic services for children, particularly those in disadvantaged circumstances (early childhood education, health, combating child poverty); however, the necessary action plan, which has been due from the federal government for well over a year, has not yet been presented (see website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: <a
href=https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Soziale-Themen/Europäische-Garantie-für-Kinder.html>https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Soziale-Themen/Europäische-Garantie-für-Kinder.html).
In addition, the Integration Department at the Federal Chancellery supports low-threshold language courses and learning support for children and young people of school age in order to improve their German skills and educational opportunities. In the years 2021 to 2023, around 7 million euros were made available for these purposes, with projects such as the Caritas learning cafés throughout Austria and the „HIPPY projects“ in various federal states being funded.   In addition, the Ombuds Office for Children and Youths offers an education ombudsman’s office for kindergartens and schools, which provides support for various school problems such as derogatory behaviour, discrimination, violence, bullying, unfair grades and the involvement of pupils in decision-making processes and acute crisis situations in kindergartens and schools;

Progress: No progress

Take concrete steps to promote inclusive education for children with disabilities in the mainstream school system

Proponent:

Bahamas


Commonwealth of the Bahamas

Bahamas


Commonwealth of the Bahamas

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Austria lacks the political will to implement a fully inclusive education system. There is no precise information on the budget allocated to individual children’s needs to enable appropriate measures for equal access to education. The Second National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II) does not promise any effective changes in the area of inclusive education. None of the 31 measures in the education chapter, which sets inclusive education as a goal, have their own budget funds available. Inclusion is only mentioned when it comes to pre-determined learning content and educational goals of school types, which contradicts the human rights-based model of disability. As a result, children and young people with learning difficulties and cognitive disabilities are largely excluded from educational opportunities after compulsory schooling (see the National Disability Action Plan on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Menschen-mit-Behinderungen/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-Behinderung.html).   There is still no legal entitlement to an inclusive kindergarten place. In Vienna, due to parental protests, a compulsory kindergarten year and an 11th and 12th school year were temporarily offered for children with disabilities, but with restrictions and redistributions. The children are largely redistributed, often lose their afternoon care (and parents their jobs) and sometimes have to be transported across Vienna, even though they previously had a place with afternoon care at their place of residence. In addition, recreational teachers continue to be cut or converted into assistant teachers, which jeopardises the quality of the profession and the inclusive multi-grade classes. The quality of the profession and the inclusive multi-grade classes is jeopardised. The Austrian Ombudsman Board has been informed, there have already been two television programmes on this and there will be another review shortly (see link to the „Citizens‘ Advocate“ programme on the topic of children with special educational needs (SEN) on the website of the Austrian Ombudsman Board: https://volksanwaltschaft.gv.at/artikel/11-und-12-Schuljahr-fuer-Kinder-mit-Behinderung available).
  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Enhance its ongoing efforts on human rights education campaigns, especially that on the rights of women, children, the elderly and minorities

Proponent:

Turkmenistan


Republic of Turkmenistan

Turkmenistan


Republic of Turkmenistan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

An open letter to the federal government from Asylkoordination Österreich calls for the expansion of youth and social work programmes as well as political education and participation. Affected people in Austria, especially young people, should be given equal and barrier-free participation in democratic processes in order to support them, especially in times of racism (Open letter, 2022: https://archiv2022.asyl.at/de/info/news/offenerbriefandiebundesregierung/index.html). The German government is called upon to take the demands formulated in the open letter seriously and to take effective measures. It is to be hoped that increased efforts will be made to create a fair and inclusive society in Austria that guarantees the equal participation of all those affected in democratic processes. Children and young people who have experienced displacement face particular challenges. Not only do they have to deal with traumatic experiences, they often also have to cope in a new, unfamiliar social environment. Asylkoordination Österreich sees a need for action here in order to give these young people a fair chance at education, political participation and social integration. At the same time, it is emphasised that existing human rights education programmes are not sufficient to fully meet the needs of these young people. They need targeted support so that they can not only integrate into society, but also actively contribute to democratic coexistence. The letter emphasises that it is not just about imparting knowledge, but also about creating real opportunities for participation that give young people a voice. Although there are already approaches and progress, such as through the United Nations World Programme for Human Rights Education, there is a clear lack of specific offers in Austria that are tailored to children and young people with a migration background. Asylkoordination Österreich is therefore calling for increased investment in programmes aimed specifically at promoting the participation and political education of these young people. Austria should intensify its campaigning work in the field of human rights education, paying particular attention to the rights of older people. In 2011, the Federal Ministry of Labour, Social Affairs and Consumer Protection, in cooperation with the Federal Advisory Council on Senior Citizens, drew up a Senior Citizens‘ Plan, which was adopted by the Federal Government and the National Council in 2012 (Senior Citizens‘ Plan 2011, page 33 ff: https://www.sozialministerium.at/dam/jcr:9ff6832d-bef5-4acc-93ac-b4ad90033b09/Bundesseniorenplan-4.-Auflage-September-2013-0(1).pdf). The plan aims to improve the quality of life of older people through measures to combat poverty, promote social participation and ensure self-determination. Specific recommendations must be implemented, including increasing disposable income, promoting social networks and securing long-term care funding. The federal senior citizens‘ plan provides for campaigns to promote healthy living and remove the taboo surrounding the need for care. It is unclear whether these measures are currently being implemented. On 10 December 2004, the United Nations General Assembly launched the World Programme for Human Rights Education (2005-ongoing) to promote the implementation of human rights education programmes in all areas (infographic UN World Programme 2005: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/issues/education/training/infographic-wphre.pdf). Austria should continue to work consistently on strengthening human rights education. This means effectively promoting and protecting the rights of all population groups, including women, children, the elderly and minorities. To this end, increased cooperation between government, educational institutions and non-governmental organisations is essential. In addition, as part of the Austrian chairmanship of the Human Security Network (2002-2003), the handbook „Understanding Human Rights“ was produced by the ETC Graz and supported by the Austrian Foreign Ministry (see handbook „Understanding Human Rights“: https://migrant-integration.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2011-01/docl_18153_933253484.pdf). It has been translated into 15 languages and includes online training materials that are used in training programmes worldwide. In 2012, an expanded English edition was published under the title „Understanding Human Rights“. In 2013, a brochure with best practice examples was published to further develop the curricula and raise awareness among the general public in order to promote a tolerant and inclusive society. 

Progress: No progress

Continue to promote human rights education, awareness-raising and promoting dialogue and tolerance

Proponent:

Bosnia and Herzegovina


Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bosnia and Herzegovina


Bosnia and Herzegovina

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The international activities of the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF) and the organisations charged with this task, erinnern.at and OeAD, all aim to support teachers and learners in the field of human rights education. However, there is no further information on specific projects from Austria. Although the World Programme for Human Rights Education was launched by the United Nations in December 2004, various measures to promote human rights education are being implemented in Austria. Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. 

Progress: No progress

Strengthen training efforts in human rights

Proponent:

Luxembourg


Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Luxembourg


Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The international activities of the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF) and the organisations charged with this task, erinnern.at and OeAD, all aim to support teachers and learners in the field of human rights education. However, there is no further information on specific projects from Austria. Although the World Programme for Human Rights Education was launched by the United Nations in December 2004, various measures to promote human rights education are being implemented in Austria. Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. 

Progress: No progress

Continue its efforts at the international level towards promotion of human rights through education projects

Proponent:

Mongolia


Mongolia

Mongolia


Mongolia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The international activities of the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF) and the organisations charged with this task, erinnern.at and OeAD, all aim to support teachers and learners in the field of human rights education. However, there is no further information on specific projects from Austria. Although the World Programme for Human Rights Education was launched by the United Nations in December 2004, various measures to promote human rights education are being implemented in Austria. Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. 

Progress: In progress

Strengthen policies to promote gender equality, increase women’s participation in the political sphere, and eliminate the wage gap

Proponent:

Ecuador


Republic of Ecuador

Ecuador


Republic of Ecuador

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

There is still a significant pay gap between women and men in Austria. According to recent studies, women in Austria earn on average 18.8 per cent less than men, and this difference exists regardless of educational and professional qualifications (Statistik Austria, 2021: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/gender-statistiken/einkommen). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have up to 3 years to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees (more information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). In Austria, corresponding legislation has not yet been passed. The labour force participation rate for women is also still lower than for men (in 2022 70% compared to 78%, Statistics Austria: https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/arbeitsmarkt/erwerbstaetigkeit/erwerbstaetige-merkmale). According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have until June 2026 to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees. The exact implementation of the directive is not yet known (further information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). Since the non-partisan expert government of 2019 with Austria’s first female Federal Chancellor, a largely balanced gender ratio of federal ministers and state secretaries has been established, although in recent years this has gradually tilted back towards a male majority. The proportion of women in parliament has also risen steadily in recent decades, most recently reaching around 40%. As there are no legal requirements for the creation of electoral lists or the allocation of mandates in this respect, there is a significant difference between the political parties. Gender parity of 50% is only reached or exceeded in the Green, Neos and SPÖ parties. The ÖVP and FPÖ are below parity, with the latter party only achieving a female quota of 17%. At provincial level, the gender ratio in both governments and provincial parliaments lags behind the federal level. There is an extreme imbalance at municipal level, where there are only around 10% female mayors. This ratio is roughly the same across all parties.   Measures taken by the federal government in 2022 include the establishment of an „Austrian Fund for the Empowerment and Advancement of Women and Girls“, which operates the „LEA – Let’s Empower Austria“ project (website https://letsempoweraustria.at/), as well as the „Girls in Politics“ project, which enables girls and young women to accompany mayors at work in individual municipalities (information on the BKA website: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/agenda/frauen-und-gleichstellung/gleichstellung-am-arbeitsmarkt/girls-in-politics.html. An evaluation of the projects is still pending. A report by the Women’s Section of the Federal Chancellery from 2022 provides a statistical basis for taking stock of the participation of women in political decision-making positions (as a PDF Further information is available at the following link: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:c1f8eb6d-b56e-480a-9463-38273dc136d6/frauen_in_polit_entscheidungspositionen_2022.pdf). 

Progress: In progress

Expand representation of women in political decision-making positions, especially at the level of states and municipalities

Proponent:

Lithuania


Republic of Lithuania

Lithuania


Republic of Lithuania

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Since the non-partisan expert government of 2019 with Austria’s first female Federal Chancellor, a largely balanced gender ratio of federal ministers and state secretaries has been established, although in recent years this has gradually tilted back towards a male majority. The proportion of women in parliament has also risen steadily in recent decades, most recently reaching around 40%. As there are no legal requirements for the creation of electoral lists or the allocation of mandates in this respect, there is a significant difference between the political parties. Gender parity of 50% is only reached or exceeded in the Green, Neos and SPÖ parties. The ÖVP and FPÖ are below parity, with the latter party only achieving a female quota of 17%. At provincial level, the gender ratio in both governments and provincial parliaments lags behind the federal level. There is an extreme imbalance at municipal level, where there are only around 10% female mayors. This ratio is roughly the same across all parties.   Measures taken by the federal government in 2022 include the establishment of an „Austrian Fund for the Empowerment and Advancement of Women and Girls“, which operates the „LEA – Let’s Empower Austria“ project (website https://letsempoweraustria.at/), as well as the „Girls in Politics“ project, which enables girls and young women to accompany mayors at work in individual municipalities (information on the BKA website: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/agenda/frauen-und-gleichstellung/gleichstellung-am-arbeitsmarkt/girls-in-politics.html. An evaluation of the projects is still pending. A report by the Women’s Section of the Federal Chancellery from 2022 provides a statistical basis for taking stock of the participation of women in political decision-making positions (as a PDF Further information is available at the following link: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:c1f8eb6d-b56e-480a-9463-38273dc136d6/frauen_in_polit_entscheidungspositionen_2022.pdf). 

Progress: In progress

Strengthen the efforts to increase the participation of women in political decision-making positions

Proponent:

Romania


Romania

Romania


Romania

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Since the non-partisan expert government of 2019 with Austria’s first female Federal Chancellor, a largely balanced gender ratio of federal ministers and state secretaries has been established, although in recent years this has gradually tilted back towards a male majority. The proportion of women in parliament has also risen steadily in recent decades, most recently reaching around 40%. As there are no legal requirements for the creation of electoral lists or the allocation of mandates in this respect, there is a significant difference between the political parties. Gender parity of 50% is only reached or exceeded in the Green, Neos and SPÖ parties. The ÖVP and FPÖ are below parity, with the latter party only achieving a female quota of 17%. At provincial level, the gender ratio in both governments and provincial parliaments lags behind the federal level. There is an extreme imbalance at municipal level, where there are only around 10% female mayors. This ratio is roughly the same across all parties.   Measures taken by the federal government in 2022 include the establishment of an „Austrian Fund for the Empowerment and Advancement of Women and Girls“, which operates the „LEA – Let’s Empower Austria“ project (website https://letsempoweraustria.at/), as well as the „Girls in Politics“ project, which enables girls and young women to accompany mayors at work in individual municipalities (information on the BKA website: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/agenda/frauen-und-gleichstellung/gleichstellung-am-arbeitsmarkt/girls-in-politics.html. An evaluation of the projects is still pending. A report by the Women’s Section of the Federal Chancellery from 2022 provides a statistical basis for taking stock of the participation of women in political decision-making positions (as a PDF Further information is available at the following link: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:c1f8eb6d-b56e-480a-9463-38273dc136d6/frauen_in_polit_entscheidungspositionen_2022.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Adopt a comprehensive strategy to eliminate discriminatory stereotypes regarding the roles and responsibilities of women and men in the family and in society

Proponent:

Bahamas


Commonwealth of the Bahamas

Bahamas


Commonwealth of the Bahamas

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In 2022, the Austrian Women’s Fund LEA was founded to make a long-term strategic contribution to overcoming discriminatory stereotypes with regard to the roles and tasks of women and men. This fund offers various services, including school workshops with role models and the organisation of webinars, for example on the topic of financial education (Further information: https://letsempoweraustria.at/).  
In both 2022 and 2021, the Women’s Section initiated the „Empowerment Call“ with the aim of breaking down gender stereotypes in the area of education and career choices.  In September 2021, a comprehensive package of measures was presented aimed at strengthening women and girls with a migration background in their fight against patriarchal structures and cultures of honour. Part of these measures includes the expansion of counselling services in the Austrian Integration Fund (ÖIF) centres (ÖIF package of measures as PDF: https://www.integrationsfonds.at/fileadmin/user_upload/20210604_Frauenaufruf_2021_Aufrufdokument.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Adopt a comprehensive strategy to eliminate discriminatory stereotypes of women and their portrayal as sexual objects, and ensure that children are educated about responsible sexual behaviour

Proponent:

Marshall Islands


Republic of Marshall Islands

Marshall Islands


Republic of Marshall Islands

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Sexuality education for children and adolescents in Austria faces several challenges. Although it is anchored in education, its implementation remains inconsistent and often inadequate. According to the WHO standards on sexuality education, teaching should promote a social climate of tolerance and openness and respect the diversity of genders and sexual identities (see WHO standards: https://www.sexualerziehung.at/hintergrundinformation-und-begriffserklaerungen/). However, many schools focus heavily on topics such as self-determination and pleasure, which leads to an incomplete discussion of sexuality (see GIVE Service Centre for Health Promotion in Austrian Schools, an initiative of the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research, the Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection and the Austrian Youth Red Cross: https://give.or.at/gv2021/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Give_Sexualerziehung2021.pdf). In addition, sex education is often not sufficiently aligned with the respective developmental phases of young people. There is a lack of resources and specialists who are able to organise lessons in an age-appropriate and sensitive manner. As a result, many important topics, such as dealing with media, violence in relationships or sexual health, are often not addressed. Another problem is the social debate about gender ideologies and the role of the family. These discussions influence the curriculum and can lead to parents and teachers feeling unsure about how to approach the topics. Overall, although the situation in Austria is regulated by law, in practice there are many challenges and deficits in sexuality education for children and young people.
  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is launching a process to improve child and youth services, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).
In 2022, the Austrian Women’s Fund LEA was founded to make a long-term strategic contribution to overcoming discriminatory stereotypes with regard to the roles and tasks of women and men. This fund offers various services, including school workshops with role models and the organisation of webinars, for example on the topic of financial education (Further information: https://letsempoweraustria.at/).  
In both 2022 and 2021, the Women’s Section initiated the „Empowerment Call“ with the aim of breaking down gender stereotypes in the area of education and career choices.  In September 2021, a comprehensive package of measures was presented aimed at strengthening women and girls with a migration background in their fight against patriarchal structures and cultures of honour. Part of these measures includes the expansion of counselling services in the Austrian Integration Fund (ÖIF) centres (ÖIF package of measures as PDF: https://www.integrationsfonds.at/fileadmin/user_upload/20210604_Frauenaufruf_2021_Aufrufdokument.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Strengthen its efforts to eliminate discriminatory stereotypes regarding the roles and the responsibilities of women and men in the family and in society

Proponent:

Timor-Leste


Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste

Timor-Leste


Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In 2022, the Austrian Women’s Fund LEA was founded to make a long-term strategic contribution to overcoming discriminatory stereotypes with regard to the roles and tasks of women and men. This fund offers various services, including school workshops with role models and the organisation of webinars, for example on the topic of financial education (Further information: https://letsempoweraustria.at/).  
In both 2022 and 2021, the Women’s Section initiated the „Empowerment Call“ with the aim of breaking down gender stereotypes in the area of education and career choices.  In September 2021, a comprehensive package of measures was presented aimed at strengthening women and girls with a migration background in their fight against patriarchal structures and cultures of honour. Part of these measures includes the expansion of counselling services in the Austrian Integration Fund (ÖIF) centres (ÖIF package of measures as PDF: https://www.integrationsfonds.at/fileadmin/user_upload/20210604_Frauenaufruf_2021_Aufrufdokument.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Work to combat discrimination against women and improve access for persons with disabilities in the workplace

Proponent:

USA


United States of America

USA


United States of America

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

With this in mind, in August 2023 the ACA also published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which highlights the potential for effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf). An important civil society initiative in this area is the Neighbourhoods Without Partner Violence Initiative („StoP Partner Violence“) with the participation of the umbrella organisation Autonomous Austrian Women’s Shelters (for the initiative, see https://stop-partnergewalt.at/). The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond current measures are needed to effectively combat violence against women. In Austria, there is a distinction between people who are fit for work and those who are not. The ability or inability to work is determined exclusively on the basis of medical criteria, often directly after school. The federal states are responsible for people who are not fit for work, while the federal government is responsible for people who are fit for work. Hardly any measures have been taken with regard to the group of people who are unable to work. These people continue to work in day labour and employment structures, but do not receive a wage and have no independent social insurance (with the exception of accident insurance). This leads to increased poverty in old age and there is no data on the transition to the regular labour market. There are no nationwide uniform measures to make this possible and the planned measures in the National Action Plan 2022-2030 have not yet been implemented (see National Action Plan on Disability available on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Menschen-mit-Behinderungen/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-Behinderung.html). Support services for people who are able to work are largely linked to a certain degree of disability (GdB), which means that people who do not have a degree of disability (GdB) determined by the state are excluded from corresponding support measures. The measures offered by the Public Employment Service (AMS) are not fully accessible to people with disabilities. As a result, unemployed people with disabilities are less likely to take part in AMS training programmes than unemployed people without disabilities.    There are only a few measures to combat gender-specific employment imbalances and wage gaps, apart from higher wage cost support for women with disabilities as part of the „Inclusion Support Plus“ programme (Inklusionsförderung/InklusionsförderungPlus: https://www.wko.at/service/arbeitsrecht-sozialrecht/inklusionsfoerderung-inklusionsfoerderungplus.html). There are no specific labour market policy measures for women with disabilities (wage subsidies: Website of the Social Ministry Service: https://www.sozialministeriumservice.at/Finanzielles/Foerderungen/Lohnfoerderungen/Lohnfoerderungen.de.html). 

Progress: In progress

Pursue policies to strengthen the promotion and protection of the rights of women, notably those who are minorities, immigrants and refugees

Proponent:

Barbados


Barbados

Barbados


Barbados

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have until June 2026 to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees. The exact implementation of the directive is not yet known (further information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). The 2021 violence protection package aims to protect women at risk and improve the financial framework. Among other things, preventative measures and awareness-raising are to be emphasised more strongly (see https://bmi.gv.at/magazin/2022_01_02/Gewaltschutz.aspx). Nevertheless, the financial resources still appear insufficient. There is also a lack of support for single parents and further training for professional groups who work with affected women and children. In this context, the Austrian Ministry of Social Affairs‘ „PERSPECTIVE WORK“ project, which deals with gender equality and the prevention of violence against women in the workplace, is of interest (see the Ministry of Social Affairs‘ website: https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Soziale-Themen/Geschlechtergleichstellung/PERSPEKTIVE-ARBEIT.html). 

Progress: No progress

Counter all forms of discrimination against women and girls with disabilities

Proponent:

Jordan


Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

Jordan


Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

No measures have been taken to prevent multiple and/or intersectional discrimination against women and girls with disabilities. There is still a lack of adequate consideration of the gender perspective in disability legislation, the disability perspective in women’s legislation, and the related enforcement of laws. The Ombud for Equal Treatment (website:https://www.gleichbehandlungsanwaltschaft.gv.at), a state institution at the Federal Chancellery (BKA), is responsible for all grounds of discrimination except disability. However, women with disabilities must contact the Social Ministry Service (website: https://www.gleichbehandlungsanwaltschaft.gv.at) and apply for conciliation. This conciliation procedure is mandatory and must be carried out before a lawsuit is filed with the civil court. The problem is that the Social Ministry Service has no specific expertise in dealing with women with disabilities and is also not trained in a gender-equitable approach;

Progress: No progress

Adopt a common official statistical framework, coordinated at the federal level, to record more accurately the crimes of femicide and other crimes of violence against women

Proponent:

Spain


Kingdom of Spain

Spain


Kingdom of Spain

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

The data situation in the area of violence and victim protection for women is still inadequate for a comprehensive evaluation of political measures and their planning. The available information, such as police crime statistics, is not sufficient to fully record the causes and offences. There is a lack of supplementary justice-specific data and dark field research on private violence. Crime statistics in Austria currently only record crimes by gender and attempted murders, but not whether there is a gender-specific, misogynistic motive or the relationship between perpetrator and victim (see, for example, a motion for a resolution in parliament on a standardised definition of femicide here: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/A/2531).   Due to a lack of data, it is not possible to provide a realistic picture of federal and state expenditure on violence and victim protection. No progress can be seen in this area, especially at national level, and the number of femicides and hate crimes continues to rise. In August 2023, the ACA published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which highlights potential for the effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA also highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf).  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Adopt a new national action plan to prevent gender-based violence against women that includes improved data collection on gender-based violence and femicide

Proponent:

Sweden


Kingdom of Sweden

Sweden


Kingdom of Sweden

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

With the National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016, measures were taken throughout Austria to implement the requirements of the Istanbul Convention against Violence against Women (see National Action Plan 2014-2016 as PDF: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:1f95e551-0e17-4d67-8090-b7bced3f4947/nap.pdf). However, the National Action Plan has now expired without replacement. Despite the fact that Austria has ratified the Convention, there is a lack of implementation and improvement of further measures, including due diligence in victim protection and, in particular, improved cooperation with civil society.   In August 2023, the ACA published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which identifies potential for the effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA also highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf). A National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016 with 60 measures has been drawn up, but no further action plan is planned (National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016 on the website of the National Coordination Centre for the Protection of Women against Violence: https://www.coordination-vaw.gv.at/koordinierung/nap.html).  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Establish a new National Action Plan to address violence against women and ensure that it is supported with adequate resources

Proponent:

Canada


Canada

Canada


Canada

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

With the National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016, measures were taken throughout Austria to implement the requirements of the Istanbul Convention against Violence against Women (see National Action Plan 2014-2016 as PDF: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:1f95e551-0e17-4d67-8090-b7bced3f4947/nap.pdf). However, the National Action Plan has now expired without replacement. Despite the fact that Austria has ratified the Convention, there is a lack of implementation and improvement of further measures, including due diligence in victim protection and, in particular, improved cooperation with civil society.   In August 2023, the ACA published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which identifies potential for the effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA also highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf). A National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016 with 60 measures has been drawn up, but no further action plan is planned (National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016 on the website of the National Coordination Centre for the Protection of Women against Violence: https://www.coordination-vaw.gv.at/koordinierung/nap.html).  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Implement and update the National Action Plan on Combating Violence against Women

Proponent:

Israel


State of Israel

Israel


State of Israel

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

With the National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016, measures were taken throughout Austria to implement the requirements of the Istanbul Convention against Violence against Women (see National Action Plan 2014-2016 as PDF: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:1f95e551-0e17-4d67-8090-b7bced3f4947/nap.pdf). However, the National Action Plan has now expired without replacement. Despite the fact that Austria has ratified the Convention, there is a lack of implementation and improvement of further measures, including due diligence in victim protection and, in particular, improved cooperation with civil society.   In August 2023, the ACA published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which identifies potential for the effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA also highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf). A National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016 with 60 measures has been drawn up, but no further action plan is planned (National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016 on the website of the National Coordination Centre for the Protection of Women against Violence: https://www.coordination-vaw.gv.at/koordinierung/nap.html).  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Adopt comprehensive measures aimed at preventing, combating and punishing all forms of gender-based violence against women

Proponent:

Togo


Republic of Togo

Togo


Republic of Togo

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Austria therefore lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are required to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Adopt comprehensive measures to prevent, combat and punish all forms of gender-based violence against women

Proponent:

Lithuania


Republic of Lithuania

Lithuania


Republic of Lithuania

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Austria therefore lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are required to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Adopt necessary measures to ensure that victims of violence and sexual abuse have full access to adequate shelters and counselling centres

Proponent:

Belgium


Kingdom of Belgium

Belgium


Kingdom of Belgium

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Civil society has pointed out that there are still too few women’s shelters and that funding is inadequate, which causes difficulties for victims of violence. Social services often do not take into account gender and multiple discrimination. In 2022, 28 women were killed as a result of gender-based violence and the lack of places in women’s shelters persisted. In September, women’s rights organisations continued to criticise the limited access to safe abortions. There is still a need for action to improve the situation (see Amnesty International Annual Report 2022: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). Increased investment and better coordination between the relevant authorities and non-governmental organisations is needed to ensure that everyone has access to protection and support. An important civil society initiative in this area is the Neighbourhoods Without Partner Violence initiative („StoP Partner Violence“) with the participation of the umbrella organisation Autonomous Austrian Women’s Shelters (for the initiative, see https://stop-partnergewalt.at/).  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html). There are numerous counselling services for women affected by violence in Austria. These include special counselling centres, hotlines and shelters that offer round-the-clock support. Many of these services offer comprehensive counselling on legal, psychological and social issues. Nevertheless, it is important that these services are further expanded and publicised to ensure that all women affected receive the support they need. The central facilities include the women’s helpline, the Austria-wide violence protection centres and the Autonomous Austrian Women’s Shelters (AÖF). The network of these facilities ensures that women in need have access to help around the clock. In addition, specific services are provided for special target groups, such as migrant women, female refugees and asylum seekers. These services are designed to overcome cultural and language barriers and offer customised support to the women concerned.  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Create a new National Action Plan „Protection against Violence for Women“ which also considers women with disabilities, precarious residence permits and asylum seekers and women with mental illness

Proponent:

Netherlands


Kingdom of the Netherlands

Netherlands


Kingdom of the Netherlands

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

With the National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016, measures were taken throughout Austria to implement the requirements of the Istanbul Convention against Violence against Women (see National Action Plan 2014-2016 as PDF: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:1f95e551-0e17-4d67-8090-b7bced3f4947/nap.pdf). However, the National Action Plan has now expired without replacement. Despite the fact that Austria has ratified the Convention, there is a lack of implementation and improvement of further measures, including due diligence in victim protection and, in particular, improved cooperation with civil society.   In August 2023, the ACA published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which identifies potential for the effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA also highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf). A National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016 with 60 measures has been drawn up, but no further action plan is planned (National Action Plan for the Protection of Women against Violence 2014-2016 on the website of the National Coordination Centre for the Protection of Women against Violence: https://www.coordination-vaw.gv.at/koordinierung/nap.html).  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Redouble efforts to eliminate all kinds of violence and discrimination against women and girls, regardless of their migratory status

Proponent:

Brazil


Federal Republic of Brazil

Brazil


Federal Republic of Brazil

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

With this in mind, in August 2023 the ACA also published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which highlights the potential for effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf). An important civil society initiative in this area is the Neighbourhoods Without Partner Violence Initiative („StoP Partner Violence“) with the participation of the umbrella organisation Autonomous Austrian Women’s Shelters (for the initiative, see https://stop-partnergewalt.at/). The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond current measures are needed to effectively combat violence against women. The 2021 violence protection package aims to protect women at risk and improve the financial framework. Among other things, preventative measures and awareness-raising are to be emphasised more strongly (see https://bmi.gv.at/magazin/2022_01_02/Gewaltschutz.aspx). Nevertheless, the financial resources still appear insufficient. There is also a lack of support for single parents and further training for professional groups who work with affected women and children. In this context, the Austrian Ministry of Social Affairs‘ „PERSPECTIVE WORK“ project, which deals with gender equality and the prevention of violence against women in the workplace, is of interest (see the Ministry of Social Affairs‘ website: https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Soziale-Themen/Geschlechtergleichstellung/PERSPEKTIVE-ARBEIT.html). Austria therefore lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are required to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Take further concrete steps to increase accessibility to shelters and support services for the victims of sexual and domestic violence

Proponent:

Croatia


Republic of Croatia

Croatia


Republic of Croatia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Civil society has pointed out that there are still too few women’s shelters and that funding is inadequate, which causes difficulties for victims of violence. Social services often do not take into account gender and multiple discrimination. In 2022, 28 women were killed as a result of gender-based violence and the lack of places in women’s shelters persisted. In September, women’s rights organisations continued to criticise the limited access to safe abortions. There is still a need for action to improve the situation (see Amnesty International Annual Report 2022: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). Increased investment and better coordination between the relevant authorities and non-governmental organisations is needed to ensure that everyone has access to protection and support. An important civil society initiative in this area is the Neighbourhoods Without Partner Violence initiative („StoP Partner Violence“) with the participation of the umbrella organisation Autonomous Austrian Women’s Shelters (for the initiative, see https://stop-partnergewalt.at/).  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html). In August 2023, the ACA published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which identifies potential for the effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA identifies shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf).   The 2021 Violence Protection Package aims to protect women at risk and improve the financial framework. Among other things, preventive measures and awareness-raising are to be emphasised more strongly (see https://bmi.gv.at/magazin/2022_01_02/Gewaltschutz.aspx). The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are needed to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Ensure that survivors of sexual and domestic violence have unrestricted access to shelters and provide adequate financial and human resources to survivors’ support services, including for effective victim protection

Proponent:

Iceland


Republic of Iceland

Iceland


Republic of Iceland

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Civil society has pointed out that there are still too few women’s shelters and that funding is inadequate, which causes difficulties for victims of violence. Social services often do not take into account gender and multiple discrimination. In 2022, 28 women were killed as a result of gender-based violence and the lack of places in women’s shelters persisted. In September, women’s rights organisations continued to criticise the limited access to safe abortions. There is still a need for action to improve the situation (see Amnesty International Annual Report 2022: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). Increased investment and better coordination between the relevant authorities and non-governmental organisations is needed to ensure that everyone has access to protection and support. An important civil society initiative in this area is the Neighbourhoods Without Partner Violence initiative („StoP Partner Violence“) with the participation of the umbrella organisation Autonomous Austrian Women’s Shelters (for the initiative, see https://stop-partnergewalt.at/).  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html). In August 2023, the ACA published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which identifies potential for the effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA identifies shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf).   The 2021 Violence Protection Package aims to protect women at risk and improve the financial framework. Among other things, preventive measures and awareness-raising are to be emphasised more strongly (see https://bmi.gv.at/magazin/2022_01_02/Gewaltschutz.aspx). The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are needed to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Take necessary legislative and administrative measures to protect children and women against domestic violence

Proponent:

Iran


Islamic Republic of Iran

Iran


Islamic Republic of Iran

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Statistics show that a significant proportion of women are affected by domestic violence. In 2023, the police in Austria recorded several thousand cases of domestic violence, with women being victims disproportionately often (see report with figures on femicides and violence against women in Austria, Gewaltinfo 2022: https://www.gewaltinfo.at/themen/gewalt-an-frauen/femizide-und-gewalt-gegen-frauen-in-oesterreich.html). In order to raise awareness of domestic violence and promote prevention, regular campaigns and educational programmes are carried out. The Violence Protection Summit and other events promote the exchange of best practices and the networking of experts in the field of violence protection. Many cases of domestic violence go unreported and the number of unreported cases is high. Organisations such as the AÖF association and the Alliance Living Free of Violence are therefore calling for a further increase in funding for gender equality and violence prevention work as well as the comprehensive implementation of the Istanbul Convention.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Continue its efforts to eliminate all forms of sexual and gender-based violence, including by adopting comprehensive measures to prevent, combat and punish all forms of gender-based violence against women as well as by reinforcing the protection and assistance provided to victims of such violence, and to provide justice to survivors

Proponent:

Liechtenstein


Principality of Liechtenstein

Liechtenstein


Principality of Liechtenstein

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Austria therefore lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are required to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).In August 2023, the ACA published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which identifies potential for the effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA identifies shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf).   The 2021 Violence Protection Package aims to protect women at risk and improve the financial framework. Among other things, preventive measures and awareness-raising are to be emphasised more strongly (see https://bmi.gv.at/magazin/2022_01_02/Gewaltschutz.aspx). The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are needed to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html). Austria lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Court of Audit highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf). It appears that the financial resources remain insufficient.  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Adopt comprehensive measures to prevent, combat and punish all forms of violence against women, strengthen the protection and assistance offered to victims of such violence, and prosecute all crimes aimed at women and girls, including refugee and asylum-seeking women and girls

Proponent:

Luxembourg


Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Luxembourg


Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Austria therefore lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are required to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).In August 2023, the ACA published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which identifies potential for the effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA identifies shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf).   The 2021 Violence Protection Package aims to protect women at risk and improve the financial framework. Among other things, preventive measures and awareness-raising are to be emphasised more strongly (see https://bmi.gv.at/magazin/2022_01_02/Gewaltschutz.aspx). The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are needed to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html). Austria lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Court of Audit highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf). It appears that the financial resources remain insufficient.  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Ensure survivors of sexual and domestic violence have unrestricted access to shelters and provide adequate resources to survivors’ support services

Proponent:

Malta


Republic of Malta

Malta


Republic of Malta

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

There are numerous counselling services for women affected by violence in Austria. These include special counselling centres, hotlines and shelters that offer round-the-clock support. Many of these services offer comprehensive counselling on legal, psychological and social issues. Nevertheless, it is important that these services are further expanded and publicised to ensure that all women affected receive the support they need. The central facilities include the women’s helpline, the Austria-wide violence protection centres and the Autonomous Austrian Women’s Shelters (AÖF). The network of these facilities ensures that women in need have access to help around the clock. In addition, specific services are provided for special target groups, such as migrant women, female refugees and asylum seekers. These services are designed to overcome cultural and language barriers and offer customised support to the women concerned.  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html). In August 2023, the ACA published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which identifies potential for the effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA identifies shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf).   The 2021 Violence Protection Package aims to protect women at risk and improve the financial framework. Among other things, preventive measures and awareness-raising are to be emphasised more strongly (see https://bmi.gv.at/magazin/2022_01_02/Gewaltschutz.aspx). The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are needed to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Strengthen measures to address unreported cases of femicides and domestic violence against women, hate crimes against migrants, refugees and asylum-seeking women and girls

Proponent:

Myanmar


Republic of the Union of Myanmar

Myanmar


Republic of the Union of Myanmar

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

The Austrian government has ensured the funding of violence protection centres and supported the expansion of shelters and transitional housing. The budget for women’s and girls‘ advice centres was increased by 67 per cent to 13.6 million euros (see Measures Report BMI, 2023: https://www.bmi.gv.at/news.aspx?id=754742316C7558786E42413D). Another focus is on the nationwide introduction of violence outpatient clinics, which provide victims with free examinations regardless of the procedure. These outpatient clinics are intended to improve the documentation of injuries and thus increase the conviction rate in cases of domestic violence. In addition, cooperation between various ministries and departments is being continuously strengthened and regular violence protection summits are held to promote the exchange of best practices and networking between experts. Measures have also been introduced to better recognise and document violence and to raise awareness of the „silent emergency call“. Despite this progress, there are still gaps in the protection against violence, particularly in the area of conviction rates and research into unreported cases. Organisations such as the association AÖF and the Alliance Gewaltfrei leben are therefore calling for a further increase in the budget for gender equality and violence prevention work in order to achieve real equality and a significant reduction in violence against women in the long term.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html). There continue to be concerns about the effectiveness of measures in Austria to combat hate crimes against migrant women. The latest data on hate crimes against women and hate crimes against migrant women in Austria show an alarming increase in reported cases in 2022 compared to the previous year. Despite a higher detection rate, many of these crimes remain unsolved. Of particular concern is the increase in offences based on ideology, national/ethnic origin and religion. Despite this, there is a lack of specific measures to prevent and support migrant women affected, and barriers to data collection and dark field research remain. Policymakers are called upon to develop and implement more effective strategies and a national action plan to combat hate crime. 

Progress: In progress

Undertake further policy, legal and financial measures for combating all forms of violence against women, including femicides and cases of domestic violence

Proponent:

North Macedonia


Republic of North Macedonia –

North Macedonia


Republic of North Macedonia –

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

With this in mind, in August 2023 the ACA also published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which highlights the potential for effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf). An important civil society initiative in this area is the Neighbourhoods Without Partner Violence Initiative („StoP Partner Violence“) with the participation of the umbrella organisation Autonomous Austrian Women’s Shelters (for the initiative, see https://stop-partnergewalt.at/). The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond current measures are needed to effectively combat violence against women. Austria therefore lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are required to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).Austria lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Court of Audit highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf). It appears that the financial resources remain insufficient.  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Continue the implementation of policies in the fields of prevention, protection and prosecution in relation to domestic violence and extend it to all forms of gender based violence

Proponent:

Romania


Romania

Romania


Romania

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Austria therefore lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are required to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).There are numerous counselling services for women affected by violence in Austria. These include special counselling centres, hotlines and shelters that offer round-the-clock support. Many of these services offer comprehensive counselling on legal, psychological and social issues. Nevertheless, it is important that these services are further expanded and publicised to ensure that all women affected receive the support they need. The central facilities include the women’s helpline, the Austria-wide violence protection centres and the Autonomous Austrian Women’s Shelters (AÖF). The network of these facilities ensures that women in need have access to help around the clock. In addition, specific services are provided for special target groups, such as migrant women, female refugees and asylum seekers. These services are designed to overcome cultural and language barriers and offer customised support to the women concerned.  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html). In August 2023, the ACA published the report „Violence and Victim Protection for Women“, which identifies potential for the effective protection of women affected by violence. The ACA identifies shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf).   The 2021 Violence Protection Package aims to protect women at risk and improve the financial framework. Among other things, preventive measures and awareness-raising are to be emphasised more strongly (see https://bmi.gv.at/magazin/2022_01_02/Gewaltschutz.aspx). The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are needed to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html). Austria lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Court of Audit highlights shortcomings in strategic planning and recommends a coordinated joint strategy between the federal ministries and the federal states (Gewalt- und Opferschutz für Frauen, BUND 2023/21: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2023_21_Gewalt_und_Opferschutz_Frauen.pdf). It appears that the financial resources remain insufficient.  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Continue its work aimed at preventing violence against women, including within the family settings

Proponent:

Russia


Russian Federation

Russia


Russian Federation

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Austria therefore lacks a comprehensive, long-term strategy to protect women from violence, although responsibility is shared between the federal and state governments. The provinces fund women’s shelters and counselling centres in particular, while the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Chancellery are active at federal level. The Austrian women’s organisations point out that violence against women, including femicide and domestic violence, is still reaching alarming proportions. In this critical situation, political, legal and financial measures that go beyond the current measures are required to effectively combat violence against women.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Intensify efforts to protect all children and provide them with better access to childhood services

Proponent:

Barbados


Barbados

Barbados


Barbados

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

On 31 January 2023, the National Council decided to develop a package of measures for child protection. The plan is to develop initiatives to promote the protection of children and young people by implementing concepts and training for professionals, strengthening sexual offences and creating prevention exceptions for perpetrators (National Council meeting on child protection – 195th session of the National Council on 31 January 2023 (195/NRSITZ): https://www.parlament.gv.at/aktuelles/pk/jahr_2023/pk0084#XXVII_NRSITZ_00195). The child protection organisations, such as the Austrian Ombuds Offices for Children and Youths, Austrian Child Protection Centres, NC Kinderrechte, ECPAT Austria and Netzwerk Kinderrechte, believe that the package of measures for child protection is progress in the right direction. However, it requires further steps, especially implementation, in order to see a real change in the protection of children and young people (position paper of the Children’s Rights Network: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/positionspapier-kinderschutzpaket-fuer-den-ausserfamiliaeren-kinderschutz/<).
  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029:
https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Continue to pay special attention to combating poverty and social exclusion of children in Austria

Proponent:

Vietnam


Socialist Republic of Vietnam

Vietnam


Socialist Republic of Vietnam

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

On 31 January 2023, the National Council decided to develop a package of measures for child protection. The plan is to develop initiatives to promote the protection of children and young people through the implementation of concepts and training for professionals, the strengthening of sexual offences and the creation of prevention exceptions for perpetrators (Nationalratssitzung zum Kinderschutz-
195th session of the National Council of 31 January 2023 (195/NRSITZ): https://www.parlament.gv.at/aktuelles/pk/jahr_2023/pk0084#XXVII_NRSITZ_00195). Child protection organisations such as the Austrian Ombuds Offices for Children and Youths, Austrian Child Protection Centres, NC Kinderrechte, ECPAT Austria and Netzwerk Kinderrechte consider the package of measures on child protection to be progress in the right direction. However, it requires further steps, especially implementation, in order to see a real change in the protection of children and young people
(Position paper of the Children’s Rights Network: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/positionspapier-kinderschutzpaket-fuer-den-ausserfamiliaeren-kinderschutz/<).
  In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government commits to the goal of effectively combating child poverty and sustainably improving equal opportunities for all children and young people in Austria (see Government Plan 2025-2029:
https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Guarantee the same standards of protection and well-being to all children in its territory, regardless of their nationality

Proponent:

Uruguay


Republic of Eastern Uruguay

Uruguay


Republic of Eastern Uruguay

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

On 31 January 2023, the National Council decided to develop a package of measures for child protection. The plan is to develop initiatives to promote the protection of children and young people by implementing concepts and training for professionals, strengthening sexual offences and creating prevention exceptions for perpetrators (National Council meeting on child protection – 195th session of the National Council on 31 January 2023 (195/NRSITZ): https://www.parlament.gv.at/aktuelles/pk/jahr_2023/pk0084#XXVII_NRSITZ_00195). The child protection organisations, such as the Austrian Ombuds Offices for Children and Youths, Austrian Child Protection Centres, NC Kinderrechte, ECPAT Austria and Netzwerk Kinderrechte, believe that the package of measures for child protection is progress in the right direction. However, it requires further steps, especially implementation, in order to see a real change in the protection of children and young people (position paper of the Children’s Rights Network: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/positionspapier-kinderschutzpaket-fuer-den-ausserfamiliaeren-kinderschutz/<).
  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029:
https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Develop a comprehensive strategy and an implementation plan to protect children from violence

Proponent:

Zambia


Republic of Zambia

Zambia


Republic of Zambia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

On 31 January 2023, the National Council decided to develop a package of measures for child protection. The plan is to develop initiatives to promote the protection of children and young people by implementing concepts and training for professionals, strengthening sexual offences and creating prevention exceptions for perpetrators (National Council meeting on child protection – 195th session of the National Council on 31 January 2023 (195/NRSITZ): https://www.parlament.gv.at/aktuelles/pk/jahr_2023/pk0084#XXVII_NRSITZ_00195). The child protection organisations, such as the Austrian Ombuds Offices for Children and Youths, Austrian Child Protection Centres, NC Kinderrechte, ECPAT Austria and Netzwerk Kinderrechte, believe that the package of measures for child protection is progress in the right direction. However, it requires further steps, especially implementation, in order to see a real change in the protection of children and young people (position paper of the Children’s Rights Network: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/positionspapier-kinderschutzpaket-fuer-den-ausserfamiliaeren-kinderschutz/<).
  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029:
https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Maintain efforts to further promote gender equality, combat violence against children, and eliminate poverty and social exclusion of children in Austria

Proponent:

Morocco


Kingdom of Morocco

Morocco


Kingdom of Morocco

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

On 31 January 2023, the National Council decided to develop a package of measures for child protection. The plan is to develop initiatives to promote the protection of children and young people by implementing concepts and training for professionals, strengthening sexual offences and creating prevention exceptions for perpetrators (National Council meeting on child protection – 195th session of the National Council on 31 January 2023 (195/NRSITZ): https://www.parlament.gv.at/aktuelles/pk/jahr_2023/pk0084#XXVII_NRSITZ_00195). The child protection organisations, such as the Austrian Ombuds Offices for Children and Youths, Austrian Child Protection Centres, NC Kinderrechte, ECPAT Austria and Netzwerk Kinderrechte, believe that the package of measures for child protection is progress in the right direction. However, it requires further steps, especially implementation, in order to see a real change in the protection of children and young people (position paper of the Children’s Rights Network: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/positionspapier-kinderschutzpaket-fuer-den-ausserfamiliaeren-kinderschutz/<).
  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government is launching a process to improve child and youth welfare, harmonise standards and provide funding for cross-sectoral projects (see Government Plan 2025-2029:
https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).
According to the Pay Transparency Directive, companies in the EU should in future exchange information on how much they pay women and men for work of equal value and take action if their gender pay gap exceeds 5 per cent. EU member states now have until June 2026 to transpose the directive into national law. This will include more comprehensive disclosure of starting salaries and pay levels, increased reporting obligations for companies and improved access to legal measures for employees. The exact implementation of the directive is not yet known (further information on this: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/themen/europa-aktuell/2023/04/gender-pay-gap-rat-der-eu-nimmt-neue-vorschriften-zur-lohntransparenz-an.html). On 31 January 2023, the National Council decided to develop a package of measures for child protection. The plan is to develop initiatives to promote the protection of children and young people through the implementation of concepts and training for professionals, the strengthening of sexual offences and the creation of prevention exceptions for perpetrators (Nationalratssitzung zum Kinderschutz-
195th session of the National Council of 31 January 2023 (195/NRSITZ): https://www.parlament.gv.at/aktuelles/pk/jahr_2023/pk0084#XXVII_NRSITZ_00195). Child protection organisations such as the Austrian Ombuds Offices for Children and Youths, Austrian Child Protection Centres, NC Kinderrechte, ECPAT Austria and Netzwerk Kinderrechte consider the package of measures on child protection to be progress in the right direction. However, it requires further steps, especially implementation, in order to see a real change in the protection of children and young people
(Position paper of the Children’s Rights Network: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/positionspapier-kinderschutzpaket-fuer-den-ausserfamiliaeren-kinderschutz/<).
  In the Government Plan 2025-2029, the Federal Government commits to the goal of effectively combating child poverty and sustainably improving equal opportunities for all children and young people in Austria (see Government Plan 2025-2029:
https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Ensure, in accordance with the best interests of the child, adequate monitoring and protection of the situation of asylum-seeking children, in particular their effective tracing and the safeguarding of their educational rights

Proponent:

Spain


Kingdom of Spain

Spain


Kingdom of Spain

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In its Concluding Observations on Austria in March 2020, the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child made more than 60 recommendations to improve the situation of children’s rights, including protection against violence, education, non-discrimination, health and inclusion. The federal government does not have a structured implementation programme (e.g. strategy, action plan) for this; an exchange with relevant stakeholders only takes place within the framework of the Children’s Rights Board set up in the Federal Chancellery/Family, albeit with non-binding results;The integration division of the Federal Chancellery supports low-threshold language courses and learning support for children and young people of school age in order to improve their German skills and educational opportunities. In the years 2021 to 2023, around 7 million euros were made available for these purposes, with projects such as the Caritas learning cafés throughout Austria and the „HIPPY projects“ in various federal states being funded.   In addition, the Ombuds Office for Children and Youths offers an education ombudsman’s office for kindergartens and schools, which provides support for various school problems such as derogatory behaviour, discrimination, violence, bullying, unfair grades and the involvement of pupils in decision-making processes and acute crisis situations in kindergartens and schools.   We would also like to draw attention to current statements written by members of the Children’s Rights Network. These concern various developments, including refugee and asylum coordination, the inclusion of children with disabilities in cooperation with the Austrian Disability Council and the protection against violence in cooperation with the Association of Child Protection Centres and „Die Möwe“.   In addition, the Children’s Rights Network submitted a supplementary report to the 5th and 6th Report of the Republic of Austria to the United Nations in accordance with Article 44 (1b) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.   In this report, the following demands are presented on behalf of the Children’s Rights Network: The introduction of compulsory kindergarten years, an expansion of educational opportunities for children under the age of three, targeted support for children with special needs, including affordable language support, the transfer of elementary education to federal competence and improved training for educators and a comprehensive integration of children’s and human rights into early childhood education and appropriate further training for educators ( see report: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Bericht_DT.pdf). 

Progress: No progress

Continue to advocate against corporal punishment by making all parts of the population aware of the legal abolition of such practices

Proponent:

Liechtenstein


Principality of Liechtenstein

Liechtenstein


Principality of Liechtenstein

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

On 31 January 2023, the National Council decided to develop a package of measures for child protection. The plan is to develop initiatives to promote the protection of children and young people through the implementation of concepts and training for professionals, the strengthening of sexual offences and the creation of prevention exceptions for perpetrators (Nationalratssitzung zum Kinderschutz-
195th session of the National Council of 31 January 2023 (195/NRSITZ): https://www.parlament.gv.at/aktuelles/pk/jahr_2023/pk0084#XXVII_NRSITZ_00195). On the part of child protection organisations such as the Austrian Ombuds Offices for Children and Youths, Austrian Child Protection Centres, NC Kinderrechte, ECPAT Austria and Netzwerk Kinderrechte, the package of measures on child protection is progress in the right direction. However, it requires further steps, especially implementation, in order to see a real change in the protection of children and young people
(Position paper Children’s Rights Network: https://www.kinderhabenrechte.at/positionspapier-kinderschutzpaket-fuer-den-ausserfamiliaeren-kinderschutz/<). 

Progress: No progress

Take further steps to promote equal opportunities for the Roma community in education and employment

Proponent:

India


Republic of India

India


Republic of India

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In 2021, the Austrian „Strategy for the Continuation of the Inclusion of Roma in Austria“ was updated (see report „Strategy for the Continuation of the Inclusion of Roma in Austria“ published by the Federal Chancellery 2021: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:b556a06c-cd86-4b3d-a492-815c8a1bfb84/Strategie%20Roma%20Inklusion.pdf). Although the strategy for the inclusion of Roma in Austria aims to combat antiziganism (marginalisation and hostility towards Sinti and Roma), it does not contain any specific information on financial support for measures to combat hostility towards Roma and Sin:tizze. 

Progress: No progress

Conduct awareness-raising campaigns aimed at the media, public officials, as well as the general public, to combat stigmatization and prejudice of which children with disabilities may be victims

Proponent:

Belgium


Kingdom of Belgium

Belgium


Kingdom of Belgium

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Nothing is known about specific awareness-raising campaigns on the rights of children with disabilities, especially those focussing on self-empowerment and human rights. 

Progress: In progress

Develop the National Action Plan on Disability 2021-2030 in a participatory way and formulate a coherent strategy for the deinstitutionalization with a clear time frame and a mechanism for its effective implementation and monitoring

Proponent:

Bulgaria


Republic of Bulgaria

Bulgaria


Republic of Bulgaria

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The National Action Plan on Disability 2012-2021 (NAP I) has now expired and has been replaced by the National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II, information on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: here). A comprehensive evaluation of the success of NAP I has been carried out by the Ministry of Social Affairs and is available on their website as a PDF https://www.sozialministerium.at/dam/jcr:edab5ca1-4995-456a-820c-c414da78bc39/Evaluierung202012%E2%80%932020.pdf </a In NAP I, there remains great potential for improvement with regard to the inclusion of people with disabilities and the organisations representing them. The reasons for this are a lack of understanding of what full and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes. In addition, political participation in Austria is highly formalised and has historical roots. This gives well-established and politically networked civil society organisations an advantage. The National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II) was adopted by the Austrian Federal Government on 6 July 2022 and is available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf). The NAP II is also the central national instrument for implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) in Austria. This also aims to ensure the full and effective participation and inclusion of people with disabilities in society.   In the view of civil society, this goal of effective social integration of people with disabilities is not sufficiently realised in NAP II. The NAP II formally exists, but cannot be considered a complete success from this perspective. The National Action Plan on Disability II 2022-2030 (NAP II, available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf) has made some progress compared to the previous National Action Plan on Disability I from 2012-2020 (NAP I). The implementation of NAP II is being monitored by the NAP Monitoring Group. This group consists of representatives from federal ministries, federal states, organisations for people with disabilities and the Monitoring Committee for the Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Its aim is to ensure that the measures in the action plan are implemented. This group also reports verbally on the implementation status of the 375 measures. The extent to which people with disabilities and their organisations are involved in implementation is not always clear and also depends on the respective measures.   During the preparation of the NAP II, the federal ministries and federal states made contributions in 26 expert teams. However, these contributions were only partially drawn up in a participatory process. The Ministry of Social Affairs and a few other federal ministries have set up corresponding processes for the preparation of their contributions. Unfortunately, however, many federal ministries did not respond to this call, which is why contributions on essential topics (e.g. education, children and young people or women) were produced without any real participation by civil society, despite numerous attempts by civil society to make contact. The participatory element was also not consistently ensured in the countries. The contributions made are available on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs, see here). Moreover, the written implementation reports for 2021 and 2022, in which the status of implementation is to be presented in detail and thus made comprehensible, have still not been published. The editorial team, which included representatives of civil society and government monitoring mechanisms, was also unable to compensate for the original lack of participation in the creation of the NAP II, as by the time they were consulted, it was only a matter of combining contributions that had already been approved by the respective political level into an overall work. It was no longer possible for civil society to exert any significant influence on the content.   Reasons for the lack of participation include a lack of understanding of what unrestricted and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes.   In terms of content, there is no coherent strategy for the de-institutionalisation of people with disabilities in the NAP II, although this would be of great importance in order to promote self-determination and inclusion in society and to prevent exploitation, violence and abuse of people with disabilities in institutions;

Progress: In progress

Redouble its liaison with stakeholders representing persons with disabilities, particularly in the adoption of the National Action Plan on Disability

Proponent:

Ethiopia


Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia

Ethiopia


Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The National Action Plan on Disability 2012-2021 (NAP I) has now expired and has been replaced by the National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II, information on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: here). A comprehensive evaluation of the success of NAP I has been carried out by the Ministry of Social Affairs and is available on their website as a PDF https://www.sozialministerium.at/dam/jcr:edab5ca1-4995-456a-820c-c414da78bc39/Evaluierung202012%E2%80%932020.pdf </a In NAP I, there remains great potential for improvement with regard to the inclusion of people with disabilities and the organisations representing them. The reasons for this are a lack of understanding of what full and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes. In addition, political participation in Austria is highly formalised and has historical roots. This gives well-established and politically networked civil society organisations an advantage. The National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II) was adopted by the Austrian Federal Government on 6 July 2022 and is available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf). The NAP II is also the central national instrument for implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) in Austria. This also aims to ensure the full and effective participation and inclusion of people with disabilities in society.   In the view of civil society, this goal of effective social integration of people with disabilities is not sufficiently realised in NAP II. The NAP II formally exists, but cannot be considered a complete success from this perspective. The National Action Plan on Disability II 2022-2030 (NAP II, available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf) has made some progress compared to the previous National Action Plan on Disability I from 2012-2020 (NAP I). The implementation of NAP II is being monitored by the NAP Monitoring Group. This group consists of representatives from federal ministries, federal states, organisations for people with disabilities and the Monitoring Committee for the Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Its aim is to ensure that the measures in the action plan are implemented. This group also reports verbally on the implementation status of the 375 measures. The extent to which people with disabilities and their organisations are involved in implementation is not always clear and also depends on the respective measures.   During the preparation of the NAP II, the federal ministries and federal states made contributions in 26 expert teams. However, these contributions were only partially drawn up in a participatory process. The Ministry of Social Affairs and a few other federal ministries have set up corresponding processes for the preparation of their contributions. Unfortunately, however, many federal ministries did not respond to this call, which is why contributions on essential topics (e.g. education, children and young people or women) were produced without any real participation by civil society, despite numerous attempts by civil society to make contact. The participatory element was also not consistently ensured in the countries. The contributions made are available on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs, see here). Moreover, the written implementation reports for 2021 and 2022, in which the status of implementation is to be presented in detail and thus made comprehensible, have still not been published. The editorial team, which included representatives of civil society and government monitoring mechanisms, was also unable to compensate for the original lack of participation in the creation of the NAP II, as by the time they were consulted, it was only a matter of combining contributions that had already been approved by the respective political level into an overall work. It was no longer possible for civil society to exert any significant influence on the content.   Reasons for the lack of participation include a lack of understanding of what unrestricted and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes.   In terms of content, there is no coherent strategy for the de-institutionalisation of people with disabilities in the NAP II, although this would be of great importance in order to promote self-determination and inclusion in society and to prevent exploitation, violence and abuse of people with disabilities in institutions;

Progress: Partial success

Continue to implement the National Action Plan on Disabilities 2012-2021 through consultations with persons with disabilities and the organisations that represent them

Proponent:

Israel


State of Israel

Israel


State of Israel

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The National Action Plan on Disability 2012-2021 (NAP I) has now expired and has been replaced by the National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II, information on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: here). A comprehensive evaluation of the success of NAP I has been carried out by the Ministry of Social Affairs and is available on their website as a PDF https://www.sozialministerium.at/dam/jcr:edab5ca1-4995-456a-820c-c414da78bc39/Evaluierung202012%E2%80%932020.pdf </a In NAP I, there remains great potential for improvement with regard to the inclusion of people with disabilities and the organisations representing them. The reasons for this are a lack of understanding of what full and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes. In addition, political participation in Austria is highly formalised and has historical roots. This gives well-established and politically networked civil society organisations an advantage. The National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II) was adopted by the Austrian Federal Government on 6 July 2022 and is available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf). The NAP II is also the central national instrument for implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) in Austria. This also aims to ensure the full and effective participation and inclusion of people with disabilities in society.   In the view of civil society, this goal of effective social integration of people with disabilities is not sufficiently realised in NAP II. The NAP II formally exists, but cannot be considered a complete success from this perspective. The National Action Plan on Disability II 2022-2030 (NAP II, available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf) has made some progress compared to the previous National Action Plan on Disability I from 2012-2020 (NAP I). The implementation of NAP II is being monitored by the NAP Monitoring Group. This group consists of representatives from federal ministries, federal states, organisations for people with disabilities and the Monitoring Committee for the Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Its aim is to ensure that the measures in the action plan are implemented. This group also reports verbally on the implementation status of the 375 measures. The extent to which people with disabilities and their organisations are involved in implementation is not always clear and also depends on the respective measures.   During the preparation of the NAP II, the federal ministries and federal states made contributions in 26 expert teams. However, these contributions were only partially drawn up in a participatory process. The Ministry of Social Affairs and a few other federal ministries have set up corresponding processes for the preparation of their contributions. Unfortunately, however, many federal ministries did not respond to this call, which is why contributions on essential topics (e.g. education, children and young people or women) were produced without any real participation by civil society, despite numerous attempts by civil society to make contact. The participatory element was also not consistently ensured in the countries. The contributions made are available on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs, see here). Moreover, the written implementation reports for 2021 and 2022, in which the status of implementation is to be presented in detail and thus made comprehensible, have still not been published. The editorial team, which included representatives of civil society and government monitoring mechanisms, was also unable to compensate for the original lack of participation in the creation of the NAP II, as by the time they were consulted, it was only a matter of combining contributions that had already been approved by the respective political level into an overall work. It was no longer possible for civil society to exert any significant influence on the content.   Reasons for the lack of participation include a lack of understanding of what unrestricted and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes.   In terms of content, there is no coherent strategy for the de-institutionalisation of people with disabilities in the NAP II, although this would be of great importance in order to promote self-determination and inclusion in society and to prevent exploitation, violence and abuse of people with disabilities in institutions;

Progress: Partial success

Adopt promptly the National Action Plan on the Protection of Persons with Disabilities 2022 – 2030, which adequately favours their effective social integration

Proponent:

Spain


Kingdom of Spain

Spain


Kingdom of Spain

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The National Action Plan on Disability 2012-2021 (NAP I) has now expired and has been replaced by the National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II, information on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: here). A comprehensive evaluation of the success of NAP I has been carried out by the Ministry of Social Affairs and is available on their website as a PDF https://www.sozialministerium.at/dam/jcr:edab5ca1-4995-456a-820c-c414da78bc39/Evaluierung202012%E2%80%932020.pdf </a In NAP I, there remains great potential for improvement with regard to the inclusion of people with disabilities and the organisations representing them. The reasons for this are a lack of understanding of what full and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes. In addition, political participation in Austria is highly formalised and has historical roots. This gives well-established and politically networked civil society organisations an advantage. The National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II) was adopted by the Austrian Federal Government on 6 July 2022 and is available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf). The NAP II is also the central national instrument for implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) in Austria. This also aims to ensure the full and effective participation and inclusion of people with disabilities in society.   In the view of civil society, this goal of effective social integration of people with disabilities is not sufficiently realised in NAP II. The NAP II formally exists, but cannot be considered a complete success from this perspective. The National Action Plan on Disability II 2022-2030 (NAP II, available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf) has made some progress compared to the previous National Action Plan on Disability I from 2012-2020 (NAP I). The implementation of NAP II is being monitored by the NAP Monitoring Group. This group consists of representatives from federal ministries, federal states, organisations for people with disabilities and the Monitoring Committee for the Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Its aim is to ensure that the measures in the action plan are implemented. This group also reports verbally on the implementation status of the 375 measures. The extent to which people with disabilities and their organisations are involved in implementation is not always clear and also depends on the respective measures.   During the preparation of the NAP II, the federal ministries and federal states made contributions in 26 expert teams. However, these contributions were only partially drawn up in a participatory process. The Ministry of Social Affairs and a few other federal ministries have set up corresponding processes for the preparation of their contributions. Unfortunately, however, many federal ministries did not respond to this call, which is why contributions on essential topics (e.g. education, children and young people or women) were produced without any real participation by civil society, despite numerous attempts by civil society to make contact. The participatory element was also not consistently ensured in the countries. The contributions made are available on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs, see here). Moreover, the written implementation reports for 2021 and 2022, in which the status of implementation is to be presented in detail and thus made comprehensible, have still not been published. The editorial team, which included representatives of civil society and government monitoring mechanisms, was also unable to compensate for the original lack of participation in the creation of the NAP II, as by the time they were consulted, it was only a matter of combining contributions that had already been approved by the respective political level into an overall work. It was no longer possible for civil society to exert any significant influence on the content.   Reasons for the lack of participation include a lack of understanding of what unrestricted and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes.   In terms of content, there is no coherent strategy for the de-institutionalisation of people with disabilities in the NAP II, although this would be of great importance in order to promote self-determination and inclusion in society and to prevent exploitation, violence and abuse of people with disabilities in institutions;

Progress: In progress

Take further measures to promote the rights of persons with disabilities, as outlined in the extended National Action Plan on Disability

Proponent:

Japan


Japan

Japan


Japan

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The current approach to promoting the participation of people with disabilities and their representative organisations has significant weaknesses. These weaknesses result from various factors, such as an inadequate understanding of full and effective participation and the insufficient provision of resources for participation processes. In addition, political participation in Austria is highly formalised and has grown historically, which gives advantages to already established and politically networked civil society organisations. However, not enough systematic attention has been paid to carrying out targeted capacity building in accordance with the requirements of the UN CRPD.   It would be desirable if a process similar to the participatory drafting of the 2nd Adult Protection Act had been set up by the Ministry of Justice in 2016 (Justice website: https://www.bmj.gv.at/themen/Zivilrecht/Erwachsenenschutz/Das-neue-Erwachsenenschutzrecht-im-%C3%9Cberblick.html). In fact, from the perspective of civil society, the NAP II cannot yet be considered a sufficient success because it does not sufficiently realise the goal of effective social integration of people with disabilities. 

Progress: In progress

Continue the implementation of the national plan on persons with disabilities

Proponent:

Lebanon


Lebanese Republic

Lebanon


Lebanese Republic

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The National Action Plan on Disability 2012-2021 (NAP I) has now expired and has been replaced by the National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II, information on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: here). A comprehensive evaluation of the success of NAP I has been carried out by the Ministry of Social Affairs and is available on their website as a PDF https://www.sozialministerium.at/dam/jcr:edab5ca1-4995-456a-820c-c414da78bc39/Evaluierung202012%E2%80%932020.pdf </a In NAP I, there remains great potential for improvement with regard to the inclusion of people with disabilities and the organisations representing them. The reasons for this are a lack of understanding of what full and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes. In addition, political participation in Austria is highly formalised and has historical roots. This gives well-established and politically networked civil society organisations an advantage. The National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II) was adopted by the Austrian Federal Government on 6 July 2022 and is available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf). The NAP II is also the central national instrument for implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) in Austria. This also aims to ensure the full and effective participation and inclusion of people with disabilities in society.   In the view of civil society, this goal of effective social integration of people with disabilities is not sufficiently realised in NAP II. The NAP II formally exists, but cannot be considered a complete success from this perspective. The National Action Plan on Disability II 2022-2030 (NAP II, available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf) has made some progress compared to the previous National Action Plan on Disability I from 2012-2020 (NAP I). The implementation of NAP II is being monitored by the NAP Monitoring Group. This group consists of representatives from federal ministries, federal states, organisations for people with disabilities and the Monitoring Committee for the Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Its aim is to ensure that the measures in the action plan are implemented. This group also reports verbally on the implementation status of the 375 measures. The extent to which people with disabilities and their organisations are involved in implementation is not always clear and also depends on the respective measures.   During the preparation of the NAP II, the federal ministries and federal states made contributions in 26 expert teams. However, these contributions were only partially drawn up in a participatory process. The Ministry of Social Affairs and a few other federal ministries have set up corresponding processes for the preparation of their contributions. Unfortunately, however, many federal ministries did not respond to this call, which is why contributions on essential topics (e.g. education, children and young people or women) were produced without any real participation by civil society, despite numerous attempts by civil society to make contact. The participatory element was also not consistently ensured in the countries. The contributions made are available on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs, see here). Moreover, the written implementation reports for 2021 and 2022, in which the status of implementation is to be presented in detail and thus made comprehensible, have still not been published. The editorial team, which included representatives of civil society and government monitoring mechanisms, was also unable to compensate for the original lack of participation in the creation of the NAP II, as by the time they were consulted, it was only a matter of combining contributions that had already been approved by the respective political level into an overall work. It was no longer possible for civil society to exert any significant influence on the content.   Reasons for the lack of participation include a lack of understanding of what unrestricted and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes.   In terms of content, there is no coherent strategy for the de-institutionalisation of people with disabilities in the NAP II, although this would be of great importance in order to promote self-determination and inclusion in society and to prevent exploitation, violence and abuse of people with disabilities in institutions;

Progress: In progress

Undertake actions ensuring the fulfillment of the National Action Plan on Disability, including more thorough consultations with organizations representing persons with disabilities

Proponent:

Poland


Republic of Poland

Poland


Republic of Poland

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The National Action Plan on Disability 2012-2021 (NAP I) has now expired and has been replaced by the National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II, information on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: here). A comprehensive evaluation of the success of NAP I has been carried out by the Ministry of Social Affairs and is available on their website as a PDF https://www.sozialministerium.at/dam/jcr:edab5ca1-4995-456a-820c-c414da78bc39/Evaluierung202012%E2%80%932020.pdf </a In NAP I, there remains great potential for improvement with regard to the inclusion of people with disabilities and the organisations representing them. The reasons for this are a lack of understanding of what full and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes. In addition, political participation in Austria is highly formalised and has historical roots. This gives well-established and politically networked civil society organisations an advantage. The National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II) was adopted by the Austrian Federal Government on 6 July 2022 and is available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf). The NAP II is also the central national instrument for implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) in Austria. This also aims to ensure the full and effective participation and inclusion of people with disabilities in society.   In the view of civil society, this goal of effective social integration of people with disabilities is not sufficiently realised in NAP II. The NAP II formally exists, but cannot be considered a complete success from this perspective. The National Action Plan on Disability II 2022-2030 (NAP II, available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf) has made some progress compared to the previous National Action Plan on Disability I from 2012-2020 (NAP I). The implementation of NAP II is being monitored by the NAP Monitoring Group. This group consists of representatives from federal ministries, federal states, organisations for people with disabilities and the Monitoring Committee for the Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Its aim is to ensure that the measures in the action plan are implemented. This group also reports verbally on the implementation status of the 375 measures. The extent to which people with disabilities and their organisations are involved in implementation is not always clear and also depends on the respective measures.   During the preparation of the NAP II, the federal ministries and federal states made contributions in 26 expert teams. However, these contributions were only partially drawn up in a participatory process. The Ministry of Social Affairs and a few other federal ministries have set up corresponding processes for the preparation of their contributions. Unfortunately, however, many federal ministries did not respond to this call, which is why contributions on essential topics (e.g. education, children and young people or women) were produced without any real participation by civil society, despite numerous attempts by civil society to make contact. The participatory element was also not consistently ensured in the countries. The contributions made are available on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs, see here). Moreover, the written implementation reports for 2021 and 2022, in which the status of implementation is to be presented in detail and thus made comprehensible, have still not been published. The editorial team, which included representatives of civil society and government monitoring mechanisms, was also unable to compensate for the original lack of participation in the creation of the NAP II, as by the time they were consulted, it was only a matter of combining contributions that had already been approved by the respective political level into an overall work. It was no longer possible for civil society to exert any significant influence on the content.   Reasons for the lack of participation include a lack of understanding of what unrestricted and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes.   In terms of content, there is no coherent strategy for the de-institutionalisation of people with disabilities in the NAP II, although this would be of great importance in order to promote self-determination and inclusion in society and to prevent exploitation, violence and abuse of people with disabilities in institutions;

Progress: In progress

Involve the civil society organisations working in the area of the rights of persons with disabilities in the current process of the implementation of the national action plan on disability for 2022-2030

Proponent:

Qatar


State of Qatar

Qatar


State of Qatar

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The National Action Plan on Disability 2012-2021 (NAP I) has now expired and has been replaced by the National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II, information on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: here). A comprehensive evaluation of the success of NAP I has been carried out by the Ministry of Social Affairs and is available on their website as a PDF https://www.sozialministerium.at/dam/jcr:edab5ca1-4995-456a-820c-c414da78bc39/Evaluierung202012%E2%80%932020.pdf </a In NAP I, there remains great potential for improvement with regard to the inclusion of people with disabilities and the organisations representing them. The reasons for this are a lack of understanding of what full and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes. In addition, political participation in Austria is highly formalised and has historical roots. This gives well-established and politically networked civil society organisations an advantage. The National Action Plan on Disability 2022-2030 (NAP II) was adopted by the Austrian Federal Government on 6 July 2022 and is available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf). The NAP II is also the central national instrument for implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) in Austria. This also aims to ensure the full and effective participation and inclusion of people with disabilities in society.   In the view of civil society, this goal of effective social integration of people with disabilities is not sufficiently realised in NAP II. The NAP II formally exists, but cannot be considered a complete success from this perspective. The National Action Plan on Disability II 2022-2030 (NAP II, available as a PDF https://www.behindertenrat.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-NAP-Behinderung-2022-2030.pdf) has made some progress compared to the previous National Action Plan on Disability I from 2012-2020 (NAP I). The implementation of NAP II is being monitored by the NAP Monitoring Group. This group consists of representatives from federal ministries, federal states, organisations for people with disabilities and the Monitoring Committee for the Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Its aim is to ensure that the measures in the action plan are implemented. This group also reports verbally on the implementation status of the 375 measures. The extent to which people with disabilities and their organisations are involved in implementation is not always clear and also depends on the respective measures.   During the preparation of the NAP II, the federal ministries and federal states made contributions in 26 expert teams. However, these contributions were only partially drawn up in a participatory process. The Ministry of Social Affairs and a few other federal ministries have set up corresponding processes for the preparation of their contributions. Unfortunately, however, many federal ministries did not respond to this call, which is why contributions on essential topics (e.g. education, children and young people or women) were produced without any real participation by civil society, despite numerous attempts by civil society to make contact. The participatory element was also not consistently ensured in the countries. The contributions made are available on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs, see here). Moreover, the written implementation reports for 2021 and 2022, in which the status of implementation is to be presented in detail and thus made comprehensible, have still not been published. The editorial team, which included representatives of civil society and government monitoring mechanisms, was also unable to compensate for the original lack of participation in the creation of the NAP II, as by the time they were consulted, it was only a matter of combining contributions that had already been approved by the respective political level into an overall work. It was no longer possible for civil society to exert any significant influence on the content.   Reasons for the lack of participation include a lack of understanding of what unrestricted and effective participation means and what conditions are necessary for this, as well as a lack of resources for participation processes.   In terms of content, there is no coherent strategy for the de-institutionalisation of people with disabilities in the NAP II, although this would be of great importance in order to promote self-determination and inclusion in society and to prevent exploitation, violence and abuse of people with disabilities in institutions;

Progress: No progress

Continue efforts in supporting persons with disabilities, by ensuring their accessibility to the labour market and social welfare benefits

Proponent:

Cyprus


Republic of Cyprus

Cyprus


Republic of Cyprus

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there is a distinction between people who are fit for work and those who are not. The ability or inability to work is determined exclusively on the basis of medical criteria, often directly after school. The federal states are responsible for people who are not fit for work, while the federal government is responsible for people who are fit for work. Hardly any measures have been taken with regard to the group of people who are unable to work. These people continue to work in day labour and employment structures, but do not receive a wage and have no independent social insurance (with the exception of accident insurance). This leads to increased poverty in old age and there is no data on the transition to the regular labour market. There are no nationwide uniform measures to make this possible and the planned measures in the National Action Plan 2022-2030 have not yet been implemented (see National Action Plan on Disability available on the website of the Ministry of Social Affairs: https://www.sozialministerium.at/Themen/Soziales/Menschen-mit-Behinderungen/Nationaler-Aktionsplan-Behinderung.html). Support services for people who are able to work are largely linked to a certain degree of disability (GdB), which means that people who do not have a degree of disability (GdB) determined by the state are excluded from corresponding support measures. The measures offered by the Public Employment Service (AMS) are not fully accessible to people with disabilities. As a result, unemployed people with disabilities are less likely to take part in AMS training programmes than unemployed people without disabilities.    There are only a few measures to combat gender-specific employment imbalances and wage gaps, apart from higher wage cost support for women with disabilities as part of the „Inclusion Support Plus“ programme (Inklusionsförderung/InklusionsförderungPlus: https://www.wko.at/service/arbeitsrecht-sozialrecht/inklusionsfoerderung-inklusionsfoerderungplus.html). There are no specific labour market policy measures for women with disabilities (wage subsidies: Website of the Social Ministry Service: https://www.sozialministeriumservice.at/Finanzielles/Foerderungen/Lohnfoerderungen/Lohnfoerderungen.de.html). 

Progress: In progress

Consider a twin-track approach on disability inclusion in international cooperation, with special consideration on women and children with disabilities

Proponent:

Indonesia


Republic of Indonesia

Indonesia


Republic of Indonesia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

One recommendation to Austria is to pursue a twin-track approach aimed at integrating people with disabilities more inclusively into society. The Three-Year Programme of Austrian Development Policy 2022-2024 was taken note of by the Council of Ministers on 16 November 2022 (available as a PDF on the parliament’s website: https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/III/805/imfname_1482905.pdf). The new three-year programme has made significant progress in terms of the inclusion of persons with disabilities in international cooperation (see information on Parliament’s website: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/III/805). Civil society will closely monitor the implementation of this programme to ensure that the strategy is actually put into practice. On 16 November 2022, the Council of Ministers took note of the Three-Year Programme of Austrian Development Policy for the years 2022 to 2024, a significant step towards strengthening the inclusion of persons with disabilities in international cooperation (Available as PDF on the Parliament’s website: https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/III/805/imfname_1482905.pdf) and more (information on Parliament’s website: https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/III/805).   Within this framework, particular attention should be paid to women and children with disabilities. This focus is crucial to ensure that the most marginalised groups within the disability community are not overlooked. Targeted measures and programmes within the three-year programme aim to significantly improve the living conditions of these groups and enable their full participation in society. Civil society plays a crucial role in monitoring the implementation of this programme. This participation ensures that the strategies and objectives set out in the programme are not just on paper, but are actually put into practice. The active involvement and feedback of civil society organisations is essential to measure progress and ensure that the needs and rights of women and children with disabilities are effectively addressed;

Progress: No progress

Ensure that effective legal remedy and independent legal counsel for asylum seekers be guaranteed under the new procedures introduced with the establishment of the Federal Agency for Provision of Care and Support/BBU

Proponent:

Sweden


Kingdom of Sweden

Sweden


Kingdom of Sweden

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In May 2019, the so-called BBU Act was passed, which aims to introduce care and support services (BBU) (see: https://www.oesterreich.gv.at/themen/soziales/armut/2/Seite.1694400.html). It is envisaged that this agency will be subordinate to the Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Justice and will take over all tasks relating to the care of asylum seekers that were previously mainly carried out by independent, non-governmental organisations. These tasks include care in the initial reception centres for asylum seekers, the provision of legal advice for asylum seekers and foreigners, return counselling and support for people who have been rejected.During the review process, Amnesty International, among others, has already criticised the draft law (see Amnesty International statement:https://www.amnesty.at/news-events/stellungnahme-zur-bundesagentur-fuer-betreuungs-und-unterstuetzungsleistungen/).   It is made clear in the main arguments that the law significantly impairs the rights of people with fair trials and the possibility of an effective complaint. It also conflicts with European requirements, such as the EU Reception Directive, particularly with regard to the requirement for free legal advice and representation. The BBU Act guarantees the independence and authority of legal advisors, as organisational, financial and personnel cooperation exists between the agency and the Ministry of the Interior. It is important to ensure that procedures are fair, transparent and in accordance with the rule of law and that asylum seekers have adequate access to legal remedies and independent counselling;

Progress: No progress

Refrain from polarizing populist campaigns against migrant communities and take a firm public stance against racist speeches

Proponent:

Turkey


Republic of Turkey

Turkey


Republic of Turkey

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The international activities of the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF) and the organisations charged with this task, erinnern.at and OeAD, all aim to support teachers and learners in the field of human rights education. However, there is no further information on specific projects from Austria. Although the World Programme for Human Rights Education was launched by the United Nations in December 2004, various measures to promote human rights education are being implemented in Austria. Although progress in human rights education is recognisable, it should be noted that there is still a considerable need for action. 

Progress: No progress

Make efforts to improve the protection of the rights of migrants and asylum seekers

Proponent:

Uganda


Republic of Uganda

Uganda


Republic of Uganda

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Law enforcement agencies continued to use facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, despite the potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and the interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and there was a lack of effective mechanisms to investigate these practices (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). Between January and August 2021, 64 Afghan nationals were deported to Afghanistan despite the risk of serious human rights violations upon their return. In August of the same year, the Austrian government refused to evacuate Afghan refugees from the Taliban and to redistribute asylum seekers from the Greek islands. In July 2021, the Provincial Administrative Court of Styria found that seven asylum seekers had been illegally returned to Slovenia. This showed that unlawful pushbacks were being systematically practised in Austria in some cases. In February 2022, the same court confirmed that an asylum seeker from Morocco had been unlawfully returned to Slovenia and pointed out the methodical application of such unlawful pushbacks. By the end of 2022, around 90,000 Ukrainian refugees had received temporary protection in Austria in accordance with the EU mass influx directives. In September 2022, the Ministry of the Interior reported that 5,140 unaccompanied minors had gone missing between January and July. Numerous NGOs and politicians are calling for the immediate allocation of guardians for unaccompanied minors as soon as they arrive, instead of waiting for admission to the asylum procedure, which often takes several months; In July 2021, the „Counter-Terrorism Package“ was passed, with concerns raised by civil society organisations and UN experts that the paragraph on „religiously motivated extremist links“ could stigmatise Muslims (see Counter-Terrorism Act – TeBG (849 d.B.): https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/I/849).   Law enforcement agencies continued to use facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, despite the potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and the interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and there was a lack of effective mechanisms to investigate these practices (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). Between January and August 2021, 64 Afghan nationals were deported to Afghanistan despite the risk of serious human rights violations upon their return. In August of the same year, the Austrian government refused to evacuate Afghan refugees from the Taliban and to redistribute asylum seekers from the Greek islands. In July 2021, the Provincial Administrative Court of Styria found that seven asylum seekers had been illegally returned to Slovenia. This showed that unlawful pushbacks were being systematically practised in Austria in some cases. In February 2022, the same court confirmed that an asylum seeker from Morocco had been unlawfully returned to Slovenia and pointed out the methodical application of such unlawful pushbacks. By the end of 2022, around 90,000 Ukrainian refugees had received temporary protection in Austria in accordance with the EU mass influx directives. In September 2022, the Ministry of the Interior reported that 5,140 unaccompanied minors had disappeared between January and July. Numerous NGOs and politicians are calling for the immediate allocation of guardians for unaccompanied minors as soon as they arrive, instead of waiting for admission to the asylum procedure, which often takes several months;

Progress: No progress

Further increase efforts aimed at protection of asylum seekers and migrants

Proponent:

Ukraine


Ukraine

Ukraine


Ukraine

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Law enforcement agencies continued to use facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, despite the potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and the interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and there was a lack of effective mechanisms to investigate these practices (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). Between January and August 2021, 64 Afghan nationals were deported to Afghanistan despite the risk of serious human rights violations upon their return. In August of the same year, the Austrian government refused to evacuate Afghan refugees from the Taliban and to redistribute asylum seekers from the Greek islands. In July 2021, the Provincial Administrative Court of Styria found that seven asylum seekers had been illegally returned to Slovenia. This showed that unlawful pushbacks were being systematically practised in Austria in some cases. In February 2022, the same court confirmed that an asylum seeker from Morocco had been unlawfully returned to Slovenia and pointed out the methodical application of such unlawful pushbacks. By the end of 2022, around 90,000 Ukrainian refugees had received temporary protection in Austria in accordance with the EU mass influx directives. In September 2022, the Ministry of the Interior reported that 5,140 unaccompanied minors had gone missing between January and July. Numerous NGOs and politicians are calling for the immediate allocation of guardians for unaccompanied minors as soon as they arrive, instead of waiting for admission to the asylum procedure, which often takes several months;In July 2021, the „Counter-Terrorism Package“ was passed, with concerns raised by civil society organisations and UN experts that the paragraph on „religiously motivated extremist links“ could stigmatise Muslims (see Counter-Terrorism Act – TeBG (849 d.B.): https://www.parlament.gv.at/gegenstand/XXVII/I/849).   Law enforcement agencies continued to use facial recognition technologies without a clear legal basis, despite the potential discrimination against gender and ethnic minorities and the interference with the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Racial profiling by the police continued to be practised and there was a lack of effective mechanisms to investigate these practices (see Human Rights Situation in Austria 2022, Amnesty International Austria: https://www.amnesty.at/themen/menschenrechte-in-oesterreich/menschenrechtslage-in-oesterreich-2022-amnesty-jahresbericht/). Between January and August 2021, 64 Afghan nationals were deported to Afghanistan despite the risk of serious human rights violations upon their return. In August of the same year, the Austrian government refused to evacuate Afghan refugees from the Taliban and to redistribute asylum seekers from the Greek islands. In July 2021, the Provincial Administrative Court of Styria found that seven asylum seekers had been illegally returned to Slovenia. This showed that unlawful pushbacks were being systematically practised in Austria in some cases. In February 2022, the same court confirmed that an asylum seeker from Morocco had been unlawfully returned to Slovenia and pointed out the methodical application of such unlawful pushbacks. By the end of 2022, around 90,000 Ukrainian refugees had received temporary protection in Austria in accordance with the EU mass influx directives. In September 2022, the Ministry of the Interior reported that 5,140 unaccompanied minors had disappeared between January and July. Numerous NGOs and politicians are calling for the immediate allocation of guardians for unaccompanied minors as soon as they arrive, instead of waiting for admission to the asylum procedure, which often takes several months;

Progress: No progress

Ensure the immediate assignment of a legal guardian to all unaccompanied minors who arrive in the country, without delays or preconditions

Proponent:

Uruguay


Republic of Eastern Uruguay

Uruguay


Republic of Eastern Uruguay

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Children and young people between the ages of 14 and 18 are largely on their own at the beginning of their asylum procedure.
In 2021, the Minister of Justice set up an independent „Child Welfare Commission“ to examine the compatibility of Austrian asylum and immigration law with children’s rights standards (see the report, recommendations and implementation of the Child Welfare Commission on the website of the Federal Ministry of Justice: <a
href=https://www.bmj.gv.at/themen/Fokusthemen/Kindeswohlkommission.html)>https://www.bmj.gv.at/themen/Fokusthemen/Kindeswohlkommission.html)). The report presented in July 2021 revealed far-reaching deficits in the material examination of the best interests of the child in asylum proceedings, in the organisation of proceedings (e.g. participation of children) and in ensuring custody when it comes to unaccompanied refugee children and the basic care of children and their families. Since then, training and internal organisational improvement measures have taken place within the BVwG; the Ministry of the Interior/BFA is not aware of any further feedback on the implementation of the recommendations.   In the area of UMF, the Federal Ministry of Justice (BMJ) has already presented a draft for a nationwide standardised custody regulation for unaccompanied refugee children (including through an amendment to the General Civil Code). With this regulation, the responsible KJH is to be entrusted with custody by law (ex lege) immediately after an unaccompanied refugee child is apprehended. However, this new provision has not yet been adopted by parliament.   Following reports of suspected assaults or sexualised violence and exploitation of children in nurseries, schools, sport and film in 2022/23, the federal government decided on a package of measures against violence against children in January 2023; in particular, all institutions are to submit child protection concepts for prevention and victim protection. However, there is no uniformly binding legal framework for this. In March 2023, the Network for Children’s Rights drew up a comprehensive „Corona Special Report“ on the far-reaching consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the support of the Ministry of Social Affairs. Since then, training and internal organisational improvement measures have taken place within the Federal Administrative Court (BVwG); no further feedback on the implementation of the recommendations is known from the Ministry of the Interior/Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum. In 2022, a report was published by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the UN Organisation for Migration (IOM) and the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) called on the Austrian Federal Government to improve protection measures for unaccompanied children and adolescents. In particular, it is crucial to ensure care from day 1 (see: <a href=https://archiv2022.asyl.at/files/366/03-20200225_obsorge_unhcriomunicef.pdf
>https://archiv2022.asyl.at/files/366/03-20200225_obsorge_unhcriomunicef.pdf). Unaccompanied children and adolescents should have guardians at their side immediately after their arrival in Austria to ensure that the best interests of the child are taken into account in all measures and decisions. The goal must be guardianship from day 1, as recommended by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and set out in the government programme. Children and young people between the ages of 14 and 18 who come to Austria without parents or other legal guardians generally receive no support during police interviews or when decisions are made regarding an asylum application. Child and youth welfare services (KJH) only come into action once these children and young people have been admitted to the asylum procedure and transferred to a basic care centre in a federal province. This can take several weeks or months, during which the young people are exposed to particular dangers. A swift appointment of qualified guardians whom the children can trust can significantly reduce the risk of disappearance or child trafficking shortly after their arrival.   The care situation is more positive for unaccompanied children under the age of 14. Child and youth welfare services are usually active immediately after arrival in Austria and provide care and support in child and youth welfare centres, accompany the children and young people to all official appointments and apply for custody.   However, this differentiation by age group is contrary to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. It is therefore of great importance that every child, regardless of legal status and age, is treated first and foremost as a child and receives the same protection and the best possible support;

Progress: In progress

Prosecute all hate crimes and assaults against migrants

Proponent:

Burkina Faso


Burkina Faso

Burkina Faso


Burkina Faso

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

On a positive note, the Federal Ministry of the Interior has integrated the systematic recording of prejudice motives in premeditated offences into police work as part of an EU project. For this purpose, the category „Hate crime“ was introduced in the police logging programme (PAD) as a separate „Motive“ tab with the title „Prejudice motives (hate crime) according to victim groups“. The recorded data is transmitted to the justice system via a separate interface: Electronic Legal Transactions (ERV) and subjected to quality assurance by the Federal Ministry of the Interior. Around 30,000 police officers throughout Austria have been prepared for this task by completing e-learning seminars and receiving training as multipliers. The police now work on the basis of a victim-centred approach, actively listening to those affected and investigating consistently to ensure appropriate prosecution. These measures are designed to help tackle bias crime and improve safety for all citizens. The Report of the Federal Ministry of the Interior on Hate Crime in Austria – Annual Report 2021 was published for the first time in 2022. In the period from January to December 2021, 5,464 offences motivated by prejudice were recorded by the police (Report of the Federal Ministry of the Interior on „Hate Crime“ in Austria 2021: https://www.bmi.gv.at/408/Projekt/files/218_2021_Hate_Crime_Bericht_2021_GESAMT_V20220510_barrierefrei.pdf). With the systematic recording of hate crimes motivated by prejudice and the publication of statistics on hate crimes recorded by the police, a first important step has been taken to make hate crimes visible. It is important to observe the extent to which the views of the police and victim protection organisations or community organisations agree on whether an incident should be classified as a hate crime or not. These observations are an important basis for the reliability of the statistics on hate crimes that are now being collected. 

Redaktionelle Verantwortung UPR-Tool:

Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte, upr@liga.or.at

Lizenz CC-BY-SA 

Unterstützung durch:

Forschungskooperation mit der Volksanwaltschaft

Förderung des Zukunftsfonds der Republik Österreich

 

Receive the latest news

Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter