Universal Periodic Review

This UPR tool reflects the global recommendations made to Austria by all countries world-wide during the Universial Priodic Review process (UPR) at the UN Human Rights Council and their current status of implementation. The League coordinates a significant part of Austrian civil society in the UPR process. 

The recommendations can be filtered in the menu below by human rights topics, SDGs, proponent states etc. also a search function is available. 

 

We welcome your comments and suggestions at upr@liga.or.at.


Search category
Filter options
Filter by tag…

Progress: In progress

Enhance ongoing measures to combat trafficking in persons and exploitation of children and ensure perpetrators are brought to justice

Proponent:

Myanmar


Republic of the Union of Myanmar

Myanmar


Republic of the Union of Myanmar

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

With regard to measures to combat human trafficking, including child trafficking, the Federal Government has set extensive goals in the areas of prevention, victim protection, prosecution and monitoring in its National Action Plan 2021-2023. However, challenges remain, for example, in the identification of trafficked persons in the area of labour exploitation, in the security of residence for trafficked persons and in measures against child trafficking. Austria has clear provisions against human trafficking in its criminal law, including criminal sanctions of up to ten years for serious cases. Nevertheless, law enforcement should be further strengthened and it should be ensured that perpetrators are effectively prosecuted and convicted, while victim protection and access to legal assistance are improved. 

Progress: No progress

Increase implementation of non-judicial measures for children accused of criminal offences

Proponent:

Montenegro


Montenegro

Montenegro


Montenegro

Remarks to progress by Liga (last modified Dec 31, 2024):

Young people between the ages of 14 and 18 who are accused of an offence have the right to be heard or to be present during investigations or the taking of evidence. This right also extends to their legal representatives, unless they themselves are suspected of being involved in the offence. The same applies to access to files. In the case of accused juveniles, the public may be excluded from the main hearing upon application or ex officio if this is necessary in the interests of the juveniles. During an exclusion, however, legal representatives, legal guardians, probation officers, as well as representatives of youth welfare organisations, youth court assistance and probation services may continue to attend the main hearing. Promoting extrajudicial measures for children who have committed offences could not only contribute to more effective resocialisation, but also enable improved social integration and prevention of further offences in the long term. Such an approach could therefore not only focus more strongly on the welfare of the children concerned, but also have a lasting positive effect on society as a whole.  In view of the recommendation to increase the use of out-of-court measures for children who have committed offences, it is to be hoped that Austria will not only take note of this advice, but also actively put it into practice in order to further promote a resource-oriented and child-friendly justice system. Given the challenges in dealing with child offenders in Austria, the increased use of extrajudicial measures could be a promising and human-centred solution. It is to be hoped that Austria will recognise the opportunity and actively implement the recommendations in order to take a significant step towards a fair and preventive justice system. 

Redaktionelle Verantwortung UPR-Tool:

Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte, upr@liga.or.at

Lizenz CC-BY-SA 

Unterstützung durch:

Forschungskooperation mit der Volksanwaltschaft

Förderung des Zukunftsfonds der Republik Österreich

 

Receive the latest news

Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter