Universal Periodic Review

This UPR tool reflects the global recommendations made to Austria by all countries world-wide during the Universial Priodic Review process (UPR) at the UN Human Rights Council and their current status of implementation. The League coordinates a significant part of Austrian civil society in the UPR process. 

The recommendations can be filtered in the menu below by human rights topics, SDGs, proponent states etc. also a search function is available. 

 

We welcome your comments and suggestions at upr@liga.or.at.


Search category
Filter options
Filter by tag…

Progress: In progress

Take additional measures to address the problem of overcrowding in places of detention and ensure the social reintegration of convicts

Proponent:

Belarus


Republic of Belarus

Belarus


Republic of Belarus

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

There are currently 191 unfilled posts in Austrian prisons, including 111 in the executive service and 80 in administration. This leads to a considerable workload for the existing staff, who have to compensate for both staff shortages and absences due to illness. The answers to two parliamentary questions make it clear that the staff shortage has existed for years and that the situation remains tense (see two questions: https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/AB/17366/imfname_1624738.pdf and https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/AB/17457/imfname_1625033.pdf). In the last three years, the number of staff has not been increased, although the number of inmates has risen. The government’s current practice is criticised as a lack of administration. Posts are not increased with the argument that they cannot be filled anyway, and there are no measures to make the professions in the prisons more attractive. There is a particular lack of specialised staff such as social workers and psychologists. A more attractive job profile with fair pay is considered essential to remedy the situation. Despite measures such as the increase in basic salaries and a new recruiting and image campaign, filling vacancies remains challenging. Further measures, such as the heavy labour regulation for all justice guard employees, are considered necessary (see also statistics on the Ministry of Justice website on the distribution of inmate numbers: https://www.justiz.gv.at/strafvollzug/statistik/verteilung-des-insassinnen-bzw-insassenstandes.2c94848542ec49810144457e2e6f3de9.de.html). Legislatively, there are no recognisable changes that will lead to a reduction in the number of people in prison.  In a study published in March 2023 by the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Fundamental and Human Rights (LBI-GMR), other problem areas were also pointed out as alternatives to the deprivation of liberty of children (e.g. complete removal of juveniles from detention centres, capacities of juvenile psychiatry).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html). Prisons tend to be at or above capacity. This has a negative impact on the quality of prison conditions and the opportunities for rehabilitation and resocialisation. Due to limited resources and overcrowding in prisons, it is often difficult to effectively fulfil the purpose of resocialisation (see also statistics on the website of the Ministry of Justice, on the distribution of the inmate population: https://www.justiz.gv.at/strafvollzug/statistik/verteilung-des-insassinnen-bzw-insassenstandes.2c94848542ec49810144457e2e6f3de9.de.html). In addition, the Court of Audit published a report on the resocialisation measures of the justice system in August 2024 (see report: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/2024_8_Resozialisierung_Justiz.pdf). From January to May 2023, the ACA audited the measures for the resocialisation of prisoners in prisons at the Federal Ministry of Justice and the Directorate General for the Execution of Sentences. It also audited the association „NEUSTART – Bewährungshilfe, Konfliktregelung, Soziale Arbeit“ with regard to cooperation and quality management, analysing and assessing the strategic orientation, impact objectives, organisation, staff, specific resocialisation measures and interface management.   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Strengthen efforts in preventing prison overcrowding, especially in this time of pandemic

Proponent:

Indonesia


Republic of Indonesia

Indonesia


Republic of Indonesia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

There are currently 191 unfilled posts in Austrian prisons, including 111 in the executive service and 80 in administration. This leads to a considerable workload for the existing staff, who have to compensate for both staff shortages and absences due to illness. The answers to two parliamentary questions make it clear that the staff shortage has existed for years and that the situation remains tense (see two questions: https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/AB/17366/imfname_1624738.pdf and https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/AB/17457/imfname_1625033.pdf). In the last three years, the number of staff has not been increased, although the number of inmates has risen. The government’s current practice is criticised as a lack of administration. Posts are not increased with the argument that they cannot be filled anyway, and there are no measures to make the professions in the prisons more attractive. There is a particular lack of specialised staff such as social workers and psychologists. A more attractive job profile with fair pay is considered essential to remedy the situation. Despite measures such as the increase in basic salaries and a new recruiting and image campaign, filling vacancies remains challenging. Further measures, such as the heavy labour regulation for all justice guard employees, are considered necessary (see also statistics on the Ministry of Justice website on the distribution of inmate numbers: https://www.justiz.gv.at/strafvollzug/statistik/verteilung-des-insassinnen-bzw-insassenstandes.2c94848542ec49810144457e2e6f3de9.de.html). Legislatively, there are no recognisable changes that will lead to a reduction in the number of people in prison.  In a study published in March 2023 by the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Fundamental and Human Rights (LBI-GMR), other problem areas were also pointed out as alternatives to the deprivation of liberty of children (e.g. complete removal of juveniles from detention centres, capacities of juvenile psychiatry).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Reform preventive detention measures for offenders with mental illness by developing review mechanisms consistent with international practice, based on defined psychiatric assessment standards

Proponent:

Ireland


Ireland

Ireland


Ireland

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

On 15 December 2022, the „Measures Enforcement Adjustment Act“ was passed by the National Council (on the parliament’s website: Maßnahmenvollzugsanpassungsgesetz, 2022). However, this law only deals with the first part of a planned two-part reform project. In particular, the requirements for admission to and release from the penitentiary system were changed with the aim of reducing the total number of offenders. These first reform steps resulted in changes to the Criminal Code (StGB), the Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO) and the Juvenile Courts Act (JGG). Only the second part of the planned reform project is intended to improve the care provided in detention centres and the therapies etc. on offer. However, no progress is currently being made on the second part of the reform. Civil society fears that the steps taken so far will bring too little practical change, as important issues such as the provision and funding of care and support before, during and after placement as well as an offer of adequate medical care remain unconsidered and offenders with mental illnesses still do not have sufficient access to medical treatment.   A study published by the LBI-GMR in March 2023 on alternatives to the deprivation of liberty of children pointed out further problem areas (e.g. complete removal of juveniles from detention centres, capacities of juvenile psychiatry). Another ongoing project is dedicated to the necessary strengthening of procedural rights of persons with psychosocial impairments in detention centres (see LBI-GMR study: https://gmr.lbg.ac.at/forschung/menschenwuerde-und-oeffentliche-sicherheit/). 

Progress: In progress

Ensure an adequate staffing situation within the penitentiary system

Proponent:

Norway


Kingdom of Norway

Norway


Kingdom of Norway

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Prisons in Austria have been operating at full capacity for years and are overcrowded, while at the same time there is a significant shortage of staff. This was noted by the Austrian Court of Audit in its latest reports, which has a negative impact on resocialisation efforts. Despite some reforms and measures, many recommendations to improve the situation, such as investment in staff development and improved operational structures, remain incompletely implemented. For example, of 15 recommendations reviewed, only five were fully implemented. In 2023, 96 per cent of posts were filled, but there was still a shortfall of over 130 full-time employees. The employment rate of prisoners varies greatly, for example in 2023 it was 69 per cent in Vienna-Simmering Prison and 94 per cent in Gerasdorf. In 2022, the average duration of employment per prisoner was 3.16 hours per working day. The ACA emphasises the need to increase employment opportunities for prisoners and adapt the training on offer in order to increase the chances of successful reintegration into society (see ACA report, Management and coordination of the prison system; follow-up review, 2024,: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/home_7/2024_9_Straf_Massnahmenvollzug_FuP.pdf).  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: In progress

Further ensure that all detainees, both legally and in practice, receive all basic legal protection from the outset of their deprivation of liberty

Proponent:

Serbia


Republic of Serbia

Serbia


Republic of Serbia

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Individual legal protection in prisons is primarily regulated by the Prison Act. Legal protection in the event of restrictions of liberty outside of prisons is guaranteed in particular by the Accommodation Act and the Residential Homes Act. There are no plans to further strengthen individual legal protection. There is no sufficiently prepared data on the practical exercise of legal protection. 

Progress: No progress

Create organisationally separate juvenile courts and detention facilities

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

A reform was implemented in the area of juvenile criminal justice. This includes the creation of organisationally separate juvenile courts and penal institutions. The aim of this measure is to take better account of the specific needs of juvenile offenders and to ensure individualised, rehabilitative treatment. Previously, juveniles were still often placed in general prisons, which led to a lack of age-appropriate care.
The reform now ensures that separate courts and detention centres are created for juveniles, which are geared towards the special legal and social needs of this age group. This is intended to provide better support for both the prevention of reoffending and reintegration into society after a prison sentence.
This development is taking place against the backdrop of international standards in juvenile criminal law, which call for adults and juveniles to be treated separately, particularly with regard to education and resocialisation. 

Progress: No progress

Evaluate the achievement of the objective of preventing juveniles and young adults who have committed crimes for the first time from pursuing a criminal career

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

A reform was implemented in the area of juvenile criminal justice. This includes the creation of organisationally separate juvenile courts and penal institutions. The aim of this measure is to take better account of the specific needs of juvenile offenders and to ensure individualised, rehabilitative treatment. Previously, juveniles were still often placed in general prisons, which led to a lack of age-appropriate care.
The reform now ensures that separate courts and detention centres are created for juveniles, which are geared towards the special legal and social needs of this age group. This is intended to provide better support for both the prevention of reoffending and reintegration into society after a prison sentence.
This development is taking place against the backdrop of international standards in juvenile criminal law, which call for adults and juveniles to be treated separately, particularly with regard to education and resocialisation. 

Progress: No progress

Implement measures to reduce the number of detainees

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

There are currently 191 unfilled posts in Austrian prisons, including 111 in the executive service and 80 in administration. This leads to a considerable workload for the existing staff, who have to compensate for both staff shortages and absences due to illness. The answers to two parliamentary questions make it clear that the staff shortage has existed for years and that the situation remains tense (see two questions: https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/AB/17366/imfname_1624738.pdf and https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/AB/17457/imfname_1625033.pdf). In the last three years, the number of staff has not been increased, although the number of inmates has risen. The government’s current practice is criticised as a lack of administration. Posts are not increased with the argument that they cannot be filled anyway, and there are no measures to make the professions in the prisons more attractive. There is a particular lack of specialised staff such as social workers and psychologists. A more attractive job profile with fair pay is considered essential to remedy the situation. Despite measures such as the increase in basic salaries and a new recruiting and image campaign, filling vacancies remains challenging. Further measures, such as the heavy labour regulation for all justice guard employees, are considered necessary (see also statistics on the Ministry of Justice website on the distribution of inmate numbers: https://www.justiz.gv.at/strafvollzug/statistik/verteilung-des-insassinnen-bzw-insassenstandes.2c94848542ec49810144457e2e6f3de9.de.html). Legislatively, there are no recognisable changes that will lead to a reduction in the number of people in prison.  In a study published in March 2023 by the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Fundamental and Human Rights (LBI-GMR), other problem areas were also pointed out as alternatives to the deprivation of liberty of children (e.g. complete removal of juveniles from detention centres, capacities of juvenile psychiatry).   As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Extend work and employment opportunities for detainees

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, there are ongoing efforts to expand work and employment opportunities for prisoners, which is seen as a central component of their resocialisation. It is increasingly recognised that meaningful work during imprisonment not only structures everyday life, but also helps prisoners to develop skills that are necessary for later reintegration into the labour market. This includes not only traditional work activities, but also educational and vocational training programmes.  However, there are still challenges in the Austrian prison system, particularly with regard to the staffing situation and limited resources in the prisons. In 2022, prisoners worked an average of only 3.16 hours per day, which is far below the target values for productive and rehabilitative work. Furthermore, employment rates vary greatly between prisons, indicating an uneven distribution of work opportunities. There are also endeavours to further improve the existing system. The Court of Audit criticises a lack of holistic concepts for the operational structure in prisons and calls for greater use and expansion of workplaces. There are also concrete proposals for improvement with regard to the training and further education of prisoners, for example through the increased integration of vocational training measures and practical workplaces in the prisons. These developments are part of the ongoing reforms aimed at increasing prisoners‘ chances of successful resocialisation and a stable re-entry into society (see press release on the reports „Management and coordination of the penitentiary system; follow-up review“).
measures; follow-up review“ and „Resocialisation measures of the justice system“
of 15 March 2024: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home_1/fragen-medien/Presseinformation_Justizanstalten_15032024_bf.pdf).  

Progress: No progress

Increase medical and psychosocial staff, but also of the judicial guard

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Apr 1, 2025):

Prisons in Austria have been operating at full capacity for years and are overcrowded, while at the same time there is a significant shortage of staff. This was noted by the Austrian Court of Audit in its latest reports, which has a negative impact on resocialisation efforts. Despite some reforms and measures, many recommendations to improve the situation, such as investment in staff development and improved operational structures, remain incompletely implemented. For example, of 15 recommendations reviewed, only five were fully implemented. In 2023, 96 per cent of posts were filled, but there was still a shortfall of over 130 full-time employees. The employment rate of prisoners varies greatly, for example in 2023 it was 69 per cent in Vienna-Simmering Prison and 94 per cent in Gerasdorf. In 2022, the average duration of employment per prisoner was 3.16 hours per working day. The ACA emphasises the need to increase employment opportunities for prisoners and adapt the training on offer in order to increase the chances of successful reintegration into society (see ACA report, Management and coordination of the prison system; follow-up review, 2024,: https://www.rechnungshof.gv.at/rh/home/home/home_7/2024_9_Straf_Massnahmenvollzug_FuP.pdf).  As part of the Government Plan 2025-2029, the federal government is pursuing this goal through close cooperation with all stakeholders (see Government Plan 2ß025-2029: https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/bundeskanzleramt/die-bundesregierung/regierungsdokumente.html).

Progress: No progress

Create free legal advice facilities for prison inmates

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Individual legal protection in prisons is primarily regulated by the Prison Act. Legal protection in the event of restrictions of liberty outside of prisons is guaranteed in particular by the Accommodation Act and the Residential Homes Act. There are no plans to further strengthen individual legal protection. There is no sufficiently prepared data on the practical exercise of legal protection. 

Progress: No progress

Ensure confidential patient interviews without the presence of the judicial guard

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Individual legal protection in prisons is primarily regulated by the Prison Act. Legal protection in the event of restrictions of liberty outside of prisons is guaranteed in particular by the Accommodation Act and the Residential Homes Act. There are no plans to further strengthen individual legal protection. There is no sufficiently prepared data on the practical exercise of legal protection. 

Progress: No progress

Improve visiting and contact opportunities for children of detained parents

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

A reform was implemented in the area of juvenile criminal justice. This includes the creation of organisationally separate juvenile courts and penal institutions. The aim of this measure is to take better account of the specific needs of juvenile offenders and to ensure individualised, rehabilitative treatment. Previously, juveniles were still often placed in general prisons, which led to a lack of age-appropriate care.
The reform now ensures that separate courts and detention centres are created for juveniles, which are geared towards the special legal and social needs of this age group. This is intended to provide better support for both the prevention of reoffending and reintegration into society after a prison sentence.
This development is taking place against the backdrop of international standards in juvenile criminal law, which call for adults and juveniles to be treated separately, particularly with regard to education and resocialisation. 

Progress: No progress

Fully implement the recommendations of the UN study on child detention

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

In Austria, the implementation of the recommendations of the UN study on the deprivation of liberty of children has been further analysed and examined in recent years. The study, which was published in 2019, looked at global standards and practices in dealing with the deprivation of liberty of children and adolescents and focussed on alternative measures to detention. These recommendations aim to consider deprivation of liberty as the last step and to ensure that less restrictive measures that can avoid or minimise the loss of liberty are always considered first.  In Austria, the way in which these recommendations are already being implemented and where there is a need for action was examined, particularly in the area of juvenile criminal justice and the care of refugee children and children with disabilities. A key issue was the availability of alternative measures to deprivation of liberty and the participation of children and young people in the relevant decision-making processes. It was noted that there are still structural and organisational challenges in some areas, particularly with regard to the practice of placement and dealing with children’s psychological and developmental needs. There are also efforts to focus more on children’s rights and to create better monitoring of the circumstances in which children are deprived of their liberty. Further adjustments to the UN recommendations should help to improve the conditions for young people placed in institutions and to develop alternatives that enable less stressful and traumatising treatment. The full implementation of these recommendations is an ongoing process that also involves close cooperation with relevant stakeholders such as the Ombudsman for Children and Youths and the Ombudsman Board (information on the KJ Wien website: https://kija-wien.at/freiheitsentzug-was-er-ist-und-was-er-aus-kinderrechtlicher-perspektive-bedeutet/).  

Progress: No progress

Adapt the maximum stopping days in house arrest (114 StVG) to international recommendations

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

The adjustment of the maximum detention days in house arrest and the associated conditions is regulated in Austria in the Prison Act (StVG) and the Probationary Services Act (BewHG). A relevant change was made as part of the 2019 amendment to the StVG, which, among other things, expanded the options for electronically monitored house arrest. This reform introduced several important elements:
1. extension of the detention period in house arrest: the duration of electronically monitored house arrest was extended to up to 24 months, with the exception of offences such as serious violence or sexual offences. This change is in line with international recommendations to improve prison conditions, particularly with regard to less restrictive forms of detention for minor offences.
2. outdoor exercise: In electronically monitored house arrest, the possibility of allowing prisoners limited outdoor exercise has also been introduced. This is in line with the recommendations of international human rights organisations, which advocate humane treatment and rehabilitation of offenders.
3. further adjustments to the prison system: Further adjustments concern the conditions of house arrest, for example with regard to insurance cover and the conditions for authorising house arrest as a form of detention for certain offences. The aim of these changes is to make the system more flexible and fairer and to promote resocialisation. 
In summary, these changes are aligned with international standards for the penal system, which support the transition from a purely punitive approach to a more rehabilitative one. They are part of a more comprehensive reform of the penal system in Austria, which aims to achieve a more differentiated treatment of offenders and better integration into society after imprisonment (see StVG-Novelle-2019: https://www.bmj.gv.at/ministerium/gesetzesentwuerfe/entw%C3%BCrfe-2019/bundesgesetz-mit-dem-das-strafvollzugsgesetz-und-das-bewaehrungshilfegesetz-geaendert-werden-stvg-novelle-2019–ministerialentwurf.html).  

Progress: No progress

Promote the reform of preventive custody on the basis of Article 14 of the CRPD

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

On 15 December 2022, the „Measures Enforcement Adjustment Act“ was passed by the National Council (on the parliament’s website: Maßnahmenvollzugsanpassungsgesetz, 2022). However, this law only deals with the first part of a planned two-part reform project. In particular, the requirements for admission to and release from the penitentiary system were changed with the aim of reducing the total number of offenders. These first reform steps resulted in changes to the Criminal Code (StGB), the Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO) and the Juvenile Courts Act (JGG). Only the second part of the planned reform project is intended to improve the care provided in detention centres and the therapies etc. on offer. However, no progress is currently being made on the second part of the reform. Civil society fears that the steps taken so far will bring too little practical change, as important issues such as the provision and funding of care and support before, during and after placement as well as an offer of adequate medical care remain unconsidered and offenders with mental illnesses still do not have sufficient access to medical treatment.   A study published by the LBI-GMR in March 2023 on alternatives to the deprivation of liberty of children pointed out further problem areas (e.g. complete removal of juveniles from detention centres, capacities of juvenile psychiatry). Another ongoing project is dedicated to the necessary strengthening of procedural rights of persons with psychosocial impairments in detention centres (see LBI-GMR study: https://gmr.lbg.ac.at/forschung/menschenwuerde-und-oeffentliche-sicherheit/). 

Progress: No progress

Continue to implement recommendations of the 2015 Reform Report for preventive custody

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

On 15 December 2022, the „Measures Enforcement Adjustment Act“ was passed by the National Council (on the parliament’s website: Maßnahmenvollzugsanpassungsgesetz, 2022). However, this law only deals with the first part of a planned two-part reform project. In particular, the requirements for admission to and release from the penitentiary system were changed with the aim of reducing the total number of offenders. These first reform steps resulted in changes to the Criminal Code (StGB), the Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO) and the Juvenile Courts Act (JGG). Only the second part of the planned reform project is intended to improve the care provided in detention centres and the therapies etc. on offer. However, no progress is currently being made on the second part of the reform. Civil society fears that the steps taken so far will bring too little practical change, as important issues such as the provision and funding of care and support before, during and after placement as well as an offer of adequate medical care remain unconsidered and offenders with mental illnesses still do not have sufficient access to medical treatment.   A study published by the LBI-GMR in March 2023 on alternatives to the deprivation of liberty of children pointed out further problem areas (e.g. complete removal of juveniles from detention centres, capacities of juvenile psychiatry). Another ongoing project is dedicated to the necessary strengthening of procedural rights of persons with psychosocial impairments in detention centres (see LBI-GMR study: https://gmr.lbg.ac.at/forschung/menschenwuerde-und-oeffentliche-sicherheit/). 

Progress: No progress

Nationwide uniform, legally binding standards, which are regularly monitored on an evidence-based basis with the participation of technical experts and guarantee improvement of standards

Proponent:

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

League


Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte


Rahlgasse 1/26, A-1060 Wien


http://www.liga.or.at/projekte/universal-periodic-review-2020-upr/

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Austria has not yet implemented some of the recommendations of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) from its report „General Policy Recommendations No. 15 on Combating Hate Speech (2015)“ (see: ECRI General Policy Recommendations No.15 on Combating Hate Speech,2015: https://rm.coe.int/ecri-general-policy-recommendation-no-15-on-combating-hate-speech/16808b5b01). This includes the pending ratification of the „Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime“ and the „Protocol No. 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.“  

Redaktionelle Verantwortung UPR-Tool:

Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte, upr@liga.or.at

Lizenz CC-BY-SA 

Unterstützung durch:

Forschungskooperation mit der Volksanwaltschaft

Förderung des Zukunftsfonds der Republik Österreich

 

Receive the latest news

Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter